Angry Love Island fans flood Ofcom with complaints over decision to bring back axed star as they spot ‘boss's game plan'
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
ANGRY Love Island fans have flooded Ofcom with complaints over the decision to bring back an axed star, as they spotted the 'boss's game plan.'
Irish stunner Megan and Spanish lad Blu have appeared in a teaser for tomorrow night's episode, as they return for a second chance at love.
Sign up for the Entertainment newsletter
Sign up
4
Angry Love Island fans have flooded Ofcom with complaints over the decision to bring back an axed star, as they spotted the 'boss's game plan'
Credit: Shutterstock Editorial
4
Megan is returning to the villa after being axed early on
Credit: Shutterstock Editorial
4
Megan and Conor were getting to know each other before she left
Credit: Shutterstock Editorial
Iain Stirling revealed the incredible comeback and The Sun understands the pair entered the villa last night.
The public previously turned on Megan after she dumped Tommy for Conor in her final few days.
Now, since Megan's villa exit, Shakira and Conor have grown close.
And angry fans have accused bosses of bringing Megan back to jeopardise the romantic connection that Shakira and Conor currently have.
One person wrote: 'At this point LI is bullying Shakira… the girl has been going through it, soon as she has a little high they help bring her back down.'
A second penned: 'Production clearly has it out for Shakira,' and a third echoed: 'At this point, just say you don't want Shakira to win.'
Fans have speculated that Meg's return is all part of a game plan to stop Shakira from winning, by disrupting what she has with Conor.
And they also think show bosses are pushing for either Meg or Helena to win the show.
And some fans have taken to X to say they've complained to Ofcom about Megan's return as a result, adding 'we voted her off for a reason.'
Love Island fans 'work out' the THIRD star to be dumped after cruel twist as they claim girl is doomed
One person penned: 'Filed an OFCOM complaint against love island, this show deserves to be cancelled. I'm soooo serious!!!'
Someone else penned: 'Submitting my first OFCOM complaint now that they've bought Meg back.'
A third echoed: 'Production doing everything to stand in Shakira's way. Filing an IPSO.'
Megan said before heading back to Love Island: "I'm excited to go back in, I think I left quite abruptly and I'm going back in for some clarity.
"It was an easy decision to make. When you can't speak to people for a couple of weeks and have to watch them on telly every night, you want some answers."
The announcement came shortly after Maya Jama returned to dump a couple from the island.
Islanders were ordered to line up in their couples as Maya announced the results of the latest public vote for their favourite boy and girl.
Maya revealed the bottom three girls were Billykiss, Emma, and Angel and the bottom three boys were Boris, Conor, and Harry.
With the fewest votes, Emma and Boris were dumped from the island, ending Casa Amor's most talked-about comeback and Love Island's biggest love triangle.
Both Emma and Boris had entered the villa as Casa Amor bombshells.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Love Island star Yasmin Pettet is left heartbroken as she reveals her beloved cat Miaow Miaow has died following cancer battle
Love Island finalist Yasmin Pettet has revealed her beloved cat Miaow Miaow has sadly died from cancer. The reality star, 24, often spoke lovingly about her pet during her time in the villa, but heartbreakingly, Miaow Miaow passed away from cancer at the age of 11 while Yasmin was still filming the show. Announcing the news on Instagram on Wednesday evening, Yasmin wrote: 'As I've spoken about her on the show I'm sure a lot of you will know I have a cat called miaow miaow who's been by my side for 11 years now. She continued: 'When I was filming Love Island I had a bad gut feeling something was off and when my mum and sister came into the villa I asked them and still felt like something was off. 'Rightfully they didn't tell me because I was still in the villa but after the final I called my sister and she told me that miaow miaow had cancer and died whilst I was away filming Love Island. 'I'm trying to be as active as I can be on socials but am taking time for myself to process this heartbreak. She concluded the heartbreaking post: 'RIP to my beautiful baby girl, you were so loved and will always be in my soul.' Yasmin, who came in third place with her partner Jamie Rhodes, 26, returned to social media earlier today to thank fans for their support throughout her journey. She said: 'My love island journey has been crazy to say the least but I really wouldn't have been able to do it without my Jamie, Toni and Shakira. 'I feel so grateful and blessed and can't wait to see what the future holds.' Jamie, who affectionately describes Yasmin as having 'black cat energy', praised her now that they're back home, writing: 'Absolutely smashed it, wouldn't want to do the journey with anyone else.' It comes after ITV released the voting breakdown for the final, confirming it was the closest result in the show's history. In total, Toni and Cach received 33.5% of the vote, with Shakira Khan and Harry Cooksley taking 26.2% - showing the result was a close call. Yasmin and Jamie came third with 22% and Angel Swift and Ty Isherwood placed fourth with 18.3%. Toni and Cach won despite the bookies' odds revealing it was Harry and Shakira in the running to win, just hours ahead of the live final. And fans seemed delighted with the decision as they took to Twitter to wish the couple congratulations. They penned: 'Justice served well done Toni & Cach .. what a gentleman man he is'; 'Congratulations Toni and cach. First American and she won. Iconic moves'; 'a bombshell + a casa boy winning love island - iconic!'; 'Love island didn't disappoint with Cach & Toni winning'; 'Toni was her true authentic self'; 'Amazing winners - hats off to the producers for an elite season of #loveisland'. But it looks like Toni and Cach may be spending even more time together in front of the camera, as ITV are reportedly planning to offer the couple a spin-off show chronicling their long-distance relationship, according to The Sun.
