
What Trump's proposed tariffs could mean for the Arab film industry
US President Donald Trump's announcement that he has authorised a 100 per cent tariff on films made "in foreign lands' has been met with shock and confusion in the Mena film community. Countries that offer tax incentives for international productions such as the UAE, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Morocco and Tunisia would be particularly affected by the potential move. For decades, Hollywood projects have been pivotal to the development of their respective local film industries, particularly in terms of investment, infrastructure and talent development. The proposed tariffs could disrupt Hollywood projects already set to film in the region, according to Qais Qandil, the Jordanian founder of The Film Makers, an Emirati production company, which has brought international projects such as The Misfits and Beyond the Likes to the emirates in the past. Qandil tells The National: 'As a producer who has spent years bridging Hollywood and Abu Dhabi, I've seen first-hand how international collaboration strengthens the industry creatively and economically. It may complicate my immediate plans to bring more US projects to the region.' Qandil also notes that Hollywood does not solely choose to film in countries such as the UAE, Jordan and Saudi Arabia because of rebate incentives. Projects such as the Mission: Impossible series, for instance, were able to pull off certain action set pieces thanks to Abu Dhabi's regulatory and logistical capabilities, which are not found in other locations. 'A tariff such as this risks penalising US productions that choose global locations like the UAE not for cost alone, but for world-class infrastructure and cinematic value. It could discourage the very partnerships that have made modern filmmaking thrive,' says Qandil. If Hollywood projects stop filming in the Mena region, it could have a potentially harmful effect on the local creative scene. UAE film professional Kane Rodrigues worked in Abu Dhabi on Dune: Part Two, the upcoming films Now You See Me: Now You Don't and F1, as well as Dubai productions including the Jack Ryan film, which stars John Krasinski, and City of Life 2. If those projects stop coming, it could halt the development of talent from the UAE, he believes. 'As a local sound mixer, getting opportunities to be part of the sound department in major Hollywood studio films means a great deal. UAE's film industry is still evolving, and these are the only opportunities we local crew get to be involved and to grow, as we rarely have locally produced films of this scale,' says Rodrigues. But the Arab film industry at large does not solely rely on Hollywood. Egyptian filmmaker Mohammed Hefzy, founder of the influential pan-regional production company Film Clinic, believes that, apart from Hollywood co-productions, Arab films will largely be unaffected. 'In terms of Arab cinema, the effect would be minimal. There are not many Arab films screened in the US anyway, and American audiences would still see those films on streaming at no extra charge.' Trump's move could also have a ripple effect of retaliatory tariffs that could have an unintended detrimental effect on American movies, Hefzy believes. 'Some European and Asian countries would probably impose counter-tariffs on US films, which would make Hollywood suffer quite a bit,' says Hefzy. The tariff proposition's lack of particulars leaves much uncertainty, especially in the world of streaming – perhaps the most significant current distribution system for bringing Arab films to the world. The US streamer Netflix, for example, distributes and produces several Arab films each year. It's unclear whether those projects would be affected by tariffs as well, how that would be implemented, and if it would harm the growth of Arab film on the world stage. Gianluca Chakra, founder of Front Row Filmed Entertainment, has produced several Netflix original Arab films, including the 2022 Lebanese-Egyptian hit Perfect Strangers and 2025's The Sand Castle. Chakra is concerned that this could affect this business model. 'I'm wondering what would happen to co-productions or streaming originals. How would you measure the value of a so-called non-US production that is streaming in the US in order then to apply its respective tariff or tax?' Chakra wonders. While Chakra understands Trump's concern for the health of Hollywood, which has experienced a marked drop in domestic production in recent years, he doesn't think the US will be able to reverse the trend. And, as on-screen storytelling has become increasingly decentralised, Mena countries should be adding increased incentives for local productions to develop their own self-sustaining industries. 'There is a hunger for those. They're slowly eating away from major studios anyway,' Chakra says. But for filmmakers hoping to gain attention from awards bodies such as the Oscars, US distribution is pivotal. Jordanian filmmaker Razan Takash, head of film at SAE University College Dubai, is concerned that the potential tariffs could affect the ability of foreign films to reach American film festivals, some of which are Oscar qualifiers. Emerging firms such as Watermelon Pictures have made a concerted effort to bring films such as Oscar-nominee Farah Nabulsi's The Teacher to US audiences. The Palestinian-Israeli film No Other Land, too, was theatrically successful despite lacking traditional distribution, in part because of its Oscars boost. And for Arab genre filmmakers, especially those working within the horror and sci-fi spaces, the US is a more supportive market than the Mena region, according to Takash. 