logo
‘No obvious frontrunner.' Why Harris' exit has scrambled the race for California governor

‘No obvious frontrunner.' Why Harris' exit has scrambled the race for California governor

For months, candidates in the race to become California's next governor had waited for a pivotal question to be settled: Will former Vice President Kamala Harris run or not?
With Harris' announcement this week that she's out, a new question arose: Who's the front-runner now?
Because of Harris' star power, the answer is far from simple. For months, other candidates saw their campaign planning and fundraising undercut by the possibility she would run, meaning the race got a big reset seconds after Harris made her announcement Wednesday.
Some political observers give the nod to former U.S. Rep. Katie Porter, who appears to have a small leg up over her opponents.
Porter was the only Democrat to receive double-digit support in multiple polls when Harris was not included in the field.
A prodigious fundraiser while she was in Congress representing an Orange County district, Porter reported a strong infusion of cash in the months after launching her campaign in March, and said she raised $250,000 in the 36 hours after Harris' announcement.
'The enthusiasm we're seeing from donors at every level shows that Californians know how critical this race is,' Porter said in an email blast.
Other candidates — including Xavier Becerra, U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services in the Biden administration and a former California attorney general — have also tried to assert that, with Harris out, they are moving up.
'BECERRA CAMPAIGN BUILDING MOMENTUM IN 'WIDE OPEN' RACE,' read the subject line of an email sent Friday by the Becerra campaign, saying he is 'well-positioned to unite a broad swath of voters around his plans to make health care and housing less expensive and more accessible.'
Outside observers, however, said that none of the candidates really stand out from the pack at the moment.
'That these remaining candidates are jockeying for bragging rights about who may be the front-runner — it's to be expected, but it's ludicrous,' said Garry South, a veteran Democratic strategist who has worked on a number of past gubernatorial campaigns, including for former Gov. Gray Davis.
'With Harris opting out, there will likely be no obvious front-runner among the remainder of the current field for quite some time,' South said. 'None of these candidates start out with statewide name recognition.'
With such a wide-open field, factors such as endorsements and communication strategies will be important to watch, experts said. So will the candidates' ability to raise money and use it to broaden their appeal.
'I would start spending money on social media, on television advertising, on every single platform I could find to build up my name ID,' South said, but 'none of them have enough money to do that at the moment.'
With Harris out, will she back someone else?
'Obviously if she did endorse, that would be a big plus' for whichever candidate she rallied behind, said John Pitney, a professor of politics at Claremont McKenna College.
Harris has long relationships with several of the candidates in the race. A source familiar with her thinking told The Times after Harris bowed out that she was still considering whether and how to approach the governor's race.
Other endorsements could affect the race as well. Hours after Harris announced her decision, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco), the influential former House Speaker, appeared on CNN to endorse Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, whom she has known for years.
'We have many great candidates, one in particular Eleni Tsakopoulos, whom I support,' Pelosi said, referring to Kounalakis by her maiden name.
Kounalakis' father, the wealthy developer Angelo Tsakopoulos, helped bankroll an independent expenditure committee supporting his daughter's 2018 campaign for lieutenant governor. Political observers are watching to see if he dumps money into a similar effort backing her gubernatorial campaign.
Pitney said Pelosi's opinion 'would carry a lot more weight' if she were still speaker. He said it 'isn't necessarily going to sway a large chunk of the electorate,' but could be important if it sways Bay Area donors.
A former GOP legislative aide and national party staffer who renounced his membership in the Republican Party the night Trump was elected in 2016, Pitney said that endorsements are far from a determining factor in today's political landscape.
'I hesitate to rule anybody out, because very often candidates seem to come out of nowhere — like Mamdani in New York City,' he said, referring to the sudden rise and stunning upset primary win of 33-year-old democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani in the New York mayoral race.
Pitney added that experience in government and administrative leadership also matters, but could also cut against candidates at a time when many voters are frustrated and want something new.
