logo
S.Africa To Offer US New Deal To Avoid 30% Tariff

S.Africa To Offer US New Deal To Avoid 30% Tariff

South Africa will offer a "generous" new trade deal to the United States on Tuesday to avoid 30-percent tariffs, government ministers said.
Washington on Friday slapped the huge tariff on some South African exports, the highest in sub-Saharan Africa, despite efforts by Pretoria to negotiate a better arrangement to avoid massive job losses.
The ministers did not release details of the new offer but said previously discussed measures to increase imports of US poultry, blueberries and pork had been finalised.
"When the document is eventually made public, I think you would see it as a very broad, generous and ambitious offer to the United States on trade," Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen said at a press briefing.
Officials have said the 30-percent tariff could cost the economy around 30,000 jobs, with unemployment already at 33.2 percent according to statistics released Tuesday.
"Our goal is to demonstrate that South African exports do not pose a threat to US industries and that our trade relationship is, in fact, complementary," Trade Minister Parks Tau said.
The United States is South Africa's third-largest trading partner after the European Union and China.
However South African exports account for only 0.25 percent of total US imports and are "therefore not a threat to US production", Tau said.
Steenhuisen said US diplomats raised issues related to South African domestic policies, which was a "surprise given the fact we thought we were in a trade negotiation".
The two nations are at odds over a range of domestic and international policies.
US President Donald Trump has criticised land and employment laws meant to redress racial inequalities that linger 30 years after the end of apartheid.
Steenhuisen is from the pro-business Democratic Alliance (DA) party, the second-largest group in the coalition government, that objects to the same laws.
"Things like expropriation without compensation, things like some of the race laws in the country, are issues that they regard as barriers now to doing trade with South Africa," he told AFP on the sidelines of the briefing.
"I think we're seeing some form of a new era now where trade and tariffs are being used to deal with other issues, outside of what would generally be trade concerns," Steenhuisen said.
Other countries, including Brazil and India, have been slapped with "far more punitive tariffs" because of ideological disagreements with the Trump administration, he said.
"This is obviously a new normal to which we're going to all have to adapt," Steenhuisen said.
Although US diplomatic ties with several countries have plummeted since Trump took office in January, Pretoria has so far said that political disagreements had not come up in the trade negotiations.
Tau said the negotiations with the United States were "unprecedented" as they did not follow the World Trade Organization rule book.
"That book has been put on the side for now and all of us are grappling with the reality of what we are dealing with," Tau said, adding it still remained "important that we reaffirm our own commitments to our own sovereignty as a country".
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israeli Far-right Minister Backs Contentious West Bank Settlement Plan
Israeli Far-right Minister Backs Contentious West Bank Settlement Plan

Int'l Business Times

time6 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Israeli Far-right Minister Backs Contentious West Bank Settlement Plan

Israel's finance minister backed plans on Thursday to build 3,400 homes in a particularly contentious area of the occupied West Bank, calling for the territory's annexation in response to several countries' plans to recognise a Palestinian state. The United Nations chief warned that building Israeli homes in the area would "put an end to" hopes for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Israel has long had ambitions to build on the sensitive parcel of land east of Jerusalem known as E1, but the plan has been frozen for decades amid international opposition. Israeli settlements in the West Bank are considered illegal under international law, while critics and the international community have warned construction on the roughly 12 square kilometres would undermine hopes for a contiguous future Palestinian state with east Jerusalem as its capital. The site sits between the ancient city and the Israeli settlement of Maale Adumim, near routes connecting the north and south of the Palestinian territory. There are also separate, frozen plans to expand Israel's separation barrier to envelop the area. "Those who want to recognise a Palestinian state today will receive a response from us on the ground... Through concrete actions: houses, neighbourhoods, roads and Jewish families building their lives," said Bezalel Smotrich, Israel's finance minister, who was speaking at a pro-settlement event on the advancement of plans for the E1 parcel. "On this important day, I call on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to apply Israeli sovereignty in Judea and Samaria, to abandon once and for all the idea of partitioning the country, and to ensure that by September, the hypocritical European leaders will have nothing left to recognise," the far-right figurehead added, using the Biblical term for the West Bank, which Israel has occupied since 1967. Britain and France are among several countries to announce in recent weeks plans to recognise a Palestinian state later this year, saying they wanted to keep the two-state solution alive. Stephane Dujarric, the spokesman for UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, said "If this went ahead -- which we call on the Israeli government not to do... it would sever the northern and southern West banks." He added that "it would put an end to the prospects of a two-state solution". The Palestinian foreign ministry condemned the plans and called for "genuine international intervention and the imposition of sanctions on the occupation to compel it to halt the implementation". "Colonial construction in the E1 area is a continuation of the occupation's plans to destroy the opportunity for the establishment of a Palestinian state," it added. The European Union's chief diplomat, Kaja Kallas, said the plan "further undermines the two-state solution while being a breach of international law" and called on Israel "to desist". Germany said it "strongly objects" to the plan and called on the Israeli government to "stop settlement construction", while Saudi Arabia also condemned the move "in the strongest possible terms". Israeli NGO Peace Now, which monitors settlement activity in the West Bank, denounced the E1 plan as "deadly for the future of Israel and for any chance of achieving a peaceful two-state solution". The NGO said the final approval hearing would be held next Wednesday by a technical committee under the defence ministry that has already rejected all objections to the proposals. After the bureaucratic steps are completed, "infrastructure work in E1 could begin within a few months, and housing construction within about a year", Peace Now said. The West Bank is home to around three million Palestinians, as well as about 500,000 Israeli settlers.

