
China's Military Flexes Muscles With Putin Ally
Newsweek has contacted Serbia's Defense Ministry for further comment via email.
Serbia-which is not a member of the European Union-has maintained close ties with both Russia and China, with President Aleksandar Vučić describing China as "Serbia's most precious friend."
The training is part of the growing military cooperation between the countries. The East Asian power provided air defense systems to the Balkan nation to help protect its airspace, raising concerns in the United States about Serbia's path toward European integration.
In addition to rapidly building up its capabilities, the Chinese military has strengthened its relations with foreign counterparts through bilateral activities. From mid-April to early May, the Chinese and Egyptian air forces conducted joint training in the North African country.
Jiang Bin, a spokesperson for the Chinese Defense Ministry, said on Monday that China would host the Peace Guardian-2025 joint training in Hebei Province-near the capital city of Beijing-in the second half of July, involving Chinese and Serbian army special forces.
"This will be the first joint training between Chinese and Serbian militaries," the Chinese military official said, adding that the bilateral activity would help strengthen the combat capabilities of participating troops and deepen cooperation between the two armed forces.
However, details of the training-including its content and duration-remain unclear. Neither China nor Serbia has announced the arrival of Serbian army special forces in China.
Prior to the announcement of the training, the Chinese state-run Global Times published an interview on July 10 with Serbian Lieutenant Colonel Dalibor Aleksic, who commands an air defense unit operating two China-supplied weapon systems: the FK-3 and the HQ-17AE.
The Serbian military officer said both Chinese air defense systems were satisfactory, praising their combat capabilities, performance, reliability, and ease of use and maintenance.
Serbia's acquisition of Chinese air defense systems contributed to the further strengthening of friendship and cooperation between the two nations, Aleksic told Global Times, adding that, as a weapons expert, he was also fascinated by "many other Chinese weapon systems."
Chinese President Xi Jinping said in a meeting with Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić in May: "China is ready to deepen strategic communication with Serbia, enhance mutual support, strengthen cooperation in trade and investment, continue supporting the construction and operation of relevant projects, give full play to their demonstrative effect, and achieve more outcomes that deliver mutual benefit and win-win results."
Vuk Vuksanovic, a senior researcher at the Belgrade Center for Security Policy, told RFE/RL's Balkan Service in May 2024: "Serbia has demonstrated once again that China, not Russia, is its most important partner in the East at the moment, especially with Russian-Serbian ties under constant scrutiny because of Ukraine."
While Serbia is likely to make additional purchases of Chinese military equipment, it remains to be seen whether China will send its troops to Serbia for joint training in the future.
Related Articles
China and India's Top Officials Meet Amid Tensions Over Pakistan, BorderChina Responds to Lindsey Graham Russia ThreatUS and Allies Train Forces for Pacific War With ChinaTaiwan Deploys HIMARS, Patriot, Stinger Weapons in China Invasion Exercise
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Appeals court hands Mike Lindell win in fight over $5M election fraud contest
A federal appeals court ruled in favor of MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell on Wednesday in his bid to avoid paying $5 million to a software developer, who declared victory in Lindell's contest to disprove his claims of foreign interference in the 2020 election. The three-judge 8 th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel's unanimous decision found an arbitration panel exceeded its power by changing unambiguous contract terms to award the developer Lindell's prize. 'Fair or not, agreed-to contract terms may not be modified by the panel or by this court,' U.S. Circuit Judge James Loken wrote in the 12-page decision. Lindell hosted a 'Cyber Symposium' in South Dakota in 2021, where he showed data claiming Chinese election interference in President Biden's 2020 victory. Lindell offered $5 million if someone could prove the data was 'unequivocally' not related to the 2020 election. Software developer Robert Zeidman, a contestant, produced a 15-page report rebuffing Lindell's data. But the challenge judges said Zeidman wasn't entitled to the prize. Per the contest rules, Zeidman brought the dispute into arbitration. After a hearing, the arbitration panel ruled in his favor. The panel concluded Zeidman had proven Lindell had not provided packet capture data, often referred to as PCAP files, and therefore had shown it was not election data. 'We conclude that the panel effectively amended the unambiguous Challenge contract when it used extrinsic evidence to require that the data provided was packet capture data, thereby violating established principles of Minnesota contract law and our arbitration precedents,' Loken wrote in the opinion. Loken is an appointee of the first former President Bush. His decision was joined by U.S. Circuit Judge Lavenski Smith, appointed by the younger former President Bush; and U.S. Circuit Judge L. Steven Grasz, appointed by President Trump. The decision instructs a lower court to immediately wipe the $5 million arbitration award or conduct further proceedings in line with the appeals court's reversal. The Hill has reached out to attorneys for Zeidman and Lindell for comment. Lindell has been embroiled in litigation over his baseless claims of mass election fraud in the 2020 election. Last month, a Colorado jury ordered Lindell to pay $2.3 million to a former Dominion Voting Systems employee who sued him for defamation. Lindell also faces defamation lawsuits that remain ongoing from both Dominion and Smartmatic, another voting systems company.


