logo
Declassified Russian documents reveal chilling new details of Hitler's last hours

Declassified Russian documents reveal chilling new details of Hitler's last hours

Time of India03-05-2025

Credit: X/@TAKEthePAIN68
On the 80th anniversary of Adolf Hitler's death, Russian intelligence has released a trove of once-classified documents that offer chilling new insight into the dictator's final moments in the
Führerbunker
.
The Federal Security Service (FSB), successor to the Soviet-era KGB, unveiled original copies of interrogation records from Hitler's closest aides—his personal vault, SS-Sturmbannführer
Heinz Linge
, and military adjutant SS-Sturmbannführer
Otto Günsche
. Both men were captured by Soviet forces at the close of World War II and played a key role in shaping Joseph Stalin's understanding of Hitler's demise.
These documents, locked away for decades in a vault in the Ivanovo region and only now made public, include detailed testimonies from Linge and Günsche. For the first time, the FSB has released these full accounts, which reveal previously unheard details about the dictator's suicide, the condition of his body, and the cremation orchestrated by loyalists as Soviet troops closed in on Berlin.
Credit: X/@runews
In a video accompanying the release, a Russian archivist explains Linge's statement regarding Hitler's decision to take his own life: 'He believed it was utterly pointless to continue the fight. He was afraid of being caught while trying to escape from Berlin. There was also his severe physical condition, which was beyond doubt, as well as his delusions of grandeur, which would not allow him to bow to the victor or enter into negotiations with him.'
Linge described entering the room after Hitler's suicide and helping burn the corpses of Hitler and his wife, Eva Braun. He recalled in stark detail the clothing the pair wore at the moment of death. 'At the moment of suicide, Hitler was dressed in a white shirt with a white turn-down collar and a black vest, a grey double-breasted uniform jacket made of fine gabardine, long black trousers of fine gabardine, thin black paper socks, and black leather half-boots,' Linge stated. 'His wife was dressed in a fine silk dress, very thin silk stockings, and shoes with wedge heels (possibly of Italian make).'
Macabre footage accompanying the release showed Hitler's dental remains, which Soviet authorities used to confirm his identity. A Soviet forensic report noted 'the presence in the mouth cavity of crushed glass ampoule fragments… a distinct bitter almond smell… and results from chemical testing of internal organs showing cyanide compounds.' The commission concluded that Hitler's death 'resulted from cyanide poisoning.'
Credit: X/@runews
Linge also addressed one of the lingering suspicions of Soviet leaders—that Hitler may have escaped using a body double. In a signed Russian-translated statement, Linge declared: 'Hitler did not have a double,' and said it was 'impossible to leave the premises without being seen, as there was only one exit from the room.'
He added that a double 'could not have committed suicide.'
One passage quoted by Russian state media captured Hitler's last exchange with Linge. 'When saying goodbye to Hitler on 30 April 1945, I asked: 'Führer, whom should we try to break through to in the West?' And I received the answer: 'For the sake of the one who is still to come.''
Other details emerged about the grim preparations for cremation. 'Three canisters of petrol, prepared by Reichsleiter Martin Bormann for the cremation of the bodies of Hitler and his wife, were standing on the last landing leading from the bomb shelter into the garden of the Reich Chancellery,' Linge testified. 'All the contents of the canisters were poured over the bodies of Hitler and his wife. Bormann pointed out the canisters to us and went down himself to get his own. This was around 4 p.m., and it was still light. A total of 60 litres of petrol was poured.'
Credit: X/@runews
Linge also recanted parts of his earlier account, admitting under Soviet interrogation: 'I must admit that my earlier testimony was incorrect. I did not hear any gunshot sounds but only noticed the smell of gunpowder and, based on that, informed Bormann that the suicide had occurred… I previously stated incorrectly that Eva Braun's body was wrapped in a blanket. I now recall that it was not.'
Günsche, like Linge, was flown to Moscow, where he was held under intense psychological pressure. According to the files, Soviet interrogators placed him in a cell with Nazi war criminal Colonel Remlinger, who was intentionally used to persuade him to cooperate. The tactic succeeded. Günsche eventually distanced himself from his 'oath' to Hitler, emphasizing how Nazi leaders had abandoned their posts in the regime's final hours.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israeli PM Netanyahu speaks to PM Modi, other global leaders amid escalating Iran conflict
Israeli PM Netanyahu speaks to PM Modi, other global leaders amid escalating Iran conflict

