logo
‘Marry the house, date the rate': Smart strategy or outdated advice?

‘Marry the house, date the rate': Smart strategy or outdated advice?

Yahoo22-05-2025

'Marry the house, date the rate' refers to the concept of buying now with an eye on refinancing should rates fall.
The advice is aimed at wary buyers who are worried about buying a home while rates are elevated.
The plan works if rates fall sharply, or if rates fall a little but you can avoid steep closing costs.
When mortgage rates began rising in 2022, Americans responded by buying fewer homes. In an attempt to spur reluctant buyers to set aside their fears and make a move, many in the housing industry have begun using the phrase 'marry the house, date the rate.'
This motto became popular during the post-pandemic era of rising rates. It's a colloquialism that contrasts the relative permanency of owning a home with the much more temporary transaction of taking out a home loan. After all, it has long been common practice for homeowners to refinance when mortgage rates fall.
'Marry the house' is a straightforward concept: Find the house of your dreams and live happily ever after. In this part of the buying strategy, you focus on finding a house you love. Homeownership may or may not be as enduring as an actual marriage — in the 1940s, one in five Americans moved every year, although that pace has steadily declined since the mid-1980s, according to research from the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies. At any rate, you don't have to stay in the house forever, but you are making a commitment of at least a few years.
While you develop an emotional connection to a house, the same doesn't apply to a mortgage. It's just a financial instrument. The analogy to dating is somewhat apt: You can stick with your mortgage for a few months or years, but when something better comes along, you can break up with the old mortgage and move on to the new one. Luckily for borrowers, refinancing a mortgage is less awkward and heart-wrenching than dumping a romantic companion.
While rates fell below 3 percent for only a brief period during the pandemic, the deals were so tantalizing that many just can't forget the moment of super-cheap money. As a result, home sales have plunged to some of the lowest levels in years. Given that backdrop, 'marry the house, date the rate' is useful advice.
A caveat: You shouldn't bank on home values going up and mortgage rates going down. While home prices have been setting one record after another, it's possible that they've entered a period of more muted appreciation. And mortgage rates are especially unpredictable. While housing economists expect mortgage rates to fall gradually, there are no guarantees.
Bankrate's take: Don't purchase a home you can't afford at today's rates with the hope of refinancing at a lower rate in the future. Make sure the mortgage payment fits your budget right now. If rates drop down the line, you can always refinance then and enjoy the savings.
Vishal Garg, CEO of mortgage lender Better, is a proponent of the 'marry the house, date the rate' strategy.
'The first question is: Have you found a house that you love? Second, can you finance the house you love at a price that's similar to what you pay in rent?' Garg says. 'If that's the case, you're getting an opportunity to buy an option to refinance in the future and significantly lower your housing costs.'
Garg has made 'date the rate' part of his company's strategy. Better offers reduced closing costs to homebuyers who finance a purchase with the company and then refinance with Better in the future.
That's important because closing costs can make a refinance a bad deal. However, in some cases, you can refinance with no title insurance fee and no appraisal. 'That means you can do a near-zero-cost refi,' Garg says.
In that case, even a modest reduction in mortgage rates might trigger a borrower to play the field. Say you've got a $400,000 loan at 7 percent, for a monthly principal and interest payment of $2,661. If rates fall to 6.25 percent, your new payment would be $2,463, or a savings of $198 a month.
If your closing costs are $4,000, you'd break even on the refinancing costs in 20 months.
Marrying the house and dating the rate might work in your favor if:
You can afford a home you like at today's rates
You expect to stay in the home for at least three to five years
Your monthly rent is comparable to what it would cost to own a home
You can refinance into a mortgage that carries a title insurance waiver, an appraisal waiver or other discounted closing costs
On the other hand, this strategy may not be to your benefit if:
You can't find a home that's in your budget and meets your needs
You think you'll move for work or family reasons in the next three to five years
Your monthly rent is significantly cheaper than your monthly mortgage payment would be
You live in a state such as Florida or New York that collects a tax on refinancing — the extra cost can push out the break-even point
Still not sure if this is the right strategy for you? Here are some different approaches you may want to consider:
Wait for rates to fall: The major downside here is that home prices could rise while you wait, which could offset any savings you might gain by refinancing to a lower rate later on.
Take out an adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM): These loans let you capture declines in mortgage rates without refinancing — although ARMs expose you to the risk of rates rising in the future.
Pay for mortgage points: If you decide to go through with the home purchase, you can buy discount points from your lender at closing. These can lower your interest rate, often by 0.25% per mortgage point.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DOJ May Consider Dropping Its HPE-Juniper Networks Merger Challenge
DOJ May Consider Dropping Its HPE-Juniper Networks Merger Challenge

