Greens defend internal complaints process after Tammy Franks's shock resignation
The South Australian Greens have hit back at former party co-leader Tammy Franks, a day after the upper house MP walked out on the party, labelling her comments "deeply regrettable and inappropriate".
A day after Greens internal tensions exploded into public view with Ms Franks's resignation, the party said its investigation into complaints against her found she had "engaged in misconduct".
Ms Franks denies any wrongdoing, describing allegations against her as "unsubstantiated and false".
She resigned from the Greens on Tuesday to sit as a "progressive independent" in the upper house, leaving the party with just one MP in parliament.
The veteran Greens MP, who had already flagged she would not stand for re-election in 2026, also went public with a scathing critique of the party's internal procedures, claiming there were people in the party who "wanted me to move on".
She claimed there were "some 100-plus pages" of allegations made against her that "weren't particularised into something that would fit anybody's definition of misconduct".
"I joined a political party that should have had processes that when an allegation was made, it should have been investigated properly," she said on Tuesday.
"The complaints included that I'd used voice-to-text to send emails and messages.
"I used voice-to-text for a short period of time because I was going through menopause and had extreme joint pain and couldn't hold pieces of paper or pens.
"I find it ludicrous that that was one of the charges against me."
Ms Franks said another misconduct charge she faced was that she had "disrupted meetings" she was chairing with her staff.
"I challenge anyone to explain how I'm meant to chair a meeting and give my staff direction and run a functional office without taking lead in that situation," she said.
Ms Franks said she intended to "take action" against the Greens for "unfair and oppressive behaviour" under the Associations and Corporations Act.
After only releasing a brief statement on Tuesday that did not address Ms Franks's claims, the SA Greens on Wednesday defended its internal party processes.
The minor party said there were "complaints raised in relation to the behaviour of Ms Tammy Franks MLC".
"The party acted on these complaints and undertook a process where it was found that Ms Franks had engaged in misconduct," the Greens said in a statement.
"That finding was upheld by the party's state council.
"The process was carried out in accordance with Greens SA by-laws and constitution.
"The party acted on, and implemented, the recommendations resulting from that process."
The Greens added that Ms Franks's decision to "publicly criticise the complainants" was "deeply regretful and inappropriate".
Ms Franks told the ABC on Wednesday the misconduct findings against her were upheld by the party but "were not investigated by an independent body and no procedural fairness was followed".
Greens MLC Robert Simms, now the only Green in South Australia's parliament, said he had "no idea" his co-leader was going to resign on Tuesday.
"I did know though … that she had been frustrated or feeling unhappy for some time," he told ABC Radio Adelaide on Wednesday.
"I did think there was a chance that something like this could happen at some point, but I had hoped that that wasn't going to be the case."
Mr Simms, a former senator who has been in state parliament since 2021, said it had been "a difficult 24 hours" and he "tried to support Tammy as best as I can".
"But these things do happen in political parties from time to time."
He also denied there was a culture problem within the Greens and defended the party's internal processes, saying: "I respect our party processes and our procedures — I think they're pretty robust."
"But of course there's always an opportunity to do things differently and the party regularly reviews our internal policies and procedures," he said.
Asked about the voice-to-text complaint Ms Franks said was raised against her, Mr Simms said he did not have "any details of the specifics of the complaint".
"Our party misconduct processes are confidential … it's not one that's run by MPs, it's run by the political party exec committee that's set up to run that," he said.
"And so out of respect for the people who are involved in that process and their privacy, I don't want to comment on what might have been involved in that process."
Mr Simms's chief of staff, Melanie Selwood, was preselected in December for the number one spot on the Greens' upper house ticket, after Ms Franks announced in September she would not stand again.