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

Israeli PM Netanyahu speaks to PM Modi, other global leaders amid escalating Iran conflict

According to the Prime Minister's Office, Netanyahu began reaching out last night and has already spoken with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and French President Emmanuel Macron read more As Israel's military operation against Iran continues, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu initiated a series of high-level diplomatic conversations with global leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi. According to the Prime Minister's Office, Netanyahu began reaching out last night and has already spoken with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and French President Emmanuel Macron. He is also likely to speak with US President Trump, Russian President Putin and the British Prime Minister. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD These diplomatic efforts come amid mounting regional tensions and fears of a broader confrontation involving Iranian retaliation and potential US involvement. With inputs from agencies

‘2 boards illogical', govt begins phased dismantling of Delhi's own school board
‘2 boards illogical', govt begins phased dismantling of Delhi's own school board

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

‘2 boards illogical', govt begins phased dismantling of Delhi's own school board

New Delhi: Delhi govt has begun the phased dismantling of Delhi Board of School Education (DBSE), marking a significant policy reversal in the city's education system. Education minister Ashish Sood confirmed that no new admission would be allowed under DBSE and that students currently enrolled would be transitioned smoothly. "There will be no new admissions under DBSE. Students who completed Class XII are done, while around 1,800 students still studying in classes IX, X and XI will be allowed to continue. They'll have flexibility—they may shift to CBSE if they choose or continue their studies under existing arrangements. The phase-out will be swift, and we will not compromise students' future," Sood said. "Having two education boards in one state doesn't make sense. The previous govt created confusion by running DBSE alongside CBSE. This dual-board structure lacks logic," he added. As part of the transition, all 56 Schools of Specialised Excellence currently under DBSE are being moved to Central Board of Secondary Education , according to sources. Established in 2021 by AAP govt, DBSE was envisioned as a progressive alternative aligned with global pedagogical standards. However, according to officials, the board will soon cease to oversee curriculum and examinations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed! IC Markets Start Now Undo Students enrolling in Class IX for the 2025-26 academic session will be registered directly under CBSE, states an official directive issued by the deputy director of education. AAP has strongly opposed the move, calling it both politically motivated and educationally unsound. "Chief minister claims a 'parallel' board puts children's futures at risk while the education minister says having two boards in one state is illogical. But India has 65 education boards recognised by central govt, and 16 states and Union territories operate with more than one board—some with up to five," an AAP member pointed out. "Before DBSE, Delhi didn't even have its own board. If DBSE coexists with CBSE, how is that different from other states?" AAP also highlighted the contradiction in Delhi govt's position, questioning how opening a new set of CM Shri Schools is deemed logical while operating two boards is not. "This is selective reasoning, presenting illogical decisions as logical simply to reverse AAP-era reforms. CBSE and NIOS are national boards under the education ministry while CISCE is a recognised private board. Many states have three or more recognised boards. Has Centre risked children's futures in those cases?" Doubts persist over the validity of classes X and XII certificates issued by DBSE during its three years of operation. CBSE officials said they were awaiting completion of procedural formalities before proceeding with the enrolment of former DBSE students into their system. Meanwhile, a principal of a private school affiliated with DBSE confirmed that instructions had already been issued to follow CBSE guidelines for future admissions and curriculum. The current batches of classes X and XII will be the last to graduate under the DBSE framework. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .

With Israel-Iran conflict, a dilemma grows for stakeholders in the region
With Israel-Iran conflict, a dilemma grows for stakeholders in the region

Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • Indian Express

With Israel-Iran conflict, a dilemma grows for stakeholders in the region

In the early hours of June 13, Israel announced it had launched a large-scale airstrike against Iran, targeting key nuclear and military sites across the country. The operation, named 'Rising Lion,' reportedly involved over 200 Israeli aircraft executing multiple waves of attacks on approximately 100 targets. Alongside the strikes meant to debilitate strategic infrastructure, the operation also killed Major General Hossein Salami, the commander-in-chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and other senior military officials and nuclear scientists. Iran immediately called the attack a 'declaration of war' and launched a retaliatory drone strike, which was intercepted by Israeli air defences. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the military operation on Iran would 'continue for as many days as it takes' to 'roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival.' The international community has expressed concern over the escalation, with calls for restraint from various states. What can account for the nature and timing of the Israeli offensive? And what are the implications for ongoing regional security dialogues, and for India's own interests in the region? First, the motivations for the operation, and especially for its timing, are mixed. The strikes were driven by a combination of long-term and more immediate security concerns, as well as strategic and political calculations. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu emphasised that Iran's capability to produce nuclear weapons within months posed a direct danger to Israel's survival. The operation targeted Iran's main uranium enrichment facility in Natanz (but interestingly not the Fordo or Isfahan sites). The operation also aimed to degrade Iran's ballistic missile production capabilities and air defence systems, including the Russian-made S-300, which was reportedly destroyed in the attacks. By targeting these assets, Israel sought to diminish Iran's ability to retaliate effectively. It is also possible that the Netanyahu government felt the window for the strikes was closing, given the ongoing US-Iran nuclear negotiations, which were scheduled to resume in Oman on Sunday. In addition, these strikes also happened in the run-up to the UN conference scheduled for June 17–20 and sponsored by Saudi Arabia and France. The gathering's agenda, which includes discussions on regional security and economic cooperation, aims to deliver a practical action document for the establishment of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. However, the most immediate consideration is to be found in Israel's own domestic compulsions. Internally, the Netanyahu government has been increasingly facing pressures related to military conscription and public opinion. The preemptive action may have been partially motivated by a desire to consolidate political support and demonstrate strong leadership in the face of external threats. On June 11, the Israeli Knesset narrowly voted against a motion to dissolve the parliament, a move that would have forced early elections and posed a significant challenge to Netanyahu's government. This episode underscores the fragility of Netanyahu's coalition, which relies heavily on ultra-Orthodox parties. The Israeli airstrikes on Iran will most likely lead to heightened tensions and uncertainty in the region. Iran perceives the Israeli actions as a direct affront, especially given the US's prior knowledge of the operation, and has warned of severe consequences for American personnel and interests in the region. This has complicated the US's position, as it seeks to balance its commitment to Israel's security with the need to engage Iran diplomatically. The heightened uncertainty and risks of a military escalation, as well as increased oil prices and concerns about global economic repercussions, also directly affect the US long-term strategy of disengaging its military from the region and pivoting to other security theatres in East Asia and the Indo-Pacific. The Israeli strikes could also complicate ties with states with which Tel Aviv aimed to normalise relations. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), which have some of the closest links with Israel of any country in West Asia, have strongly condemned the strikes, labelling them a breach of Iran's sovereignty and a serious threat to regional stability. Despite often being at odds with Shiite Iran, the largely Sunni Arab countries have been trying to avoid a regional war that could also prove damaging to their economies and see them caught in the crossfire. Not surprisingly, India has also expressed deep concern regarding the escalating tensions between Israel and Iran. The Ministry of External Affairs issued a statement urging both nations to exercise restraint and avoid further escalation. This reaction is similar to India's official response to the escalating tensions between Israel and Iran in April 2024. However, the conflict raises concerns over regional stability, especially considering India's significant energy imports from West Asia and the safety of over nine million Indians living in the region. Furthermore, India still has close ties with Iran, notably through its investments in the Chabahar port. India's broader regional connectivity strategy is at risk of derailment given its strong commercial stakes in the development of the India-Middle East Economic Corridor. A deepening Israel-Iran conflict will therefore put India into an acute geopolitical dilemma when it has been successful in balancing ties with Israel, Iran and the Gulf Arab states for the past decade. India's shifting statements on the Gaza crisis had already led to some questions in the region over its positioning on important West Asian security issues. While one cannot expect an active mediating role, India, which historically has good relations with both Israel and Iran, could play a more immediate part in providing a channel of communication and ensuring a dialogue, along with regional players like Saudi Arabia and the UAE, to ensure a de-escalation of the current crisis. The writer is Associate Professor of International Relations at the Institute of Political Science, Leiden University in the Netherlands. He studies India's foreign and security policy-making, the politics of migration governance, the international politics of South Asia, and India's relations with the Middle East

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store