logo
ADB warns against long-term protectionism

ADB warns against long-term protectionism

Express Tribune06-05-2025

Listen to article
The Asian Development Bank (ADB)'s Chief Economist, Albert Park, has expressed support for Pakistan's efforts to successfully complete its International Monetary Fund (IMF) Extended Fund Facility (EFF), noting that such a move would likely enhance Pakistan's standing with other international lenders, including the ADB itself. However, he warned that any hopes of a sharp drop in interest rates purely due to an IMF qualification may be unrealistic.
Responding to questions from The Express Tribune on the sidelines of the ADB's 58th Annual Meeting in Italy, the bank's chief economist said that an IMF deal acts as a "signal" of macroeconomic discipline and stability. "If the IMF comes to an agreement with Pakistan, that's important for the ADB. It means we feel Pakistan is more fiscally sound," the official explained. However, they added that while such agreements impact lending confidence, they do not automatically translate into lower interest rates from multilateral agencies like the ADB.
ADB lending decisions, he noted, are primarily based on a country's level of development and debt sustainability. "We don't want to lend to countries with unsustainable debt burden. But once there is a reform agreement in place, it opens up avenues for deeper engagement," the official said.
The ADB also weighed in on the ongoing debate in Pakistan about whether it should pursue protectionist industrial policies to shield local industries—at least in the short term—before liberalising trade. Addressing this, the official said that while historical examples exist of countries like Japan, India and South Korea using temporary protectionism during their early industrial phases, in many cases such protection becomes entrenched.
"In theory, temporary protection might help an industry grow, but in practice, protections often become permanent due to vested political interests," Park warned. "That leads to inefficiencies and higher costs, especially in today's globalised world where foreign direct investment depends on openness and predictability."
Instead, ADB official stressed that Pakistan and other South Asian economies, including India and Bangladesh, should focus on boosting exports, improving ease of doing business, and attracting foreign investment. Trade liberalisation and participation in global value chains were identified as long-term strategies for sustained economic growth.
On India, He said the country is well-positioned to benefit from shifting global supply chains, especially post-COVID. However, India needs to address infrastructure bottlenecks, reduce trade barriers, and improve its regulatory environment. "India remains relatively protectionist," said Park, cautioning that high tariffs on intermediate goods could make domestic industries less competitive globally.
In Bangladesh's case, officials noted that the country's slow integration into regional and multilateral trade blocs— such as ASEAN and RCEP—limits its export diversification potential. Currently, Bangladesh has only one bilateral trade pact, a preferential trade agreement (PTA) with Bhutan. ADB attributed this hesitation to fears of heightened competition, but stressed that greater openness could lead to long-term benefits.
The ADB also flagged growing concerns over escalating trade tensions globally, particularly involving the United States and China. The bank's April outlook forecasted Asia's growth at 4.9% this year and 4.7% for 2026, admitting that those figures did not account for recent reciprocal tariffs announced by Washington.
"The uncertainty itself is harming investment and production across Asia," the official said. "Increased volatility, especially from shifting trade policies, has led to a slowdown in manufacturing and weakened business confidence."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PSX makes history on macro boost
PSX makes history on macro boost