South Africa's National Dialogue: Can it heal old wounds? – DW – 08/14/2025
South Africa's National Dialogue: Can it heal old wounds? – DW – 08/14/2025

DW

time18 hours ago

  • DW

South Africa's National Dialogue: Can it heal old wounds? – DW – 08/14/2025

South Africa's National Dialogue kicks off on Friday, but critics say it's been rushed. Key political foundations have pulled out, warning that real change needs more time. South Africa's ruling African National Congress (ANC) has long aimed to improving its citizens' living standards. Since it came to power 31 years ago, the ANC has worked to expand freedom and deepen democracy. However, according to South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, poverty, unemployment and inequality "are deep wounds that prevent us from reaching our full potential as a nation..." Ramaphosa last year proposed the "National Dialogue" initiative, which was intended to tackle some of South Africa's most pressing challenges, including unemployment and crime. "I call on all South Africans, united in our diversity, to come together in the National Dialogue to define a vision for our country for the next 30 years," Ramaphosa said in February 2025 at the opening of Parliament. Four months later, Ramaphosa announced that a National Convention would take place on Friday, August 15, to set the agenda and define South Africa's "path into the future." Friday's convention will take place at the University of South Africa (UNISA) Muckleneuk Campus, in the country's administrative capital, Pretoria. The gathering will represent South Africa's diversity — including leaders from government, politics, business, civil society, religions and other groups, who will lay the foundation for solutions to South Africa's major challenges. Social inequality has remained a significant challenge in the three decades since apartheid ended in 1991. Crime, unemployment, and infrastructure issues — particularly in the energy sector — hinder economic development. Jakkie Cilliers, chairman of the Board of Trustees at the Institute for Security Studies (ISS) in South Africa, told DW that the National Dialogue got off to a "chaotic start." Seven well-known foundations established by former ANC leaders and liberation fighters, such as the Steve Biko Foundation, the Desmond and Leah Tutu Legacy Foundation, and the foundation of former President Thabo Mbeki, have withdrawn from the process. They consider August 15 to be too early a starting point. "Dialogue cannot be built on haste," the foundations said in a statement. "What began as a citizen-led initiative has unfortunately in practice shifted towards government control," the statement added. "August 15 was set at the request of government officials. Pushing for this date undermines "a critical moment in which citizens should be leading." Anzio Jacobs disagrees with the criticism. He is the coordinator of the Civil Society Dialogue Committee and head of the Nelson Mandela Children's Fund's child protection program. He helped prepare the National Dialogue with many civil society organizations. "When we counted at the beginning of this week, all nine provinces of South Africa were represented. We reached 85,000 ordinary South Africans who are waiting for the dialogue process and are ready to participate," Jacobs told DW. He believes South Africans are tired of waiting any longer. There are also political disputes with the ANC's new coalition partner, the pro-business Democratic Alliance (DA), which draws strong support white South Africans. For a year now, since the ANC's historically poor election result, it has been forming a government of national unity with the former liberation movement, but ideological differences have hindered unity. The recent dispute over the dismissal of Andrew Whitfield, the DA's deputy minister for trade and industry, almost led to the party's withdrawal from the coalition in June. The DA then withdrew from the dialogue initiative. DA chairman John Steenhuisen described the National Dialogue as "expensive talk shop without action, without reform and without a plan' in view of the provisional costs of 700 million rand (around €35 million/$40 million). A comprehensive dialogue on sustainable change in South Africa without the largest partner in the coalition government raises doubt about the its success. Cilliers sees considerable problems. "At present, there is uncertainty about the purpose of the dialogue and what will happen. So we will discuss our problems. But how do we link the national dialogue to a long-term development plan for South Africa?' asks Cilliers. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In Cilliers' view, "the problem is that South Africans do not believe that further talks will solve anything. The real problem is that the government lacks determination and is not taking action." The analyst pointed out that South Africa has had several commissions of inquiry — for example into corruption scandals involving former President Jacob Zuma. Cilliers believes that the subsequent government did not respond adequately when it came to taking action. "What South Africans are looking for, in my opinion, is a process based on analysis that can then be put up for debate and discussion, leading to concrete measures and putting the country on the path to growth," Cilliers noted. "Nothing is more important in South Africa than boosting the economy so that we can create jobs, reduce unemployment, and reduce inequality. These are some of the challenges that the National Dialogue must address."

