'One Big Beautiful Bill' could end energy tax credits, jobs for thousands of Hoosiers
The federal spending plan, dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, currently ends homeowner savings on solar panel and battery installations, efficient appliances and other energy-saving home improvements such as new doors and windows, biomass stoves and energy audits.
Indiana's seven Republican representatives voted to approve the bill, with the funding cuts, while the state's two Democrats voted against it.
The cuts are part of the massive House bill that is now in the U.S. Senate waiting for approval. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, introduced the bill into the House and said it, among other things, 'unlocks American energy dominance.'
People working in Indiana's clean energy sector disagree, saying the changes would hurt thousands of Hoosier home owners and workers employed in the solar industry.
Zach Schalk, senior Indiana program director for Solar United Neighbors Action, said the Senate should not approve the bill as it is currently written.
'The bill is a devastating step in the wrong direction,' Schalk said. 'It's going to make the air dirtier and our water less clean. It's going to make Hoosiers sicker and it's just not good policy for anybody.'
There are roughly 4,000 solar jobs in Indiana that could be at risk if the federal government cuts these tax credits, according to data from the Solar Energy Industries Association.
Schalk and Solar United Neighbors work with homeowners interested in going solar. Hoosiers building solar projects at home have been able to take advantage of a 30% tax credit on those purchases. The cost-saving incentive originally was set to end 2034, but the House's proposed budget would end it nearly a decade early this December.
Installing residential solar is not cheap, and projects costs widely vary but can add up to more than $20,000. The Residential Clean Energy Tax Credit provides homeowners certainty by allowing them the ability to plan a budget, Schalk said.
Homeowners who are planning for a solar project that won't be complete until 2026 will find their projects 30% more expensive if the bill is signed into law as written.
'And in Indiana, we don't have meaningful local solar incentives,' Schlak said. 'This federal tax credit is really an essential component for Hoosiers who want to go solar.'
The solar industry already has suffered direct attacks from state policy like the end of net metering, Schlak said, which raised the price of going solar and caused uncertainty in the market.
The loss of the credits also affects homeowners buying battery storage for their residential solar arrays. Battery systems also received a 30% credit, which saved Hoosiers thousands of dollars.
Darrell Boggess, a Bloomington resident, was an early adopter of solar power for his home and said tax credits are a large motivator for these expensive purchases.
'If the tax credits disappear, then the price increases by about a third and most people, including me, are price sensitive,' Boggess said. 'So, if it costs more you just don't think about buying it.'
Boggess not only fitted his home with solar panels, but purchased heat pumps, too. These systems are energy-efficient substitutes for the standard heating and cooling systems found in most homes.
'When it was below zero outside I was getting 90-degree air into the house and the temperature inside stayed constant,' Boggess said.
The solar panels, heat pumps and other upgrades have saved Boggess money. The work also has made him pay closer attention to the amount of energy his home uses.
Household appliances, like Boggess's heat pump, meant to help homeowners reduce energy use and save on bills, could also lose federal tax credits under the House bill.
The Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit provides homeowners up to $3,200 in tax credits for various new appliance purchases and other expenses with a 30% credit.
Rewiring America's CEO Ari Matusiak said about 64,000 households in Indiana used these tax credits in 2023 and saved meaningful amounts of money on their energy bills. Matusiak and Rewiring America work to help homeowners save money by going electric. The organization's research shows that if all Hoosiers upgraded their energy efficiency, Indiana would save about $3 billion each year on energy bills.
Based on Rewiring America's research about a quarter of Indiana's households rely on delivered fuels like propane to heat their homes or use inefficient electric heaters like the type that run along baseboards, Matusiak said. These homes could benefit from energy efficiency tax credits and end up saving around $3,840 every year on their energy bills.
'This is a big deal in terms of the impact of these tax credits on energy costs,' Matusiak said. 'Energy costs are rising for families and nationally they've gone up over 30 percent over last four years.'
This is a strange moment, Matusiak said, because we are having a conversation about energy affordability and the amount of energy on the grid, but these credits help grid capacity and save individuals thousands of dollars on energy bills.