For example, Antonio Villaraigosa, the former state Assembly speaker and L.A. mayor who is in his 70s, 'obviously has a long history, but that long history is both an advantage and a disadvantage,' Pitney said.
Villaraigosa has said his campaign is 'about the future.' But voters 'may not regard him as a fresh face,' Pitney said.
None of the current candidates for governor have the same profile as Harris. In fact, they are broadly unknown to huge swaths of the electorate.
That means they have their work cut out for them, Pitney and South said — namely in terms of fundraising.
South said that there 'is no question that the Democratic donor base has basically been sitting on their haunches waiting to see what Harris is going to do.'
But, he said, he hasn't seen any sign yet that donors have picked a favorite candidate now that she's out, either — which is a problem for candidates with little or no name recognition.
'None of these candidates in the remaining field with Harris out have enough money in the bank to run a statewide campaign for governor,' he said.
South said that could change if Kounalakis gets another major infusion of cash from her father and once again taps her personal wealth.
At the same time, there could also be a 'huge blowback' from that sort of splashy family spending, South said, especially if Kounalakis' opponents pounced on it as distasteful.
'We have not tended in this state to elect moneyed people who try to buy the governor's race,' he said.
South said he is watching to see if big Bay Area donors decide to back Porter 'because of her profile as a progressive.'
Los Angeles developer and 2022 mayoral candidate Rick Caruso 'could be a force' if he were to enter the race, Pitney said, because 'he has prominence in Southern California and also has a lot of money.'
The most recent fundraising reports, which were due Thursday night, shine a light on candidates' coffers — but only through the end of June, well before Harris dropped out.
The Democrats who do not have the potential to self-fund their campaigns reported having millions of dollars in cash on hand as of June 30, including some who transferred money from prior campaign committees to their gubernatorial accounts.
Former legislative leader Toni Atkins reported having $4.3 million in the campaign, while raising $648,000 and spending $549,000 in the first six months of this year.
Villaraigosa raised $1.1 million and spent $550,000 this year, but reported $3.3 million cash on hand based on fundraising he did last year.
Becerra had $2.1 million in the bank after raising $2.5 million and spending $449,000 in the first six months of the year.
Porter reported raising $2.5 million and spending $449,000 since launching her campaign in March. She said she has $2.1 million in the bank.
Unlike the other candidates, Porter's campaign revealed her fundraising because her filing on the state disclosure website didn't show any dollar figures.
Spokesman Nathan Click said her number of small-dollar donors crashed the state's system, and that they had been working with state officials to get the documents displayed on the secretary of state's website all day Friday. He said most of Porter's 34,000 donors contributed less than $200 each.
Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco reported raising $1.6 million and spending $609,000 this year, leaving him with $1 million in the bank.
A few candidates reported mediocre fundraising numbers, but have personal wealth they can draw on.
Kounalakis raised just over $100,000 and spent nearly three times as much during the first half of this year. She has more than $4.6 million on hand and millions more in her lieutenant governor campaign account, although some of that money can't be transferred because of campaign finance rules.
Businessman Stephen J. Cloobeck, a Los Angeles Democrat, raised about $160,000 and spent $1.5 million — including more than $1 million on consultants. He had about $729,000 on hand at the end of the period. He also said he made a $10-million contribution Friday that he said 'turbocharged' his campaign.
'One of my many advantages is that I'm not a politician and I am not compromised,' Cloobeck said.
Former Fox News host Steve Hilton, a Republican candidate, raised about $1.5 million, of which $200,000 was a personal loan. Hilton spent about $1 million and has a little less than $800,000 in the bank.
At the lowest end of the fundraising were former state controller Betty Yee, who raised almost $238,000 and spent $255,000, with $637,000 on hand; and state schools superintendent Tony Thurmond, who raised about $70,000, spent about $180,000 and had almost $560,000 on hand.
Both Yee and Thurmond told The Times last month that fundraising had slowed while Democratic donors waited on Harris to make a decision.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Blaming ‘the system,' Kamala Harris falls for the oldest temptation
Blaming ‘the system,' Kamala Harris falls for the oldest temptation

