Beijing, Philippines spar over South China Sea claims during Munich conference
China's former deputy foreign minister Fu Ying said in a panel discussion, titled "Making Waves: Maritime Tensions in the Indo-Pacific", that Beijing would not accept occupation by the Philippines of new features that the Southeast Asian country has constructed in the South China Sea. Philippine Foreign Secretary Enrique Manalo was part of the panel.
"China cannot agree for the Philippines to occupy Second Thomas Shoal and Sabina Shoal, because that is a violation of the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea," Fu said, referring to a non-binding document signed by Beijing and Asean countries.
Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.
Fu insisted that the document's language - in particular, a pledge to "not to make more moves" - was watered down at Manila's request to entice the country to sign.
The declaration asks signatories to exercise "self-restraint" when conducting activities that would "complicate or escalate disputes", and refrain from building on the sea's uninhabited features.
The presence of a dilapidated but still active Philippine Navy ship BRP Sierra Madre at the Second Thomas Shoal (Ayungin Shoal) in the South China Sea has been denounced as unacceptable by Beijing. Photo: AP alt=The presence of a dilapidated but still active Philippine Navy ship BRP Sierra Madre at the Second Thomas Shoal (Ayungin Shoal) in the South China Sea has been denounced as unacceptable by Beijing. Photo: AP>
Further actions by Manila, including construction efforts to reinforce the BRP Sierra Madre, a World War II-era tank landing ship deliberately positioned on the Second Thomas Shoal in 1999, have been denounced by Beijing as unacceptable.
China's coastguard has regularly used water cannons, blockades, and additional tactics to obstruct Philippine resupply efforts to the rusting warship stationed at the shoal, referred to as Ayungin Shoal in the Philippines.
These confrontations have precipitated several clashes between Chinese and Philippine vessels over the past two years, including a notable incident in June that caused injuries to Filipino crew members.
Without naming China directly, Manalo said non-compliance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Unclos) is "creating tensions" in the busy maritime corridor that has become a flashpoint for conflict in recent years.
The top envoy said his country is following international law, and slammed "countries who reinterpret [Unclos] or apply their own domestic laws to certain areas and try to enforce them".
"The best way to reduce tensions in the South China Sea is for countries who have signed on for agreements, such as Unclos, to abide by these agreements. But it is not the case," he said, adding that "rich, powerful" countries are in a position to "assert their own laws against weaker countries, leading to greater contention".
The panel discussion, which drew a large audience of European and American think tank experts, as well as diplomatic and military officials, was one of the few events at the annual Munich conference exclusively focused on Asia.
Fu Ying, China's former deputy foreign minister, said at the Munich Security Conference on Saturday that China cannot agree for the Philippines to occupy the Second Thomas Shoal. Photo: SCMP / Dickson Lee alt=Fu Ying, China's former deputy foreign minister, said at the Munich Security Conference on Saturday that China cannot agree for the Philippines to occupy the Second Thomas Shoal. Photo: SCMP / Dickson Lee>
Recent incidents involving Chinese military assets in the South China Sea have not been limited to the Philippines.
Last week, Canberra accused Chinese military aircraft of releasing flares within 30 metres of an Australian aircraft conducting "routine surveillance" of the contested waterway.
Referencing that incident, US Senator Christopher Coons, who also took part in the discussion, emphasised the necessity of open lines of communication between Washington and Beijing, especially given the volatile encounters in the region.
Open lines of communication reestablished during the administration of former president Joe Biden between the US and China military forces should be "sustained and advanced" to ensure quick communication and avoid misunderstanding, he said.
This article originally appeared in the South China Morning Post (SCMP), the most authoritative voice reporting on China and Asia for more than a century. For more SCMP stories, please explore the SCMP app or visit the SCMP's Facebook and Twitter pages. Copyright © 2025 South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Copyright (c) 2025. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
36 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Back in the Oval Office, Zelenskyy wears a blazer and Trump doesn't shout
WASHINGTON (AP) — It was only a few months ago that U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy last met in the Oval Office, but Monday's face-to-face between the two leaders looked markedly different. For much of their February exchange, during which Trump and Vice President JD Vance blasted Zelenskyy as 'disrespectful' and warned about future American support for his country, Zelenskyy crossed his arms and looked askance at the U.S. leaders. The presidents often spoke over each other, also gesturing disagreement. A conservative reporter, Brian Glenn, even asked Zelenskyy why he wasn't wearing a suit. Monday's meeting was rounded out with more smiles and pleasantries between Trump and Zelenskyy, as well as agreement on some points regarding Russia's ongoing war against Ukraine. Both men largely sat with their hands clasped in their laps, affably fielding questions from reporters. And Glenn, when called upon by the Republican U.S. president to speak, complimented Zelenskyy, saying, 'You look fabulous in that suit.'
