Bill to lower voting age to 16 introduced in Dáil – and Taoiseach ‘wouldn't rule anything out'
Social Democrats TD Aidan Farrelly, who represents Kildare North, introduced the Forty-first Amendment of the Constitution (Reduction of Voting Age to 16 Years) Bill yesterday.
The last reduction in the voting age was in 1972, when the electorate endorsed a drop from 21 to 18.
Taoiseach Micheál Martin said he 'wouldn't rule anything out' in relation to a voting age of 16, adding that the issue merited 'serious consideration'.
'I don't have an issue with reducing it to 16. We will give that serious consideration. We'll engage in the debate,' Mr Martin said.
Tánaiste Simon Harris, however, said he was not sure now was 'the right time' for such a proposal.
Two separate government referendum proposals in March last year were heavily beaten.
Mr Farrelly, in introducing the bill, said lowering the voting age to 16 was one of the recommendations from the Convention on the Constitution in 2014.
'If one can work full-time and pay taxes at 16, it is only fair that people have the formal opportunity to influence how these taxes are spent locally and nationally,' he said.
He acknowledged that many young people choose not to vote, and there was no doubt that many aged 16 and 17, if afforded the opportunity, would also choose not to do so, he said.
But he called for a focus on those who will: 'The many thousands who care about their communities and their society, who are as passionate about politics, public administration and civic duty as their peers aged 18-plus.'
ADVERTISEMENT
Mr Farrelly said he had been a youth worker and had run many mock elections over the years encouraging young people to participate.
'Whether it was a referendum, or a local or general election, the vote was nearly almost mirrored in their local ballot box, or nationally,' he said.
He said the Dáil could achieve something momentous. It was 'an opportunity to tell the 16 and 17-year-olds of Ireland that we value them and their voice, that we trust them and their power, and that we need them and their participation'.
He added that the bill was 'one of inherent importance to me as a father, youth worker and citizen of Ireland'.
It was an issue of fairness and equality, not maturity, he told fellow TDs.
Government Chief Whip Mary Butler said the legislation was not opposed at this stage.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Cabinet to discuss introducing three new terrorist offences
Ireland will introduce three new terrorist offences under plans to be discussed by Cabinet on Tuesday morning. Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan will discuss the publication of the Criminal Justice (Terrorist Offences) (Amendment) Bill 2025 when Ministers meet in Government Buildings. The Terrorist Offences Bill will allow for the prosecution of a broader range of terrorist activities in light of the evolving nature of terrorism, sources said on Monday evening. The Bill provides for the addition of three new terrorist offences which are directed at what was branded the 'foreign terrorist fighter phenomenon'. This will make receiving training for terrorism, travelling for the purpose of terrorism and organising or facilitating travelling for the purpose of terrorism criminal offences. It will also permit courts to treat the fact that the offence was committed against a child as an aggravating factor when sentencing a person for recruiting or providing training. It is understood that these changes will bring Ireland's counter-terrorism laws into line with other EU member states and will facilitate Ireland's participation in enhanced counter-terrorism networks across the EU. This will give An Garda Síochána the ability to tap into those networks to respond to both domestic and cross-border terrorist threats. Elsewhere, Tánaiste Simon Harris will tell Cabinet that he is concerned about the EU's list of potential retaliatory tariffs on the US. The EU last month produced a list of counter tariffs it will impose on the US if President Donald Trump does not row back on proposed measures. He initially announced 20% tariffs on goods entering the US from the EU but then implemented a 90-day pause and said a 10% tariff would apply. President Trump then announced that a 50 per cent tariff would apply from June 1 after he suggested that negotiations with the EU were 'going nowhere'. However, he reinstated the 90-day pause following a phone call with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. It expires on July 8. At this morning's Cabinet meeting, the Tánaiste will tell his colleagues that Ireland has particular concerns about the list of proposed countermeasures in relation to the aviation, the medtech and agrifood sectors. These concerns are being conveyed to the Commission, including in a letter from the Tánaiste to EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič sent ahead of the closure of the EU's public consultation period today. The Tánaiste's letter will state that the countermeasures should not harm EU businesses and consumers more than the US, that the EU should be mindful to avoid unnecessarily escalating trade tensions and that the impact of measures must also not be implemented disproportionately, either on any one Member State, one sector or one individual company. Where possible, Mr Harris wrote, the EU should try to avoid imposing unnecessary costs on EU companies. The Tánaiste will tell colleagues that discussions on a possible trade deal between the EU and the US are advancing with technical talks taking place in Washington DC in recent days. If no solution is reached, the EU will implement its countermeasures on July 14. The Tánaiste will seek Cabinet approval for a plan designed to retain and incentivise highly skilled specialists in the Air Corps. Under the proposals, a Service