Telangana HC clears woman to donate liver to father without husband's consent
The court was hearing a writ petition filed by the woman, who expressed her willingness to donate part of her liver. However, the hospital had refused to proceed without prior consent from her husband, despite the couple being estranged. The petitioner argued that her husband was deliberately withholding consent due to ongoing marital discord, putting her father's life at risk.
Senior counsel Prabhaker Sripada, appearing for the petitioner, argued that there was no legal requirement under the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act to obtain spousal consent for such a donation. He contended that the hospital's insistence was arbitrary and lacked legal backing.
Justice Sarath agreed with the petitioner's arguments and issued an interim order suspending the hospital's demand for the husband's consent.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 hours ago
- Time of India
‘Maintain senior residency counselling seats'
1 2 Jaipur: The Rajasthan High Court has directed the state govt to maintain the current number of available seats in the ongoing counselling process for senior residency at govt hospitals in Rajasthan. It has also asked key officials of the medical education department to appear before the court to respond to allegations of arbitrariness in the seat allotment. The directions came during a hearing on July 30 after a group of post-graduate medical students from the 2021 batch challenged the counselling and seat allotment process, claiming it violated merit and fairness. The bench of Justice Sameer Jain ordered the chairman of the counselling board for senior residents to be present in court. It also directed the secretary of the medical education department to attend the next hearing either in person or through video conferencing. The court emphasised that any further delay could cause irreparable harm to the petitioners and dilute their career prospects. One of the counsels for the petitioners, Purvi Mathur, said the core issue in this case revolves around the discriminatory treatment faced by postgraduate medical students from the 2021 batch who pursued PG in Rajasthan and were out of state. These students, including the petitioners, completed their MD/MS degrees from govt colleges after signing a bond to serve the state for two years or pay a Rs 10 lakh penalty. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like New Container Houses Indonesia (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search Ads Search Now Undo After their results, the state issued a single round of counselling for allotment to Senior Resident (SR) posts—a mandatory step for career progression. However, unlike previous batches, the 2021 batch was neither given multiple counselling rounds nor considered for leftover vacancies, which were instead filled through walk-in interviews and lateral entry via the principal's pool. The state explicitly barred the 2021 batch from participating in these later processes, denying them further opportunities for seat allotment or upgradation, and leaving many eligible candidates without senior residency postings at govt hospitals. The petitioners argued this violates the principles of parity, legitimate expectation, and equality. They also contend that the state's arbitrary policy change lacks transparency and fairness and imposes undue hardship on candidates contractually bound to serve. They are seeking judicial intervention to restore their right to fair and equal opportunity in public employment. They claimed the instruction booklet issued by the govt explicitly prohibited changes once allotments were made, yet the process was allegedly being manipulated. The high court has listed the matter for further hearing on Aug 1 and directed the concerned officials to furnish complete records related to the counselling and allotment process.
Hindustan Times
a day ago
- Hindustan Times
SC lifts HC stay, paves way for admission process to restart in MP's paramedical courses
New Delhi, The Supreme Court on Friday paved the way for restarting the admission process in paramedical courses for the academic years 2023–24 and 2024–25 in Madhya Pradesh. SC lifts HC stay, paves way for admission process to restart in MP's paramedical courses On July 16, a division bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur stayed the ongoing recognition and admission process for paramedical courses for 2023–24 and 2024–25 by taking note of a plea filed by the law students' association. The MP High Court had stayed the admission process in paramedical courses after taking note of a plea filed by the law students' association. A top court bench comprising Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran was apprised by senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the registrar of Madhya Pradesh Paramedical Council, that such a drastic order was passed by the high court on a petition filed by some law students having no locus in the matter. The senior lawyer referred to COVID-19 pandemic and said that certain paramedical courses in the states could not begin on time due to the pandemic. He said the registrar of the Paramedical Council grants recognition to institutions and regulates the admission process and the impugned order of the high court has brought everything to a standstill. "How can law students file such a petition?" the CJI asked, and stayed the high court order. The CJI also issued notices to the state government and others on the plea of the Paramedical Council. The high court stay order came following a move to permit 166 paramedical institutions to begin courses for the 2023–24 academic year, despite granting recognition to these institutions only in 2025. The high court found the timeline "illogical" and questioned how institutions could start academic sessions for 2023–24 in the year 2025 when they did not even exist at the time the courses were supposed to commence. It examined the order of July 14 of the Paramedical Council granting permission to 166 institutions to offer courses for 2023–24. However, the high court pointed out that the courses were originally scheduled to run from November 2023 to October 2024 and that the last date for institutions to apply for recognition was December 31, 2023. The bench expressed strong disapproval of the retrospective recognition, stating, "It belies all logic, sensibility and questions the sanity of a reasonable man how these institutions could be allowed to start the course for the year 2023-24 in the year 2025." This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
IAF aspirant gets 2nd chance as high court flags hypertension diagnosis flaw
Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana high court has ordered a fresh medical examination for an Indian Air Force (IAF) aspirant rejected five years ago for an airman's post due to alleged hypertension. The court criticised the central govt's failure to adhere to proper medical jurisprudence in labeling a variance in blood pressure as a confirmed ailment. "The basic medical jurisprudence for reporting a spiked-up blood pressure to be a case of hypertension has not been referred to… In the absence of such clarity, especially in light of contradictory medical opinions, fairness demanded a re-examination," the HC observed while ordering the re-examination. In its order, released on Wednesday, the HC ordered the petitioner to appear before the Command Hospital, Chandimandir, on Sept 2 or on a suitably fixed date for determining whether the petitioner fulfils the medical conditions prescribed for induction in the IAF. Justice Vinod S Bhardwaj passed these orders while allowing a petition filed by Deepak, a resident of Bhiwani district in Haryana. In Sept 2020, for the posts of Airmen Group 'X' (Technical) for intake 1/2021 for the recruitment rally to be conducted in Ambala, the petitioner qualified for all the examinations but was declared medically unfit by the Appeal Medical Board, referring to cardiovascular system hypertension. He was, however, cleared by the appeal board of other alleged conditions like substandard vision and overweight status, but his recruitment was terminated due to the purported diagnosis of high blood pressure. The petitioner challenged the decision based on three subsequent independent medical evaluations conducted at Civil Hospital, Bhiwani, PGIMS, Rohtak, and a private practitioner. All of them concluded that he was not hypertensive. The Centre's counsel argued that the recruitment process was concluded and that Deepak had no accrued right to an appointment, suggesting fresh consideration could only occur under the Agnipath scheme. They maintained his blood pressure was "on the higher side and beyond permissible limits" during the initial examination. However, the court pressed the central govt's counsel to specify the medical jurisprudence required to label blood pressure variance as hypertension, a question for which no relevant medical literature or practice could be provided. Consequently, the high court has directed Deepak to appear before Command Hospital, Chandimandir on Sept 2, or a mutually fixed date, to determine his medical fitness for induction into the IAF. The bench made it clear that both parties must abide by the re-examination's medical report. Should Deepak be found medically fit, he will be permitted to join the IAF with all consequential benefits. MSID:: 123018647 413 |
