Florida lawmakers put in their two-cents worth, rejecting Trump's Bitcoin scheme
When Trump issued an executive order in March that created a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, he called the volatile cryptocurrency 'digital gold' and draped it in a lot of hyperbolic rhetoric that guaranteed short-term gains for existing investors.
'The United States Government currently holds a significant amount of BTC, (bitcoin), but has not implemented a policy to maximize BTC's strategic position as a unique store of value in the global financial system,' the executive order read.
'Just as it is in our country's interest to thoughtfully manage national ownership and control of any other resource, our Nation must harness, not limit, the power of digital assets for our prosperity.'
And like magic, Trump-susceptible legislatures around the country began pushing bills that called for state funds to invest in Bitcoin.
That effort in the Florida House of Representatives was led by Rep. Webster Barnaby, R-Deland, who authored a bill that would allow the state to invest up to 10 percent of the money in the state's retirement trust fund, general fund, and other funds in Bitcoin.
Speaking to the House Insurance and Banking Subcommittee last month, Barnaby told members to put aside their fears of cryptocurrency and put their faith in Trump.
'It is a new day. This is a new rising. We are embarking on the golden age of the United States of America,' Barnaby said.
'We are doing something that is consequential, representatives. While we cannot tangibly see, we have to trust … I've done my research and I can tell you wholeheartedly that I believe in the president of the United States.'
(That sound you hear in the back of your head is the faint bleating of a lamb.)
Clearly, the man's not a Trump University graduate.
Letter: Does Trump see Harvard as his next Trump University?
As for research, I would start with noting that Trump disbanded the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team while he relentlessly marketed his own $TRUMP memecoin and his sons Don Jr. and Eric got into the Bitcoin mining business.
Looks like 'the golden age' is off to a grifting start.
Lucky for us, the sales pitch to make Florida the first state to jump on the Trump Bitcoin bandwagon and put the state's pension fund at risk gave lawmakers some pause.
'The second one of these blockchain technologies gets hacked, the value of that coin goes to zero pretty quick,' said Rep. Kevin Steele, R-Hudson. 'That would be the only fear I have in investing in something like that.
'I'm a tangible person,' Steele continued. 'A coin I can't touch, feel or see is not tangible. It's 'vaporware,' so to speak.'
State Rep. Mike Caruso, R-West Palm Beach, thought that giving the state's Chief Financial Officer the ability to invest 10 percent of state funds in a cryptocurrency was too risky.
'Do you think it's wise to invest up to 10 percent of our entire portfolio in any one item, whether it's Bitcoin or Tesla stock?' he asked.
State Rep. Adam Anderson, R-Palm Harbor, a wealth manager by trade, said he didn't know why the state should single out just Bitcoin when there are many other forms of cryptocurrency that could be purchased.
He also said that this was an investment option that was still 'in its infancy.' And that should give us pause.
'There are new concerns when we're adding a new asset class,' he told his colleagues. 'One of them, significantly, is the volatility.'
State Rep. Yvonne Hayes Hinson, D-Gainesville, 65, said she learned from her children and grandchildren that 'there's a whole new world out there in this digital stuff.'
Opinion: Will Florida follow behind Texas with litter box legislation for public schools?
But she worried about giving Florida's Chief Financial Officer, a job that's now vacant, the power to take real money out of state funds to invest in something so hard to imagine.
'My generation don't understand it if it's not money,' she said.
In the end, Florida lawmakers took a pass on succumbing to Trump's Bitcoin push. And the state wasn't alone.
Similar legislative efforts in Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Pennsylvania and Oklahoma failed to adopt Bitcoin reserves in those states too.
And in Arizona, the state's Democratic governor, Katie Hobbs, vetoed a Bitcoin bill last week that had been passed by the Republican-led legislature there.
'The Arizona State Retirement System is one of the strongest in the nation because it makes sound and informed investments,' Hobbs wrote in her veto letter.
