3 Estate Planning Moves To Make To Protect Your Wealth as Recession Looms
Find Out:
Read Next:
Whether or not a recession hits remains to be seen, but it's always best to be prepared for the worst — especially when it comes to your plans for passing down wealth. Here are the estate planning moves you should consider making to protect your wealth and take advantage of a potential market downturn.
When asset values drop, you can gift more within the annual tax-free limit.
'Gifting assets to heirs is especially advantageous during a market sell-off,' said Leslie Thompson, CIO and co-founder of Spectrum Wealth Management. 'Lower valuations allow individuals to transfer more shares while staying within the annual gift tax exclusion, which is set at $19,000 per recipient in 2025, or using less of their lifetime exemption. This allows heirs to benefit from future appreciation outside of the donor's taxable estate and reduce possible future estate taxes.'
Consider using tools like grantor retained annuity trusts (GRATs) and donor-advised fund (DAFs), which can be very effective in volatile markets.
Learn More:
Lower account values mean lower taxes on Roth conversions.
'Roth conversions provide another valuable strategy when markets are down,' Thompson said. 'Converting pretax retirement funds to a Roth IRA results in lower taxable income, since taxes are based on the asset's value at the time of conversion. Once converted, the assets grow tax-free and can take full advantage of market recovery.'
Estate freeze techniques can be used for tax savings during economic downturns.
'Estate freeze techniques such as grantor retained annuity trusts or intentionally defective grantor trusts shift future appreciation to heirs while minimizing taxable values at the time of transfer,' Thompson said. 'This results in lower gift tax implications at the time of the gift and shifting future growth outside of the donor's estate, helping preserve wealth across generations.'
More From GOBankingRates
5 Types of Vehicles Retirees Should Stay Away From Buying
The New Retirement Problem Boomers Are Facing
4 Things You Should Do if You Want To Retire Early
8 Common Mistakes Retirees Make With Their Social Security Checks
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: 3 Estate Planning Moves To Make To Protect Your Wealth as Recession Looms
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
30 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump's ‘big beautiful bill' makes Roth conversions more complicated — here's what to know
If you're eyeing a Roth conversion, President Donald Trump's "big beautiful bill" could make the strategy more complicated, according to financial experts. Roth conversions transfer pretax or nondeductible individual retirement account funds to a Roth IRA, which starts future tax-free growth. The trade-off is paying regular income taxes on the converted balance. Trump's new tax cuts could make Roth conversions more appealing for some investors, experts say. But incurring too much income could impact eligibility for certain tax breaks. More from Personal Finance:What to do with RMDs when you don't need the moneySocial Security COLA may be 2.7% in 2026: estimatesOlder student loan borrowers face high delinquency rates When weighing Roth conversions, you need to know the multi-year state and federal tax impact, said Judy Brown, a certified financial planner who works at SC&H Group in the Washington, D.C., and Baltimore area. For example, if you're nearing Medicare age or already enrolled, boosting your earnings could increase income-related monthly adjustment amounts, or IRMAA, for Medicare Part B and Part D premiums. The strategy is "looking at a lot of different pieces, and figuring out the optimal place for each client," said Brown, who is also a certified public accountant. Roth conversions have always been about "tax bracket management," said CFP Patrick Huey, owner of Victory Independent Planning in Portland, Oregon. When making Roth conversions, advisors typically incur enough regular income to "fill up the lowest brackets," he said. Your federal brackets are based on each part of your "taxable income," which you calculate by subtracting the greater of the standard or itemized deductions from your adjusted gross income. Before Trump enacted the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, lower federal income tax brackets were scheduled to sunset after 2025, which would have made converted balances more expensive. Trump's legislation made the lower tax rates permanent, but several new tax breaks — deductions for older Americans, tipped workers and consumers with overtime pay and car loan interest — are temporary with varying earnings limits. These tax breaks, which are available from 2025 through 2028, could offer more room for Roth conversions before hitting the next tax bracket, experts say. Once these cuts expire, you could be "paying more for the exact same Roth conversion," said CFP Ashton Lawrence at Mariner Wealth Advisors in Greenville, South Carolina. While Trump's new tax cuts could make more space in the lower tax brackets, higher income from Roth conversions can impact eligibility, experts say. For example, the additional $6,000 deduction for older Americans starts to phase out, or get smaller, once modified adjusted gross income exceeds $75,000 for single filers or $150,000 for married couples filing jointly. It probably still makes sense to convert funds at 22% or 24% tax rates now — and skip the $6,000 deduction — to avoid the 30% brackets for large pre-tax required withdrawals later, Brown said. Most retirees must take required minimum distributions, or RMDs, from pretax retirement accounts starting at age 73 or face an IRS penalty.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's What Is Changing With Social Security in 2025
