logo
Showdown over $825 million prison looms for state House of Representatives

Showdown over $825 million prison looms for state House of Representatives

Yahoo21-02-2025

Attendees await a hearing on budgeting for a proposed men's prison on Feb. 20, 2025, at the South Dakota Capitol in Pierre. (John Hult/South Dakota Searchlight)
PIERRE — A prison that would be the most expensive taxpayer-funded project in South Dakota history has once again failed to earn support from the lawmakers who hold the key to the last $182 million needed to build it.
The state's budget-setting committee voted Thursday to send a bill to fund the new men's prison to the floor of the House of Representatives with no recommendation for or against it.
Because it appropriates funds, it needs to pass that chamber by a two-thirds majority.
'This deserves to be heard, by the entire body, with an up and down vote, on the floor tomorrow,' said Rep. Mike Derby, R-Rapid City.
SD House panel lukewarm on bill to finalize new men's prison funding
Thursday's action sets up a Friday showdown between supporters and opponents of a 1,500-bed prison that Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden called a top priority this week.
No lawmaker on the Joint Appropriations Committee telegraphed their feelings on the project, but legislative leaders said at a press conference held earlier in the day that the bill's success is not certain.
'This thing, right now, I see is floundering a bit as far as passing,' said House Speaker Pro Tempore Karla Lems, R-Canton, who is a frequent critic of the prison plan. 'That could change when it gets to the floor, obviously. We don't know what the votes will be until they get on the board.'
Rhoden, before departing to Washington, D.C., to meet with federal leaders in the Trump administration, called on lawmakers to follow through on the prison.
He lauded the Senate's passage of a separate bill to rename the prison system as the 'Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation,' and said the state needs a new prison if it expects to live up to the promise of the moniker.
'We need to put our money where our mouth is,' Rhoden said. 'The unfortunate truth is, rehabilitation is not possible in the current state penitentiary. The facility is Gothic, it's old and it's decrepit.'
The budget committee's neutral recommendation Thursday was preceded by around an hour of back-and-forth about the prison. The price is set at $825 million before factoring in road construction or ongoing operational costs.
Supporters spoke first.
Ryan Brunner, a policy analyst in Rhoden's office, said the $825 million guaranteed price would slip from the state's grasp if legislators take the advice of opponents and spend a year studying alternative solutions for overcrowding at the penitentiary in Sioux Falls. The new prison on a rural site south of Sioux Falls would largely replace that older facility, state officials have said.
The guarantee of a maximum price ends March 31.
Resistance to final budget request for new prison 'a real possibility' in Pierre
'That price will only go up if this project does not continue to move forward in some way,' Brunner said.
State Engineer Stacy Watters said lawmakers could wind up on the hook for $100 million in upgrades to 'bring it up to code' if their plans involved continued use of the penitentiary, which was built in 1881.
'Three years ago, when discussing the new prison, I halted all maintenance and repair projects at the Hill that were not emergency in nature,' Watters said, referring to the penitentiary by its informal name.
There are multiple roof replacements needed across the penitentiary grounds, she said, as well as a need to address HVAC projects in the administration area, fire suppression system upgrades in recreation buildings, and heat pump replacements, upgrades to LED lighting and 'repairing walls that are pulling away from the building structure' in parts of the penitentiary.
Department of Corrections Secretary Kellie Wasko, echoing Rhoden, testified that the new facility would free up space across the system to offer rehabilitation programming like substance abuse treatment and parenting classes, and to add job training.
'We need space to do this, and we can only accomplish this with a new facility,' Wasko said.
The site of a proposed men's prison in southeastern South Dakota.
Some of the comments from Brunner, Watters and Department of Corrections Secretary Wasko addressed concerns brought to lawmakers' attention by Doug Weber, the retired chief warden and former longtime director of prisons at the state DOC.
The former warden has come out strongly and publicly against the prison plan in recent weeks. He's sent seven letters this year to lawmakers, spoken to media outlets and addressed Republican leaders during a closed door, face-to-face meeting in Pierre.
Lems told South Dakota Searchlight on Thursday that Weber's dispatches have offered insight to lawmakers who feel the executive branch has 'not been transparent.'
Lems is among the elected officials supporting efforts to pause prison funding and study options before the state dips into the $600 million, interest-bearing incarceration construction fund it created for correctional projects three years ago.
'I'm not saying don't do anything,' said Lems. 'Overcrowding is an issue. We do have the money set aside, and that's a good thing.'
A 2021 report from Nebraska's DLR Group offered up a 1,500-bed multi-custody-level men's facility as its top recommendation to address the prison system's woes.
Private employers say they were pushed out of state prisons
But Weber contends the state's laser-like focus on that recommendation is short-sighted. The same report suggested several other options, including new facilities on the grounds of Mike Durfee State Prison in Springfield, in Rapid City, on the penitentiary grounds, and near Yankton's Human Services Center (HSC). Such facilities would serve different kinds of inmates with different needs, which Weber said is important in a prison system with fewer than 300 maximum security inmates.