Express Tribune

time10 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

PSX makes history on macro boost

Listen to article The Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) sustained its bullish streak in the outgoing week, with the benchmark KSE-100 index surging to an all-time high of 121,798 points on June 4, before settling at 121,641, marking a weekly gain of 1,950 points (+1.63%). The rally was fueled by renewed investor confidence following successful budget talks with the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Asian Development Bank's (ADB) approval of a $800 million financing package and the government's finalisation of a Rs1.275 trillion circular debt resolution deal with banks – a significant development for the energy sector. Macroeconomic indicators further supported sentiment as petroleum sales jumped 10% year-on-year (YoY) in May 2025, the Consumer Price Index (CPI)-based inflation eased to 3.5% and the trade deficit narrowed 23% month-on-month (MoM). However, the State Bank's reserves dipped slightly by $7 million, settling at $11.5 billion. On a day-on-day basis, the PSX attempted once again on Monday to decisively breach the key psychological barrier of 120,000 at close but fell short, ending the session at 118,878, reflecting a decline of 813 points. It came due to profit-taking pressure at record levels. On Tuesday, the market soared to an all-time high above 120,000 points as investor optimism grew following the approval of a $800 million loan by the ADB for Pakistan's public finance programme and the government's approval of a Rs880 billion Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP). The benchmark KSE-100 index recorded an increase of 1,573 points and settled at 120,451. The bourse continued its record-breaking run on Wednesday, with the index closing at an all-time high of 121,799, up 1,348 points. Investor sentiment remained upbeat ahead of the federal budget, buoyed by expectations of fiscal relief measures and encouraging macroeconomic indicators. However, the PSX witnessed a volatile session on Thursday, with the benchmark index retreating after hitting record highs a day earlier. Investor sentiment turned cautious due to concerns about stringent conditions linked to a new IMF programme, including the proposed enforcement of agriculture income tax and the IMF's opposition to provincial energy subsidies. The PSX ended the day on a negative note at 121,641, down 158 points. "Building on last week's bullish trend, the market picked up pace, with the KSE-100 reaching an all-time high of 121,798 points on June 4, driven by buying interest across different sectors," Arif Habib Limited (AHL) wrote in its weekly report. Positive sentiment followed Pakistan's successful budget talks with the IMF, alongside the ADB's approval of a $800 million financing package. The government also finalised a Rs1.275 trillion circular debt resolution deal with banks, a significant move for the power sector, AHL said. Meanwhile, during May 2025, petroleum sales rose 10% YoY, inflation came in at 3.5% and the trade deficit narrowed 23% MoM. The State Bank's reserves declined $7 million to $11.5 billion. The market closed at 121,641, depicting a surge of 1,950 points, or 1.63% week-on-week (WoW). Sector-wise, the positive contribution came from commercial banks (1,044 points), power generation and distribution (369 points), fertiliser (206 points), food and personal care products (95 points) and chemicals (60 points). Meanwhile, the sectors that contributed negatively were technology and communication (82 points), automobile assemblers (29 points), miscellaneous (24 points), cable and electrical goods (10 points) and Real Estate Investment Trusts (five points). Scrip-wise, the positive contributors were Pakgen Power (327 points), Bank AL Habib (208 points), NBP (165 points), HBL (160 points) and Fauji Fertiliser Company (158 points). Foreigners' selling was witnessed during the week, which came in at $14.7 million compared to net selling of $5.56 million last week. Average volumes arrived at 660 million shares (-0.2% WoW) while average traded value settled at $98.6 million (up 24.9%), AHL added. Syed Danyal Hussain of JS Global wrote that the KSE-100 index hit an all-time high during the outgoing week, closing at a record level of 121,641 points, up 1.6% WoW. The rally was largely driven by optimism surrounding a potential agreement with the IMF, as indicated by the prime minister, which spurred pre-budget sentiment, he said. The government, following the IMF's endorsement, finalised a Rs1.275 trillion financing agreement with 18 commercial banks to address the power sector's circular debt. On the sectoral front, local cement dispatches rose 9% YoY in May 2025, bringing 11MFY25 volumes to nearly flat levels. Meanwhile, a 26% rise in exports during 11MFY25 lifted total cement sales to a growth of 2%, he added.

