logo
Mali's junta chief grants himself indefinite presidential term amid political crackdown

Mali's junta chief grants himself indefinite presidential term amid political crackdown

First Post10-07-2025
Mali's junta chief has granted himself a five-year presidential mandate, renewable 'as many times as necessary' and without election, in a law made public Thursday read more
Colonel Assimi Goita (C), President of CNSP (National Committee for the Salvation of People) addresses the press during the ceremony of the 60th anniversary of Mali's independence in Bamako, on September 22, 2020. AFP File
Mali's junta chief has granted himself a five-year presidential mandate, renewable 'as many times as necessary' and without election, in a law made public Thursday.
General Assimi Goita's approval of the measure had been widely expected for several days, and comes after the country's military-appointed legislative body passed the bill last week.
The law, which was leaked to the public after being signed by Goita Tuesday, allows him to lead the west African country until at least 2030, despite the military government's initial pledge to return to civilian rule in March 2024.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
It is the latest in a series of restrictions on freedoms by Mali's military leadership to consolidate its power in the jihadist-hit Sahelian nation.
The country's cabinet, the Council of Ministers, had already adopted the measure last month.
Under the law Goita will be able to serve 'as head of state for a term of five (05) years, renewable as many times as necessary, until the country is pacified'.
When Goita took power, he insisted on Mali's commitment to the fight against jihadist violence and initially pledged a return to civilian rule.
He was even celebrated in some quarters as a hero who might bring salvation to his troubled west African nation.
But he ultimately failed to make good on his promise to cede power to elected civilians, which was to occur by March 2024.
Earlier this year, a junta-led national consultation recommended proclaiming Goita president without a vote for the five-year renewable term.
The same assembly – boycotted by most political groups – also recommended the dissolution of political parties and tougher rules for their creation.
Subsequently, the junta announced in May the dissolution of all political parties and organisations, as well as a ban on meetings.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The ongoing squeeze on Mali's civic space comes against a backdrop of clamour by authorities for the country to unite behind the military.
Turning point
Goita's rule has marked a turning point in Mali's relationship with the West. The country has broken ties with France and other former allies and pivoted toward Russia.
Mali and its junta-led neighbours Burkina Faso and Niger have teamed up to create their own confederation, the Alliance of Sahel States (AES), and have announced the creation of a joint 5,000-strong force for joint military operations.
Meanwhile its Russian mercenary allies from the Africa Corps, tasked in particular with tracking down jihadists, are regularly accused of rights violations against civilians alongside the Malian army.
Since 2012, Mali has been mired in violence carried out by jihadist groups affiliated with Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State group, as well as other criminal organisations.
Those attacks have only intensified in recent weeks.
Despite Mali's multifaceted tumult, Goita remains popular with a segment of the population, which views him as an architect of reform and newfound sovereignty.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oil falls $2 a barrel on worries about Opec+ supply, US jobs data
Oil falls $2 a barrel on worries about Opec+ supply, US jobs data

Business Standard

time14 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Oil falls $2 a barrel on worries about Opec+ supply, US jobs data

Oil prices $2 a barrel on Friday because of jitters about a possible increase in production by Opec and its allies, while a weaker-than-expected US jobs report fed worries about demand. Brent crude futures settled at $69.67 a barrel, down $2.03, or 2.83 per cent. US West Texas Intermediate crude finished at $67.33 a barrel, down $1.93, or 2.79 per cent. Brent finished the week with a gain near 6 per cent, while WTI rose 6.29 per cent. Three people familiar with discussions among Opec members and allied producers said the group may reach an agreement as early as Sunday to boost production by 548,000 barrels per day in September. A fourth source familiar with Opec+ talks said discussions on volume were ongoing and the hike could be smaller. The US Labour Department said the country added 73,000 jobs in July, lower than economists had forecast, raising the national unemployment rate to 4.2 per cent from 4.1 per cent. "We can blame US President Donald Trump with the tariffs or we can blame the Federal Reserve for not raising interest rates," said Phil Flynn, senior analyst with Price Futures Group. "It looks like the Fed misjudged their decision on Wednesday." On Wednesday, the Fed voted to keep interest rates unchanged, drawing criticism from Trump and a chorus of Republican legislators. Oil traders have focused for much of the week on the potential impact of US tariffs, with tariff rates on US trading partners largely set to take effect from next Friday. Trump signed an executive order on Thursday imposing tariffs ranging from 10 per cent to 41 per cent on US imports from dozens of countries and foreign territories that failed to reach trade deals by his Aug. 1 deadline, including Canada, India and Taiwan. Partners that managed to secure trade agreements include the European Union, South Korea, Japan and Great Britain. "We think the resolution of trade deals to the satisfaction of the market - more or less, barring a few exceptions - has been the key driver for oil price bullishness in recent days," said Suvro Sarkar at DBS Bank. Prices were also supported this week by Trump's threats to impose 100 per cent secondary tariffs on Russian crude buyers as he seeks to pressure Russia into halting its war in Ukraine. This has stoked concern over potential disruption to oil trade flows and the removal of some oil from the market. On Thursday, JP Morgan analysts said Trump's threatened penalties on China and India over their purchases of Russian oil potentially put 2.75 million barrels per day (bpd) of Russian seaborne oil exports at risk. China and India are the world's second and third-largest crude consumers respectively. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Secondary tariffs on Russian oil buyers: A new shockwave for global energy markets
Secondary tariffs on Russian oil buyers: A new shockwave for global energy markets

