
One-size-fits-all pancreatic cancer vaccine showed promise in early trial
Pancreatic cancer is of particular concern. The five-year survival rate is about 13%, and over 80% of pancreatic cancers come back.
'If you were to ask me what disease most needs something to prevent recurrences, I'd say this one,' said Dr. Zev Wainberg co-director of the University of California, Los Angeles, gastrointestinal oncology program, who co-led the Phase 1 clinical trial.
The vaccine targets one of the most common genetic drivers of cancer: KRAS gene mutations.
KRAS mutations occur in about one-quarter of all cancers, including as much as 90% of pancreatic cancers and about 40% of colorectal cancers. Their ubiquity makes KRAS mutations a great target for cancer therapies, but the mutations have long been considered impossible to target with drugs.
To accomplish this, the vaccine uses short chains of amino acids called peptides that teach immune cells to recognize and attack cells with KRAS mutations.
'The critical step is engaging an immune response,' Wainberg said.
Cancer vaccines are a growing field of research, but many of these vaccines are personalized to the patient. This means their tumor must be sequenced for a specialized vaccine to be created. The vaccine in the current study, however, doesn't need to be personalized and would be available off the shelf.
Killing lingering cancer cells
In the Phase 1 trial, published Monday in Nature Medicine, Wainberg and a team of doctors from across the country recruited 20 people with pancreatic cancer and five with colorectal cancer. (They chose to also include a few colorectal cancer patients because KRAS mutations are also a common driver of colorectal cancers, and people whose colorectal cancer is driven by these mutations are more likely to have a recurrence, Wainberg said.)
Everyone in the trial had KRAS mutations and had undergone standard treatment — usually chemotherapy and surgery — to remove the bulk of their tumors.
After surgery, blood tests showed that a smattering of cancer cells remained behind, referred to as microscopic residual disease, which is very common with pancreatic cancer.
'We are talking about cancer that is so microscopic that we can't see it on scans,' said Dr. Scott Kopetz, a professor of gastrointestinal medical oncology at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.
These cells can travel elsewhere in the body and grow into metastasized tumors, prompting an often fatal cancer recurrence. Chemotherapy can kill some of these cells, but some usually remain in the body.
'Realistically, if we want to kill every last cancer cell and really make people cured, you need to engage the immune system,' said Stephanie Dougan, an associate professor of cancer immunology and virology at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston. 'We've just been really bad at getting an immune response in pancreatic cancer.'
Post-surgery, everyone in the trial got up to six priming doses of the experimental vaccine, called ELI-002 2P. Thirteen also received booster shots. The whole process took 6 months.
About 85% — 21 of the 25 participants — mounted an immune response to the KRAS mutations, and about two-thirds of those patients had an immune response that appeared to be robust enough to stave off lingering cancer cells.
What's more, in nearly 70% of people in the trial, the vaccine appeared to trigger an immune response not just to KRAS mutations, but to other tumor cell targets that were not in the vaccine. A few people were 'super-responders' who mounted an abnormally strong immune response to the cells.
'Those people had the best outcomes,' Wainberg said. His team is currently running a randomized Phase 2 trial to test the durability of the vaccine and compare whether the vaccine is more effective than the standard of care, which would usually be monitoring the patient for a recurrence.
In the Phase 1 trial, people with pancreatic cancer survived for an average of 29 months and lived recurrence-free for more than 15 months post-vaccination.
'That far exceeds the rates with resectable cancers,' said Wainberg, referring to cancers that can be removed with surgery.
A growing field
Cancer vaccines have been incredibly difficult to make, in part because cancer cells have a lot of the same proteins as healthy cells, making safe targets difficult to come by. Only recently has medical technology made the strides researchers needed to hone the treatment. Refined mRNA technology and gene sequencing becoming faster and cheaper has put cancer vaccines back into clinical trials, Dougan said.
Personalized mRNA cancer vaccines are showing promise in both pancreatic and colorectal cancers, but a one-size-fits-all cancer vaccine would make treatment faster and cheaper. Past trials using peptide vaccines have failed to prevent cancer recurrences. But the peptides in the new vaccine, called lipophilic peptides, have something past treatments did not — a tail.
'That tail sticks in the lymph nodes where immune cells get activated,' Dougan said. 'You need something to get the immune system going, and just injecting killed cancer cells or peptides doesn't work that well.'
More advanced clinical trials will have to confirm the results of the Phase 1 trial, but promising results have been seen in other cancer vaccine trials as well and could pave the way for major breakthroughs in preventing cancer recurrences. Memorial Sloan Kettering is also working on an off-the-shelf vaccine that targets a gene mutation found in 95% of people with acute myeloid leukemia. The data from the KRAS-targeting vaccine trial published Monday showed it is likely possible to target these mutations with nonpersonalized vaccines, something researchers long thought was impossible.