Ms Franks said she has "no current plans" to run as an independent in 2026 but "I don't rule anything out".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
35 minutes ago
- ABC News
Tasmanian election called for July 19, but both Liberals and Labor hamstrung on key issues
After a nail-biting few days of "will they, won't they, could they, should they," Tasmania's very, very early election is full-steam ahead. Except this one can't exactly be full steam, can it? After all, it's an election that nobody wanted brought on for a variety of reasons, including the dire state of Tasmania's budget situation. That was one of the reasons for Labor's successful no-confidence motion in Premier Jeremy Rockliff. Imagine making that a sticking point and then throwing cash at a bunch of bowls clubs (they're always on the funding list). If the major parties want to look like they're serious about getting Tasmania's finances back on track, they are going to need to avoid any form of pork barrelling. No matter how tempting. The Liberals have been accused of it the past three elections. Their response is to deny it's happening and insist they're simply listening to the community. Labor also made promises to sports clubs last election, but the plan was to have government departments "rigorously" assess them all before the funds were handed out. On top of that, Labor has said it wants to ban pork barrelling as part of its plan to fix the budget, it would be rather hypocritical to engage in it itself. But it's not just pork barrelling that arguably needs to go. Even a competitive sports grants process, which would otherwise be welcomed, could be a little on the nose, given the state barely has a cent to spare. And we all know that pool of money would not be up for grabs if it were not for an election. The other issue is the Liberals have just put out a budget. We know what they were planning to spend the money on, and where. Sure, they can change some things up — but how many sweeteners can they really surprise us with? So if they can't focus it on all the cash they want to drop, or their savings plans, that leaves policy. The Liberals have already begun to rethink theirs. Starting with privatisation. The premier announced just last Saturday the Liberals will not privatise any state-owned companies, and will in fact legislate so a two-thirds majority of parliament is required to sell them. Clearly they know going to an election with a "we want to explore privatisation" agenda is unlikely to win them many fans. It was also one of the reasons listed on the no-confidence motion. But how many other unpopular policies can they really rethink? The May decision to walk away from a treaty process was deeply unpopular among some Aboriginal groups, but there's no policy fix for the bungled process around the new Spirit of Tasmania ferry terminal, for example. The party's most unpopular position, an undying support for the almost billion-dollar Macquarie Point stadium, is unlikely to change. Lucky for the Liberals, Labor has taken the same stance, so it can't be used against them by the only other party viable to form government. But while the Liberals are trying to reconsider policies, Labor is going to need to come up with some (more). The party has been grappling with being stuck in the political wilderness for over a decade now. It lost the last election just 15 months ago. Badly. So, naturally, all policies are under review. With a little more notice of this election, it might have spent some time polishing them off, but it is partially responsible for this mess after all. When it comes to offering up something fresh, Labor's got the advantage of having a new leader, and as Dean Winter likes to remind everyone, "Labor has changed under me". Now is his time to really prove it. He certainly gained some kudos from the public for bringing the Spirit of Tasmania saga to light and has made it clear that the party backs workers. His mantra is almost "jobs, jobs, jobs". But the party still needs to figure out its position on a lot of issues. For example, just last month Mr Winter could not say if Labor was for or against a treaty. His argument was he could not take a side without consultation, but the issue is not exactly new. And Mr Winter has to transition from criticism to having solutions — fast. And answer questions such as whether Labor still wants to pause new permits for whole-home short-stay accommodation. Unclear. Or, what the plan is to cut the amount the state pays on locum doctors? Or, how it would go about closing the Ashley Youth Detention Centre if it's suddenly thrust into power. It is also a rare day when the party talks about what used to be some of its core issues — health, housing and education. And while Prime Minister Anthony Albanese talks about the need to balance industries and the environment, Mr Winter's pro-industry mantra can come across as "jobs at any cost". But where there is a void, there is always someone else happy to fill it. In this case, that is the Greens and other environmentally conscious crossbenchers. The same goes for the stadium. It is the crossbench who will be rewarded for their anti-stadium stance, and if the polls are anything to go by, it is a large crowd to capitalise on. But for how many Tasmanians will the stadium be their number one issue? Considering the Liberals' stuff-ups are fresh in people's minds, and Labor is copping a lot of the blame for the early election, the crossbench could very well benefit from voters' frustrations. But Tasmanians annoyed about the election also have a reason to take their anger out on the crossbench. Because, as much as the Greens and other independents like to spruik the power and benefits of minority parliament, most of them played a hand in blowing up that parliament less than halfway through its term. How can voters trust that won't happen again soon? Little about this election is going to be normal. But like it or not, in just over a month's time we're being dragged to the polls. No-one is coming into this unscathed and the end result is still anyone's game. Whatever the result, those 35 politicians owe it to Tasmanians to make it work for longer than 15 months, whatever it takes.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Edwin Kumar deported back to Sydney after US sentencing for AN0M bugged phone sting
