Kiwis in Australia get Medicare, welfare payments, but Aussies to face new entry fees for New Zealand's top attractions; here's why
New Zealand will introduce a conservation levy in 2027, charging international tourists, including Australians, between $18 and $36 to visit popular natural sites like Milford Sound and Tongariro Crossing. The scheme aims to generate funds for environmental protection, facility upgrades, and job creation, addressing the impact of high tourist traffic. Locals will be exempt from the fees.
Cathedral Cove is one of the four destinations where Australians need to pay to visit, the others are Tongariro Crossing, Milford Sound and Mount Cook. (Image: Tourism New Zealand) Australian tourists will soon have to pay between $18 and $36 to visit some of New Zealand's most famous natural sites, under a new conservation scheme announced by the NZ government. The plan, which exempts locals but applies to all overseas visitors, aims to raise tens of millions of dollars for environmental protection and job creation.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Conservation Minister Tama Potaka revealed the changes at the National Party annual conference in Christchurch, reported by the Daily Telegraph.
It was also just days before Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was due to visit Queenstown for bilateral talks.Currently, the Aussie PM is visiting New Zealand for bilateral talks.The visitor levy will be charged to all international tourists (including Australians) visiting four key attractions:
Cathedral Cove
Tongariro Crossing
Milford Sound
Aoraki/Mount Cook Entry will remain free for New Zealand citizens, and Luxon says these sites are part of the locals' 'collective inheritance.'
The NZ government says international visitors make up 80 per cent of traffic to these locations, creating pressure on infrastructure and the environment.The scheme, worth NZ$62 million, will: Fund conservation work
Upgrade facilities
Support local jobs and wages Mr Potaka compared the move to entry fees at national parks in Australia, the US, and Canada, though locals pay the same fees as tourists in those countries.
Charges will range between: NZ$20 (AU$18) and NZ$40 (AU$36) per person
Exact prices will depend on the site visited. The money will be reinvested directly into the conservation of these attractions.
The fee system is set to begin in 2027. Australians will not be exempt despite the trans-Tasman Travel Arrangement, which allows citizens to live and work in each other's countries without visas. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, around 2.27 per cent or about 618,000 New Zealand-born people lived in Australia, making them the fourth largest overseas-born population in Australia.This group includes those living for various reasons, such as business, permanent residence, and study. The number gradually increased from around 598,000 in 2023 to about 583,000 in 2014.In 2024, New Zealand citizens, those traveling on New Zealand passports, accounted for 85 per cent of the 47,300 migrant departures to Australia and 67 per cent of the 17,300 migrant arrivals from Australia. In comparison, in 2023, these figures were 84 per cent for departures and 61 per cent for arrivals.Kiwis residing in Australia can access Medicare, domestic university fees, and welfare payments, including pensions, rent assistance, and disability support services.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Accenture to buy Australian cybersecurity firm CyberCX for reported $650 mln
Accenture said on Thursday it will buy Australian cybersecurity firm CyberCX in its largest-ever deal in the sector, with the Australian Financial Review valuing the transaction at more than A$1 billion ($650 million). A wave of devastating cyberattacks has battered Australia, including a 2022 breach at telecom major Optus that exposed the personal data of up to 10 million users, and a hack on health insurer Medibank affecting nearly 10 million customers. In July, Qantas Airways disclosed that criminals had infiltrated one of its call centres, accessing personal information of six million customers. Private equity firm BGH Capital , which is selling CyberCX, has not disclosed any financial terms. Accenture declined to provide additional details, while BGH Capital didn't respond to Reuters' requests for comment on the reported valuation. The deal underscores the surging demand for advanced digital security services as businesses worldwide face increasingly sophisticated cyber threats that disrupt operations and compromise sensitive data. Melbourne-based CyberCX was formed in 2019 through the merger of 12 smaller cybersecurity firms backed by BGH Capital. The company now employs about 1,400 people and runs security operations centres across Australia and New Zealand, with offices in London and New York. CyberCX is led by John Paitaridis, formerly managing director of Optus Business, and Chief Strategy Officer Alastair MacGibbon, Australia's former national cybersecurity coordinator. The leadership's ties to Optus are notable, given the telecommunications company's 2022 data breach, which exposed names, birth dates, addresses, phone numbers, email contacts and passport and driver's license numbers. Since 2015, Accenture has completed 20 security acquisitions, including recent purchases of Brazilian cyber defense firm Morphus, MNEMO Mexico and Spain-based Innotec Security. On the domestic front, the firm entered into a $700 million collaborative agreement with Telstra in February, aiming to implement AI capabilities across the telecommunications company.
