Smells like teen spirit: prodigies, prodigals and everything in between
Over the past few weeks, a question has popped up in the minds of many players, commentators and fans associated with cricket: What were we doing when we were 14?
Serious reflection may elicit a variety of interesting responses. But the brief purpose of this rhetorical query is to highlight the point that none of us was bludgeoning world-class bowlers and bringing up 35-ball centuries under the piercing gaze of vast audiences in the Indian Premier League.
Defying conventional logic
At an age when most boys, experiencing puberty and perhaps a phase of teenage rebellion, are prone to glibly conjuring up a new career path every month, Vaibhav Suryavanshi is a professional cricketer defying conventional logic in the world's biggest T20 league. Frankly, for a large majority of us, even to dream along these lines would be beyond the realms of possibility.
In Suryavanshi's adolescent life — let it sink in that he belongs to a generation even more nascent than Gen-Z — he has already made a habit of doing things that would be considered straight out of a fairy tale. In January 2024, at the age of just 12 years and 284 days, he made his First Class debut for Bihar against domestic giant Mumbai in the Ranji Trophy.
Then in September-October, featuring for India U-19, the left-hander smashed a 58-ball century against Australia U-19 in a Youth Test in Chennai. It pointed to a precocious talent, but what ensued in November, during the IPL auction in Jeddah, was truly unprecedented: still 13, his cherubic face exuding blissful ignorance, he attracted a bidding war that eventually saw Rajasthan Royals cough up a whopping ₹1.1 crore.
If all this was out of the ordinary, the boy from Samastipur has endeared himself to fans even further this summer. That his bat could produce moments of Mary Poppins-induced magic became apparent after his very first ball in the IPL when he backed away and thumped Lucknow Super Giants' Shardul Thakur for a spectacular six over extra cover. He made 34 off 20 balls, a few tears rolling down his cheeks on his dismissal being the only giveaway of his tender age.
Just two matches later, the view that this is a wonderkid poised to leave our collective jaws on the floor was fortified. Against a Gujarat Titans attack comprising six international bowlers, Suryavanshi hit a record-shattering 38-ball 101 to help RR hunt down 210 in 15.5 overs. 'There is no fear. I don't think much, I just focus on playing' was Suryavanshi's laconic post-match remark.
He is hardwired to bashing the ball at every opportunity: he makes a back-and-across shuffle deep into his crease, keeps his front leg away from the line of the ball to create room and swings his bat at lightning speed from an extravagantly high back-lift. There's another thing that has caught the eye of Royals coach Rahul Dravid.
'What you look for in a good young batter is how quick they are to judge length,' Dravid told the media. 'That is something that has really amazed me. One thing you notice with Vaibhav is that he is very quick to pick up on anything that is fractionally short or full.'
Bringing Tendulkar to mind
Owing to the amazement aroused by a boy in his mid-teens taking on highly established bowlers, Suryavanshi has evoked comparisons with Sachin Tendulkar. The prodigy from Mumbai was a 16-year-old with a squeaky voice on India's tour of Pakistan in 1989 when he famously dispatched the crafty Abdul Qadir for four sixes in an over in an exhibition game in Peshawar after an ODI had been abandoned. To draw further parallels between the two, of course, would be a bit of a stretch for the time being.
Tendulkar's fabled 24-year international career was down to a combination of technique, temperament, hunger for runs and an uncompromising work ethic. 'See, Sachin grew up in a different environment. He was brought up by his coach to do things with a different methodology,' former India cricketer W.V. Raman weighed in. 'So that being the case, you cannot compare. Sachin was a lot more technically correct. So, it was easy for him to build on the strong basics he had.'
The arrival of a promising youngster on the scene tends to tug at the heartstrings and raise anticipation. But for every Tendulkar and Gary Sobers — the great all-rounder was 17 when he first played for West Indies — there are several cautionary tales. Of the Indians who made their Test debuts before 18 — Tendulkar, Piyush Chawla, L. Sivaramakrishnan, Parthiv Patel, Maninder Singh, Vijay Mehra and Harbhajan Singh — it is evident that only a couple fulfilled their potential.