'This is not the thing to be taking aim at if you're worried about those kinds of things and that's why we want to make sure people know about it,' he said.
Cutting the tax credits will not only affect Hoosiers paying utility bills, but the local jobs the credits help support cannot be offshored, Matusiak said.
Bradley Stroot owns Tuttle Heating and AC, a residential HVAC company based in Bloomington. Stroot's company focuses on installing and servicing high efficiency heat pumps in Monroe and the surrounding counties.
The 30% tax credit has made homeowners Stroot worked with much more likely to install these heat pumps, he said. The high efficiency systems often save enough energy over their lifespan that the upfront costs are worth paying. Heating and cooling a home typically makes up about half of the homeowner's energy bill, he said, and even modest increases in efficiency can mean significant savings over time.
'If Congress chooses to get rid of these tax credits it will come at the detriment of both homeowners and small businesses like ours,' Stroot said. 'A significant portion of our business is related to installing and servicing heat pumps, many of which qualify for $2,000 tax credits.'
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act is now in the U.S. Senate waiting on any changes before a vote. The Senate Finance Committee released its version of the draft bill June 16, and the committee is still considering cutting the incentives.
Sen. Todd Young's spokesperson Leah Selk said in an email to IndyStar that Young's office didn't have anything to share about the clean energy tax credits. "Senator Young continues to have conversations with his colleagues and stakeholders about improving the House-passed bill and addressing our nation's debt and deficit challenges," Selk wrote.
Sen. Jim Banks did not respond to IndyStar's request for comments.
'(The bill) does not make any sense from our perspective,' Matusiak said. 'It's not a good policy decision, and certainly not good for individuals. People should let their elected officials know that.'
IndyStar's environmental reporting project is made possible through the generous support of the nonprofit Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
24 minutes ago
- New York Post
Texas Dems leave state to block vote on redrawn House map backed by Trump
Texas Democrats left the state Sunday in an attempt to prevent the state House from holding a vote Monday on new congressional maps that Republicans hope will net them several additional U.S. House seats in the 2026 midterm elections. The dramatic move could expose Democrats to fines and other penalties — with the state's attorney general having previously threatened to arrest them if they took such an action. Refusing to attend legislative sessions is a civil violation, however, so Democrats legally could not be jailed and it's unclear who has the power to carry out the warrants. 6 Texas Representative Chris Turner presenting a map of congressional districts during a redistricting hearing. AP Democrats have cast the decision to leave the state as a last-ditch effort to stop Republicans who hold full control of the Texas government from pushing through a rare mid-decade redrawing of the congressional map at the direction of President Donald Trump. 'This is not a decision we make lightly, but it is one we make with absolute moral clarity,' said Gene Wu, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, in a statement. To conduct official business, at least 100 members of the 150-member Texas House must be present. Democrats hold 62 of the seats in the majority-Republican chamber. At least 51 Democratic members are leaving the state, said Josh Rush Nisenson, spokesperson for the House Democratic Caucus. 'Apathy is complicity, and we will not be complicit in the silencing of hard-working communities who have spent decades fighting for the power that Trump wants to steal,' he said. The move marks the second time in four years that Texas Democrats have fled the state to block a vote. In 2021, a 38-day standoff took place when Democrats left for Washington, D.C. in opposition to new voting restrictions. 6 'This is not a decision we make lightly, but it is one we make with absolute moral clarity,' said Gene Wu. AP Republican Gov. Greg Abbott called a special session of the Legislature that started last month to take up the redistricting effort, as well as to respond to flooding in Texas Hill Country that killed at least 135 people in July. Trump has urged Texas Republicans to redraw the map to help the party net a handful of seats in the midterms next year. 6 Map of proposed Texas congressional districts, Plan C2308. AP 'For weeks, we've been warning that if Republicans in Texas want a showdown — if they want to delay flood relief to cravenly protect Donald Trump from an inevitable midterm meltdown — then we'd give them that showdown,' Democratic Party Chair Ken Martin said in a statement. 'That's exactly what Texas Democrats did today: blowing up Republicans' sham special session that's virtually ignored the plight of flood victims in Kerr County.' Attorney General Ken Paxton on X said the state should 'use every tool at our disposal to hunt down those who think they are above the law.' 'Democrats in the Texas House who try and run away like cowards should be found, arrested, and brought back to the Capitol immediately,' he wrote. 