A tech whiz caught up in what the Australian Federal Police (AFP) dubbed the biggest organised crime sting in its history has avoided prison in the United States and is back free in Sydney. Edwin Harmendra Kumar avoided spending more time in a California jail cell after facing a San Diego court in March. Court records state he was sentenced to a four-year jail term to be followed by three years' supervised release, though was deported having already spent three years in custody. Little has been known about what happened to Kumar, who was one of two Australian nationals extradited three years ago to the United States over the distribution of the specialised AN0M devices used to facilitate crimes. Kumar, from Kogarah in Sydney's south, was also one of dozens of arrested in the AFP's Operation Ironside in 2022. The joint Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and AFP investigation involved planting the mobile devices into organised crime networks. In reality, the AFP was able to watch live as crime figures organised drug importations, kidnappings and murders. Kumar was enlisted as a one of several 'distributors' of AN0M, tasked with taking subscription payments and providing technical support to criminals. According to court documents he pleaded guilty to one count of racketeering in February — a charge reserved for members of organised crime networks regardless of what role they played. According to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of California, Kumar was caught in messages bragging about bringing kilograms of cocaine from Belgium to Australia on fishing boats. He has never been charged or convicted of any drug offences in relation to Operation Ironside. When contacted this week, Kumar's American lawyer Victor Sherman said he told the judge "it was time to go home" for the former Sutherland Shire computer master. The original indictment naming Kumar in the case revealed criminals were being charged $1,700 for six months' access to the the AFP-bugged service in Australia. In total, the syndicate Kumar was a part of netted $15 million from distributing the devices into the criminal underworld, court documents state. Kumar was extradited to the US in 2023 where he was charged with racketeering and faced a maximum penalty of 20 years in an American prison. He was originally named in the indictment alongside Australia's most wanted man Hakan Ayik, who remains in custody in Türkiye for leading a transnational drug empire. Part of the case against Kumar was that he was part of the enterprise led by Mr Ayik that saw them unwittingly run and distribute the messaging platform infiltrated by police. Law enforcement had dubbed Mr Ayik and other Australia drug dealers caught up in the sting as an "Aussie cartel" at the time. The other Australian arrested at the time Osemah Elhassen, was picked up from his base in Colombia and extradited to America in May 2023. He was jailed for five years in a San Diego court in November 2024. The FBI claimed the investigation thwarted 150 murders, saw them seize more than 12 tonnes of cocaine and took 300 firearms off the streets.
SBS Australia
an hour ago
- SBS Australia
United States to conduct review into AUKUS agreement as PM prepares to meet Trump
Australia's AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine deal with the United States and United Kingdom is facing a review by the Pentagon, as the prime minister prepares for his first face-to-face meeting with the US president. Since returning to the White House, Donald Trump has provided some reassurance about the future of the $368 billion submarine agreement struck in the Biden era. But in a move first reported by the Financial Times and confirmed by the Pentagon, a review will be conducted to ensure the program meets the "America First" criteria. Announced in 2021, the AUKUS agreement was designed to eventually support a shipbuilding industry in Australia to construct the highly complex nuclear-powered submarines using a UK design and technology shared between the three countries. But in the 15 years ahead of that, the US was set to provide at least three Virginia-class submarines, though its own domestic manufacturing industry is under pressure. Australia's agreement on AUKUS included significant investment in the American production line, and has been considered advantageous to the US. US Democrat congressman Joe Courtney, one of AUKUS' supporters in Washington, warned of serious consequences if the Trump administration junks the defence agreement. "To abandon AUKUS — which is already well under way — would cause lasting harm to our nation's standing with close allies and certainly be met with great rejoicing in Beijing," Courtney said. The prime minister is expected to lock in face-to-face talks with Trump on the sidelines of the G7 in Canada, which starts on Sunday.
