China intercepts Japanese spy aircraft over East China sea: Report
The ministry reported that the Chinese aircraft approached the Japanese plane to within 196 feet horizontally and 98 feet vertically, describing the maneuver as 'unusual' and cautioning that it could have led to a collision. The close encounter lasted for approximately 10 minutes. No damage or injuries were reported.A similar incident was reported on Wednesday, when another YS-11EB aircraft was intercepted by a JH-7 fighter for around 15 minutes under similar conditions. It remains unclear whether the same aircraft were involved in both encounters.These incidents follow a June interception in which Chinese jets from an aircraft carrier confronted a Japanese patrol plane east of the First Island Chain—a strategic line of islands including Japan, Taiwan, and the Philippines, forming part of the U.S. military's regional containment strategy.Beijing has defended its actions, accusing Japan of 'dangerous provocations' near its military assets. In contrast, Tokyo has repeatedly expressed serious concern and called for measures to prevent a future escalation.In 2013, China declared an Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) over much of the East China Sea, demanding foreign aircraft notify Chinese authorities before entry. The zone is not internationally recognized and has been a persistent source of friction.The Japanese government continues to monitor the situation closely and has lodged diplomatic protests, urging China to act responsibly to avoid an unintended crisis in the region.- EndsMust Watch
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
26 minutes ago
- Mint
Who's feeling the pain of Trump's tariffs?
In the bygone age that was 2024, America charged levies averaging just 2% on its imports of goods. In the new era of trade wars, it now has an 'effective' tariff of over 16%, the highest since the 1930s (see chart 1). (The Economist) Rates look set to go even higher. On July 31st President Donald Trump signed an executive order that significantly raises tariffs on most of America's trading partners, with the increases due to go into effect on August 7th. Duties on most products from the European Union and South Korea, which recently struck deals with America, will rise to 15%. India faces a tariff of 25%; South Africa, 30%; Canada, 35%. As we published this, Mr Trump seemed inclined to extend America's tariff truce with China. But that still leaves the world's second-largest economy facing levies of around 40% on sales to the world's largest. Who pays for these tariffs, in all their infinite variety? Most economists reckon that ordinary Americans will lose out, as prices in shops rise. Mr Trump and his coterie, by contrast, blithely insist that the rest of the world will shoulder the load by cutting their selling prices. So far, the evidence is giving the know-nothings a glimmer of hope. Mr Trump's critics in the economics profession have history and research on their side. Studies show that when a country imposes duties on its imports, its foreign suppliers often keep their prices roughly the same. The tariff is layered on top. So it was during the first Trump administration, which slapped tariffs on China and others. A study from 2019 found 'complete pass-through of the tariffs into domestic prices of imported goods'. Some foreign firms are taking a similar stance in response to Mr Trump's new levies. In April Ferrari added up to 10% to the price of its cars. Britain's Ineos said it would charge more for its Grenadier off-roader. Canon, a camera-maker, has warned dealers to brace for price increases. But the broader pattern is more benign. There is, for example, surprisingly little evidence so far of tariff 'pass-through' into inflation. In June America's 'core' consumer prices (ie, excluding food and energy) rose by 0.2% on the previous month, below the consensus estimate of 0.3%. Economists have found some evidence of tariff-induced price rises—in car parts, for instance—but they have had to look harder for it than they had expected. What explains these surprising results? American firms, not consumers, may be paying for the trade war by accepting lower profits, suggests research by Deutsche Bank. Some firms also boosted inventories before the tariffs were implemented, allowing them to avoid raising their prices for now. America's foreign suppliers may also be sharing more of the load than they did in Mr Trump's first term. Nintendo, a Japanese electronics firm, is keeping the American price of the Switch 2 games console at $449.99. Many Chinese manufacturers seem prepared to follow Nintendo and absorb duties: Fuling, a supplier of cutlery, says its clients expect it to shoulder 'part of the increased tariff costs'. TIRTIR, a South Korean beauty brand popular with American Gen Zers, has signalled that it can absorb most of the tariffs. Games Workshop, a British manufacturer of war games, also seems resigned to taking the hit, warning investors that tariffs could reduce annual profits by £12m ($16m). 'We found tentative evidence that Korean auto exporters are shouldering the cost of higher US tariffs, at least for now,' wrote Kim Jin-Wook of Citigroup, a bank, in a recent note. The Bank of Japan tracks the prices of the country's car exports to America. In yen terms, they have fallen by 26% in the past year. Some of that decline may reflect exchange-rate movements. An unchanged dollar price brings in fewer yen when the American currency is weak. But that only raises another question: why are Japan's carmakers not raising their dollar prices more vigorously in response? More comprehensive data point in a similar direction. The Economist assembled a series on export prices from a number of America's largest trading partners, including Canada, Germany and South Korea. In the past exporters in these countries have been perfectly willing to raise prices: during the inflationary surge of 2021-22, they increased them by more than 15% over a 12-month span (see chart 2). Yet in the past year the average local-currency price of their exports has fallen by 3.6%. Nothing of the sort happened during Mr Trump's first trade war. (The Economist) Some economists have noted a disconnect between what