6 Colin Allred at a Texas congressional redistricting hearing. AP Abbott's office and House Speaker Dustin Burrows did not immediately respond to requests for comment Sunday afternoon. Texas Republicans last week unveiled their planned new U.S. House map that would create five new Republican-leaning seats. Republicans currently hold 25 of the state's 38 seats. By leaving the state, Democrats are looking to block Republicans from the needed quorum to hold votes on the map set for Monday. The Texas House has rules to fine lawmakers $500 each day they break a quorum. GOP Attorney General Ken Paxton has said previously that if Democrats break quorum, 'they should be found and arrested no matter where they go.' 6 Texas Republicans last week unveiled their planned new U.S. House map that would create five new Republican-leaning seats. AP 'My office stands ready to assist local, state, and federal authorities in hunting down and compelling the attendance of anyone who abandons their office and their constituents for cheap political theater,' Paxton said on the social media platform X on July 15. A large chunk of the Texas Democrats are heading to Illinois, where Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker had been in quiet talks with them for weeks about offering support if they chose to leave the state to break quorum. Pritzker, a potential 2028 presidential contender, has been one of Trump's most outspoken critics during his second term. Last week, Pritzker hosted several Texas Democrats in Illinois to publicly oppose the redistricting effort. California Gov. Gavin Newsom held a similar event in his own state. 6 Last week, Pritzker hosted several Texas Democrats in Illinois to publicly oppose the redistricting effort. AP Pritzker also met privately with Texas Democratic Chair Kendall Scudder in June to begin planning for the possibility that lawmakers would depart for Illinois if they did decide to break quorum to block the map, according to a source with direct knowledge who requested anonymity to discuss private conversations. Now, with Texas Democrats holed up in Illinois and blocking the Trump-backed congressional map, the stage may be set for a high-profile showdown between Pritzker and the president. Trump is looking to avoid a repeat of his first term, when Democrats flipped the House just two years into his presidency, and hopes the new Texas map will aid that effort. Trump officials have also looked at redrawing lines in other states, such as Missouri, according to a person familiar with conversations but unauthorized to speak publicly about them.


New York Post
24 minutes ago
- New York Post
Tulsi Gabbard explains why Russia must have thought Hillary Clinton win was ‘inevitable'
The Russians privately felt it was 'inevitable' that Hillary Clinton would triumph in the 2016 election, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said on Miranda Devine's 'Pod Force One' podcast. Despite widespread narratives that Russia was in President Trump's corner, Moscow's objective was to sow chaos in the American political process and brace itself for a Clinton presidency, Gabbard claimed, citing the trove of intelligence documents her team has released. 'It surprised me that all of these documents still existed, quite frankly,' Gabbard said in an episode set for release Wednesday. 'As we've learned in later documents that we've reviewed throughout that campaign, Russia believed that Hillary Clinton would win the election. Advertisement 'They felt it was inevitable.' Last month, Gabbard's team began disclosing a trove of documents that gave a behind-the-scenes look at the intelligence community's machinations during the 2016 election cycle regarding the probe of Russian interference. 4 Tulsi Gabbard accused the Obama administration of mounting a campaign to subvert President Trump. Ron Sachs – CNP for NY Post Advertisement 4 Hillary Clinton once implied that Tulsi Gabbard is a Russian asset. Getty Images This included a House Intelligence Committee report from 2020 that claimed the Russians may have had intelligence that Clinton was 'placed on a daily regimen of 'heavy tranquilizers' and while afraid of losing.' That was supposedly due to her alleged 'psycho-emotional problems, including uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness.' Gabbard pondered why that supposed Russian intelligence wasn't leaked to the public if Moscow's chief objective was to prop up Trump and undermine Clinton. Advertisement 'If Russia aspired to help Trump get elected, which is what the manufactured January 2017 intelligence community assessment says with high confidence, according to Brennan and Clapper, then Putin would have released the most damaging information and emails to help President Trump,' she said. 'It was intentionally withheld and not released because they assumed that Hillary Clinton would win that election, and their plan,' Gabbard added, citing the 2020 House Intelligence Committee report, '[was to] wait until maybe days or weeks before her inauguration to release these documents.' The Russians were widely alleged by US officials to have hacked Democratic National Committee emails during he 2016 campaign. 4 Narratives about Russian interferences in the 2016 election haunted President Trump during his first term. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement The 2020 House Intelligence Committee report had concluded that Russian strongman Vladimir Putin's 'principal motivations in these operations were to undermine faith in the US democratic process' and that he didn't necessarily prioritize propping up one candidate over the other. 'The American people, I think, have been, and our republic, has been most harmed by this,' Gabbard said of the Russia collusion narrative. 