Scottish Sun
4 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Rihanna shows off baby bump as she is spotted out in LA wearing £2.1k marshmallow-inspired designer dress
Rihanna is no stranger to confectionery-themed fashion RI'S A SWEETIE Rihanna shows off baby bump as she is spotted out in LA wearing £2.1k marshmallow-inspired designer dress Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) PREGNANT Rihanna shows off her baby Flump — sorry, bump — in a bonkers outfit the colour of the marshmallow treat. The singer, 37, was seen out and about in Los Angeles in a pink and orange dress. Sign up for the Entertainment newsletter Sign up 4 Pregnant Rihanna shows off her baby bump in this colourful outfit Credit: 4 The star was seen out and about in Los Angeles in a pink and orange dress Credit: And the Barbadian star's vintage 2001 Issey Miyake frock cost a lot more than the sweets — at just over £2,100. Rihanna, expecting her third baby in weeks, is no stranger to confectionery-themed fashion, wearing a Haribo Heart Throbs-style red dress in 2016. The pregnant star also showed off her huge bare baby bump while going out for dinner in LA at her favorite eatery. The business mogul, who announced her pregnancy earlier this year, looked ready to pop. Stepping out to head for dinner at her favorite Italian restaurant, Giorgio Baldi, Rihanna put her bump on display. Giorgio Baldi is a "luxurious family-run Italian spot near the ocean" which serves seafood and pasta. While heading out for food at the spot, Rihanna looked sensational in a navy suit, sheer mesh bra and polka dot tie. The mother-of-two wore her navy blazer open at the front, with her bump showing. She wore her hair slicked back, and kept her makeup natural and soft, yet glamorous. Pregnant Rihanna's third baby's gender revealed as partner A$AP Rocky slips and leaks news on Smurfs red carpet 4 Rihanna looks like one of these Flump sweets Credit: Shutterstock
Spectator
5 hours ago
- Spectator
‘I've taken to sleeping in my teeth' – the wartime admissions of T.S. Eliot
In 1944, T.S. Eliot is 56 years old. He seems older: 'I am getting to be a wambling old codger.' He is war-worn: 'I have taken, when in London, to sleeping in my teeth.' As a fire-watcher sharing shifts, his sleep is hampered by understandable pudeur: 'I haven't got enough phlegm to undress completely, and I think it best to sleep in my truss, in case of sudden blasting, which is not very comfortable.' He knows, too, that his letters are dull. To Anne Ridler, 19 June 1942, he confesses: 'If I had any small gift for letter writing, it has been ruined years ago by the pressure of the kind of correspondence I have to practise most of the time.' Namely, the business letter, where you can see Eliot now and then resorting to the formulaic. For example, touching on the prose poem, he says: 'Years ago I did a little of the sort myself but was never able to persuade myself that the result was more than just a note for a poem to be written.' A year later, he is rejecting the poems of Kay Dick: 'The effect is rather of notes for poems or notes for something, rather than of poems. And a few months after that he is applying the formula to D.H. Lawrence, who 'wrote a kind of free verse, but it seems to me to be mostly notes for poems'. In January 1944, Eliot turns down the poems of Michael Burn (of whom more in a moment): 'I should call them notes for poems than poems.' Now and then, very rarely, these rejection letters sound a note of pained asperity. To one Arthur Sale, Eliot is momentarily incontinent, in his measured way: 'One is ready to concede admiration, rather than put oneself to the torture of reading to the end.' And he closes, stingingly: 'I have never read poetry that irritated me more than yours, and it would irritate me if there was nothing in it.' The editorial annotation tells us that poor savaged Sale later went on to teach at Magdalene College, Cambridge, where his pupils included Michael Hofmann and Bamber Gascoigne. Of course, Eliot – ever compliant, exhausted by good works, school prize-givings, readings for wartime causes, endless theological faffing and fussing, broadcasts to India and servitude to the British Council – could occasionally ironise the public man he had become. To Mary Trevelyan (29 June 1942): I ought to have explained to you long ago that I had an Irish grandmother, of a respextable [sic] family founded by a man who tried to steal the Crown Jewels. This accounts for a good deal but is far from being the whole story. In my father's family is a hereditary taint, going back for centuries, which expresses itself in an irresistible tendency to sit on committees. A rare frisk. John Haffenden's footnote tells us that Eliot's mother believed she was descended from Thomas Blood (1618-80) who tried to steal the Crown Jewels in 1671. These spectacularly unspectacular