Wasko's pleas for a single new prison – a prison bid as a Level V, or high-custody, facility – are essentially her 'trying her best to make this prison, in my opinion, into something that it's not.'
'I'm going to continue to refer to it as a 1,500-bed human warehouse, a massive human warehouse, because that's really what it looks like to me right now,' Weber told South Dakota Searchlight.
The state has spent millions to maintain the penitentiary over the years, Weber said. It can safely serve its purpose – like prisons of similar design such as California's San Quentin Rehabilitation Center – particularly if enough medium-security inmates could be moved out to leave one inmate per cell, according to Weber. That's what it was designed for.
The state added more cameras, lighting and other security upgrades during Weber's tenure, following the 2011 murder of Correctional Officer Ronald 'R.J' Johnson. The campus training center was upgraded and named after Johnson a few years later.
State official says new men's prison will alleviate health risks during heat events
Just a few years ago, the state installed air conditioning at the penitentiary, and put around $300,000 toward a new elevator in the penitentiary's administration wing.
Following Thursday's vote, Weber characterized Watters' $100 million list of facility fixes as mostly 'wish list' maintenance unrelated to the basic functioning of the penitentiary's housing areas.
Former state Speaker of the House Steve Haugaard has also come out as a vocal opponent. On Thursday, Haugaard once again testified against the prison bill.
The state needs to focus on rehabilitation and recidivism, he said, consider all its options, and do a better job managing its penitentiary operations.
'I've been in the penitentiary hundreds of times over the course of my career,' said Haugaard, a Sioux Falls lawyer. 'It's perfectly suitable to get the job done if you just hire the staff that you need.'
Wasko responded by reminding the committee that lawmakers had boosted staff pay to address open positions a few years ago. The DOC is at its lowest vacancy rate in 10 years, she said, and 'that is something to be commended.'
'As of the last six months, our problem has not been to recruit, it's been to retain,' she said. 'And I think we've got a lot of initiatives in place to improve that retention.'
Watters addressed the Yankton idea, suggesting that the state would struggle to staff a prison in that city. The HSC is the state's psychiatric hospital.
'You'll hear that we should construct a new prison in Yankton to be closer to HSC and medical services,' she told the committee. 'However, as of right now, HSC has four of their 16 pods closed due to lack of staffing.'
Wasko and Brunner, meanwhile, maintained that the state's plan is for a 'multi-custody' facility. Its units would be flexible and able to serve the needs of any kind of inmate, they said.
'This is not the maximum security facility you've been told it is,' Wasko said.
According to the Department of Corrections website, a Level V facility is the most secure available. It must 'have double perimeter fencing with razor wire and detection devices or equivalent security architecture.' The perimeters 'must be continuously patrolled.'
In South Dakota, only the Jameson Prison Annex on the penitentiary grounds in Sioux Falls and South Dakota Women's Prison in Pierre are Level V facilities. The 1881 penitentiary that the new prison will largely replace is a Level IV facility.
The request for information sent to potential bidders in 2023 asked those bidders to present a plan for 'a 1,500-bed Level V facility.' A bid document for an environmental assessment also uses the same language.
Critics have pointed to a 1,500-bed Nebraska prison priced at $350 million as proof that South Dakota is overbuilding.
Consternation over that figure has bubbled over in multiple legislative meetings about the South Dakota prison, both before and during the 2025 session.
Calls for transparency and accountability permeate prison commission meeting
South Dakota officials have repeatedly responded by saying that the Nebraska prison is for medium-security inmates, and by saying the price tag is a moving target without the certainty of a guaranteed maximum price.
According to reporting from the Lincoln Journal Star, officials in that state said at an August groundbreaking that the $350 million figure should hold.
On Thursday, however, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services spokeswoman Dayne Urbanovsky told South Dakota Searchlight that the main building construction package for the new prison 'will be bid out in the spring.'
'As for projected total construction costs, I do not have those numbers at this time,' she wrote.
J.E. Dunn Construction guaranteed the $825 million price for South Dakota.
Vance McMilllan of J.E. Dunn told lawmakers that the Nebraska price tag, whatever it winds up being, is for a less durable facility.
'You've asked us to look at a facility that is going to last 100 years,' McMillan said, adding that 'I know for a fact' that some of the buildings in the Nebraska prison will be made of metal.
'Metal buildings will not last 100 years,' he said.
When asked on Wednesday if the South Dakota prison price would be lower if the state had asked for a lower-custody facility, Brunner said he'd have to 'look at all the classification levels' to know for sure.
He said South Dakota's design will accommodate mostly medium-security inmates, but that the new prison's design makes it like a five-speed pickup, for which you can use 'all five speeds.'
'A modern cell is concrete wall, concrete floor, steel door, two people per cell,' Brunner said. 'And so that's the facility that's been designed.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Four Senior Biden Officials to Testify in Probe on His Health: Report
Four Senior Biden Officials to Testify in Probe on His Health: Report

