Liberation Day might have cost you Independence Day: Firework costs skyrockets on Trump tariffs
Fireworks wholesalers and distributors are halting the shipment of goods into the U.S. after President Donald Trump announced his ' Liberation Day' tariffs earlier this month.
China is the world's largest producer of fireworks, but goods from the country have been socked by Trump with a 145 percent tariff, forcing American distributors to stop purchasing the products from the country.
That means Americans might end up going without fireworks for this year's July Fourth holiday, according to a report from NBC News.
Days after announcing the tariffs, Trump implemented a 90-day pause for most countries, but raised China's to the three-digit figure.
According to the National Fireworks Association, Trump's new trade policy went into effect as companies were ordering the last of their holiday fireworks. About 75 percent of fireworks used in shows and 99 percent of consumer fireworks come from China.
Many countries say the tariffs are too costly and it's unlikely consumers would take on significant price hikes, reported NBC News.
Fireworks aren't the only products at risk. The tariffs stand to make everyday products more expensive, particularly toys for children as small business toymakers struggle to navigate the tariffs.
About 64 percent of small toy companies and 80 percent of mid-sized toy companies have said they've canceled orders due to the tariff-hiked prices. Additionally, half of those companies also said they would go out of business within weeks or months if Trump's China policy doesn't change, according to a survey from the Toy Association.
The president dismissed those concerns during a Cabinet meeting Wednesday, saying ships coming into the country were largely carrying products 'we don't need.'
'Somebody said, 'Oh, the shelves are going to be bare.' Well, maybe the children will have two dolls instead of 30, you know?' Trump commented, adding, 'And maybe the two dolls will cost a couple of bucks more than they would normally.'
The New York Post mocked Trump's comments by putting a Barbie on its front cover Thursday with the headline: 'Skimp on the Barbie.'
Stacy Schneitter Blake, president of the National Fireworks Association, told NBC News in a statement: 'Shipping has essentially stopped. While there's still a good amount of fireworks in the U.S. from wholesalers who stocked up earlier, we're still expecting shortages because many of us typically rely on shipments that would have arrived over the past month.'
Schneitter Blake said her business had to halt several shipments that wouldn't have reached the U.S. before the implementation of tariffs.
'With tariffs this high, bringing fireworks in just isn't feasible, so we've had to leave shipments overseas,' she noted.
Stephen Vitale, who runs Live Events, a company that does more than 3,000 fireworks shows a year, said he's going to start getting nervous if the policy doesn't shift in the next 30 to 45 days.
'We've placed orders for 2026, but based on the tariffs, we've paused any production until we have some certainty.'
It might already be too late this summer to meet demand across the country, even if tariffs are reduced. In China, the manufacturing of fireworks stops due to rising temperatures, which could leave consumers waiting for fireworks until the following year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
29 minutes ago
- NBC News
After criticism from MAGA world, Amy Coney Barrett delivers for Trump
WASHINGTON — As President Donald Trump reveled in a major Supreme Court victory that curbed the ability of judges to block his policies nationwide, he had special praise for one of the justices: Amy Coney Barrett. 'I want to thank Justice Barrett, who wrote the opinion brilliantly,' he said at a White House press conference soon after Friday's ruling. Barrett's majority opinion in the 6-3 ruling along ideological lines, which at least temporarily revived Trump's plan to end automatic birthright citizenship, is a major boost to an administration that has been assailed by courts around the country for its broad and aggressive use of executive power. It also marks an extraordinary turnaround for Barrett's reputation among Trump's most vocal supporters. Just a few months ago, she faced vitriolic criticism from MAGA influencers and others as she sporadically voted against Trump, including a March decision in which she rejected a Trump administration attempt to avoid paying U.S. Agency for International Development contractors. CNN also reported that Trump himself had privately complained about Barrett. That is despite the fact that she is a Trump appointee with a long record of casting decisive votes in a host of key cases in which the court's 6-3 conservative majority has imposed itself, most notably with the 2022 ruling that overturned the abortion rights landmark Roe v. Wade. One of those outspoken critics, Trump-allied lawyer Mike Davis, suggested that the pressure on Barrett had the desired effect. 'Sometimes feeling the heat helps people see the light,' he said in a text message. Quickly U-turning, MAGA influencers on Friday praised Barrett and turned their anger on liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson instead. They seized upon language in Barrett's opinion in which she gave short shrift to Jackson's dissenting opinion, in which the President Joe Biden appointee characterized the ruling as an 'existential threat to the rule of law.' Barrett responded by accusing Jackson of a 'startling line of attack' that was based on arguments 'at odds with more than two centuries' worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself.' Jack Posobiec, a conservative firebrand who a few months ago called Barrett a ' DEI judge,' immediately used similar language against Jackson, who is the first Black woman to serve on the court. In an appearance on Real America's Voice, a right-wing streaming channel, he call Jackson an ' autopen hire' in reference to the unsubstantiated allegation from conservatives that Biden's staff was responsible for many of his decisions. He then described Barrett as 'one of the nicest people. She's not some flame-throwing conservative up there.' It is not just the birthright citizenship case in which the Trump administration has claimed victory at the Supreme Court in recent months. The court, often with the three liberal justices in dissent, has also handed Trump multiple wins on emergency applications filed at the court, allowing various policies that were blocked by lower courts to go into effect. In such cases, the court does not always list exactly how each justice voted, but Barrett did not publicly dissent, for example, when the court allowed Trump to quickly deport immigrants to countries they have no connection to or ended temporary legal protections for 500,000 immigrants from four countries. Barrett defenders dismiss suggestions she would be influenced by negative comments from MAGA world, with Samuel Bray, a professor at Notre Dame Law School, saying her ruling that limited nationwide injunctions simply shows her independent qualities as a judge. 