San Francisco Chronicle
36 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Photos of Zelenskyy, top European leaders and Trump: Can they end Russia's war?
WASHINGTON (AP) — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Europe's top leaders were meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday on ending Russia's war in Ukraine. Read what to know and get live updates. This is a photo gallery curated by Associated Press photo editors.
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Everyone loses in a redistricting war
Gerrymandering, a wonky topic previously discussed mainly among AP history students and political scientists, has recently dominated national news headlines. In the fight for control of Congress after the 2026 midterm elections, governors of several states are opting to hijack the decennial process for partisan advantage, rather than letting voters decide directly who should represent them in Congress. Election analyst and redistricting expert Dave Wasserman recently referred to what's happening as the 'gerrymandering apocalypse.' CNN referred to it as a 'battle royale.' And Gov. Kathy Hochul (D-N.Y.) said, 'we are at war.' It's easy to point fingers at Gov. Greg Abbott (R-Texas) and say 'he started it!' Abbott acquiesced to President Trump's suggestion that the state take up redistricting mid-cycle and draw five additional Republican seats — a seemingly desperate attempt to avoid the ' midterm curse, ' where the incumbent president's party typically loses House seats in a midterm election. But the Archduke Ferdinand in the war on redistricting isn't Texas, it's actually Ohio. There's a famous adage relevant here: 'So goes Ohio, so goes the nation.' And over the past two redistricting cycles, Ohio has gone down a very gerrymandered path that the nation now seems to be following. In matters that extend beyond Ohio and gerrymandering, it is imperative that we pay attention to what is going on in statehouses around the country, ' laboratories of autocracy ' as they are often rightly called, for a glimpse into the corruption that awaits our national politics. Ohio has some of the most gerrymandered maps in the nation. Its state legislature and Republican-dominated redistricting committee gerrymandered maps through a series of secret backroom deals, disregard of multiple court orders, and a deliberate strategy of confusing voters to sabotage attempted reform. They even tried to impeach the Republican chief justice of the Ohio Supreme Court for ruling their rigged maps unconstitutional. But while state politicians were gerrymandering Ohio, unfortunately, few people were paying attention. Despite repeatedly breaking the rules, there was no accountability for the elected officials who took part in the scheme. To the contrary, most who participated were rewarded with electoral districts they were guaranteed to win, and a veto-proof majority in the state legislature. This has allowed Republicans in the state to pass unpopular laws that aren't supported by most voters. Take, for example, Ohio's Heartbeat Law, which outlawed abortion after six weeks of pregnancy. Poll after poll showed that a majority — nearly 60 percent — of Ohioans supported abortion rights, with only 32 percent opposed and 10 percent undecided. These numbers have held relatively steady over several years. However, the 2019 legislative vote passing the bill seemed to reflect the inverse; the Ohio House passed the measure 56-40 and the Ohio Senate 18-12. Although average voters around the country weren't paying attention to what was happening in the Buckeye State, political operatives were. What happened in Ohio is now serving as a playbook for what we are seeing in states like Texas, Missouri and Florida. The governors and state legislatures of these states have indicated that they are willing to cheat to win. The Trump administration has demonstrated its willingness to ignore court orders it does not like. And, if they continue to do so, we will likely have a Congress that continues to pass legislation that is unpopular with voters. Politics is often like physics, in that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. Democrats have indicated they are willing to fight back by gerrymandering blue states such as California and New York. Some have praised them for this effort, with one Democratic consultant stating: 'There's anger among Democrats, and they wonder why their elected leaders aren't doing everything they can to fight back. … Kathy Hochul is out there saying, 'I'll do everything I can to fight back — including gerrymandering the s–t out of New York.'' But as the redistricting wars escalate, it is also a reminder that, as in any war, no one actually wins. Regardless of which party controls Congress after the 2026 midterms, voters in both red and blue states will be disenfranchised, in direct violation of the Supreme Court's ' one man, one vote ' edict . Both Democrats in red states and Republicans in blue states will be without any genuine form of representation. And even those who have a congressman of their preferred party affiliation will likely be represented by a more extremist candidate whose policy positions aren't reflective of the people in that district. As noted by The Associated Press, 'gerrymandering, once a feared accusation, has now become a battle cry.' If there's any lesson we can take away from the fight, it's that the lines we need to redraw aren't those separating congressional districts, but the ones we are willing to cross to ensure our side wins at all costs.
