UK airport staff offered cash bonuses for spotting easyJet passengers with oversized bags
An internal email seen by The Sunday Times has revealed that staff at Swissport, an aviation company that provides ground handling services, were told they were 'eligible to receive £1.20 (£1 after tax) for every gate bag taken, effective immediately'.
The email was reportedly sent to Swissport employees working at seven airports across the UK in Belfast, Birmingham, Glasgow, Jersey, Liverpool and Newcastle.
The cash bonuses were introduced to staff as the easyJet gate bag revenue incentive, which is 'intended to reward agents doing the right thing' and would result in 'payments made directly to employees'.
The email was sent in November 2023, with The Sunday Times stating that the policy is still in force.
The message was signed off by Dean Martin, a Swissport station manager at Glasgow Airport, who said: 'Thank you for your ongoing contribution to the success of easyJet.'
Other ground handling companies, such as DHL Supply Chain, also have similar remuneration packages for identifying easyJet bags that do not comply with easyJet's dimensions.
DHL Supply Chain, which operates at Gatwick, Bristol and Manchester airports, receives a 'nominal amount' per bag, the publication states.
The extra cash incentive applies to bags that are deemed too big to the taken into the cabin, either because the passenger has not paid to take a larger suitcase or their free hand luggage is too big.
If a passenger's cabin bags or non-purchased bags are brought to the gate, easyJet will charge £48 and place the bags in the hold.
Strict airline baggage rules across various airlines have caused contention at the gate, especially when passengers are handed hefty fees if staff deem their bags noncompliant with their policies.
The Sunday Times says that £1.20 of this fee will be paid to the ground handler. Ground handling agents are employed by third parties, which vary from airport to airport. They manage agent remuneration directly, and easyJet do not have oversight on this.
Swissport ground handlers earn around £12 per hour. One former Swissport passenger service manager told a publication that he and his colleagues had no choice but to keep a check on oversized baggage.
'Confronting people with excess baggage is like taking on fare dodgers,' he told The Sunday Times on the condition of anonymity.
'You risk abuse or worse — imagine stopping a group of lads on a stag weekend and telling them, 'I'm going to have to charge you more than you paid for your tickets to check those bags into the hold'.'
A spokesperson for Swissport told The Independent: 'We serve our airline customers and apply their policies under terms and conditions for managing their operation.
'We're highly professional and our focus is on delivering safe and efficient operations, which we do day in and day out for four million flights per year.'
A spokesperson for DHL Supply Chain also told The Independent: "We're fully committed to ensuring the safety, security, and on-time departure of all aircraft. A critical component of this is adherence to the easyJet Baggage Policy, which plays a vital role in maintaining an efficient operation as well as passenger safety.'
The company requires 'all colleagues to consistently adhere to [the easyJet baggage policy] and this is recognised as part of their remuneration'.
'Doing so ensures we provide a smooth travel experience for every passenger.'
EasyJet said it is 'focused on ensuring our ground handling partners apply our policies correctly and consistently in fairness to all our customers'.
'Our bag policies and options are well understood and we remind customers of this when booking, before they travel and on their boarding pass, which means a very small proportion of customers who don't comply will be charged at the airport,' the spokesperson told The Independent.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Motor 1
an hour ago
- Motor 1
Lamborghini Hints at a Rear-Wheel-Drive Temerario: 'A Different Kind of Hybridization'
For years, Lamborghini was all about all-wheel drive—it was the one thing separating the Italian automaker from its chief rival, Ferrari. Only occasionally did the company offer rear-wheel drive on a limited special edition. But Lamborghini began embracing rear-wheel drive near the end of the Gallardo's run. For the Huracan, the company would offer rear-drive in both base models and specials like the STO and Tecnica. Soon, the Temerario could follow in the same footsteps. Speaking to the UK's Car magazine at the Goodwood Festival of Speed, Lamborghini CTO Rouven Mohr hinted at a rear-wheel drive Temerario. "I'm not saying in the future you couldn't see a [two-wheel drive] version of the street car, and then perhaps a different kind of hybridization," he said. Lamborghini Temerario Alleggerita Photo by: Lamborghini Currently, the Temerario is only offered as an all-wheel drive hybrid. It has a mid-mounted, twin-turbo V-8 and an electric motor driving the wheels, with two additional motors for the front wheels. In theory, it seems Lamborghini could delete the front motors, leaving just the V-8 and single rear electric motor. A car like this could still be very powerful—the engine on its own makes 789 horsepower, and the electric motor is capable of 147 hp. In its current all-wheel drive iteration, the Temerario makes 920 hp, as the engine and electric motors make peak power at different points. Car seemed to suggest to Mohr that a rear-drive hybrid Temerario may not need a battery as large as the all-wheel drive car's 3.8-kilowatt-hour unit, and that it might not need to be a plug-in hybrid either. "This [sort of hybrid] is already available