Though quite a few of these were bowlers, is there a case to make for batters being more equipped to succeed at a younger age? Teenage spinners are generally perceived to need more time to assimilate the vagaries of their craft. In the case of fledgling pacers, a developing body not yet fully geared to the rigours of bowling fast may come in the way.
'The system will be a little apprehensive with spinners. Because they would also tend to cast their minds back to the likes of Sivaramakrishnan and Maninder. Of course, blooding them in at that age was not the issue. It was just that they did not have the right guidance once they hit a rough patch. And it has also been proven over the years that spinners mature late. A lot of factors are involved for bowlers because they need the backing of their captain,' Raman opined.
'But for batters, once they get a few runs, the obstacles are not many. And that's the reason why you see young batters gaining recognition sooner than bowlers.'
Recognition has certainly come Suryavanshi's way very soon. But his dismissals on 0 and 4 in successive outings following his century were a reminder of the ebbs and flows that his journey will entail, and underlined the need to temper expectations.
What lies ahead
To ensure that his encounter with fame isn't all too fleeting, a cooperative racking of brains, involving his IPL franchise, the Bihar Cricket Association and the BCCI, will be needed. The mental effects of an early exposure to the arc lights will also have to be monitored.
'He's got to watch out on the kind of advice he heeds. Because he will go through a lot of teams. And he will have to obviously work with a lot of coaches along the way,' Raman said. 'So, he has to be about five times as good as the coaches that he encounters. He has to decide what really suits his game, what really suits his temperament, and what really suits his philosophy of cricket. That is going to be the key. If he resorts to following just about everything, then he is going to be in that zone of confusion. So it will all come down to that.'
For now, Suryavanshi has a coach in Dravid at RR who will offer good counsel. As and when the IPL resumes, then, let's just marvel at a boy hammering fours and sixes on the big stage without a care in the world. Something we weren't doing at 14.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
‘50 overs bhi nahi khel sakte...': Vaibhav Suryavanshi hype meets reality check; Yograj asks 'Can he survive 5 days?'
Vaibhav Suryavanshi's sensational rise in IPL 2025 has sparked a nationwide conversation. The 14-year-old dazzled in his debut season, scoring 252 runs for Rajasthan Royals, including a record-breaking 35-ball century against Gujarat Titans. His flair and audacity at such a young age had many drawing parallels with the legendary Sachin Tendulkar. Suryavanshi became the youngest-ever player to appear in the IPL, debuting at just 14 years and 23 days old against Lucknow Super Giants. Just nine days later, he lit up Jaipur with a jaw-dropping ton — the fastest by an Indian batter in IPL history. His red-hot form continued beyond the IPL. In a red-ball practice match at the BCCI Centre of Excellence in Bengaluru, he reportedly smashed 190 runs off just 90 balls, making a strong case ahead of India Under-19's upcoming tour of England. But even amid the hype, a reality check came from former cricketer Yograj Singh, father of Yuvraj Singh. Speaking to InsideSport, Yograj raised a crucial question: "My vision is Test cricket. Can you survive five days? That's the real test. 50 overs - fair enough. 20 overs - fair enough. I don't go by these formats. But since they (formats) are there, you should be fit enough to play all three formats. Why do you struggle? Because you are only concentrating on T20, IPL and 50 overs. Aj toh 50 overs bhi nahi khel sakte hum log (Today, we cannot even play 50 overs). That's the way we are," he said. Yograj didn't stop there — he took a dig at coaches and administrators, accusing them of lacking passion: "All the coaches and all the administrators want to sit in the air conditioning and do things. Here, I am under 48 degrees Celsius, having a passion to produce more brilliant cricketers like Yuvraj Singh," he added. Vaibhav Suryavanshi's IPL heroics wowed fans, but Yograj Singh asks tough questions: "Can he survive five days? That's the real test of a cricketer."


