
Republicans slam Trump's firing of Bureau of Labor Statistics chief
The disappointing figures – coupled with a downward revision of the two previous months amounting to 258,000 fewer jobs and data showing that economic output and consumer spending slowed in the first half of the year – point to an overall economic deterioration in the US.
Trump defended his decision to fire US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner Erika McEntarfer. Without evidence to back his claims, the president wrote on social media that were numbers were 'RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad' and the US economy was, in fact, 'BOOMING' on his watch.
But the firing of McEntarfer, who had been confirmed to her role in January 2024 during Joe Biden's presidency, has alarmed members of Trump's own party.
'If the president is firing the statistician because he doesn't like the numbers but they are accurate, then that's a problem,' said Wyoming Republican senator Cynthia Lummis. 'It's not the statistician's fault if the numbers are accurate and that they're not what the president had hoped for.'
Lummis added that if the numbers are unreliable, the public should be told – but firing McEntarfer was 'kind of impetuous'.
North Carolina senator Thom Tillis, a Republican, said: 'If she was just fired because the president or whoever decided to fire the director just … because they didn't like the numbers, they ought to grow up.'
Kentucky senator Rand Paul, another Republican, questioned whether McEntarfer's firing was an effective way of improving the numbers.
'We have to look somewhere for objective statistics,' he said. 'When the people providing the statistics are fired, it makes it much harder to make judgments that you know, the statistics won't be politicized.'
According to NBC News, Paul said his 'first impression' was that 'you can't really make the numbers different or better by firing the people doing the counting'.
Tillis and Paul were both opponents of Trump's recent economic legislative package, which the president dubbed the 'big, beautiful bill'.
But Alaska senator Lisa Murkowski, a Republican who supported the legislation after winning substantial economic support for her state, remarked that the jobs numbers could not be trusted – and 'that's the problem'.
'And when you fire people, then it makes people trust them even less,' she said.
William Beach, a former BLS commissioner appointed by Trump in his first presidency, posted on X that McEntarfer's firing was 'totally groundless'. He added that the dismissal set a dangerous precedent and undermined the BLS's statistical mission.
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
Beach also co-signed a letter by 'the Friends of the Bureau of Labor Statistics' that went further, accusing Trump of seeking to blame someone for bad news and calling the rationale for McEntarfer's firing 'without merit'.
The letter asserted that the dismissal 'undermines the credibility of federal economic statistics that are a cornerstone of intelligent economic decision-making by businesses, families and policymakers'.
The letter pointed out that the jobs tabulation process 'is decentralized by design to avoid opportunities for interference', adding that US official statistics 'are the gold standard globally'.
'When leaders of other nations have politicized economic data, it has destroyed public trust in all official statistics and in government science,' the letter said.
Democrats have also hit out at Trump's decision. Vermont senator Bernie Sanders described it as 'the sign of an authoritarian type', and he said the decision would make it harder for the American people 'to believe the information that comes out of the government'.
Paul Schroeder, executive director of the Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics, described the president's allegation against McEntarfer as 'very damaging and outrageous'.
He said: 'Not only does it undermine the integrity of federal economic statistics, but it also politicizes data which need to remain independent and trustworthy. This action is a grave error by the administration and one that will have ramifications for years to come.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
22 minutes ago
- Reuters
Gold gains as Trump doubles India tariffs, boosting safe-haven demand
Aug 7 (Reuters) - Gold rose on Thursday, supported by renewed safe-haven demand after U.S. President Donald Trump slapped an additional 25% tariff on Indian imports, escalating trade frictions. Spot gold was up 0.4% at $3,380.76 per ounce as of 0247 GMT. U.S. gold futures gained 0.3% to $3,443.30. "Trump has been dishing up fresh tariff threats which is keeping gold in the frame as a defensive play for investors," Tim Waterer, chief market analyst at KCM Trade said. "Gold is moving towards the doorstep of the psychological $3400, with risk-assets being kept off-balance somewhat by the constant tariff proclamations by the U.S. President." Trump on Wednesday slapped an additional 25% tariff on imports of Indian goods, citing New Delhi's continued buying of Russian oil, deepening a trade rift between the two nations after talks reached a deadlock. The new import tax, effective 21 days after August 7, will raise duties on some Indian exports to as high as 50% - among the highest levied on any U.S. trading partner. Adding to gold's support, the dollar index (.DXY), opens new tab hovered near a more than one-week low after surprisingly weak U.S. jobs data last week triggered bets for U.S. rate cuts in September. A weaker dollar makes gold less expensive for holders of other currencies. Traders are now pricing in a 94% chance of a 25-basis point rate cut next month, according to the CME Group's FedWatch Tool, opens new tab. The Federal Reserve may need to cut rates in the near-term in response to a slowing U.S. economy, even though it remains unclear whether tariffs will continue to push inflation higher, Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari said. Gold, traditionally considered a safe-haven asset during political and economic uncertainties, tends to thrive in a low-interest-rate environment. Elsewhere, spot silver rose 0.3% to $37.98 per ounce, platinum lost 0.7% to $1,324.26 and palladium shed 0.8% to $1,141.56.