'My last sci-fi shorts got distributed mostly in the US, so if they are not going be taking foreign films at the same rate, then that's a big loss for me as a platform,' she adds. Amid a lack of clarity as to how the plan will be enacted and whether it will come to fruition at all, many in the Mena region's film industry are waiting to see what will happen next – and hoping for the best. 'Personally, I believe this tariff is politically driven and unlikely to hold in the long run,' says Qandil.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arabian Post
an hour ago
- Arabian Post
Oil Holds Gains on US China Trade Talks Optimism
Oil prices maintained stability following a notable rise as market participants reacted to constructive signals from high-level discussions between the United States and China. Brent crude hovered near $65 a barrel, positioning itself for a weekly advance that would mark its first since mid-May. Similarly, West Texas Intermediate settled close to $63, reflecting a cautious but optimistic outlook amid evolving geopolitical dynamics. The dialogue between President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping marked a pivotal moment in addressing ongoing trade frictions that have weighed heavily on global markets. Both leaders expressed commitment to continued negotiations targeting tariff disputes and supply chain concerns, particularly regarding rare earth minerals critical for technology and manufacturing sectors. This development provided a welcome boost to commodity traders, who have been closely monitoring the situation amid fears of escalating protectionism. Market analysts have noted that oil, being highly sensitive to international trade flows and economic growth forecasts, often mirrors the broader sentiment surrounding US-China relations. The prospect of easing trade tensions suggested potential improvements in global demand for energy, which had been dampened by uncertainty and tariff barriers affecting industrial output. ADVERTISEMENT Despite the positive tone, traders remained vigilant. The recent gains followed a period of volatility driven by mixed signals from trade negotiations and concerns about slowing economic activity in key consuming regions such as China and Europe. Economic indicators have highlighted uneven growth patterns, prompting cautious optimism rather than outright confidence. The agreement to pursue further talks on rare earth minerals carries significant implications beyond the energy markets. These materials, essential for manufacturing electronics, renewable energy technologies, and defence equipment, have been at the centre of a strategic tussle between the two economic superpowers. Supply disruptions or restrictions have ripple effects on various sectors, influencing broader commodity market trends. Financial markets also responded to the potential for stabilisation in trade relations, with equity indices showing tentative gains in tandem with oil's upward movement. Investors appear encouraged by the prospect of de-escalation, although the path to a comprehensive trade deal remains uncertain. The oil market's reaction underscores the interconnectedness of geopolitical developments and commodity pricing. While the immediate impact of the talks has been supportive for prices, the sector continues to face headwinds, including fluctuating demand forecasts and supply-side challenges. OPEC's production decisions, US shale output levels, and inventories in key storage hubs remain closely watched variables that could influence price trajectories. The broader economic backdrop factors into market calculations. Growth slowdowns in major economies have triggered expectations of weaker fuel consumption, while concerns about inflation and central bank policies contribute to volatility in oil and financial markets. The Federal Reserve's stance on interest rates and stimulus measures in China are particularly influential, shaping investor sentiment and demand projections. Traders are also monitoring geopolitical tensions outside the trade sphere, including developments in the Middle East and North Africa, which historically affect oil supply security. Any escalation in these regions tends to prompt risk premiums on crude prices, adding complexity to an already dynamic market environment. In the supply chain arena, ongoing challenges related to refining capacity and transportation logistics remain points of focus. Infrastructure bottlenecks and maintenance schedules have periodically constrained fuel availability, impacting pricing at the consumer level. These operational factors, coupled with geopolitical and economic influences, create a layered context for oil market behaviour.


Khaleej Times
an hour ago
- Khaleej Times
Trump-Musk feud: From "bromance" to a social media brawl; when did it all begin?