Sixty-nine million Americans rely on social security checks, and that number is only going up. CNBC's senior personal finance correspondent Sharon Epperson joins TODAY to break down what to know about the guaranteed income and what's changing this year. Solve the daily Crossword
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
On Social Security's 90th Birthday, A New Idea To Solve Its Shortfall
Since it was signed into law 90 years ago today, Social Security has become the most successful antipoverty program in American history and the foundation upon which most Americans plan their retirement. But changing demographics and policy mistakes have weakened that foundation and put the program on track for a crisis before the end of the next president's term. Policymakers must act quickly to strengthen the program without imposing an unfair burden on vulnerable seniors or working Americans. At its conception, Social Security was designed to be an 'earned benefit' — workers pay a dedicated payroll tax on wages up to a certain level, and once these workers reach retirement age, they receive benefits to replace some fraction of the wages upon which they were taxed. But in practice, funds paid in by today's workers are used to pay the benefits due to today's retirees. And every year since 2010, the program has spent more on benefits than it raised in dedicated revenue because the ratio of workers to retirees is worsening as our population ages. Unfortunately, today's policymakers have only compounded the problem. Last year, bipartisan majorities in Congress voted overwhelmingly to give higher-income retirees already receiving public pensions the opportunity to draw more generous benefits. And earlier this year, Republicans siphoned off a portion of the program's revenue stream in their 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' Social Security's trust-fund system allows it to temporarily run deficits commensurate with the savings generated by past surpluses. But before the end of 2032, the bigger of Social Security's two trust funds is projected to be depleted, and benefits for retirees will be automatically cut by 24% to match the program's incoming revenues if no action is taken. The prospect of such a steep and sudden benefit cut makes it difficult for current workers to plan for retirement and risks throwing vulnerable seniors into poverty. But simply continuing to fund scheduled benefits without any changes, whether by raising payroll taxes or by borrowing money to finance Social Security's growing deficits, would impose an unfair burden on working Americans to solve a problem created by previous generations. Many people, particularly on the left, believe the simple solution is to just have the rich pay more in taxes or means-test their benefits. But it is virtually impossible to do this under a system in which benefits are based on a beneficiary's lifetime earnings without fundamentally eroding Social Security's premise as an earned benefit. That's why my team at the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) recently proposed an ambitious package of policy changes built around an innovative new concept: awarding benefits based on how many years someone works rather than how much they earned throughout their career. This approach would prevent the perversity of raising taxes on working Americans to give bigger benefits to the highest-earning retirees while preserving Social Security's status as a benefit that people earn through work. Because this change alone is not enough to ensure long-term sustainability, we also advocate for a gradual increase in the retirement age to reflect rising life expectancies. Additionally, we propose reforming cost-of-living adjustments so they no longer overstate the effects of inflation. But we would preserve a special early retirement option for lower-income workers who haven't benefited from increased longevity, and bolster benefits for widow(er)s and older beneficiaries most at risk of outliving their savings. While top earners would see modest benefit reductions about on par with those already projected to occur under current law, most retirees would be shielded from any reductions to their monthly benefits. In fact, many low-income or long-career workers would actually receive greater benefits than they currently do, ensuring that those who have contributed most diligently are rewarded for their efforts. Altogether, independent modeling showed that PPI's benefit reforms would close roughly half of Social Security's shortfall over the next 30 years while reducing elderly poverty. Under the current system, in which benefits are based on a worker's contributions, the only coherent way to raise the revenue needed to close the remaining gap would be by increasing the payroll tax. But today's payroll tax rate is already more than seven times what it was when Social Security was created, making it an increasingly regressive tax on workers' wages. By transitioning to a system based on years worked, we make it practical to close Social Security's shortfall using progressive income tax changes and broader-based consumption taxes that spread the responsibility for fixing our nation's fiscal challenges fairly among all Americans. These proposals offer a robust framework for radically pragmatic Social Security reform. But the longer policymakers wait to enact this plan or any other, the more painful solutions will become. Now is the time to address Social Security's shortfall in a thoughtful way that is fair to working Americans and retirees alike.