'The fact that the long-term survival really correlated with T-cell response suggests that the vaccine caused this,' Dougan said, referring to the specific immune cells activated by the vaccine. 'The idea that you can target KRAS is really exciting.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Two Thirds Of Trash Found In Global Rivers Is Plastic, Study Finds
Pieces of plastic, including bottles, bags, straws and cutlery, make up two thirds of the rubbish found in rivers around the world, according to a new analysis. The research by experts at the University of California, Santa Barbara, used on-the-ground data from Mexico, Jamaica, Panama, Ecuador, Kenya, Vietnam, Thailand and Indonesia. Over the three-year period, local teams collectively removed and analyzed 3.8 million kilograms of river debris, the equivalent to 380,000,000 single-use plastic water bottles, with 66% classified as microplastic. The researchers also found substantial variation in the amount of plastic pollution intercepted in rivers studied, but all contained plastic debris of some sort. Based on their findings, researchers now estimate 1.95 million metric tons of travels down rivers worldwide every year. The study has been published as negotiators in Geneva failed to reach an agreement on an international treaty to curb plastic pollution. Lead author, Chase Brewster, a project scientist in University of California, Santa Barbara's Benioff Ocean Science Laboratory, said it was largest continuous dataset, which has ever been produced on the subject of plastic pollution in rivers, in an interview. Brewster added the research helps underline and scope and the scale of the issue around the world. 'This problem is not going away and it is global,' he told me. 'We should not be ignoring in this day and age the fact two thirds of everything coming down our rivers is now plastic.' Brewster said the researchers on the project also engaged with local communities and he hoped the data would help them take targeted action 'The more involved and engaged people are, and the more empowered they feel in their communities, the more likely they are to change behavior and influence legislation in their areas. 'More often than not, these communities are not trying to pollute. It's the larger institutions who are failing them. There's no access to waste management services, or other options.' Brewster said the report makes a number of recommendations, including creating more of a value for plastic waste to discourage people from throwing it away and letting it go to waste. He added one of the big problems is that it is still cheaper to produce virgin plastic than it is to make recycled plastic, so there need to be incentives like bottle deposit fees, and virgin production caps to create better market conditions for a circular economy. The study also calls for greater support for the informal waste-picking sector in certain parts of the world and more investment in waste management and recycling infrastructure and services. It also recommends more consistent and more transparent monitoring and data collection to inform targeted upstream actions. In addition, it calls for well-designed local and national policies as well as ambitious international frameworks to address the different scales of the problem. 'Negotiators and country officials can use this data to assess the river plastic pollution problem in real life, look at differences in pollution in different places, and test ideas about what policies and systems are working,' Brewster added. Anthony Merante, senior plastics campaigner at Oceana Canada, said the oceans have become the dumping grounds for the world's plastic waste, in an email. Merante added people have over-plasticized their lives and invested in single-use, disposable systems hoping that recycling will save us. 'Not a single river studied was free from plastic, emphasizing that this is a planetary problem we all must act to correct,' he said. 'The solution is clear; we need to reduce plastic production and use and invest in solutions that actually work like refill and reuse.'


Gizmodo
18 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Scientists Identify a New Glitch in Human Thinking
Good news, everyone! Scientists at the University of California, Berkeley, have coined a new term to describe our brains being dumb. In a recent study, they provide evidence for a distinct but common kind of cognitive bias—one that makes us reluctant to take the easier path in life if it means retracing our steps. The researchers have named the bias the 'doubling-back aversion.' In several experiments, they found that people often refuse to choose a more efficient solution or route if it requires them to double back on the progress already made. The findings suggest that people's subjective fear of adding more to their workload and their hesitance to wipe the slate clean contribute to this bias, the researchers say. 'Participants' aversion to feeling their past efforts were a waste encouraged them to pursue less efficient means,' they wrote in their paper, published this May in Psychological Science. The 12 cognitive biases that prevent you from being rational Psychologists have detailed all sorts of biases related to digging our feet in when faced with important new information. People tend to stick to the status quo in choosing dinner at a favorite restaurant, for example, even when someone recommends a potentially tastier option. There's also the sunk cost fallacy, or the reluctance to veer off a disastrous path and choose another simply because they've spent so much time or resources pursuing it. The researchers argue that their newly named bias is certainly a close cousin to the sunk cost fallacy and similar biases, but that it ultimately describes a unique type of cognitive pitfall. In their paper, they provide the example of someone whose flight from San Francisco to New York becomes massively delayed early on, leaving them stuck in Los Angeles. In one scenario, the traveler can get home three hours earlier than their current itinerary if they accept the airline's offer of a new flight that first stops in Denver; in the second, the person is instead offered a flight that will also shave three hours off, but they'll first have to travel back to San Francisco. Despite both flights saving the same amount of time, people are more likely to refuse the one that requires going back to their earlier destination, the paper explains (some people might even refuse the Denver flight, but that would be an example of the status quo bias and/or sunk cost fallacy at work, they note). To test their hypothesis, the researchers ran four different types of experiments. The experiments collectively involved more than 2,500 adults, some of whom were UC Berkeley students and others who were volunteers recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk. In one test, people were asked to walk along different paths in virtual reality; another asked people to recite as many words starting with the same letter as possible. Across the various tests, the researchers found that people routinely exhibited this aversion. This Is What Your Brain Looks Like When You Solve a Problem In one experiment where people had to recite words starting with 'G,' for instance, everyone was asked midway through if they wanted to stay with the same letter or switch to reciting words starting with 'T' (a likely easier letter). In the control condition, this decision was framed as staying on the same task, simply with a new letter, but in the other, people were asked if they wanted to throw out the work they had done so far and start over on a new task. Importantly, the volunteers were also given progress bars for the task, allowing them to see they would perform the same amount of work no matter the choice (though again, 'T' would be easier). About 75% of participants made the choice to switch in the control condition, but only 25% did the same when the switch was presented as needing to double back. 'When I was analyzing these results, I was like, 'Oh, is there a mistake? How can there be such a big difference?'' said lead author Kristine Cho, a behavioral marketing PhD student at UC Berkely's Haas School of Business, in a statement to the Association for Psychological Science, publishers of the study. Other researchers will have to confirm the team's findings, of course. And there are still plenty of questions to answer about this aversion, including how often we fall for it and whether it's more likely to happen in some scenarios than others. But for now, it's oddly comforting to know that there's another thing I can possibly blame for my occasional stubbornness to take the faster subway train home.