US President Donald Trump and X owner Elon Musk have long been close allies, with their bond or "bromance" serving as amusement to many social media users. Their affection for each other has now taken a sharp turn into an all-out clash, both using social media as their tools in a tit-for-tat exchange. So, when did it all begin? Trump's "big, beautiful" bill apparently wasn't just so beautiful to Musk. He criticised it, calling it a "disgusting abomination" on the basis that the tax-cut and spending would add even more to the nation's debt, which already reaches a staggering $36.2 trillion. In response, Trump told reporters in the Oval Office he was "very disappointed" in Musk. "Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore," Trump said. Trump has also said that Musk's opposition to the bill was because of the elimination of consumer tax credits for electric vehicles. However, Musk has maintained that he does not mind cuts to the EV credits as long as Republicans rid the bill of wasteful spending. The X owner and the US President have harnessed their usual platforms to snub each other. Trump has claimed that he asked Musk to leave as the Tesla owner was "wearing thin". "I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy electric cars that nobody else wanted, and he just went crazy!", Trump posted on Truth Social. Meanwhile, Musk hit back, posting on X that the "real reason the Epstein files have not been made public" are because Trump is in them. "Have a nice day, DJT!", Elon quipped. Musk has also responded "Yes" to a post on X that said Trump should be impeached and called out the US President's "ingratitude". "Without me, Trump would have lost the election," wrote Musk, who spent nearly $300 million backing Trump and other Republicans in last year's election. Trump meanwhile, took a dig at Elon's space businesses, suggesting that "the easiest way to save money in the budget — billions and billions of dollars — is to terminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts." "I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!", Trump added. Musk, who owns SpaceX, said the company would "begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately" in light of Trump's statement, which would be a big blow to US space aspirations. Dragon is the only US spacecraft capable of sending astronauts to the International Space Station. The world is watching closely as these two men, both with loud opinions, clash. As the feud unfolds, conveniently written out on social media, it is yet to see how this will impact the White House, and US politics.

Gulf Today
an hour ago
- Gulf Today
Intense Russian air attack on Ukraine's capital kills four
Russia mounted an intense missile and drone barrage of the Ukrainian capital overnight, killing four people, Ukrainian officials said, as powerful explosions reverberated across the city. The attack followed a warning from Russian President Vladimir Putin, conveyed via US leader Donald Trump, that the Kremlin would hit back after Ukrainian drones destroyed several strategic bomber aircraft in attacks deep inside Russia. Kyiv mayor Vitali Klitschko said 20 people were injured, 16 of them in hospital, in addition to the four deaths. The city's metro transport system was disrupted by a Russian strike that hit and damaged tracks between stations, Kyiv's military administration said. Ukraine's state rail company Ukrzaliznytsia said it was also detouring some trains due to railway damage in the region. In the Solomianskyi district, a Russian drone slammed into the side of apartment building, leaving a gaping hole and burn marks, a Reuters photographer at the scene said. A man inspects damage next to a shattered window at the site of a Russian strike in Kyiv, Ukraine, on Friday. Reuters Falling concrete blocks from the building crushed cars parked below. Two police investigators were examining what appeared to be the drone's engine. Earlier in the night, Reuters reporters heard the sound of Russian kamikaze drones buzzing in the sky, accompanied by the sounds of outgoing fire from Ukrainian anti-aircraft fire. Reuters witnesses reported a series of booming explosions powerful enough to rattle windows far from the impact sites. Some Kyiv residents sought shelter in metro stations, or in underground car parks. Ukraine's air force said the country had been targeted with drones and missiles overnight. Russian forces struck industrial facilities and infrastructure in the western city of Ternopil, leaving parts of it without power, mayor Serhii Nadal said. The regional administration said the attack injured five people and recommended residents stay inside due to a high concentration of toxic substances in the air after a fire. Five people were injured in the northwestern city of Lutsk where the attack also damaged private homes, educational institutions and government buildings, according to mayor Ihor Polishchuk. In one of the most audacious attacks of the war between Ukraine and Russia, Ukrainian spies last weekend destroyed some of Russia's strategic bomber aircraft on the ground using quadrocopter drones hidden in wooden sheds. The Kremlin was planning an unspecified response to the Ukrainian attack on Russian air bases, Trump said after a telephone conversation with Putin on Wednesday. Reuters