Economic Times

time14 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Secondary tariffs on Russian oil buyers: A new shockwave for global energy markets

Understanding Secondary Tariffs Global Oil Production and Consumption Landscape Live Events Potential Market Impact Geopolitical Ramifications (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel In a bold geopolitical move, US President Donald Trump has reiterated his intent to impose secondary tariffs on countries that continue purchasing oil from Russia. This move, aimed at pressuring Moscow into a ceasefire in Ukraine, could significantly disrupt global oil markets, intensify geopolitical tensions, and reshape energy tariffs are punitive measures not imposed directly on Russia, but against third-party nations that engage in trade with Russia—particularly in oil, gas, and uranium. The proposed tariffs could be as high as500%, targeting imports from countries that violate US sanctions. This strategy is designed to isolate Russia economically by deterring its trading partners, but it risks collateral damage across global supply of mid-2025, global oil production stands at approximately 101 million barrels per day (bpd), with consumption closely matching at 100.5 million bpd, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). The top producers include the United States (12.9 million bpd), Saudi Arabia (10.5 million bpd), and Russia (9.8 million bpd). Russia remains a critical supplier, especially to China, India, and parts of Eastern Europe, which have increased imports since the Ukraine war Russian oil flows were completely banned, replacing its supply would be extremely challenging for global markets as it contributes roughly 10% of global supply. Even in an optimistic scenario, the world could replace 5–6 million bpd, leaving a shortfall of 3–5 million secondary tariffs are enacted, they would likely lead to a sharp price increase, global inflation, energy rationing in vulnerable economies and accelerated investment in renewable energy and gas Russian oil indirectly through its buyers could reduce global supply, especially if major importers like India and China face pressure to cut back. This supply shock could push Asian Brent crude prices to exorbitant highs, raising worries over inflation dependent on Russian oil may scramble for alternatives, increasing demand for Middle Eastern and U.S. oil. This could strain existing production capacities and lead to regional energy shortages, particularly in Asia and Eastern the proposed tariffs are not just economic tools—they're geopolitical weapons. If President Trump enforces this tariff on China and India—two of Russia's largest energy customers—could face significant economic and strategic challenges. These tariffs would not only raise the cost of imports but also strain diplomatic ties with the US, forcing both countries to recalibrate their energy and trade in such a high tariff environment, China and India may adopt a multi-pronged strategic approach as a response to the US. Both countries could accelerate deals with Middle Eastern supplies and may find new suppliers from Africa and Latin America. China may boost Yuan based trade to bypass dollar-based sanctions. In addition, diplomatic measures, enhancing renewable investments and boosting domestic production may also expected Trump's proposed secondary tariffs represent a high-stakes gamble. While they aim to pressure Russia into peace talks, the global repercussions could be severe—fuelling inflation, disrupting energy markets, and reshaping geopolitical alliances. As the world watches, the decision could mark a turning point in both the Ukraine conflict and the future of global energy diplomacy.: Recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)

Has India really stopped buying oil from Russia as Trump claims?
Has India really stopped buying oil from Russia as Trump claims?

First Post

time14 minutes ago

  • First Post

Has India really stopped buying oil from Russia as Trump claims?