'Of course, President Trump went through hell and his family because of this Russia hoax that was manufactured by President Obama and his administration.' Critics such as former CIA Director John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper accused Gabbard of peddling 'patently false' accusations about their Russiagate activities. Much of what Gabbard has released centered around rebuffing a 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA), which concluded among other things that 'the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.' Brennan, Clapper and others have pointed to a 2020 bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report, which noted the panel 'heard consistently that analysts were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.' Clapper and Brennan recenty penned an op-ed insisting that the intelligence community report never referenced 'collusion' between Trump and the Russian government, and stood by their claims that the Kremlin prefered him in the 2016 election. Tulsi Gabbard's Russiagate claims Tulsi Gabbard's claims of election interference focus on the controversial 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, which President Barack Obama ordered his intel chiefs to compile. The report fueled the Russiagate investigations against President Trump. Gabbard alleges it amounted to a political hit job, claiming Obama officials knowingly used shaky intel and then lied about it. Gabbard's new claims are based on a 2020 House Intelligence Committee report, which she has publicly released. Its findings differ in some key ways from both the Obama report and a previously released Senate Intelligence Committee report. Democrats, however, point to the Senate report, which was backed by then-Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) — now Trump's secretary of state. That supports some of the findings of the Obama report. Here are the biggest points — and what the dueling intel reports say: The Steele dossier The House report contradicts the claims of Obama officials that they never relied on the discredited Steele dossier — which was compiled by Hillary Clinton's campaign — as part of the Russiagate investigation. In a 2017 House hearing, Obama CIA Director John Brennan denied that his agency used the Steele dossier for intelligence assessments. However, the full Steele dossier was still included as an attachment to the Obama intel report, the newly public House report found. Additionally, according to the House report, Brennan, FBI Director James Comey and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe pushed to use the Steele dossier for the Obama intel report. Senior intel officials also confronted Brennan about the legitimacy of the Steele dossier, the House report said, but he shrugged it off. Brennan's response was reportedly, 'Yes, but doesn't it ring true?' The Senate investigation found that the Steele dossier was not used as part of the Obama intel report. Obama's involvement Gabbard claimed Wednesday that Obama ordered the creation of the 2017 intel report and suggested it 'was subject to unusual directives directly from the president and senior political appointees.' She added: 'Obama directed an intelligence community assessment to be created, to further this contrived false narrative that ultimately led to a year-long coup to try to undermine President Trump's presidency.' The 2020 Senate intel report confirmed that Obama ordered the report to be drafted, but did not comment on the political motivations. Obama said that 'the bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.' Did Putin want Trump to win? The Obama report said that 'Russia's goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability' and that Putin had a 'clear preference for President-elect Trump.' But the House report contradicted this, saying that Putin's 'principal motivations in these operations were to undermine faith in the US democratic process.' The Russian strongman also seemed to expect Clinton to win, and held back on 'some compromising material for post-election use against the expected Clinton administration.' The Senate report said lawmakers were given 'specific intelligence reporting to support the assessment that Putin and the Russian Government demonstrated a preference for candidate Trump.' Did Russia alter the 2016 election? To buttress her claims that the Obama intel report was political interference, she highlighted the findings of multiple intelligence agencies that Russia 'had neither the intent nor capability to impact the outcome of the US election.' On this, all three reports are in agreement. Gabbard pointed to how Obama ordered the 2017 ICA of Russian interference in the 2016 election and his administration's machinations detailed in the document dump to accuse the 44th president of subversion. Advertisement 'What we now know came from President Obama was a covert mission, essentially, to subvert the will of the American people, create this lie that would challenge the legitimacy of President Trump's election and the four years of his administration, resulting and affecting in what was truly a years' long coup,' Gabbard said. Reps from Obama have refuted those characterizations, saying that the 'bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.' 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes,' Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush said in a statement last month. 4 Tulsi Gabbard has drawn President Trump's attention with the document dump on Russiagate. REUTERS Advertisement Gabbard made referrals to the Justice Department based on her findings, and the DOJ has since formed a 'strike force' to comb through the claims.