Reuters
22 minutes ago
- Reuters
Vietnam PM tells central bank to remove cap on credit growth from 2026
HANOI, Aug 7 (Reuters) - Vietnamese Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh has told the country's central bank to remove a cap on credit growth in the banking system from next year, the government said on Thursday. The central bank should, instead, develop a set of standards for banks to operate in an "efficient and healthy" manner, the government said in a statement. The State Bank of Vietnam has set an annual cap on credit growth in the banking system as a way to control the flow of money into the economy and maintain the system's stability. The cap for this year stands at 16%.


Reuters
22 minutes ago
- Reuters
Japan presses US on auto tariff cut, seeks clarification on other levies
TOKYO, Aug 7 (Reuters) - Japan pressed the U.S. to swiftly implement an agreed cut to auto tariffs and sought clarification on levies for other goods, as conflicting interpretations of the bilateral trade deal further pressured Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's shaky administration. In a meeting with U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick in Washington on Wednesday, top trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa urged the U.S. to implement at an early date an agreed cut to U.S. tariffson Japanese auto and auto parts, Japan's government said. Akazawa also sought confirmation and "immediate execution" of the two countries' agreement on U.S. levies for other goods imported from Japan, the government said in a statement released on Thursday. The meeting came hours before President Donald Trump's higher tariffs on dozens of trading partners kick in on Thursday, as Japan scrambles to clarify divergences with Washington on details of their bilateral trade deal. Under the deal clinched last month, the U.S. agreed to cut tariffs on Japanese car imports to 15% from levies totalling 27.5% previously, but did not announce a timeframe for the change to take effect. While the two agreed that U.S. duties on most other Japanese goods will be cut to 15% from 25% effective Thursday, a lack of written confirmation of the deal has led to confusion over whether the new 15% tariffs will be stacked on top of existing levies. Japan argues the two countries had agreed its goods imported to the U.S. would be exempt from such "stacking," where they can be affected by multiple tariffs. Speaking in parliament on Tuesday, Akazawa said Japan wants to make sure goods such as Japanese beef, which already carries tariffs above 15%, will not be charged the new 15% rate as an additional tariff. But a Federal Register attached to President Donald Trump's July 31 executive order that addressed tariff rates for many trading partners showed a "no stacking" condition applies to the European Union, but no such clarification was issued for Japan. Japan's Asahi newspaper reported on Thursday, citing an unnamed White House official, that the U.S. will stack the tariffs, adding 15% on all Japanese imports without applying exceptions for items that already have tariff rates above 15%. In a regular news conference held after the Asahi report, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said the U.S. was unlikely to stack 15% tariffs on existing levies. He said Akazawa confirmed the point with the U.S. side during his visit to Washington on Wednesday. Given such discrepancies, Ishiba has been under attack in parliament and domestic media for not crafting a written joint statement stipulating details of the trade deal with the U.S. Ishiba defended the decision, telling parliament on Monday that Japan decided to forgo a written statement for fear that doing so could delay U.S. tariff reductions. Some lawmakers have warned a lack of written confirmation could backfire given Trump's unpredictable decision-making style. The confusion adds to trouble for Japan's shaky government led by Ishiba, who is facing calls to step down after the ruling coalition's huge loss in last month's upper house election. "In negotiating with the U.S., Minister Akazawa at least ought to have nailed down exactly when U.S. automobile tariffs would be lowered to 15%," ruling party heavyweight and former trade minister Ken Saito told Reuters on Tuesday. Yuichiro Tamaki, leader of opposition Democratic Party for the People, urged Akazawa to press Trump's administration harder to adhere to the bilateral agreement. "After all, I do feel that a document on the agreement was necessary," Tamaki wrote in an X post on Thursday.