India's hegemonic designs
India's hegemonic designs

Business Recorder

time11 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

India's hegemonic designs

One reality which emerged out of the recent India-Pakistan conflict is that India is one among equal in the fraternity of South Asian nations. India has long positioned itself as the dominant regional power in South Asia, leveraging its demographic, economic, and military superiority. However, the recent conflict between India and Pakistan has exposed critical vulnerabilities in this hegemonic posture. This article examines the implications of the conflict on India's regional dominance, highlighting the growing parity between India and Pakistan in diplomatic and military affairs and the increasing strategic autonomy of smaller South Asian nations. It argues that the traditional notion of Indian hegemony is being challenged by an emerging more multipolar and assertive regional order India's involvement in regional organizations like the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) and the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) also illustrates its ambitions to play a leadership role in South Asia. Yet, this perceived hegemony has often been met with resistance from neighboring countries. Indian leadership's role in South Asia has been underpinned by a combination of soft power, economic leverage and strategic dominance. New Delhi has frequently acted as a security guarantor, development partner, and political influencer in countries like Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives. However, these relationships have often been marked by tensions, with smaller states resisting perceived Indian overreach. Pakistan, influenced by historic parity between the two carved out countries, remained out of the orbit of India's hegemony. Countries like Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka have increasingly asserted their sovereignty and economic independence. Bangladesh has pursued extensive economic partnerships with China and Japan and lately with Pakistan, while Nepal has defied Indian pressure on constitutional and territorial matters. Sri Lanka, Bhutan and the Maldives have oscillated between pro-India and pro-China alignments, reflecting a desire for strategic balance rather than dependence. Nevertheless, this hegemonic stance has increasingly come under scrutiny, particularly in the wake of the recent India-Pakistan conflict, which has revealed significant constraints on India's ability to unilaterally influence regional and global outcomes. India's relative military and economic superiority did not translate into strategic dominance in this conflict. The parity in tactical outcomes has dented the myth of India's invincibility in conventional military terms. Pakistan's nuclear deterrence, improved air defence, and effective diplomacy neutralized India's attempts to impose strategic costs, creating a deterrent equilibrium. The conflict illustrated that conventional superiority does not guarantee dominance in modern asymmetric and nuclear-influenced warfare. The rapid military responses on both sides underscored the limits of escalation without mutual destruction. The conflict has affirmed Pakistan's continued relevance in global diplomacy. Despite India's growing alignment with the West, especially the US, , France and Russia, these powers refrained from taking a partisan stance. Instead, international diplomacy focused on de-escalation and parity-based dialogue. This reinforces the notion that, in matters of regional security and peace, India is not the sole interlocutor, and Pakistan remains a necessary counterpart. Diplomatically, both countries engaged with major global powers to narrate their versions of the conflict. Crucially, the international community treated both states as equally responsible actors, calling for restraint and dialogue. The ceasefire agreement, reportedly influenced by external mediation from actors like the US and the United Arab Emirates, further undermined India's insistence on bilateralism and highlighted its vulnerability to international pressure. Moreover, internationally, both India and Pakistan engaged in parallel diplomatic offensives, apprising the world capitals of their narratives. Significantly, none of these powers outrightly condemned either side. Instead, global calls for restraint and dialogue placed both nations on an equal diplomatic footing. India's inability to dictate the terms of the conflict's resolution represents a broader erosion of its regional and global influence. This shift is not only due to Pakistan's strategic resilience but also because of the changing dynamics among other South Asian nations, many of whom are actively diversifying their diplomatic and economic engagements. The cumulative effect of these developments is a region that is moving away from a unipolar Indian-led order toward a more multi-polar framework. South Asian states are no longer content with passive roles in a hierarchy led by India; instead, they are engaging in multilateral diplomacy, leveraging international partnerships, and resisting hegemonic pressures. The recent India-Pakistan conflict serves as a critical inflection point in South Asia's geopolitical trajectory. It challenges the long-standing assumption of Indian hegemony and underscores the emergence of a more balanced regional order. India's strategic and diplomatic parity with Pakistan in the conflict, coupled with the assertiveness of smaller neighboring states, signals the decline of unilateral Indian dominance. Moving forward, India's future role in South Asia will depend not on its ability to dominate, but on its willingness to engage as a partner among equals. In a region characterized by rising nationalism, economic competition, and strategic realignments, hegemonic posturing may prove not only unsustainable but counter-productive. The way forward lies in fostering regional integration, resolving bilateral issues through dialogue, and embracing a pluralistic vision of South Asian solidarity. India can play a significant role in making this happen. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Fixing budget to unleash growth
Fixing budget to unleash growth

Business Recorder

time11 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Fixing budget to unleash growth

