
Senedd hears future generations law ‘lacks teeth'
Labour's Mick Antoniw warned the Act, which aims to put sustainable development at the heart of decision making, lacks impetus and risks being a "bureaucratic tick-box exercise'.
Mr Antoniw, who was involved in early stages of scrutiny of the then-bill, said: 'It started off… as a sustainability bill until no one could actually define what they meant by sustainability… came up with the term future generations and… that might be seen to be equally nebulous.'
As well as describing the Act as vague, the former minister suggested Wales' future generations commissioner has few – if any – powers to hold public bodies to account.
He said: 'I always thought that was a mistake right from the beginning, [you] don't give it proper teeth to actually have the impact that shifts decision making.'
Calvin Jones, an environmental economist, said the commissioner and his predecessor told him their only 'big stick' is to 'name and shame' which they are reluctant to do. 'As soon as you get the stick out, people take their eyes off the carrot,' he said.
'There's this constant tension between wanting to chivvy the laggards along but realising once you get a reputation as somebody who's an auditor effectively then games start being played and boxes start being ticked.
'That tension has always stymied the way in which the commissioners have been prepared to name and shame which was, I think, the only serious bit of teeth in the Act.'
Prof Jones, who left Cardiff University in May, suggested Audit Wales should have more of a role in holding public bodies to account in a similar way to their bookkeeping duties.
He warned of a major lack of funding for the commissioner's office, describing the money allocated by the Welsh Government as akin to using a sticking plaster on the Titanic.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Wales Online
42 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Cardiff Bus gives update on planned September strike
Cardiff Bus gives update on planned September strike The company warned customers of possible disruption next month There has been a long-term dispute over pay conditions at Cardiff Bus (Image: WalesOnline/Rob Browne) Cardiff Bus has warned customers of potential strike action next month as members of Unite the union continue to ballot for an improved pay offer. The Union said that the action would affect services for a period of three and a half weeks from Monday, September 1. Earlier this week, the company's management was informed of the action through a formal notification. The bus service is the primary bus provider for the Welsh capital and its surrounding areas like Barry and Penarth. The strike is however dependent on the result of an existing ballot which will be held by the union. Never miss a Cardiff story by signing up to our daily newsletter here The result of this will be announced on Friday, August 29 at the latest and if the revised pay offer is accepted a letter rescinding the strike action will be issued. Cardiff Bus said they were "preparing contingency plans" for if the strike was to go ahead with only a short window between the ballot result and start of the strike action. They reassured customers that as soon as a definite decision is made further details would be published on the company's website, app and social media channels. Content cannot be displayed without consent Craig Hampton-Stone, Managing Director, said: "We hope it does not come to this and that the ballot result is acceptance of the revised pay offer. "However, we have to act responsibly, both for our customers and our staff, by preparing for all scenarios. "We remain committed to resolving this dispute and have put forward a new pay deal which led to the postponement of the previous strike and commencement of the subsequent ballot. Our focus is on achieving a fair resolution that avoids unnecessary disruption. "Cardiff Bus will update customers on progress with pay talks and the outcome of the ballot as soon as further information is available. "Please check the company's website, app and social channels for the latest updates." Article continues below Strike action was previously called off earlier this month after a revised pay offer was put forward alongside proposed changes to working conditions which included longer breaks and improved sickness terms. This original industrial action was due to take place from August 17 and was due to run for three weeks, ending on Sunday, September 7.


The Sun
43 minutes ago
- The Sun
Interactive map reveals number of hotel migrants in each UK council as official figs show 32K currently in accommodation
A MAP has revealed the number of asylum seekers living in hotels in each UK council. Data released today showed that 32,059 migrants were living in taxpayer-funded hotels as of June this year, up eight per cent over the past year. 3 While data has not been released on the number of hotels in use, Labour says there are less than 210 being used, down from the more than 400 that were being utilised in summer 2023. The local authority housing the highest number of asylum seekers in June was Hillingdon in west London, with 2,238 people staying in hotels. Hounslow, also in west London, housed the second highest number of hotel migrants, with 1,536 staying in the area as of the end of June. Manchester had the highest number of asylum seekers outside of London, with 1,158 living in hotels. The vast majority of councils had no migrants housed in hotels. Other data published today revealed government spending on asylum in the UK fell to £4.76 billion in the year ending March 2025. This marks a 12 per cent decline from a record £5.38 billion the year prior. The totals represent Home Office costs related to asylum, including direct cash support and accommodation such as hotels but not costs relating to intercepting migrants crossing the English Channel. In all, roughly 0.37 per cent of total government spending in the year 2024-25 was related to asylum. While specific costs for hotels have not been published, a report from public spending watchdog the National Audit Office earlier this year found housing asylum seekers in hotels accounted for around 76 per cent of annual costs for asylum accommodation and support contracts. Small boat crossings under Labour are on brink of hitting 50,000 - one illegal migrant every 11 