'Arizonans' retirement funds are not the place for the state to try untested investments like virtual currencу.'
And neither is Florida's. At least for now.
So, let's salute our state lawmakers for having enough sense this time to resist being conned by their greedy hero.
Frank Cerabino is a news columnist with The Palm Beach Post, which is part of the USA Today Network-Florida. He can be reached at FCerabino@pbpost.com.
This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Trump couldn't get Florida its own Bitcoin reserve. Good | Opinion
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pete Buttigieg Has A Name For What Trump Does When He's Desperate, And It's Spot On
Donald Trump's efforts to shift the nation's conversations away from files concerning the crimes of convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein don't seem to be working. Instead, Trump's base has begun turning on him over his administration's flip-flopping about whether an Epstein "client list" does or does not exist... Related: And they're burning their hats to be heard. Twitter: @krassenstein Amid the backlash, Trump used this time to bolster the unsupported claims of National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard, who says she has evidence of an 'Obama Administration Conspiracy to Subvert Trump's 2016 Victory and Presidency.' (The Obama administration has denied this, and former CIA director John Brennan told NBC News, 'There is no factual basis for the allegations that Tulsi Gabbard is making.") But, of course, that didn't stop Trump from sharing a fake, AI-generated video of Obama being arrested on his Truth Social account. Related: Well, when asked about the chaos during his appearance on The Breakfast Club, former secretary of transportation Pete Buttigieg called Trump's actions exactly as he saw them. "So, Trump says, 'We're going to release the files, we're going to release the files, we're going to release the files.' And then he says, 'We're not going to release the files,'" Buttigieg told hosts. Related: "And people are mad, including MAGA, saying, 'Wait a minute, you said you were going to release this information and you're not.'" "And what does he do?" Buttigieg posed. "He's like, 'Uh, we're going to arrest Obama.'" As hosts laugh, Buttigieg concludes, "That has nothing to do with anything," before adding a term for Trump's behavior anytime he's cornered, "It's the distraction machine." Related: Viewers appear to resonate with the interview as a whole, which you can watch in full here. What are your thoughts on his take? Let us know in the comments. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Poll: Americans think Paramount is canceling 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' because of politics — and they don't approve
More favor (46%) than oppose (31%) "late-night talk show hosts getting involved in politics by speaking out on political issues." More Americans disapprove (40%) than approve (33%) of Paramount's controversial decision earlier this month to cancel CBS's long-running late-night program with host Stephen Colbert, according to a new Yahoo/YouGov poll. And while CBS has claimed the decision was 'purely … financial' — adding that it was 'not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount' — more Americans believe that politics rather than money was the real reason behind it. The survey of 1,729 U.S. adults was conducted in the immediate aftermath of Paramount's Late Show announcement, from July 24 to July 28 — a period that coincided with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) finally agreeing to sign off on the company's proposed $8 billion mega-merger with the Hollywood studio Skydance. Colbert is a sharp critic of President Trump, and skeptics have accused Paramount of canceling the Late Show not because late-night talk shows are losing money but because the company wanted to appease the Trump administration and get its Skydance deal over the line. Last October, Trump sued Paramount for the way CBS's 60 Minutes program edited an interview with his Democratic rival, Kamala Harris — and earlier this month, Paramount decided to settle with Trump and pay $16 million to his future presidential library, even though several legal experts said the case was frivolous. Colbert — who is scheduled to keep hosting the Late Show until it goes dark next May — mocked the settlement on-air, calling it a 'big fat bribe.' 'As someone who has always been a proud employee of this network, I'm offended, and I don't know if anything will ever repair my trust in this company,' Colbert told his audience. 