Newsweek

time35 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Four Senior Biden Officials to Testify in Probe on His Health: Report

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Four senior officials in former President Joe Biden's administration are set to testify in a House probe into Biden's health while in office. Newsweek reached out to Jill and Joe Biden's office via online form Tuesday for comment. Why It Matters Biden dropped out of the 2024 presidential race in late July following a disastrous debate performance against then-Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump. Biden repeatedly stared at Trump and made halting statements where he appeared to lose his train of thought. Biden later said he had "a bad, bad night." Questions swirled about his mental acuity and possible decline as the White House and then Vice President Kamala Harris fielded questions about his cognitive ability in the final months of his presidency. Biden also faced harsh feedback as excerpts from CNN's Jake Tapper and Axios' Alex Thompson's book Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again were published. What To Know According to Politico, citing a House Oversight Committee aid, former deputy chief of staff Annie Tomasini, former deputy director of Oval Office operations Ashley Williams, former director of the Domestic Policy Council Neera Tanden, and Anthony Bernal, former senior adviser to the then first lady, are all set to testify in either June or July. Committee Chair James Comer requested their cooperation with the probe in May and also sent Biden's physician, Kevin O'Connor, a subpoena last week, Politico reports. In a post on X, formerly Twitter, Comer said that he requested O'Connor appear for a deposition on June 27, 2025. Trump has pushed White House lawyers to look into whether Biden's aides covered up his alleged health decline, Reuters reports. Biden also revealed last month that he had been diagnosed with an "aggressive" form of prostate cancer that had metastasized to the bone. Former President Joe Biden can be seen posing at the opening night of "Othello" on Broadway at The Barrymore Theatre on March 23, 2025, in New York City. (Photo by Bruce Glikas/WireImage) Former President Joe Biden can be seen posing at the opening night of "Othello" on Broadway at The Barrymore Theatre on March 23, 2025, in New York City. (Photo by Bruce Glikas/WireImage) What People Are Saying House Oversight Committee on X over the weekend: "Even Obama's doctor admits the truth. This is precisely why Chairman @RepJamesComer subpoenaed Dr. Kevin O'Connor, Biden's physician. This is a scandal of historical proportions, and we will investigate it thoroughly!" Trump on Truth Social in May after Biden's diagnosis: "Melania and I are saddened to hear about Joe Biden's recent medical diagnosis. We extend our warmest and best wishes to Jill and the family, and we wish Joe a fast and successful recovery." Biden in a statement last week: "Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false," Biden said. "This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans who are working to push disastrous legislation that would cut essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families, all to pay for tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations."

House panel demands records of 217 NGOs that nabbed billions of taxpayer dollars to ‘fuel' border crisis
House panel demands records of 217 NGOs that nabbed billions of taxpayer dollars to ‘fuel' border crisis

New York Post

time41 minutes ago

  • New York Post

House panel demands records of 217 NGOs that nabbed billions of taxpayer dollars to ‘fuel' border crisis