Time Business News
a day ago
- Time Business News
D-Dimer Test Flags Clot Risk, Aids Broader Diagnosis
D Dimer Test is a kind of blood test detecting the presence of D-dimer in the blood. D-dimer is a protein fragment of fibrin formed after Fibrinolysis degradation of blood clot. It is helpful to diagnose the conditions with abnormal blood clots formation and breakdown, intravascular fibrinolysis, and coagulation. High D-dimer levels indicate clinical suspicion of a blood clot and needs ultrasound, CT angiography, scans could be performed to confirm the presence of clot and location of clot. D-Dimer test is not specific to any disease. D-Dimer test is not specific to any disease and thus is performed in conjunction with other evaluations and diagnostic tests. 0.5 is measured as normal range for D-dimer and greater than 0.5 is measured to be positive. D-dimer decreases under abnormal medical case which is measured by specific antibodies. Key Growth Drivers and Opportunities Demand for D-Dimer Testing: Traditional testing is replaced by D-dimer testing, allowing for faster test results, quicker diagnosis, shorter patient wait times, and better patient outcomes overall. D-Dimer testing to be more widely used by customers offering compelling advantages. Moreover, the growing prevalence of lung and cardiovascular illnesses might, in extreme circumstances, lead to potentially fatal blood clot problems, which propels D-Dimer Test. Rising Genetic Disorders: Increasing cases of Thrombus embolism along with various cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases that could be life threating due to clot formation increases the demand for D-Dimer Test globally. D-dimer functions as valuable marker in various clinical conditions such as HIV, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease. New technological advancement such as development of aptamers, reducing use of antibodies for D-dimer testing being cost-effective, long-lasting boosts D-Dimer Test widening scope for these tests. Challenges The major challenge consists of inadequate skilled professionals and trained professionals unable to perform the test properly and lack of knowledge leads to false results and restrains the D-Dimer test Market. High cost and poor reimbursement policies restrains people to take such tests for proper diagnosis increasing the prevalence of disease and deaths. Innovation and Expansion Study Links Long COVID Brain Fog to Blood Microclots In September 2023, Finding was published in Nature Medicine, suggesting links between brain fog in long COVID and 'micro clots' in the blood. These clots often contain misfolded fibrinogen proteins that prevent the clots from breaking down, and this effect can clog blood vessels and block oxygen flow to the brain and other organs. Blood tests for both D-dimer and fibrinogen are already standard around the world, so researchers had plenty of available data to check whether the same phenomenon occurred in other groups of patients. LumiraDx Expands Rapid Testing for VTE and Heart Failure In June 2022, LumiraDx Limited, a next-generation point of care Diagnostics Company, announced its cardiovascular offering with a CE Mark for its new NT-proBNP test to aid in the diagnosis of CHF and an updated CE Mark for its D-Dimer test to now rule out venous thromboembolism (VTE) in symptomatic patients. With these two additions, the LumiraDx Platform can further support clinicians in quickly and accurately assessing patient symptoms for both VTE and heart failure at the point of care. The LumiraDx NT-proBNP test is a rapid microfluidic immunofluorescence assay for the quantitative measurement of NT-proBNP in human capillary, venous whole blood and plasma specimens. Inventive Sparks, Expanding Markets The major companies present in the D-dimer test market are Bio/Data Corporation, Becton Dickinson BV, Sysmex Corporation, Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Dickinson and Company, Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., among others. Global companies work to foster lasting innovation, grow their markets, and provide quality goods and services. They concentrate on improving customer experience, applying tech, and creating strong operations. About Author: Prophecy is a specialized market research, analytics, marketing and business strategy, and solutions company that offer strategic and tactical support to clients for making well-informed business decisions and to identify and achieve high value opportunities in the target business area. Also, we help our client to address business challenges and provide best possible solutions to overcome them and transform their business. TIME BUSINESS NEWS