letters are salvaged by the footnotes. For example, we learn that Michael Burn was bisexual, slept with Guy Burgess, met Hitler at a Nuremberg rally, was briefly persuaded of 'the values of National Socialism' but later became a communist after witnessing poverty in the Barnsley coalfields. He joined the commandos and was wounded and captured during the raid on St Nazaire in 1942. He was awarded the MC and sent to Colditz. There, he was the recipient of an aid package from a Dutch one-time lover, Ella van Heemstra. On his release from Colditz, he sent her food and cigarettes. She sold the cigarettes to buy penicillin to save the life of her 'ill and undernourished daughter – the future actress Audrey Hepburn'. Gossip. Top gossip: 70 per cent proof. Three more footnotes. On a British Council trip to Sweden, Eliot stayed with Sir Victor Mallet at the British Legation. Haffenden has read Mallet's unpublished memoirs, of which this is an extract: T.S. Eliot pursued his quiet way with the Swedish Pen Club and other intellectual bodies and achieved an outstanding success. We were much amused when he came home late one evening from one of these parties, his cheeks covered with lipstick from being embraced by a number of enthusiastic Swedish girls after reading his poetry. F.R. Leavis secures Eliot's help in preserving Scrutiny, which is threatened by the paper restrictions. In a letter of thanks, Leavis adds: P.S. Ralph, my small son, looks forward to seeing you again. He said to his mother at bedtime after you had gone last Whitsun: 'Now I only want to meet Mr Shakespeare.' What we want, fervently, from letters is the authentic, unofficial version of events and people – indiscretion. Here, the widow of the American literary critic Irving Babbitt is trying to edit the correspondence between Babbitt and his late colleague Paul Elmer More. She complains to Eliot that More's widow has redacted everything of interest from her husband's side of the correspondence. The following –another footnote – is from a letter to Valerie Eliot about her husband, dated 20 February 1972, written by Dr Elizabeth Wilson, the daughter of a Surrey GP whom Eliot had consulted 'at some time in the 1940s': After tea we invited him to join us for a swim. He had no costume but a very antique ladies model (navy wool, to be tied round his waist by an old tie) was found & we walked to a nearly artificial lake, at one time properly dredged as a swimming pool but by then pretty muddy & well supplied with tadpoles. There were, of course, no changing facilities, only bushes. Mr Eliot never expressed by word or expression, any dismay – he appeared to quietly enjoy himself although I always wondered whether he was aware that the moths had feasted on the posterior of his borrowed garment. This seems worth much more than the clunky, jaundiced repudiation by Eliot of his own literary output: 'The structure of the play [The Family Reunion] is very defective theatrically.' He can't bear to re-read his critical prose. The unrevised The Use of Poetry is 'one of my works with which I had the least cause to be satisfied'. The moth-eaten cossie trumps this bogus, high-fallutin' incitement to endless hermeneutics: 'I don't know whether there is any 'complete understanding' of a poem that has any depth to it.' Think of a very good poem like W.H. Auden's 'Musée des Beaux Arts', the fall of Icarus representing the world's indifference to individual tragedy – easily understandable and profound nevertheless. Eliot is merely hiking the price on his own sometimes difficult poems. And personally I would prefer to hear about Stephen Spender's elastic stocking for his varicose veins; or Eliot's delight when the Chinese minister of information addresses Spender as 'Steve'; or about the (incomprehensible) message from William Blake conveyed by Mrs Millington, Eliot's blind masseuse; or the survival of Omar Pound's bombed stamp collection; or about Winston Churchill (the grandson) saying grace then standing on his head, rather than read this example of Eliot's prose at its most comatose: I admit frankly this personal difficulty in reading because I know it may be something of which the reader is very much more conscious when presented with a part of the book than he might be if he had the complete work before him and read it from cover to cover. A sentence that is asleep, sounds asleep, before it reaches the full stop. These letters, with their rich annotation and the intimate correspondence with Emily Hale, are the real biography of Eliot. We don't need Peter Ackroyd's off-the-cuff impressions and cavalier opinions. Nor Robert Crawford's numbly industrious two-volume biography and its dour judgments. The life of the life is here – in its dullness, in its detail, in its attention to the very texture of Eliot's existence. The boredom and the horror and the glory.