foreigners report and what American importers say they are paying. For instance, it is hard to find much evidence of plunging prices for Japanese car imports. Economists at Citi speculate that the time it takes to ship a foreign product to an American port may explain the puzzle. It 'implies a lag between falling export prices and when US import-price data would capture the decline', they say. Why might foreign suppliers be so forgiving? Some bosses worry more than before about the American consumer. With high inflation a recent memory, people already think that everything is too expensive. They have little tolerance for paying even higher prices. The opposite may be true of the foreign companies themselves. They are in a good financial position to withstand the tariffs. Aggregate margins of listed companies in emerging markets have become fatter over the past decade, increasing by over two percentage points. European firms have enjoyed similar gains. These companies can afford to take a small hit to profits, at least for now. Before long America's economy is likely to feel the pain of the trade war more acutely. Although some Chinese firms may have lowered their prices, these cuts are not nearly deep enough to offset the huge rise in tariffs they now face, points out Deutsche Bank's research. In addition, foreign companies that have borne the costs until now may not be able to bear them for ever—especially if tariff rates keep ratcheting up. The president loves defying his adversaries, in the economics profession and beyond. But he is always his own worst enemy. © 2025, The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved. From The Economist, published under licence. The original content can be found on Disclaimer: © 2025, The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved. From The Economist, published under licence. The original content can be found on
India.com
26 minutes ago
- India.com
Pakistan's close ally China faces major threat! Offering citizens lakhs of money due to..., reason will shock you
With the rising conflicts and wars across the globe, several countries are either stockpiling military assets or emphasizing population growth. Many countries are preparing for conflict in today's geopolitical climate. Orders to strengthen military capabilities are increasing, and population size is once again being viewed as a strategic asset. It is to be noted that population holds a significant role in war—whether as a source of manpower, economic strength, or national resilience. Well, Pakistan's close ally, China, is facing a serious problem: declining birth rates. According to the BBC report, the Chinese government has announced an annual subsidy of 3,600 yuan (around £375, $500) payable to parents for each child under the age of three under a new initiative launched to encourage more births nationally for the first time. China is now experiencing the consequences of its largest policy blunder: the 'one child' policy. While it produced rapid economic growth for decades, it also produced a fast-growing elderly population and turned China into an 'aged' nation before its time. This situation has become so dire that the government is now offering subsidies to encourage childbirth. On Monday, the government announced a policy that will provide the parents of children under the age of three an annual subsidy of 3,600 yuan (reportedly about Rs 41,000). The policy will be implemented on January 1, 2025. Meanwhile, even families with children born in 2022, 2023, or 2024 will still be eligible for partial benefits. The subsidy will be tax-free and excluded from poverty-assistance eligibility calculations. The government estimates that 20 million families could benefit from the new program. According to state media, the handouts will benefit about 20 million families, with the cost of raising children. The plan was revealed on Monday, with parents receiving up to 10800 yuan per child. Beijing's state broadcaster CCTV said the policy will be retroactive to the beginning of the year reported BBC. This comes amid multiple local government initiatives designed to address low birth rates in locations across China. For example, in Hohhot, a city in the northern region of China, parents are receiving support of up to 100,000 yuan per baby for couples with at least three children. The study by the China-based YuWa Population Research Institute found that the average nationwide cost of raising a child from birth to age 17 was about $74,800 – rising to more than $94,500 to support a child through a bachelor's degree, CNN reported. The cost of raising a child to age 18 in China is 6.3 times higher than the country's GDP per capita, the report said – a ratio second only to South Korea, which has the world's lowest fertility rate, and where the cost of child-rearing is 7.79 times the GDP per capita, CNN reported.
Deccan Herald
2 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
Read of the Week (Aug 3 to Aug 9)
At the turn of the century, the Central Intelligence Agency was in crisis. The end of the Cold War had robbed the agency of its mission. Then came September 11, 2001. After the attacks, the CIA transformed itself into a lethal paramilitary force, running secret prisons and brutal interrogations, mounting deadly drone attacks, and all but abandoning its core missions of espionage and counterespionage. The consequences were grave: the deaths of scores of its recruited foreign agents, the theft of its personnel files by Chinese spies, the penetration of its computer networks by Russian intelligence and American hackers, and the tragedies of Afghanistan and Iraq..A new generation of spies now must fight the hardest targets while confronting a president who has attacked the CIA as a subversive force. From Pulitzer Prize winner Tim Weiner comes The Mission, which tells the gripping, high-stakes story of the CIA through the first quarter of the 21st century, revealing how the agency fought to rebuild the espionage powers it lost during the War on Terror and finally succeeded in penetrating the Kremlin. .Tim Weiner has won the Pulitzer Prize for his reporting on American national security and the National Book Award for Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA.