Is South Africa's National Dialogue a recipe for progress? – DW – 08/14/2025
Is South Africa's National Dialogue a recipe for progress? – DW – 08/14/2025

DW

time19 hours ago

  • DW

Is South Africa's National Dialogue a recipe for progress? – DW – 08/14/2025

South Africa's National Dialogue kicks off on Friday, but critics say it's been rushed. Key political foundations have pulled out, warning that real change needs more time. South Africa's ruling African National Congress (ANC) has long aimed to improving its citizens' living standards. Since it came to power 31 years ago, the ANC has worked to expand freedom and deepen democracy. However, according to South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, poverty, unemployment and inequality "are deep wounds that prevent us from reaching our full potential as a nation..." Ramaphosa last year proposed the "National Dialogue" initiative, which was intended to tackle some of South Africa's most pressing challenges, including unemployment and crime. "I call on all South Africans, united in our diversity, to come together in the National Dialogue to define a vision for our country for the next 30 years," Ramaphosa said in February 2025 at the opening of Parliament. Four months later, Ramaphosa announced that a National Convention would take place on Friday, August 15, to set the agenda and define South Africa's "path into the future." Friday's convention will take place at the University of South Africa (UNISA) Muckleneuk Campus, in the country's administrative capital, Pretoria. The gathering will represent South Africa's diversity — including leaders from government, politics, business, civil society, religions and other groups, who will lay the foundation for solutions to South Africa's major challenges. Social inequality has remained a significant challenge in the three decades since apartheid ended in 1991. Crime, unemployment, and infrastructure issues — particularly in the energy sector — hinder economic development. Jakkie Cilliers, chairman of the Board of Trustees at the Institute for Security Studies (ISS) in South Africa, told DW that the National Dialogue got off to a "chaotic start." Seven well-known foundations established by former ANC leaders and liberation fighters, such as the Steve Biko Foundation, the Desmond and Leah Tutu Legacy Foundation, and the foundation of former President Thabo Mbeki, have withdrawn from the process. They consider August 15 to be too early a starting point. "Dialogue cannot be built on haste," the foundations said in a statement. "What began as a citizen-led initiative has unfortunately in practice shifted towards government control," the statement added. "August 15 was set at the request of government officials. Pushing for this date undermines "a critical moment in which citizens should be leading." Anzio Jacobs disagrees with the criticism. He is the coordinator of the Civil Society Dialogue Committee and head of the Nelson Mandela Children's Fund's child protection program. He helped prepare the National Dialogue with many civil society organizations. "When we counted at the beginning of this week, all nine provinces of South Africa were represented. We reached 85,000 ordinary South Africans who are waiting for the dialogue process and are ready to participate," Jacobs told DW. He believes South Africans are tired of waiting any longer. There are also political disputes with the ANC's new coalition partner, the pro-business Democratic Alliance (DA), which draws strong support white South Africans. For a year now, since the ANC's historically poor election result, it has been forming a government of national unity with the former liberation movement, but ideological differences have hindered unity. The recent dispute over the dismissal of Andrew Whitfield, the DA's deputy minister for trade and industry, almost led to the party's withdrawal from the coalition in June. The DA then withdrew from the dialogue initiative. DA chairman John Steenhuisen described the National Dialogue as "expensive talk shop without action, without reform and without a plan' in view of the provisional costs of 700 million rand (around €35 million/$40 million). A comprehensive dialogue on sustainable change in South Africa without the largest partner in the coalition government raises doubt about the its success. Cilliers sees considerable problems. "At present, there is uncertainty about the purpose of the dialogue and what will happen. So we will discuss our problems. But how do we link the national dialogue to a long-term development plan for South Africa?' asks Cilliers. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In Cilliers' view, "the problem is that South Africans do not believe that further talks will solve anything. The real problem is that the government lacks determination and is not taking action." The analyst pointed out that South Africa has had several commissions of inquiry — for example into corruption scandals involving former President Jacob Zuma. Cilliers believes that the subsequent government did not respond adequately when it came to taking action. "What South Africans are looking for, in my opinion, is a process based on analysis that can then be put up for debate and discussion, leading to concrete measures and putting the country on the path to growth," Cilliers noted. "Nothing is more important in South Africa than boosting the economy so that we can create jobs, reduce unemployment, and reduce inequality. These are some of the challenges that the National Dialogue must address."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store