logo
Defence industry debanking crisis puts national security ‘at risk'

Defence industry debanking crisis puts national security ‘at risk'

Telegraph19 hours ago

British defence companies vital to national security claim they are being debanked because high street lenders see them as a threat to their reputations.
In an alarming report about the financial challenges facing UK-based manufacturers, nearly three quarters surveyed said they had experienced 'issues' accessing basic banking services as major lenders become wary of taking on clients involved in arms.
Companies said these issues included being barred from obtaining insurance, taking out loans and opening a bank account – which stops employers paying staff or suppliers.
One business owner quoted in the report, which was carried out by the ADS – the trade body representing more than 1,500 small defence companies – said their bank account was shut down after being told they did not meet the bank's 'terms and conditions'.
The report will raise fresh questions over the Government's push for Britain to become 'battle ready' as it prepares to counter growing threats from countries such as Russia.
Earlier this month, the strategic defence review said that Britain must be ready to once again 'fight and win' a full-scale war by rearming and upgrading its equipment.
But according to the ADS, the companies that will be instrumental in achieving this objective are facing financial barriers so severe they 'risk going under'.
Small defence manufacturers produce the vital parts used in military hardware, from the tiny components used in tanks to artillery cases.
Of 200 owners surveyed by the ADS, 72 per cent reported issues accessing banking services.
One owner quoted in the report said: 'Our bank account was actually forced to be closed and the only explanation they could offer was that they didn't meet our terms and conditions.'
The report said banks' reputational concerns have been a 'key driving factor' in a more hesitant approach in providing their services to defence firms.
Some banks, the report claims, described being lobbied not to support the defence sector, while others referenced pro-Palestinian protests targeting high street branches with perceived links to the Israel-Hamas war.
Last June, activists from Palestine Action attacked up to 20 Barclays bank branches across the UK by throwing red paint and smashing windows as part of their demand that the bank divest from 'Israel's weapons trade'.
One owner of a small defence company, quoted in the report, said: 'The financial sector has completely decimated the defence industry, they'd rather have an account with the local car-wash than a firearms dealer or somebody in the defence industry.'
Santander and Lloyds closed 300 accounts belonging to 'public administration and defence' companies last year alone, according to correspondence with MPs on the Treasury select committee.
Luke Charters, a Labour MP and chairman of the all-party parliamentary group on financial technology, told The Telegraph: 'As war rages on our continent and Russia continues to mobilise their wartime economy at pace, we have to ensure the [small defence companies] who will keep us safe aren't being blocked from banking access.
'Our sovereign defence financing capability is not only a matter of national security; but an absolute necessity at this moment in time. We cannot risk it being undermined by historical red tape, that has persisted for far too long.'
A spokesman for the ADS said: 'The scale of the issue with regard to smaller businesses accessing financial services is increasing in magnitude – and without appropriate options, smaller businesses risk their ability to deliver on their full potential.
'The long-term effect of this is that exciting businesses – that deliver the capability responsible for protecting our national security – risk going under, or are unable to deliver the pace, scale and innovation that our increasingly unstable environment requires.'
An interviewee for the report, described as a 'financial stakeholder', said: 'People chucking bricks at windows, ATMs, chucking paint at staff. It's horrible.
'Banks do take threats to their staff seriously and that is difficult. It doesn't get directed at the defence industry, or maybe it does, but banks are more visible. They've got this high-profile, high-street presence that people can target.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Homes at former police station in Cleethorpes approved
Homes at former police station in Cleethorpes approved

BBC News

time26 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Homes at former police station in Cleethorpes approved

Plans to build 21 homes at a former police station in Cleethorpes, despite flood risk concerns, have been Bannister of Land Developers (Lincs) Ltd proposes to convert the former station in Princes Road into 10 flats. Eleven houses would also be built on the former car East Lincolnshire Council officers had recommended refusal after an objection from the Environment Agency on tidal flood risk councillors approved it by 5-2 votes, on the grounds of regeneration of a brownfield site and that sufficient attempts had been made to come to a resolution over flood risk. The Prince's Road site in Cleethorpes was sold off after Humberside Police moved out in 2020 after almost 90 to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, Anglian Water were also concerned about the proposals due to surface water run-off and the levels of some floors being below anticipated flood Hayden Dawkins questioned the major flood risk given the Princes Road side was on a hill."It's a typical situation where the Environment Agency goes against every development in Grimsby and Cleethorpes because we're in a flood zone," he said. Residents also raised concerns, with over a hundred people signing a petition against the Helen Lanfranchi said water "frequently pools" in the former police station's car said in the summer of 2021 most of it was covered by water."It remained for over three months with an infestation of flies with, understandably, a horrendous smell."The police and fire services said the empty site had attracted anti-social behaviour and the building had been broken into Police and Crime Commissioner Jonathan Evison said approval would generate money for the police that would be reinvested back into the Grimsby Evison said: "I really worry that if we don't get this through, what does that say to all the other developers in the area?" Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.