today," he said, referencing the Porsche 911's hybrid system. He called it a "super example of a completely different hybrid approach." Photo by: Lamborghini The 911's hybrid system is pretty different than what Lamborghini may do, however. Porsche uses an internal-combustion engine designed around an electric turbocharger , whereas the new Lamborghini V-8 uses conventional turbos. While Mohr didn't confirm anything, we'd be shocked if we didn't see a rear-drive Temerario. Lamborghini tends to keep its models in production for a long time, introducing many variants to keep things fresh. Rear-wheel drive supercars are also a well-established part of its business now, and the prospect of a lighter, simpler Temerario has us excited. But don't expect to see a non-hybrid version. Lamborghini just revealed the Temerario GT3 race car , which deletes the hybrid system to comply with current GT3 regulations, but Mohr says he "wouldn't bet" on a non-hybrid street car. That said, he doesn't completely rule out the possibility—but the reality of current emissions regulations makes building such a car unrealistic. More on Lamborghini Lamborghini's New Supercar Is Going Racing Lamborghini Walks Back Urus EV, Plans Hybrid Instead Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ultimate Finance reports 15% increase in H1 2025 new lending
Ultimate Finance has reported its 'highest ever' half-year origination results, with £126m ($170m) in new business lending, marking a 15% increase from the same period in 2024. The UK-based asset-based lender said it achieved positive outcomes across all business areas. In the first six months, the company's lending book reached £357m. Ultimate Finance CEO Josh Levy said: 'Our performance in the first half of 2025 is a clear demonstration of the success of our business strategy and represents another step towards realising our growth ambitions. Having all three areas of the business – working capital, asset finance, and bridging finance – working in unison is delivering real strategic value. 'We have built strong momentum, and our results reflect the strength of our team, the resilience of our local relationship-based model, and the increasing demand for our tailored finance solutions. 'Looking ahead, we are set to launch further developments in our structured finance product to address growing demand in the ABL space. We remain as committed as ever to delivering tailored funding solutions through our growing network of introducers.' During the period under review, Ultimate Finance increased its maximum invoice finance facility size from £7m to £10m, accommodating larger funding requirements and aligning with recent product improvements. It also made enhancements in bridging finance, including reduced pricing on development exit facilities and a new light-touch refurbishment offering up to an 85% day one loan-to-value ratio. Additionally, more flexibility was introduced in the release of net sales proceeds on multi-unit loans and on personal guarantee terms. Ultimate Finance also expanded its asset finance team, moved into a larger office, and increased its securitisation facility to support growing demand. Last month, the company launched its updated brand identity as part of its growth strategy. "Ultimate Finance reports 15% increase in H1 2025 new lending" was originally created and published by Leasing Life, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
BIBA appeals to Chancellor on regulatory relief
The British Insurance Brokers' Association (BIBA) has requested the Chancellor to consider easing the regulatory constraints on insurance brokers. In a letter, BIBA chief executive Graeme Trudgill stressed the importance of insurance brokers to the UK economy and the challenges posed by current regulatory measures. BIBA argues that over-regulation is hindering the ability of brokers to serve their clients and is contributing to a decline in the sector, as evidenced by the low number of new broker authorisations compared to the number of firms exiting the market in the first quarter of 2025. The association is seeking a revision of the Financial Conduct Authority's (FCA) regulatory framework, suggesting that a more 'balanced' and 'reasonable' approach to regulation is necessary to support the government's growth agenda and to maintain the UK's position in the global market. 'Now is the time to stop the downward spiral on productivity, to encourage new firms to start up, and to persuade the smaller businesses that serve the local communities to stay in the sector', the letter read. Trudgill's letter calls for a regulatory environment that reduces complexity, encourages innovation, and supports the establishment and scaling of new firms. BIBA believes that the FCA's mandate to regulate for growth should translate into tangible changes, including a more 'reasonable reporting requirements' rather than 'simplifying insurance rules' in a recent step by FCA. 'Now is the time, Chancellor, for bold action – not just cutting red tape, but resetting regulation', Trudgill said in the letter. The letter concluded with a call for the Chancellor to use the upcoming presentation of the Financial Services Growth and Competitiveness Strategy to initiate a shift towards regulation that better balances consumer protection with the need for economic growth and 'competitiveness' in the insurance broking sector. In May 2025, the FCA announced plans to update its insurance regulations by eliminating "outdated or redundant requirements" from its rulebook. "BIBA appeals to Chancellor on regulatory relief " was originally created and published by Life Insurance International, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.