Axios
19 minutes ago
- Axios
Iran worries U.S. will use nuclear talks as pretext for new attacks: Senior official
Iran is willing to return to the negotiating table with the U.S., "the sooner the better," but must be convinced the talks aren't cover for further military action, Tehran's nuclear negotiator Kazem Gharibabadi said on Wednesday. The big picture: U.S. officials were discussing the dates for future talks with Tehran last month while simultaneously coordinating war plans with Israel, Gharibabadi said. While Tehran knows it needs to negotiate with the U.S. to get sanctions lifted and avoid new ones, he said bluntly that "we don't trust the U.S." Driving the news: Iran and the "E3" — France, Germany and the U.K. — will hold talks in Istanbul on Friday on the issue of "snapback" sanctions. The European signatories to the 2015 nuclear deal could impose those harsh sanctions for Iranian non-compliance, though Tehran denies that such a move would be legitimate. Gharibabadi, Iran's deputy foreign minister and lead nuclear negotiator, said Friday's talks were "important" but not "decisive," because even if an agreement is not reached "we still have time." Between the lines: The U.S. and the E3 jointly settled on the end of August as a deadline to impose the harsh snapback sanctions if no U.S.-Iran deal is reached by then. But Gharibabadi suggested that was a soft deadline, noting that the E3 had also called Iran's foreign minister to express their desire to come to an arrangement. The power to impose snapback sanctions expires in October, but the Europeans are expected to raise the possibility of extending that deadline. In return, they want Iran to take steps toward resuming the work of UN inspectors in its nuclear facilities and possibly move its 60% highly enriched uranium to another country. Gharibabadi said it was "premature" to discuss an extension. What he's saying: Speaking to reporters in New York on Wednesday, Gharibabadi said it was now incumbent on Iran to negotiate over snapback with the Europeans and over the broader nuclear issue with the U.S. But he made clear just how difficult that would be. The last time around, he argued, the U.S. repeatedly changed its positions in talks — making it difficult to make progress — and then turned around and bombed Iran. Gharibabadi said a military operation may always have been the true U.S. intention — something U.S. officials deny — and that could be the case once again. Concerns about future attacks are one reason Iran want assurances on the Trump administration's seriousness before returning to the table, he said. State of play: Gharibabadi said Iran had invited a technical team from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to visit Tehran in the next few weeks, but not to visit the country's nuclear sites. Iran suspended its cooperation with the IAEA due to the Israeli and U.S. attacks. Gharibabadi criticized IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi for declining to condemn those attacks, suggesting he had political motives. But he said Iran was willing to discuss "a new modality" for cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, including access to the nuclear sites that were not attacked and also those that were. The IAEA has not yet requested access to the three bombed nuclear facilities, Gharibabadi said, noting that it would be very dangerous for inspectors to enter them. The intrigue: When reporters repeatedly asked about the status of Iran's nuclear facilities and material after the strikes, Gharibabadi joked that rather than asking him they should trust President Trump's insistence that they were "totally destroyed." What to watch: The U.S. has continually proposed a resumption of talks since the war, and there have been several discussions in Tehran about the terms on which to resume them, Gharibabadi said. He insisted that any talks would be "indirect," conducted through mediators, despite the U.S. desire for "direct" talks. Asked why, he said "we don't trust the U.S." and don't think the process has reached a stage where direct talks are appropriate. Gharibabadi didn't lay out a timetable for the resumption of talks with the U.S., but suggested Friday's talks in Istanbul would be a factor.