New York Post

time21 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Blaming ‘the system,' Kamala Harris falls for the oldest temptation

August is usually downtime in Washington, DC: Congress is in recess, the heat and humidity contribute to the desire to escape town for cooler weather, the president is normally somewhere else and cable news is focused on shark attacks. Not this August. Cable news especially, along with some newspapers, seem to be fixated on the person Democrats will nominate for president in 2028. We are just eight months into President Donald Trump's second term — and we are being forced to listen and read speculation about an election a political lifetime away. Part of it can be blamed on former Vice President Kamala Harris, who received headlines for announcing she is not running for governor of California and will not seek the presidency again. Harris told Stephen Colbert on his soon-to-be canceled 'Late Show' the reason she will not run again: 'The system is broken,' she said Funny how Democrats claim the system is broken only when they lose. The larger part of the media's preoccupation with politics is that many 'can't stop thinking about tomorrow' instead of living in the present. For many, politics has become a false god. Like those ancient gods described in the Old Testament that could never deliver what the people claimed to want, the political 'gods' are worshiped no matter how many times they fail to keep their promises. If, as Harris claims, 'the system' is broken, much of the reason is that we have asked the government to do what it was never created to do. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! Even as Trump, however imperfectly, is trying to fix it, too many voters still put too much faith where it doesn't belong. It is here that CS Lewis offers valuable insight. In his classic work 'The Screwtape Letters,' a demon-in-training named Wormwood is assigned by his Uncle Screwtape (aka Satan) to distract his 'patient' (aka us) from the plans of 'the enemy' (aka God). Kamala Harris would do well to read this excerpt, since she blames a broken system for her loss, and her decision not to run again. 'Be sure that the patient remains completely fixated on politics,' Lewis' Screwtape advises. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters 'Arguments, political gossip, and obsessing on the faults of people they have never met serves as an excellent distraction from advancing in personal virtue, character, and the things the patient can control. 'Make sure to keep the patient in a constant state of angst, frustration, and general disdain towards the rest of the human race in order to avoid any kind of charity or inner peace from further developing. 'Ensure the patient continues to believe that the problem is 'out there' in the 'broken system' rather than recognizing there is a problem with himself.' William Shakespeare had his own analysis of the human condition. Students may remember this comment by Cassius in 'Julius Caesar': 'The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves, that we are underlings.' It means that fate and destiny do not control us, but rather the good or bad choices we make are the result of our own actions, determined by the worldview to which we cling and in which we believe. Imagine if politicians began speaking like Lewis and the Bard, telling voters, 'I can't do more for you than you can do for yourselves.' With so many addicted to politics and 'the system,' voters might quickly drive the career politicians from office — and the ratings on cable news would drop like a stone. Cal Thomas is a veteran political commentator, columnist and author.

GOP senators place holds over tax credit guidance
GOP senators place holds over tax credit guidance

The Hill

time21 minutes ago

  • The Hill

GOP senators place holds over tax credit guidance

Grassley, who recently engaged in a heated back-and-forth with Trump over the handling of judicial picks, announced his move to place the holds in the congressional record Friday. 'Today, I placed a hold on three Department of the Treasury nominees,' he said in the record, specifically naming Trump's picks for the department's general counsel, assistant secretary and undersecretary. The Iowa Republican added that while the 'big, beautiful, bill' recently passed by Congress allowed for wind and solar companies to continue to get tax credits if they begin construction of their projects in the next year, the Treasury Department 'is expected to issue rules and regulations implementing the agreed upon phase-out of the wind and solar credits by August 18, 2025.' 'Until I can be certain that such rules and regulations adhere to the law and congressional intent, I intend to continue to object to the consideration of these Treasury nominees,' Grassley said. Sen. John Curtis (R-Utah) is also placing a hold on the same nominees — Brian Morrissey Jr., Francis Brooke and Jonathan McKernan — for the same reason, a source familiar told The Hill. After legislation to terminate the tax credits was passed, Trump signed an executive order that directed the Treasury to take a strict approach to limit which projects are eligible while they're still active.