Every year, Pakistan's federal budget arrives with familiar choreography: a frantic scramble for revenue, a ritualistic promise of belt-tightening, a prayer for donor approval—and, inevitably, a deepening economic funk. The budget, instead of being a strategic tool to unleash growth and build reserves, has become a reactive exercise designed to appease creditors and perpetuate the status quo. This is not just a budgeting problem—it is a full-blown political economy failure. To break this cycle, we must fundamentally reimagine the budget—not as a ledger-balancing ritual, but as the central engine of economic revival through a sustained growth acceleration. Bloated government Pakistan's budget has historically expanded alongside a steady growth in government spending—starting with the welfare and development spree of the Bhutto years. Since then, successive governments have continued to bloat expenditures, expand political patronage networks, and indulge in borrowed vanity projects. Unsurprisingly, the lion's share of the budget is now devoured by a bloated and inefficient government machinery—ministries, SOEs, elite subsidies, and ever-growing civilian and military pensions. Development spending (PSDP) does not fare much better. It is either slashed mid-year or burned on politically motivated brick-and-mortar projects that neither raise productivity nor enhance exports. Numerous studies show that public investment in Pakistan is failing to crowd in private capital, generate jobs, or enhance competitiveness. No surprise, then, that economic growth has been on a steady downward slope this century. Don't tax the economy to death Maintaining the donor mantra that the 'tax-to-GDP ratio is low,' the IMF responds to our fiscal deficits by prescribing more and more taxes. When unrealistic revenue targets fall short, they roll out the usual remedy: 'further taxes,' 'additional taxes,' 'super taxes'—all piled on top of already over-taxed sectors in the infamous minibudget blitzes. The result? A regressive, volatile, and thoroughly anti-growth tax regime. Pakistan's real problem is not just low revenue—it is the structure of revenue—complicated, intrusive, and volatile. The consequence is a skewed, unjust, and investment-suppressing system. As deficits ballooned alongside unchecked political largesse, public debt skyrocketed past the 60 percent of GDP ceiling set by the 2003 Fiscal Responsibility Act—an IMF-sponsored law. Today, over 50 percent of the federal budget is consumed by interest payments. Yet both federal and provincial governments continue spending with abandon. Just in FY2025, they added over 60 new government agencies. Apparently, austerity is for textbooks — not our political class. A good budget To shift the budget toward growth, we must reframe our fiscal strategy around three core objectives: investment facilitation, economic restructuring, and foreign exchange generation. Our fiscal culture is rooted in control. Every economic activity is smothered in paperwork, redundant approvals, and bureaucratic misalignment. The budget must empower cities, universities, and private innovators—not just federal ministries. Local governments have been 'in the pipeline' for decades. While this issue lies beyond the immediate scope of the budget, it is crucial that administrative decentralization and institutional autonomy be pursued with proper performance checks and accountability frameworks. Perhaps the most urgent—and overdue—reform is the restructuring of the Planning Commission and the PSDP. The Haq/HAG model of brick-and-mortar development must evolve into a productivity-enhancing strategy. Let us transform the PSDP into a competitive grants framework—empowering cities and knowledge institutions to innovate, tied to clear outcomes in research, urban regeneration, and enterprise development. Likewise, the Planning Commission should be converted into a genuine reform engine—steering away from bloated plans and abstract visions that no one reads, let alone implements. And yes, this also means an end to discretionary funds and politically captive schemes. Enough random taxation The obsession with squeezing more out of the same tax base is strangling the economy. We need to broaden the base by simplifying, lowering, and stabilizing the tax structure—rather than repeatedly taxing the same goods and sectors into oblivion. As we outlined in the Haque Tax Commission Report of 2024: a) Simplify the tax code and reduce compliance burdens b) Replace withholding and turnover taxes with a value-added tax (VAT) system, with automatic and credible refunds c) Streamline documentation requirements for entering the tax system d) Broaden the base through digitization and administrative ease e) Most importantly, stop the frantic revenue drives that inject volatility, erode confidence, and drive away both domestic and foreign investment A good time to open the economy The relentless thirst for revenue has turned tariffs into a catch-all crutch—even exports now suffer because import duties are raising the cost of globally integrated inputs. Worse still, policy remains trapped in an outdated import-substitution mindset that rewards rent-seeking rather than export excellence. It is time for a bold pivot: abandon import substitution and stop using tariffs as a revenue crutch. Elementary economics teaches that tariffs are used to prevent a needed exchange rate adjustment. Tariffs can never be a competitive strategy. If we are serious about export-led growth—not just sloganeering—we must let the rupee find its true value, open the economy, and dismantle protectionist walls. Make the budget a living, transparent document For two decades, we have had a grand-sounding World Bank project—PIFRA ('Project to Improve Financial Reporting and Auditing')—with nothing to show. We still lack basic budget transparency. Follow the rest of the world and now adopt accrual-based budgeting across Pakistan. Here is a modest proposal for the finance minister: Make PIFRA live for public access this year. Put real-time dashboards online so citizens can trace every rupee spent. Growth is the only way out Our fiscal burden continues to grow as economic growth slows. The only way to break free from perpetual debt, IMF bailouts, and creeping default is through a sustained acceleration of private sector-led growth. This must be the cornerstone of budget policy: raise private investment from today's pitiful 8–9 percent of GDP to over 20 percent in five years. Deregulate. Open up. Simplify taxes and documentation. Build a performance-oriented public sector that enables growth—not one that chases after taxes with a club and spends the money on useless projects, bloated government, and patronage. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store