Commitment Scheme, currently used by Air Corps pilots, will be extended to Air Traffic Control personnel. Elsewhere, new college places in the health, disability and education sectors will be created under a plan being brought by Higher Education Minister James Lawless, Health Minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill and Children's Minister Norma Foley. This funding will support the creation of 461 additional annual places in these priority professions each year from now on, with the majority of new places commencing in 2025. This immediate expansion will include Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, Speech and Language Therapy, Radiation Therapy, Radiography, Podiatry, Social Work, Medical Science, and Dietetics. Minister for Education Helen McEntee will update Cabinet on progress being made in providing new special education classes for the 2025/26 school year. She has asked for all timelines for the 2026/27 school year to ensure better planning and ensure that children are accepted into new special classes much earlier.
RTÉ News
7 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Plans for Galway local authority rent increases criticised
Galway City Councillors have roundly criticised plans to increase rents for over 2,500 local authority tenants. The proposals arise from a 'Differential Rent Review', which aims to generate an additional €1 million in revenue per annum. The proposals would entail a 3% increase in the proportion of assessable income, to be paid in rent, by those in social housing - going from 17% to 20%. In real terms, this amounts to a weekly rent rise in the region of 17.6%. The measures also include plans to abolish a €5 discount on rents for pensioners, those with children or people with a disability. The local authority's meeting heard the move was an executive function, as opposed to a decision that would be made by elected representatives. Effectively, this means councillors have no say on whether the decision will proceed. The meeting heard that €2.8 million is outstanding in rent arrears at present. Maintenance costs have doubled since 2019, and repair costs have surged for re-lets due in part to energy retrofitting obligations. The council's Chief Executive Leonard Cleary said the plan was difficult but necessary to address a significant gap in funding for housing. He said the revenue generated would go towards the maintenance of properties owned by the council. The increase will also apply to tenants in accommodation provided by approved housing bodies. Labour Councillor Niall McNelis described the proposed increase as "the third nail in the cross" for local authority tenants across the city. He said a number of people on Housing Assistance Payments were already making under-the-counter payments to secure their tenancies. He added that "the most vulnerable are the ones that are going to be hammered here". Social Democrats Councillor Eibhlín Seoighthe said she was taken aback by the proposal. She described the plan as "absolutely appalling", adding there was no cognizance of the societal impact it would have. She added it was "a huge burden to bear, which should be measured more clearly". Independent Councillor Mike Cubbard said some of the most vulnerable people in society were tenants of the local authority and that they needed to be protected. He said the proposal to remove a €5 discount for those eligible was the worst decision he has seen since being elected to the local authority in 2014. Labour's John McDonagh said the plan was like something from a Charles Dickens novel. Sinn Féin Councillor Aisling Burke asked the executive not to proceed with the move. She said people were already experiencing significant financial difficulties and that the increase in rents was unconscionable. Citing one of four case studies presented to councillors in which a tenant's rent would go from €51 to €71 per week, she said the scale of that increase was very difficult to comprehend. "You just cannot do it," she added. Fine Gael's Shane Forde said there had been years of under-investment in Co Galway, adding the council was now experiencing the full force of this. He pointed out that in recent months, councillors had approved increases to the Local Property Tax and commercial rates. He said he was sickened that elected representatives in Dáil Éireann "never wear the Galway jersey" but were happy to be on the airwaves discussing issues of national and international import. Fianna Fail's Michael Crowe said the examples presented to elected representatives appeared to show that those who were working would be most heavily penalised by the measures. No date has been given for the increase to take effect, but it will be in place by the end of this year or early in 2026. The Director of Services for Housing defended the proposals as "timely, proportionate, reasonable and needed". Elizabeth Fanning said rents had not increased since 2019, adding that a large proportion of those impacted would be able to afford the rise. She gave a commitment that the council would "100% work" to support vulnerable renters. She also pointed out that even after the increases were processed, tenants of local authority housing in the city would still be paying around seven times less in rent than those in private rental accommodation. A motion calling on the executive to abandon the 3% rent increase and instead proceed with a 1.5 % increase in January 2026, a similar hike in January 2028 as well as maintaining the €5 discount, was approved by all councillors. However, the motion is not binding on the decision made by the Council Executive. At the conclusion of more than an hour of discussions, the Council Chief Executive said he had noted the input of members and would reflect on their motions and feedback before making a final decision on the matter.