Bonta says millions spent, but billions saved, in California's legal war with Trump
Bonta says millions spent, but billions saved, in California's legal war with Trump

Los Angeles Times

time21 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Bonta says millions spent, but billions saved, in California's legal war with Trump

California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta said Monday that his office has spent more than $5 million fighting the Trump administration in court over the last six months, but saved the state nearly $170 billion. 'That means that for every one dollar we've been given by the legislature and the governor from special session funding to do this work — and we are very grateful for that funding — we've returned $33,600 for the state,' Bonta said during an afternoon news conference alongside Gov. Gavin Newsom. 'Just to put it in perspective, if you told a Wall Street investor they'd get a $33,000 return on every one dollar invested, they would trip over themselves to get in on that deal.' Bonta's calculations are based on a mountain of litigation his office has filed against the administration since President Trump's inauguration on Jan. 20, including 37 lawsuits — many alongside other liberal-led states — and 47 amicus briefs backing other litigants' lawsuits against the administration. The vast majority of the savings Bonta claimed were the result of one particular lawsuit, in which California and other states successfully challenged a Trump administration effort to freeze trillions of dollars in federal funding to the states — including what Bonta said was $168 billion for California alone. 'In his first week in office, President Trump went after a full-third of California's budget — and we went to court less than 24 hours later and stopped him in his tracks,' Bonta said. Bonta also cited court orders his office has won protecting $7 billion in transportation funding to maintain roads, highways, bridges and other infrastructure; $939 million in education funding for after-school and summer learning and teacher preparation; $972 million in healthcare funding for identifying, tracking and addressing infectious diseases, ensuring immunizations and modernizing public health infrastructure; and $300 million for electric vehicle charging infrastructure. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment Monday. However, it has previously derided California's efforts to block Trump's agenda in the courts. Last month, White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson told The Times that Newsom was 'destroying' the state and that Trump has been trying to 'step in and save Californians from Gavin's incompetence.' The state legislature during a special session in February allocated Bonta's office an extra $25 million to staff up and fight Trump in court. As part of that allocation, the legislature required that Bonta provide regular reports on how the money is spent. Bonta and Newsom's news conference Monday followed the first of those reports being submitted to lawmakers. Bonta said much of the $5 million his office has spent to date was used to pay for in-house attorneys and paralegals, and that none has been spent on outside counsel. He also said that, given the pace and scope of the work to date, his office will eventually need more funding. 'We're grateful for the $25 million and the ability to draw down that $5 million so far. We do think we will need more going into the future, and I'm hopeful that through the conversations that we have — talking about what we would use it for, our success so far, what the continuing threats are down the road — that we'll get to a place that will work for everybody,' Bonta said. Newsom, citing Bonta's financially consequential wins in court already, promised he'll get the funding. 'Let me assure you, he will not be in need of resources to do his job,' Newsom said. 'This report only highlights why I feel very confident in his ability to execute and to deliver results for the people of this state.' Bonta's report outlined 36 lawsuits his office had brought against the Trump administration through Wednesday. Those lawsuits challenged Trump's efforts to slash the federal workforce, cut healthcare funding and research, dismantle the Department of Education and reduce education funding. They also challenged Trump administration efforts to end birthright citizenship for the U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants and restrict voting access in California, among other things. On Friday Bonta's office filed its 37th lawsuit, challenging the administration's efforts to effectively ban gender-affirming care for transgender youth nationwide. Newsom said Bonta's work to date shows exactly why it was necessary for him and other California leaders to call a special session and allocate the additional funds. California sued the first Trump administration more than 120 times, and they knew it would need to sue the second Trump administration, too. 'We were mindful that past is prologue,' Newsom said, and the added resources they provided Bonta's office 'have come to bear great fruit.' Bonta said there is no time to slow down now, as the Trump administration continues to violate the law, and that his team is ready to keep fighting. 'We know that this work is just the beginning,' he said, 'but we are not backing down.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store