Newsweek
20 minutes ago
- Newsweek
NATO Ally Shadows China Icebreaker
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Canadian military confirmed to Newsweek that it is "actively monitoring" the Chinese icebreaker Xue Long 2, which was tracked entering Arctic waters from East Asia last week. "The top priority of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) is the defense of Canada and Canadians, and we will continue to conduct activities needed to detect, deter, and defend against potential threats in, over, and approaching Canada," the Canadian Joint Operations Command said. Newsweek reached out to China's Foreign Ministry and Canada's Coast Guard via email for comment. Why It Matters China asserts itself as a "near-Arctic state" and an important stakeholder in Arctic affairs. In recent years, it has gradually expanded its presence in the region, including deploying its icebreaking fleet and conducting scientific research that could have military applications. The Xue Long 2's voyage comes amid growing Arctic rivalry between the United States and China. U.S. President Donald Trump expressed interest in acquiring Greenland, a Danish island rich in mineral and energy resources, and one that counts China as a key economic partner. Canada, Washington's key NATO ally, conducted an "Arctic awareness and sovereignty mission" in July of last year, during which one of its warships shadowed the Arctic-bound Xue Long 2, China's first domestically built icebreaker capable of conducting research. China's icebreaker Xue Long 2 leaving the Xiuying Port in Haikou on June 8, 2025. China's icebreaker Xue Long 2 leaving the Xiuying Port in Haikou on June 8, 2025. VCG/VCG via AP What To Know Using data from the vessel-tracking website MarineTraffic, Steffan Watkins, a research consultant based in Canada, said the Canadian Coast Guard vessel CCGS Sir Wilfrid Laurier shadowed the Xue Long 2 at a distance as it sailed from Japan toward Alaska. A Newsweek map shows that the Xue Long 2 departed East China on July 6 and was operating in the Chukchi Sea, located south of the Arctic Ocean and north of the Bering Strait, on July 18, following a transit past the west and north coasts of Japan and Russia's Far East. As of Tuesday, the Xue Long 2 was not in Canadian territorial waters, which extend up to 13.8 miles from the coastline, the Canadian Joint Operations Command told Newsweek. According to the Chinese company COSCO Shipping Heavy Industry, the icebreaker completed a 10-day, high-intensity maintenance on June 29 and returned to its polar expedition base in Shanghai, as it prepared for an Arctic scientific expedition mission scheduled for this month. The Sir Wilfrid Laurier, a multi-purpose ship capable of icebreaking, was deployed to the North Pacific last month for a patrol aimed at deterring illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing. According to the map, it departed Hakodate Port in northern Japan on July 8. The ship, one of seven Canadian icebreakers scheduled to deploy for the Coast Guard's Arctic summer operations between June and November, was tracked near Nome, Alaska, on July 19, as it shifted its mission to icebreaking and scientific support in the Arctic. While the voyages of the Chinese and Canadian vessels "unmistakably paralleled" each other during their transit to the Arctic, as described by Watkins, the Canadian Coast Guard denied that the Sir Wilfrid Laurier was shadowing the Xue Long 2, according to CBC News. Meanwhile, ADSBexchange, an online platform that collects real-time flight data, tracked a Canadian CP-140 patrol aircraft launching from Alaska and heading toward the Chinese vessel in the Arctic, Watkins revealed on Bluesky on Sunday. Watkins told Newsweek that only one patrol aircraft appears to have been deployed to Anchorage, flying nine-hour sorties every day or every other day. The Canadian Joint Operations Command confirmed to Newsweek that a CP-140 aircraft was based in Alaska. 🇨🇳 Chinese dual-use research vessel Xue Long 2 (MMSI:413381260) has returned to the Arctic, shadowed at a distance by CCGS Sir Wilfrid Laurier (MMSI:316052000) all the way from Japan. It appears #RCAF CP-140 Aurora 140108 #C2B1ED is monitoring Xue Long 2 right now. 👀 — Steffan Watkins 🇨🇦 (@ 2025-07-21T02:32:24.602Z Canada has been deploying military patrol aircraft to Alaska for at least the past two years to monitor Chinese research vessels in the Arctic; however, such missions have not been made public. "Canadians should be aware and appreciate what the air force does," Watkins said. What People Are Saying The Canadian Joint Operations Command said in a statement to Newsweek on Tuesday: "Competitors are exploring Arctic waters and the seafloor, probing our infrastructure, and collecting intelligence using dual-purpose research vessels and surveillance platforms. The [Canadian Armed Forces] will continue to actively monitor the Xue Long 2 so long as it continues to operate near Canadian territorial waters." Steffan Watkins, a research consultant based in Canada, told Newsweek on Tuesday: "I'm sure some of [Chinese research vessel] deployments to the Pacific are academic-research related, but like American and Russian research vessels, I presume they're conducting some of that 'research' for their military; whether that's deploying or retrieving sensors, mapping undersea cables, collecting intelligence, measuring the salinity of the water, or other tasks." What Happens Next According to Watkins, Canada is expected to receive the first of its 16 P-8A patrol aircraft, each equipped with a long-range radar and high-resolution imaging and detection system, in 2026 and achieve full operational capability by 2033 for monitoring vessels of interest.