Forbes

time31 minutes ago

  • Forbes

DOJ May Consider Dropping Its HPE-Juniper Networks Merger Challenge

Abigail Slater, US assistant attorney general nominee for US President Donald Trump, during a Senate ... More Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing in Washington, DC, US, on Wednesday, Feb. 12, 2025. Democratic senators pressed President Donald Trump's nominee for Deputy Attorney General, Todd Blanche, on politicization of the Justice Department and recent efforts to gather names of FBI agents who worked on cases related to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol. Photographer: Daniel Heuer/Bloomberg © 2025 Bloomberg Finance LP The U.S. Department of Justice's challenge to the proposed acquisition of Juniper Networks by HPE signals a concerning trend in merger enforcement that could undermine American economic vitality in a crucial high-tech sector. While regulatory scrutiny of consolidations is vital, a blanket skepticism toward merger activity, particularly one that overlooks significant procompetitive benefits, risks stifling innovation and weakening the very markets it purports to protect. As I have previously discussed, robust merger and acquisition (M&A) activity is indispensable for a dynamic economy, facilitating capital reallocation to higher-valued uses and driving efficiency and innovation. In the fast-evolving landscape of enterprise networking, the proposed HPE-Juniper merger presents a compelling case for its potential to enhance, rather than diminish, competition. Tellingly, the European Commission (EC) recognized as much when it approved the acquisition. The Proposed Merger DOJ alleges that the merger would harm competition by bringing together the second (HPE) and third (Juniper) largest wireless local network providers of wireless local area network (WLAN) in the United States. DOJ stresses that 'this would leave U.S. enterprises facing two companies commanding over 70% of the market: the post-merger HPE and market leader Cisco Systems Inc." Factors Suggesting No Harm To Competition DOJ's complaint ignores a variety of factors strongly suggesting that the merger would not harm competition. It relies primarily on market concentration, which modern antitrust economics views as only the starting point in determining whether a merger might reduce competition. HPE and Juniper point out that DOJ's market definition ignores 'a broad set of players' that are competing for WLAN business as customers shift to AI and cloud-driven strategies. Indeed, the EC found that HPE-Juniper would 'continue to face competition from a wide range of competitors, including strong and established players on each of the markets.' Even accepting DOJ's market definition, Cisco would remain the largest player post-merger. The merged firm would be positioned to intensify beneficial competition with Cisco. As an industry analyst explains, if 'DOJ blocks the HPE-Juniper deal, Cisco stands to gain the most." If the merger goes forward, however, there could likely be increased pressure on all players to innovate and offer better value. DOJ is silent about the 'remaining 30%' of the market. As Scalia Professor John Yun puts it, 'nearly 67% of sales [would] occur outside of a combined HPE-Juniper." The Case for Beneficial Efficiencies The DOJ's narrow focus also risks missing substantial efficiency gains that could accrue to consumers and the broader economy. Combining HPE's extensive enterprise reach and complementary product portfolio with Juniper's cutting-edge, AI-powered Mist platform holds immense promise. This synergy is not merely about eliminating redundancies, but about forging a more integrated and sophisticated product offering. Such a combination could streamline product development, accelerate the deployment of advanced networking solutions, and yield significant cost savings that can be passed on to customers through more competitive pricing or reinvestment in research and development. These are precisely the merger-specific efficiencies, creating a formidable force for innovation, that procompetitive merger analysis should recognize. The Global Dimension The global competitive landscape, particularly the rise of foreign competitors like Huawei, adds another layer of strategic importance to this merger. When considering the broader enterprise networking market, which includes a diverse array of global players, a combined HPE-Juniper likely would create another robust and credible American firm. In an increasingly interconnected and competitive global economy, enhancing American competitiveness in key high-tech sectors is paramount. A stronger, more innovative HPE-Juniper entity would be better positioned to compete globally, not just domestically, thereby bolstering the U.S.'s strategic advantage in critical digital infrastructure. Fostering highly competitive domestic firms capable of driving technological advances and economic growth is particularly significant against a backdrop of intensifying international rivalry. Dismissing these potential gains risks unintended negative consequences for American leadership in a sector vital to national security and prosperity. DOJ Should Consider Withdrawing Its Complaint Applying narrow and economically dated approaches to merger analysis risks stifling the very innovation and economic growth that America needs. DOJ may wish to seriously weigh the EC's pragmatic stance in this case, based on a sophisticated assessment of competition in a dynamic and evolving high-tech market. Continuation of the DOJ case against the HPE-Juniper merger omits consideration of key economic realities. This merger promises not only significant efficiencies and product enhancements, but also the creation of a stronger American competitor poised to challenge market leader Cisco and contend more effectively in the global high-tech arena. A nuanced approach that prioritizes enhanced American competitiveness and innovation, rather than an outdated and simplistic focus centered on the number of market players, is essential for continued economic vitality in this critically important sector. More generally, the Trump Administration's commitment to an 'America First' agenda would be promoted by supporting mergers that enhance the global competitive strength of American firms in key high tech sectors without diminishing domestic competition. Opposing such mergers would seem to be at odds with America First. An interim Antitrust Division head approved the HPE-Juniper challenge a mere 10 days after the January presidential inauguration. Now that they have assumed their posts, Attorney General Pam Bondi and Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust Division Gail Slater may want to consider these factors carefully in refining DOJ merger policy. (Federal Trade Commission Chairman Andrew Ferguson may also wish to take note.) Such a consideration may warrant dropping the merger challenge to the HPE-Juniper merger prior to the July 9 trial date.