mins since the election That amounts to around £1.3 billion of an estimated £1.7 billion in 2024/25. The Home Office has a legal obligation to provide accommodation to asylum seekers who would otherwise be destitute. So, when there is not enough housing, the department moves asylum seekers from temporary accommodation to alternatives such as hotels and large sites, like former military bases. This comes after Home Office data released this morning showed 111,000 people claimed asylum in the year ending June 2025, up 14 per cent on last year. It is higher than the previous recorded peak of 103,000 which was set in 2002. The number of people claiming asylum in the UK has almost doubled since 2021. And just under half of all those applying for protection in the UK are granted it at the initial decision stage - 48 per cent. It is lower than in 2022 when 77 per cent of those applying were given the green light. It comes just after Epping Forest District Council this week won its bid to block asylum seekers being housed there. The Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, has been at the centre of anti-immigration demonstrations after one of its guests was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. The owners of the hotel have now been ordered to remove migrants from the site before September 12, inspiring other councils to say they will pursue similar legal challenges. Labour's plan must show results... and fast By JACK ELSOM, Political Editor LABOUR Ministers can insist they are getting a grip on illegal migration until they are blue in the face - but the numbers speak for themselves. We already knew that Channel crossings are up around 50 per cent since Sir Keir Starmer came into power last year on a promise to 'smash the gangs'. Today's damning statistics will only add to public fury over the small boats crisis, with asylum claims at a record high and hotel use up 8 per cent. Even the PM's flagship boast to have ramped up deportations seems hollow when you drill into the numbers. Yes, removals have increased, but the vast majority are migrants leaving this country voluntarily, often with a sum of taxpayer cash to send them on their way. Returns of small boat migrants have actually DECREASED by seven per cent in the past year. Inside Yvette Cooper's Home Office there is fury that the Tories are seizing on their migration woes having left them with a right old mess. The Conservatives are far from blameless, especially given the mind-bending figure that just 4 per cent of small boat arrivals have been returned since 2018. But frenzied Labour attempts to point the finger at the last lot will not wash with voters demanding action. Sir Keir and his ministers knew the problem they would be inheriting, and told Brits they had a plan to fix it. That plan needs to start showing some results, and fast. 3 3


New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
The age of unpopularity
Illustration by Dom McKenzie / Ikon Images Last September, just two months after Labour's election, Keir Starmer declared that his government was 'going to have to be unpopular'. That has proved to be one of the Prime Minister's safer predictions. Earlier this week Labour achieved another unwelcome milestone: its net approval rating fell to -56, matching the level recorded by the Conservatives just before the 2024 election. Some will conclude from this that the government can simply do no right in the eyes of a disillusioned electorate. But this isn't quite true. Polling by More in Common shows that policies such as the Ukraine negotiations, the minimum wage increase, the Renters' Rights Bill and the sewage bill are both popular and salient. For the public, however, these are far eclipsed by failures such as the winter fuel payment cuts, an excessively gloomy narrative and a lack of clear purpose. Yet it isn't only Labour's descent into unpopularity that is striking – British politics is defined by it. Not one of the current party leaders enjoys a positive approval rating according to YouGov. Nigel Farage, the man cast as an electoral pied piper, is almost as unpopular as the becalmed Kemi Badenoch. Jeremy Corbyn, the insurgent eyeing a second coming, is still more unpopular than both. Ed Davey emerges as the most popular leader but he is flattered by his greater obscurity: 38 per cent of voters don't have an opinion on him. Though Reform now comfortably leads among every pollster, this is some way short of a truly popular revolt. Back in 1981, the SDP-Liberal Alliance, invoked again in recent months, once achieved a rating of 50.5 per cent; Reform is currently averaging 29 per cent. What we are witnessing, in short, is a war of the weak. Labour is an unpopular incumbent and the Tories an unforgiven opposition. Farage and Corbyn are daring but divisive (both, with telling symmetry, are disliked by 61 per cent of the electorate). Who wins in this strange new universe? Pollsters and commentators have traditionally defined British elections as a battle for the 'centre ground'. Swing voters – who would oscillate between the Conservatives and Labour – were prized above all. But this conventional fight, some in Westminster argue, has now been supplanted by another. A private polling presentation by Stack Data Strategy – co-founded by Ameet Gill, a former strategist to David Cameron – instead frames British politics as a struggle between left and right coalitions. In an era when the winning post is closer to 30 per cent than 40 per cent, the side which triumphs will be that which best preserves its base. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe The risk for Labour is that while the right-wing vote consolidates around Reform, the left-wing vote fragments. Since the general election, Farage has won over almost a third of 2024 Tories (29 per cent). Labour, meanwhile, has shed votes to the Lib Dems (13 per cent) and the Greens (9 per cent). A new left party, already polling as high as 15 per cent in some surveys, threatens only to maximise this disunity. How does Labour prevent this trend giving Farage an electoral shortcut to No 10? It's a question Starmer will soon need to show his party he has an answer to. This piece first appeared in the Morning Call newsletter; receive it every morning by subscribing on Substack here [See also: What the Bell Hotel closure reveals about the asylum housing stalemate] Related