'But just taking a stab at it, I'd say $16 million would help.' The new Yahoo/YouGov poll shows that more Americans agree with Colbert's theory of why his show was canceled than agree with other, more 'purely financial' explanations. When asked why CBS and Paramount are canceling the Late Show — and instructed to select all the reasons that apply — the share who select 'Paramount is trying to curry favor with the Trump administration' (37%) and 'Stephen Colbert is too critical of Donald Trump' (36%) is greater than the share who select 'the Late Show is losing money (32%), 'the Late Show is losing viewers' (30%) and 'the late-night format is losing relevance' (26%). Partisan preferences are clearly playing a role in the reaction to the Late Show's demise. Far more Americans think Colbert is liberal (53%) than think he's moderate (10%) or conservative (3%), and Democrats (72%) are six times more likely to disapprove of the decision than Republicans (12%). Still, there is no consensus that Colbert has gone overboard politically. In fact, more Americans (35%) say he is "about right" politically than say he's "too political" (28%). And more also favor (46%) than oppose (31%) "late-night talk show hosts getting involved in politics by speaking out on political issues." That might help explain why a majority of Americans still say they watch Colbert's content — either 'always' (5%), 'occasionally' (21%) or when they 'see clips online' (27%). The rest (47%) say they never watch Colbert. Finally, when Americans are asked to select up to three of their favorite late-night talk show hosts, Colbert (25%) ties Jimmy Fallon (25%) for first place, with Jimmy Kimmel (22%), Jon Stewart (19%), John Oliver (11%) Seth Meyers (7%), Bill Maher (7%), Andy Cohen (3%) and Taylor Tomlinson (2%) trailing behind them. __________________ The Yahoo survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,729 U.S. adults interviewed online from July 24 to 28, 2025. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2024 election turnout and presidential vote, party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Party identification is weighted to the estimated distribution at the time of the election (31% Democratic, 32% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 3.1%. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Marjorie Taylor Greene Is Now The First GOP Member Of Congress To Call The Crisis In Gaza A "Genocide"
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) became the first congressional Republican to label the worsening humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip a 'genocide' on Monday, after President Donald Trump acknowledged that Palestinians are starving. Greene's comment came within a larger criticism of a colleague, Rep. Randy Fine (R-Fla.), who spoke approvingly of the deteriorating situation in Gaza. Related: 'Release the hostages. Until then, starve away,' Fine wrote on social media last week, adding that he considers the increasing evidence of widespread famine in the region to be 'a lie.' Even Trump was moved to say there is 'real starvation' occurring in Gaza as a result of Israel's nearly two-year war in retaliation for the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on civilians that was instigated by fighters from the Palestinian militant group Hamas, who took hostages back to Gaza. 'It's the most truthful and easiest thing to say that Oct 7th in Israel was horrific and all hostages must be returned, but so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza,' Greene wrote on X, formerly Twitter. Related: 'But a Jewish U.S. Representative calling for the continued starvation of innocent people and children is disgraceful,' she said. 'His awful statement will actually cause more antisemitism.' Greene has also fueled antisemitic tropes in the past, most notably in a now-deleted 2018 Facebook post that suggested a link between the wealthy Jewish Rothschild family and wildfires in California — prompting ridicule for what her critics called her 'Jewish space lasers' theory. Her choice of words, however, makes her unique among congressional Republicans. Trump said during his visit to Scotland on Monday that he had been disturbed by images and reporting he had seen on television of the worsening situation in Gaza. Related: Israel, which controls entry to Gaza and patrols its coastline, has for months been blocking aid from reaching over 2 million Palestinians there. Photos of exhausted, skeletal children have begun to surface on front pages around the world. One child reportedly weighed less upon her death than when she was born. 'You can't fake that,' Trump said of the images. Related: Like Fine, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has flat-out denied that Palestinian civilians are starving to death. Israel has for months claimed that Hamas, which controls Gaza, is misusing shipments of food and supplies, although the New York Times reported over the weekend that Israeli officials know there is no evidence to support that assertion. Asked Monday if he agreed with Netanyahu, Trump responded, 'I don't know.' 'I mean, based on television, I would say not particularly,' he went on. 'Because those children look very hungry.'This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Solve the daily Crossword