United News of India
4 hours ago
- United News of India
Ashoka writes to NHRC over Chinnaswamy stampede
Bengaluru, Jun 12 (UNI) Karnataka Leader of the Opposition R. Ashoka on Thursday urged the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) to take suo motu cognisance of the June 4 stampede outside M. Chinnaswamy Stadium here, which left 11 people dead and 75 injured during the IPL victory celebrations of Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB). In a letter addressed to NHRC Chairperson, Ashoka alleged gross negligence and administrative failure on the part of the state government, police, and event organisers. He described the incident as a 'grave human rights violation' and called for a comprehensive investigation to fix accountability. 'This is not merely an unfortunate accident—it reflects a systemic failure and blatant disregard for public safety. The fundamental right to life of the victims was violated,' Ashoka stated. The stampede occurred when thousands of people gathered near the stadium following social media messages and reports that entry to the celebration would be free. The turnout reportedly far exceeded the crowd-handling capacity of the area. Ashoka outlined five major lapses that he believes led to the tragic stampede outside M. Chinnaswamy Stadium on June 4. He pointed to overcrowding caused by misleading announcements and overselling of the event, which resulted in lakhs of people arriving at a venue meant to accommodate only 35,000. This, he alleged, was exacerbated by inadequate police deployment and a lack of basic crowd control measures. Ashoka further highlighted the absence of emergency services at the scene, with eyewitnesses reporting shortages of ambulances, medical aid, and even water. He accused RCB, the event management firm DNA, and the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) of failing to coordinate and implement essential safety protocols. The state government's delayed and inadequate response—despite registering FIRs and announcing a probe—was also criticised as insufficient and reactive. Calling the incident a grave human rights violation, Ashoka appealed to the NHRC to take suo motu cognisance of the tragedy. He sought a thorough investigation into the roles of all responsible parties, legal action against those found negligent, formulation of national guidelines for large public events, and active monitoring of the inquiry to ensure accountability and justice for the victims. 'This tragedy has shaken public confidence. It is imperative that justice be delivered and preventive steps be taken to ensure no family has to suffer such a loss again,' he wrote. The state government has not yet responded to the allegations made in the letter. The NHRC is yet to make a statement on whether it will take up the matter. UNI BDN SSP


New Indian Express
5 hours ago
- New Indian Express
When grandstanding drowned governance in Bengaluru
The tragedy that unfolded at Bengaluru's M Chinnaswamy Stadium—where a celebration spiralled into a stampede—was synthetic, foreseeable and entirely self-inflicted. It was not a case of public enthusiasm gone awry; it was the culmination of a toxic brew of political theatre, administrative apathy and corporate vanity. It laid bare a deeper crisis: a collapse of institutional judgement and a contemptuous disregard for the sanctity of public life. The government's response—suspending the city police commissioner and other senior officers in haste—only served to expose the rot. Scapegoating of honest officers has become the easiest way to deflect accountability. This time, it crossed an ethical line. When spectacle replaces governance, tragedy ensues. What exactly was the occasion for the grand felicitation? Royal Challengers Bengaluru—a private IPL franchise that, let us remind ourselves, had only won a trophy—was feted like a conquering army on the grand steps of the Vidhana Soudha, the symbol of Karnataka's democratic and constitutional dignity. With the governor, chief minister, deputy CM, and chief secretary playing hosts, it resembled a swearing-in ceremony, not a sports meet. Why does the state machinery spring into action to elevate a private commercial venture? The RCB brand is not a public institution; it is a business. Unlike our Ranji Trophy-winning state teams that have brought glory to Karnataka for decades but have never been feted in this manner, RCB's success—modest and long in coming —was transformed into a photo-op, a media spectacle. The motivation was not celebration; it was proximity to celebrity, optics over ethics, and power over prudence. The people came not just because they loved the sport or the team—they came because the state, the Karnataka State Cricket Association , and RCB whipped up a frenzy. Social media was used irresponsibly to amplify the call. No prior assessment was done of the crowd expected. No crowd control plan was in place. Was any consultation done with the police commissioner—the person whose job is to ensure the security of citizens? Was his and his ground-level team's advice heeded? When things went tragically wrong, the same officer was summarily suspended. A career officer known for his integrity and professionalism was cast as the villain in a theatre of public incompetence. This has rightly caused outrage. The public recognises what this is: an old playbook of punishing the wrong person so that those truly responsible may escape scrutiny.