Compass Sues Zillow as Fight Over Home Listings Heats Up
Compass Sues Zillow as Fight Over Home Listings Heats Up

Bloomberg

time32 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Compass Sues Zillow as Fight Over Home Listings Heats Up

Residential real estate brokerage Compass Inc. sued Zillow Group Inc., alleging that the home-search website is using 'anticompetitive tactics' with its plan to restrict certain listings. Compass alleges that Zillow 'has retaliated against competitive threats by enacting an exclusionary policy' by banning listings that have been publicly marketed elsewhere first, according to the lawsuit filed Monday in federal court in Manhattan.

Senate Readies Tax Bill for Vote as Holdouts Threaten Delay
Senate Readies Tax Bill for Vote as Holdouts Threaten Delay

Bloomberg

time32 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Senate Readies Tax Bill for Vote as Holdouts Threaten Delay

President Donald Trump's tax-and-spending agenda is nearing a climactic vote in the Senate this week in the wake of air strikes on Iran, which risk embroiling the US in a prolonged Middle East conflict. Trump's $4.2 trillion tax-cut package, partially offset by social safety-net reductions, does not yet have the support it needs to pass the Senate. Fiscal hawks seeking to lower the bill's total price tag are at odds with Republicans worried about cuts to Medicaid health coverage for their constituents and phase-outs to green energy incentives that support jobs in their states.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store