US President Donald Trump says India 'is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia', calling it a 'good step' if true. But Indian officials deny knowledge of any halt, while reports suggest some state refiners briefly paused purchases read more Employees manually fill containers with diesel during a power cut at a fuel station in New Delhi, July 31, 2012. Representational Image/Reuters Speaking to reporters in Washington on Saturday, United States President Donald Trump said: 'I understand that India is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard, I don't know if that's right or not. That is a good step. We will see what happens.' The comment is Trump's latest in a slew of remarks against India's purchasing of Russian crude oil. Trump has launched a campaign of economic pressure against countries continuing to engage with Russia, threatening tariffs and penalties as leverage to force a resolution to the war in Ukraine. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Days earlier, his administration announced a sweeping set of trade measures that would affect around 70 nations, including India. As part of this, a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods entering the United States took effect, alongside a separate penalty related to purchases of Russian oil and military hardware. Trump also warned that countries buying Russian oil could face tariffs as high as 100 per cent if Moscow does not agree to a peace deal by mid-August. His stance has raised concerns about the potential impact on global markets, given India's role as the largest importer of Russian seaborne crude since 2022. In a strongly worded post on Truth Social, Trump lashed out at India's trade practices and its reliance on Russian defence and energy sectors. 'Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of energy, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to stop the killing in Ukraine — All things not good!' In another comment, he took an even sharper tone: 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. We have done very little business with India, their Tariffs are too high, among the highest in the World. Likewise, Russia and the USA do almost no business together. Let's keep it that way…' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The question: Has India really stopped buying Russian oil? In response to speculation, Indian officials and sources have sought to clarify the country's position. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has not confirmed any change in policy and has made it clear that energy sourcing decisions remain based on price and national interest. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, when asked about reports suggesting Indian oil firms had stopped taking Russian crude, said during his weekly briefing, 'We take decisions based on the price at which oil is available in the international market and depending on the global situation at that time. As for the specifics of your particular question, I am not aware of it. I don't have details of these specifics.' Privately, an MEA source echoed this line, telling ANI that energy decisions are grounded in economic realities: 'India's energy purchases are driven by national interests and market forces. We do not have any reports of Indian oil firms halting Russian imports.' Reports of a temporary pause by state refiners While there has been no formal announcement from New Delhi, multiple reports suggest some state-owned refiners may have temporarily paused buying Russian oil in the past week. According to Reuters, India's key state refiners — including Indian Oil Corporation, Bharat Petroleum Corporation, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation, and Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemical Ltd — did not seek Russian crude cargoes recently. This development comes amid narrowing discounts on Russian oil and increased warnings from Washington about the risks of continuing purchases. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A man stands at an Indian Oil fuel station in Sonipat, March 5, 2025. Representational Image/Reuters These refiners, which control over 60 per cent of India's combined refining capacity of 5.2 million barrels per day, frequently purchase Russian oil on a 'delivered' basis, meaning suppliers handle shipping and insurance. When they did not place orders, they turned instead to the spot market, buying mostly West Asian and West African crude grades such as Abu Dhabi's Murban. Notably, the country's private refiners — Reliance Industries and Nayara Energy — are the largest individual buyers of Russian crude in India, but the state-owned companies dominate the overall refining landscape. Whether these pauses represent a longer-term shift or merely a short-term adjustment remains unclear. India's reliance on Russian crude since 2022 India became the world's biggest importer of Russian seaborne oil after Europe stopped most purchases in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. This marked a significant pivot in global energy flows: before 2022, Europe had been Russia's largest oil buyer. India now sources nearly 2 million barrels per day from Russia — roughly 35 per cent of its total oil imports — amounting to over $50 billion worth of purchases in the 2024-25 fiscal year, according to official data. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The range of Russian crude reaching Indian shores is wide. Imports include Urals from Russia's western ports, ESPO and Sokol from the Pacific, and some grades from the Arctic. Urals, the largest Russian export grade, is particularly reliant on India; up to 70 per cent of its exports are absorbed by Indian refiners. Russia's state oil giant Rosneft has also become deeply intertwined with India's refining sector, holding a significant stake in one of the country's largest refineries, which further cements the commercial relationship. Why purchasing Russian oil is not illegal Officials and industry sources defending India's Russian oil imports underline that the purchases are not only lawful but beneficial for global energy stability. Sources speaking to ANI stressed that Russian oil has never been sanctioned outright by the US or the European Union. Instead, a price-cap mechanism was introduced by the G7 and EU to restrict Moscow's revenues while ensuring crude continued to flow into world markets. India has adhered to this framework, ensuring all purchases stayed below the cap — currently $60 per barrel — while securing affordable energy supplies. The same sources argued that India's strategy helped prevent a worse crisis: 'Had India not absorbed discounted Russian crude combined with OPEC+ production cuts of 5.86 mb/d, global oil prices could have surged well beyond the March 2022 peak of US $137/bbl, intensifying inflationary pressures worldwide.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This perspective paints India not as an outlier, but as a stabilising force in global oil markets, especially at a time when other buyers, including the EU, continue to import Russian-origin energy in other forms. For instance, during this period, the EU remained the largest buyer of Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG), accounting for 51 per cent of exports, with China and Japan following. How Moscow could retaliate Analysts warn that any sharp reduction in Indian demand for Russian oil could provoke a major response from Moscow. Russia's exports to India are so vital that they now make up a substantial share of the Kremlin's revenues. Experts at JP Morgan have cautioned that if India's imports were disrupted, Moscow could retaliate by closing the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) pipeline from Kazakhstan. This pipeline is critical for US energy majors like Chevron and Exxon, who have significant investments in Kazakh production. Any closure of CPC would create another severe supply shock, reverberating across the global oil market. How India would manage without Russian oil If India were to scale back or halt Russian purchases, the adjustment would be complicated and costly. Refiners would have to increase imports of US and West Asian crude or reduce refining activity. Either path could send ripples through the global economy. A cut in refining runs would immediately tighten diesel supply. India is a significant exporter of refined fuels, especially diesel, to Europe. Reduced output in India would likely push European diesel prices higher. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Switching suppliers on a large scale would also require logistical and contractual adjustments. India's refiners have integrated Russian crude into their operations over the past two years; unwinding that flow would not happen overnight. Meanwhile, private refiners — which account for a large chunk of Russian crude purchases — have not publicly signalled any change. Donald Trump's claim that India has stopped buying Russian oil remains unverified. With inputs from agencies

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store