Mint
9 hours ago
- Mint
Many Australians secretly use AI at work, a new report shows. Clearer rules could reduce ‘shadow AI'
Melbourne, Aug 16 (The Conversation) Australian workers are secretly using generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) tools – without knowledge or approval from their boss, a new report shows. The 'Our Gen AI Transition: Implications for Work and Skills' report from the federal government's Jobs and Skills Australia points to several studies, showing between 21 per cent and 27 per cent of workers (particularly in white collar industries) use AI behind their manager's back. Why do some people still hide it? The report says people commonly said they: -'feel that using AI is cheating' -have a 'fear of being seen as lazy' -and a 'fear of being seen as less competent'. What's most striking is that this rise in unapproved 'shadow use' of AI is happening even as the federal treasurer and Productivity Commission urge Australians to make the most of AI. The new report results highlight gaps in how we govern AI use at work, leaving workers and employers in the dark about the right thing to do. As I've seen in my work – both as a legal researcher looking at AI governance and as a practising lawyer – there are some jobs where the rules for using AI at work change as soon as you cross a state border within Australia. Risks and benefits of AI 'shadow use' The 124-page Jobs and Skills Australia report covers many issues, including early and uneven adoption of AI, how AI could help in future work and how it could affect job availability. Among its most interesting findings was that workers using AI in secret, which is not always a bad thing. The report found those using AI in the shadows are sometimes hidden leaders, 'driving bottom-up innovation in some sectors'. However, it also comes with serious risks. "Worker-led 'shadow use' is an important part of adoption to date. A significant portion of employees are using Gen AI tools independently, often without employer oversight, indicating grassroots enthusiasm but also raising governance and risk concerns." The report recommends harnessing this early adoption and experimentation, but warns: "In the absence of clear governance, shadow use may proliferate. This informal experimentation, while a source of innovation, can also fragment practices that are hard to scale or integrate later. It also increases risks around data security, accountability and compliance, and inconsistent outcomes." Real-world risks from AI failures The report calls for national stewardship of Australia's Gen AI transition through a coordinated national framework, centralised capability, and a whole-of-population boost in digital and AI skills. This mirrors my research, showing Australia's AI legal framework has blind spots, and our systems of knowledge, from law to legal reporting, need a fundamental rethink. Even in some professions where clearer rules have emerged, too often it's come after serious failures. In Victoria, a child protection worker entered sensitive details into ChatGPT about a court case concerning sexual offences against a young child. The Victorian information commissioner has banned the state's child protection staff from using AI tools until November 2026. Lawyers have also been found to misuse AI, from the United States and the United Kingdom to Australia. Yet another example – involving misleading information created by AI for a Melbourne murder case – was reported just yesterday. But even for lawyers, the rules are patchy and differ from state to state. (The Federal Court is among those still developing its rules.) For example, a lawyer in New South Wales is now clearly not allowed to use AI to generate the content of an affidavit, including 'altering, embellishing, strengthening, diluting or rephrasing a deponent's evidence'. However, no other state or territory has adopted this position as clearly. Clearer rules at work and as a nation Right now, using AI at work lies in a governance grey zone. Most organisations are running without clear policies, risk assessments or legal safeguards. Even if everyone's doing it, the first one caught will face the consequences. In my view, national uniform legislation for AI would be preferable. After all, the AI technology we're using is the same, whether you're in New South Wales or the Northern Territory – and AI knows no physical borders. But that's not looking likely yet. If employers don't want workers using AI in secret, what can they do? If there are obvious risks, start by giving workers clearer policies and training. One example is what the legal profession is doing now (in some states) to give clear, written guidance. While it's not perfect, it's a step in the right direction. But it's still arguably not good enough, especially because the rules aren't the same nationally. We need more proactive national AI governance – with clearer policies, training, ethical guidelines, a risk-based approach and compliance monitoring – to clarify the position for both workers and employers. Without a national AI governance policy, employers are being left to navigate a fragmented and inconsistent regulatory minefield, courting breaches at every turn. Meanwhile, the very workers who could be at the forefront of our AI transformation may be driven to use AI in secret, fearing they will be judged as lazy cheats. (The Conversation) SKS GRS GRS
United News of India
10 hours ago
- United News of India
Accenture set to acquire CyberCX in a strategic push towards cybersecurity
New Delhi, Aug 16 (UNI) Accenture announced its plans to acquire a cybersecurity services provider CyberCX. This organization focuses on serving the customers of Australia and New Zealand. The acquisition move made by Accenture is its largest cybersecurity acquisition and is intended to boost the company's tech capabilities in the Asia Pacific. Moreover, the collaboration will also drive Accenture's abilities to build business resilience, protect critical infrastructure, and focus on enterprise reinvention. Paolo Dal Cin, global head, Accenture Cybersecurity, said, ' CyberCX and Accenture share a mission to harness the power of cyber to help our clients securely navigate change, accelerate business reinvention and build resilience against evolving threats.' ' By combining Accenture's agentic AI capabilities with CyberCX's strong market leadership, innovative offerings, and trusted C-suite and government relationships, we will enable clients across Asia Pacific to transform cybersecurity into a strategic advantage,' Cin added. Accenture's acquisition move is also bit strategic as its own 'State of Cybersecurity Resilience 2025' report cited that Australian organizations are future ready to adopt the change that will happen with AI. John Paitaridis, CEO of CyberCX, said, 'We are immensely proud of the business we have built, becoming one of the leading providers of cybersecurity services in the region. Joining Accenture's global cybersecurity organization enables our exceptional people to combine forces with global capabilities and provide world-leading cybersecurity services to an even greater number of clients across Asia Pacific as we accelerate our growth in the region.' UNI SAS PRS