WASHINGTON — A House Republican panel is demanding records from more than 200 non-governmental organizations that nabbed billions of dollars in taxpayers' money to settle migrants in the US under ex-President Joe Biden. One of the targeted groups is among those embroiled in the anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles. House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mark Green (R-Tenn.) and Subcommittee Chairman Josh Breechen (R-Okla.) fired off letters to the 217 organizations Tuesday, accusing each of having 'helped fuel the worst border crisis in our nation's history.' Advertisement 5 House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mark Green (R-Tenn.) fired off letters to 217 non-governmental organizations Tuesday accusing them of having 'helped fuel the worst border crisis in our nation's history.' Bloomberg via Getty Images The powerful Republican chairman and Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee leader said the groups created a 'pull factor' in providing taxpayer-funded transportation, translation, housing and other services to migrants, most of whom were released into the country after crossing the border illegally. 'The Committee remains deeply concerned that NGOs that receive U.S. taxpayer dollars benefitted from the border crisis created by the Biden Administration, and stand ready to do so under future Democrat administrations,' Green and Breechen wrote, citing a 'near-total lack of accountability' for how the money was spent. Advertisement They also noted that they are investigating how much the funding incentivized 'human trafficking and smuggling' operations as well as whether the 'NGOs are now actively advising illegal aliens on how to avoid and impede law enforcement officials.' 5 The ICE crackdown in Los Angeles rounded up convicted sexual abusers, drug dealers and gang members to put into removal proceedings, federal officials said. REUTERS One of the groups, the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA), took nearly $1 million in DHS grants to 'offer both citizenship instruction and naturalization application services to lawful permanent residents' starting in 2021. Its last tranche of funding was yanked by the Trump administration in March. CHIRLA organized a rally Thursday to denounce the ICE arrests of illegal immigrants in Los Angeles before protests devolved into full-blown riots that destroyed property and led to the assaults of federal law enforcement. Advertisement 'We have not participated, coordinated, or been part of the protests being registered in Los Angeles other than the press conference and rally,' a CHIRLA rep previously told The Post in a statement. The group did not respond to a Post request for comment Tuesday. The ICE crackdown in the city rounded up convicted sexual abusers, drug dealers and gang members to put into removal proceedings, DHS officials said. 5 'The committee remains deeply concerned that NGOs that receive U.S. taxpayer dollars benefitted from the border crisis created by the Biden Administration,' Green wrote. REUTERS Advertisement Southwest Key Programs, another group being probed by Green's panel, was the largest housing nonprofit for unaccompanied migrant kids who entered the US and took around $3 billion in taxpayer funding from Biden's Health and Human Services — before Trump officials pulled the plug in March. Between 2021 and 2023, Southwest Key's top five executives saw their salaries inflated on average from $420,000 to $720,000 — even as the organization outspent its revenue by millions of dollars. The Justice Department sued Southwest Key Programs in July 2024, alleging that some supervisors and employees had committed 'severe' and 'pervasive' rape and sex abuse against kids between 2015 and 2023. The civil suit was dropped by the DOJ in March 2025, the same month that Trump's HHS cut off federal funding for the organization. 5 Green led the GOP charge in the House to impeach former Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. AP Southwest Key 'strongly denied the claims relating to child sexual abuse in our shelters,' a rep previously said. The group did not respond to a Post request for comment Tuesday. Of the more than 550,000 migrant kids who entered the country between February 2021 and January 2025, at least 291,000 were released from federal custody to domestic sponsors — thousands of whom have since been flagged as sex abusers or gang members — and 32,000 went missing entirely, according to an August 2024 report from DHS's inspector general. On average, 2.4 million immigrants entered the US every year between 2021 and 2024, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Roughly 60% crossed the border illegally, a Goldman Sachs analysis found. Advertisement DHS subagencies such as ICE and the Federal Emergency Management Agency were tapped to 'coordinate with nonprofit organizations that provide services such as food, shelter, and transportation' for those non-citizens who were released, according to a Government Accountability Office report in April 2023. 5 President Trump pulled taxpayer funding for many immigration NGOs after returning to the White House. AP A March 2023 DHS Office of Inspector General audit revealed that 'more than half' of FEMA funding that went to NGOs couldn't be accounted for, Green notes in his letter. The GOP leader has previously called out $81 million in possibly 'illegal' funds that helped cover migrant stays in luxury New York City hotels. Advertisement Conservative immigration groups have previously estimated that the influx of migrants cost New York City residents as much as $10 billion and bilked US taxpayers up to $150 billion in 2023, the year when illegal border crossings reached their highest level in recorded history. Green led the GOP charge in the House to impeach former Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas for allegedly failing to comply with federal immigration law and lying to Congress that the border was 'secure.' The Republican missive requests the total dollar amount of federal grants, contracts or payments received by the NGOs between Jan. 19, 2021, and Jan. 20, 2025. It also demands to know whether any organization sued the feds and what services it provided to migrants. Influential left-leaning groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union, Amnesty International and the Southern Poverty Law Center have all been asked to respond to the queries.