Irish Times
11 hours ago
- Irish Times
Tough decisions to tackle housing crisis are under way – but will they work?
The expected move to ease rent caps is part of a Government response to the worsening housing crisis which will see further policy changes announced in the coming weeks, before a revised plan for housing is finalised in July. Government insiders hope that the departures will show them finally getting to grips with the housing crisis. But it would be an exaggeration to say there is confidence that all this will work quickly to increase housing supply. Meanwhile, opposition to the rent cap changes is growing and will be heard both in the Dáil tomorrow and on the streets next week when Raise the Roof, an umbrella group co-ordinated by the trade unions and including NGOs and Opposition parties, holds a major protest outside Leinster House. The housing measures include some already announced and some yet to come. There will be changes in planning regulations to allow small residences in back gardens, extensions and attic conversion s without planning permission; potentially also changes in regulations on apartment construction; the role of the Land Development Agency will be expanded to include mixed-use developments with private sector partners; the appointment of a 'housing tsar' ( just don't call it that ) is also coming; commencing the changes in last year's mammoth planning Act will make it harder to block planning permissions; and money will be provided for new planners in local authorities and An Bord Pleanála to speed up the planning process. READ MORE [ Explainer: Garden rooms and attics – What are the proposed changes to regulations? Opens in new window ] Divisions remain in Government over the possibility of tax incentives for builders and developers of certain types of housing, and they are unlikely to be settled until the budget. But at the top level of Government, there is a growing sense that urgent action is needed on housing, with one insider insisting that the series of decisions now under way will place housing at the very centre of the Government's priorities from now until the summer recess in mid-July. However, there is also an awareness that some measures to increase supply will leave the Coalition open to political attack and public unpopularity. [ Proposed changes to rent rules will incentivise evictions, housing charity warns Opens in new window ] And the problem for the Government is that the unpopularity and the political attacks will be immediate – but any potential payback from the measures in the shape of increased supply is at best years away, and may not even be felt until after the next general election. Even without the planning delays and legal actions that they have to factor into their considerations, builders and developers say it can still take three to four years to deliver a block of apartments. There is no doubt the measures will be welcomed by developers and landlords. But that is not necessarily the same thing as prompting them to move quickly to increase supply. Many will want to see if tax incentives are introduced in the budget; others will want to see if the Government has the political will to resist the pressure already building on the rent pressure zone changes. 'Look, the reality is there is no silver bullet,' says one senior Government source. But, the source says, we need apartments, and the people who build apartments are not building them right now because of the rent caps. [ Rules for renters: What are the planned reforms and will they work? Opens in new window ] All very well, but the simple and logical outcome of changing the rent cap rules is that rents will go up – that's why the landlords and the developers are in favour of it. The Government says that its package will protect renters – but among groups working at the coalface of homelessness, there is little confidence in that. An uptick in evictions and rising rents – both predicted by Opposition parties – would pile enormous pressure on the Government. Within Government, there is an undoubted willingness to take difficult decisions, and an awareness that the time to take them is in the first year of its term of office. But that is not matched by any great confidence that the measures will work. [ Ireland's housing crisis: Why is there such a shortage of homes to buy and rent here? Opens in new window ]