More jets does not mean UK ‘at war' says Reeves, amid Israel-Iran conflict
More jets does not mean UK ‘at war' says Reeves, amid Israel-Iran conflict

The Independent

time40 minutes ago

  • The Independent

More jets does not mean UK ‘at war' says Reeves, amid Israel-Iran conflict

Sending more jets to the Middle East 'does not mean' that the UK is at war, Rachel Reeves has said, as she warned of rising oil and gas prices amid the conflict between Israel and Iran. The Chancellor also indicated that the UK could 'potentially' support Israel, but declined to comment on 'what might happen in the future'. The two nations continued to exchange fire overnight, as the region braced for a protracted conflict. Sir Keir Starmer confirmed on Saturday that more RAF planes are being deployed, amid the escalating hostilities between Israel and Iran. Additional refuelling aircraft have been deployed from UK bases and more fast Typhoon jets will be sent over, it is understood. Asked whether the announcement from the Prime Minister means the UK is at war, Ms Reeves told Sky News: 'No, it does not mean that we are at war. 'And we have not been involved in these strikes or this conflict, but we do have important assets in the region and it is right that we send jets to protect them and that's what we've done. 'It's a precautionary move.' Oil prices surged surged on Friday after Israel's initial strikes against Iran's nuclear programme, sparking fears of increasing prices in the UK. The Chancellor told the BBC that there is 'no complacency' from the Treasury on the issue and 'we're obviously, monitoring this very closely as a government'. Sir Keir has declined to rule out the possibility of intervening in the conflict entirely, and the Chancellor indicated on Sunday that the UK could 'potentially' support Israel in the future. Britain last announced it had deployed fighter jets in the region in last year, when the Government said British aircraft had played a part in efforts to prevent further escalation. Asked whether the UK would come to Israel's aid if asked, the Chancellor told Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips: 'We have, in the past, supported Israel when there have been missiles coming in. 'I'm not going to comment on what might happen in the future, but so far, we haven't been involved, and we're sending in assets to both protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies.' Pushed again on whether the UK would deploy assets in support of Israel if asked, she said: 'What we've done in the past (…) is help protect Israel from incoming strikes. 'So a defensive activity.' She added: 'I'm not going to rule anything out at this stage (…) it's a fast moving situation, a very volatile situation.' It comes after Iranian state media said Tehran had warned it would target US, UK and French bases in the region if the countries help Israel thwart Iran's strikes, according to reports on Saturday. Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride has backed the Government's decision to send further RAF jets to the region, telling the BBC it is the 'right thing' to do. He told the BBC: 'We've got assets out there in the UAE, Oman, Cyprus, they need to be protected given that Iran has suggested they may be under threat.'

Britain's finance minister signals possible support for Israel in Iran conflict
Britain's finance minister signals possible support for Israel in Iran conflict

Reuters

time41 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Britain's finance minister signals possible support for Israel in Iran conflict

LONDON, June 15 (Reuters) - Britain could potentially support Israel in its conflict with Iran, but the decision to send additional military jets to the Middle East was made mainly to protect British bases and personnel, British finance minister Rachel Reeves said on Sunday. Israel and Iran launched fresh attacks on each other overnight into Sunday. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the attacks by Israel so far were nothing compared with what Iran would see in the coming days. Speaking to Sky News, Reeves called for a de-escalation in the conflict and said the decision to send additional jets to the region was a "precautionary move". Asked if Britain would come to Israel's aid if asked, Reeves said: "We have, in the past, supported Israel when there have been missiles coming in." She added: "We're sending in assets to both protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies." Britain was involved last year in protecting Israel from missile attacks from Iran. In April, British planes shot down Iranian drones heading for Israel and in October it said two of its fighter jets and an air-to-air refuelling tanker were involved in trying to intercept Iranian missiles. The jets did not engage any targets.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store