First Republican Indianapolis council member joins calls for Hogsett to resign
First Republican Indianapolis council member joins calls for Hogsett to resign

Indianapolis Star

time41 minutes ago

  • Indianapolis Star

First Republican Indianapolis council member joins calls for Hogsett to resign

A Republican on the Indianapolis City-County Council has joined other calls for Mayor Joe Hogsett's resignation, following an investigation into the handling of sexual harassment complaints by his former top aide and the revelation of the mayor's late-night, personal text messages to two younger women. Joshua Bain, who represents the south side of Marion County, is the first Republican on the 25-member Democrat-led council to call for Hogsett's resignation. Democrat Andy Nielsen and Democratic socialist Jesse Brown previously called on Hogsett to resign. "Calling for resignation is not something I do lightly," Bain said in a statement June 10. "But the weight of these failures — ethical, personal, and professional —demands accountability. Immediate change in leadership would be right for Indianapolis." The call from Bain follows an explosive City-County Council meeting on June 9 in which Lauren Roberts, who is one of three women who accused Hogsett's former right-hand man Thomas Cook of harassment and abuse, was forcibly dragged out of the council chambers by sheriff's deputies as she tried to make a statement to council members about her experience and the subsequent investigation. Though the calls for Hogsett's resignation are growing, it's not up to the City-County Council whether Hogsett stays in office. An impeachment process exists, but is largely controlled by the Indiana General Assembly. Recall elections also don't exist here. However, losing support from the council where there is a Democratic supermajority could make it more difficult for the mayor to govern. It already appears to be impacting his schedule. Hogsett had been scheduled to attend a press conference June 10 to announce a city housing initiative called "Streets to Home" but that event was canceled. More: 'We won't allow facts to be buried': Hogsett investigative report omissions raise concerns The Council's Democratic caucus released a statement yesterday stating they were let down by the mayor's behavior but stopped short of calling for a resignation. But the statement added "the mayor's past and recent conduct has compromised (public) trust and weakened the moral authority of the office." Democrats called for the city to implement several reforms, including establishing an independent human resources board to replace the city's current human resources division. The council's Republicans are also demanding that the council take several additional action steps, including an oversight hearing, more documentation from the law firm that conducted the investigation and a public addendum to the report that includes any evidence omitted from the official version. So far, just one member of the council, Democrat Ron Gibson, has released a statement in staunch support of Hogsett. IndyStar's recent reporting revealed the mayor's late-night personal texts to younger women made them feel uncomfortable, they said, and they shared those texts with Fisher Phillips investigators who were probing the Cook allegations as evidence of a troubled workplace culture under Hogsett. No mention of the texts appeared in the final report, IndyStar reported last week, even though they directly contradicted some of the report's conclusions. After the June 9 meeting, where dozens of people came to protest Hogsett, another Democrat on the council, Crista Carlino, said she was "deeply considering" calling for Hogsett's resignation. 'As someone who serves part-time, runs campaigns, evening text messages with staff are things that unfortunately have to happen," Carlino said. "We pull late nights. But the content of those, particularly around the poetry especially for a married man, gives me great pause.' Hogsett was married at the time the messages were sent but got divorced in 2023. In his call for the mayor to resign, Bain said there was a "troubling and growing pattern" of issues with the mayor, including a "lack of response" during the 2020 protests in downtown Indianapolis. "That lack of leadership left a lasting mark — on our downtown, on our public trust, and on our ability to move forward as a united city," Bain said. More: Can Indiana mayors be removed from office? There's a law, but it's rare, experts say. Fallout from the City-County Council meeting in which Roberts and her supporters were forcibly removed from the chambers continued the next day. Before the meeting, Hogsett had been scheduled to attend a press conference June 10 to announce a city housing initiative called "Streets to Home." On the day of the press conference, Hogsett's administration decided to "postpone" the meeting to an undetermined date "in light of recent events, in order to keep the focus on supporting our unhoused neighbors." Faith leaders criticized that decision and said they had suggested that someone else from the mayor's office represent the administration "out of concern for the tone, perception and effectiveness" of the event. "Last night's events at the City-County Council meeting deeply unsettled many in our community and cast a shadow over the important progress we are trying to make through the Streets to Home initiative," according to a statement from Rabbi Aaron Spiegel, Pastor David Greene and Rev. Gray Lesesne. The Concerned Clergy of Indianapolis and the Baptist Ministers' Alliance also released a statement on June 10 criticizing the "disturbing revelations about sexual harassment, retaliation and silencing of victims at the highest levels of city government." Removing Roberts from the council meeting was "further traumatizing a woman who had the courage to speak truth to power." "We say with one voice: You cannot protect future victims by abandoning those already harmed. You cannot legislate equity while practicing erasure. You cannot call yourself a public servant and privately shield misconduct," the statement read. Email IndyStar Reporter Jordan Smith at JTsmith@ Follow him on X: @jordantsmith09.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store