'It should reinforce the sense that she's her own justice and she's committed to giving legal answers to legal questions. We shouldn't be looking for political answers to political questions,' he said. Barrett, via a Supreme Court spokeswoman, did not respond to a request for comment. More broadly, legal experts said that in the Supreme Court term that just ended, Barrett showed that on many traditional conservative issues she is 'solidly to the right,' Anthony Kreis, a professor at Georgia State University College of Law. There were fewer examples of her going her own way than in the previous term, when which she staked out her own path in some significant cases. On Friday alone, she was part of a conservative 6-3 majority in three of the five rulings, including the birthright citizenship case. The others saw the court rule in favor of religious conservatives who objected to LGBTQ story books in elementary schools and uphold a Texas restriction on adult-content websites. 'I don't think we can say she was ever drifting left, but she was occupying a center-right position on the court that occasionally made her a key swing vote,' he added. 'This term's docket at the end just wasn't that.' One notable wrinkle in the birthright citizenship case is that Barrett, as the most junior justice in the majority, would not have been expected to write it. Often, Chief Justice John Roberts, who gets to assign cases when he is in the majority, will write such rulings himself. Carolyn Shapiro, a professor at Chicago-Kent College of Law, said the assignment suited Barrett, who is known for her expertise on legal procedure. But she also wondered if Roberts might have considered the impact of the complaints against Barrett and wanted to 'give her a place to shine from the perspective of the right.' Even if that were a consideration in Roberts' thinking, Shapiro added, 'I don't see much evidence that she is doing things that she wouldn't have done if not for the criticism she received.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Satellite pictures show secret activity at Iranian nuclear site that the U.S. bombed
New satellite photos have revealed that Iran is trying to piece back together its nuclear site after the U.S. bombed it. Heavy machinery was seen at the Fordow site as Iran appears to be intensifying its construction and excavation of the nuclear facility after U.S. B-2 bombers struck it last Saturday in Operation Midnight Hammer. Activity was seen near the tunnel entrances and near the points where the American buster bombs struck in Donald Trump's early-morning attack. Construction equipment was also seen digging new access roads to the facility and repairing damage to the main one in order to restore access to the country's main nuclear facility. Trump said the strikes 'completely obliterated' Iran's nuclear program and set it back years, but the new aerial images suggest the country has taken preliminary efforts to protect its facility. Iranian media said the sites had been evacuated prior to the strikes and the enriched uranium was transported to a 'safe location'. It is unclear how much uranium was left at the site during the bomb, but officials said there is no contamination after the strikes. Earthwork also showed signs tunnel entrances might have been sealed off before the attacks, Newsweek reported. Similar construction activity was seen at the Fordow site prior to the strikes, where Iranians were seen shipping contents from the nuclear site to another location a half a mile away. Despite the extent of the damage being up to question, International Atomic Energy Agency - the UN's nuclear watchdog - said Fordow's centrifuges were 'no longer operational' and suffered 'enormous damage'. A leaked preliminary report from the Defense Intelligence Agency, a U.S. government intelligence group, suggested there was 'low confidence' that the Middle Eastern country's program had been set back. Even Iran's leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has said the U.S. hit Tehran's nuclear sites but achieved 'nothing significant'. He said: 'Anyone who heard [Trump's] remarks could tell there was a different reality behind his words - they could do nothing.' The Trump Administration - including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Director Of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard - pushed back on the report. Hegseth slammed the media for diminishing the strikes, which Trump compared to Hiroshima. 'Your people are trying to leak and spin that it wasn't successful, it's irresponsible,' he said at a press conference. 'There's nothing that I've seen that suggests that what we didn't hit exactly what we wanted to hit in those locations,' he explained without offering further evidence that the uranium was destroyed. Trump has threatened to sue The New York Times and CNN for reporting on the preliminary report. The Times reported on Thursday that Trump's personal lawyer Alejandro Brito had reached out to the newspaper and said the article had damaged the President's reputation. The letter demanded The Times 'retract and apologize for' the story, calling it 'false,' 'defamatory' and 'unpatriotic'. The newspaper's lawyer responded by noting that Trump administration officials had confirmed the existence of the report after The Times published its findings. 'No retraction is needed,' The Times' lawyer David McCraw said in a letter. 'No apology will be forthcoming. We told the truth to the best of our ability. We will continue to do so.' A spokesperson for CNN told The Times that the cable news network had responded to Trump's lawyer in a similar fashion. Operation Midnight Hammer marked the end of a 45-year stand-off between the U.S. and Iran. Trump warned Iran not to try and rebuild its nuclear program. 'I don't think they'll ever do it again,' he said while attending a NATO summit. 'They just went through hell. I think they've had it. The last thing they want to do is enrich.' But the President also didn't rule out another airstrike if necessary. When asked whether the U.S. would strike again if Iran built its nuclear enrichment program, he replied: 'Sure.' In total, the U.S. launched 75 precision-guided munitions, including more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles, and more than 125 military aircraft in the operation against three nuclear sites.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Israel says Iran was building warheads capable of hitting London
Iran has been building the biggest ballistic missile arsenal on the planet, producing one-tonne warheads capable of reaching London, Israeli officials have warned. The focus since last weekend's US strikes on Iran has been on the country's nuclear programme and controversy over whether or not it was 'completely obliterated', as President Trump has claimed. But Israeli officials say that was not the only objective when the attack on Iran was launched in the early hours of June 13. 'We actually acted because of two existential threats,' said Oren Marmorstein, spokesman for Israel's foreign ministry. 'One was nuclear, and we acted when we did because Iran was at the 11th hour of being able to build a bomb. But the other was the ballistic threat.' Before the conflict, Tehran was estimated by the US to have about 3,000 ballistic missiles but the regime had been in the midst of an operation to increase production to 20,000, Marmorstein said, including some with payloads of one or two tonnes. He said that on the morning of Tuesday last week, just before a ceasefire came into effect, a missile killed four people in their safe room in the southern Israeli town of Beersheba. 'Imagine if Tehran sent 10,000 of those,' he added. 'That threat was as existential to us as a nuclear bomb. 'They were moving into industrial scale and about to become the No 1 ballistic missile producer in the world. Some of these are intercontinental, which are not for us.' He said these had the range to reach European cities, including London. On the nuclear programme, Israel has yet to release the intelligence that prompted it to launch Operation Rising Lion — what Trump calls the 12 Day War. 'They were getting closer and closer, almost to the point of no return,' Marmorstein said. He claimed Iran stepped up its programme after Israel's assassination of Hassan Nasrallah, the Hezbollah leader, in Beirut in September. It is a claim that has been echoed by Trump, though not by the US's director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, when she testified to Congress in March. 'On uranium enrichment, they had stockpiled enough for nine nuclear bombs and we saw extreme acceleration on weaponisation. This was all part and parcel of a bigger plan for the annihilation of Israel with three elements — nuclear, ballistic and physical invasion,' Marmorstein said. Marmorstein described the Israeli operation as 'successful beyond our expectations', adding: 'Just imagine the first night we took out the entire senior command of Iranian regime — think of the Nazis being deprived of the entire Wehrmacht command in the first days of World War Two. 'And these were surgical operations, getting to the right window at the right time, almost like James Bond.' The Israelis are still assessing the damage done by America's bunker-buster bomb strikes — a question that has seen heated exchanges of words in Washington — but are confident, according to Marmorstein, 'it has been taken back years. The nuclear race has received a huge blow.' The ballistic programme had also been damaged severely, he said, with many missiles eliminated, as were more than half of Iran's 300 missile-launchers, and the production facility for Shahed drones — something he said 'the Ukrainians are pleased about', because hundreds had been used by Russia against Kyiv. A strike was also launched on a military facility in Yazd that houses Iran's heaviest declared missile, the Khorramshahr — a copy of a North Korean missile carrying a two-ton warhead. The line of used espresso cups behind Marmorstein's desk testify to late nights over the past fortnight. The first Israelis knew of the war was when they were woken at 3am on Friday June 13 by an air raid siren. 'I told my wife and mother, 'This is very serious',' he said. 'We had expected the Iranians to react very soon and on a bigger scale. But they were so blown away by the scale of the Israeli operation, it took them more time to react than expected.' Although some Iranian missiles managed to evade Israel's Iron Dome air defences, taking down blocks of apartments and killing 25 Israelis, this was far fewer than the hundreds or even thousands feared. On Thursday, in his first public appearance in more than a week, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, declared victory against Israel and America. The US had been forced to enter the war, he said, 'because it felt that if it did not, the Zionist regime would be completely destroyed. Marmorstein smiles at this. 'The fact of the matter is the Iranian regime suffered huge blows not just to its nuclear and ballistic programme but to the IRGC [Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps], the Basij militia, and I think there is hope for something else …' Although he says 'regime change was not part of this operation, that's for the Iranian people to decide', his office has been very busy with public diplomacy, putting out material in Persian on Instagram and other channels that has had more than 380 million views. He insists: 'This is not a fight with the Iranian people but with the regime.' Since the ceasefire, Tehran has started a new crackdown and Marmorstein's office has noticed 200,000 Iranians have left the Instagram account. He has a warning for the international community. 'This was a huge landmark, perhaps a turning point, but it's not over,' he said. 'We took Iran's nuclear programme years back but I'm not sure the nature of the regime's ambitions have changed. The international community needs to demand that the regime refrain from any foolish attempt to try and resume.'