Boston Globe
24 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Texas Democrats leave the state to block vote on redrawn House map backed by Trump
Advertisement 'This is not a decision we make lightly, but it is one we make with absolute moral clarity,' said Gene Wu, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, in a statement. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up To conduct official business, at least 100 members of the 150-member Texas House must be present. Democrats hold 62 of the seats in the majority-Republican chamber. At least 51 Democratic members are leaving the state, said Josh Rush Nisenson, spokesperson for the House Democratic Caucus. 'Apathy is complicity, and we will not be complicit in the silencing of hard-working communities who have spent decades fighting for the power that Trump wants to steal,' he said. The move marks the second time in four years that Texas Democrats have fled the state to block a vote. In 2021, a 38-day standoff took place when Democrats left for Washington, D.C. in opposition to new voting restrictions. Advertisement Republican Gov. Greg Abbott called a special session of the Legislature that started last month to take up the redistricting effort, as well as to respond to flooding in Texas Hill Country that killed at least 135 people in July. Trump has urged Texas Republicans to redraw the map to help the party net a handful of seats in the midterms next year. 'For weeks, we've been warning that if Republicans in Texas want a showdown — if they want to delay flood relief to cravenly protect Donald Trump from an inevitable midterm meltdown — then we'd give them that showdown," Democratic Party Chair Ken Martin said in a statement. 'That's exactly what Texas Democrats did today: blowing up Republicans' sham special session that's virtually ignored the plight of flood victims in Kerr County.' Speaker Dustin Burrows said the Texas House would meet as planned on Monday afternoon. 'If a quorum is not present then, to borrow the recent talking points from some of my Democrat colleagues, all options will be on the table. . .,' he posted on X. Attorney General Ken Paxton on X said the state should 'use every tool at our disposal to hunt down those who think they are above the law.' 'Democrats in the Texas House who try and run away like cowards should be found, arrested, and brought back to the Capitol immediately,' he wrote. Abbott's office did not immediately respond to requests for comment Sunday afternoon. Texas Republicans last week unveiled their planned new U.S. House map that would create five new Republican-leaning seats. Republicans currently hold 25 of the state's 38 seats. Advertisement By leaving the state, Democrats are looking to block Republicans from the needed quorum to hold votes on the map set for Monday. The Texas House has rules to fine lawmakers $500 each day they break a quorum. Paxton has said previously that if Democrats break quorum, 'they should be found and arrested no matter where they go.' A large chunk of the Texas Democrats are heading to Illinois, where Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker had been in quiet talks with them for weeks about offering support if they chose to leave the state to break quorum. Pritzker, a potential 2028 presidential contender, has been one of Trump's most outspoken critics during his second term. Last week, Pritzker hosted several Texas Democrats in Illinois to publicly oppose the redistricting effort. California Gov. Gavin Newsom held a similar event in his own state. Pritzker also met privately with Texas Democratic Chair Kendall Scudder in June to begin planning for the possibility that lawmakers would depart for Illinois if they did decide to break quorum to block the map, according to a source with direct knowledge who requested anonymity to discuss private conversations. Now, with Texas Democrats holed up in Illinois and blocking the Trump-backed congressional map, the stage may be set for a high-profile showdown between Pritzker and the president. Trump is looking to avoid a repeat of his first term, when Democrats flipped the House just two years into his presidency, and hopes the new Texas map will aid that effort. Trump officials have also looked at redrawing lines in other states, such as Missouri, according to a person familiar with conversations but unauthorized to speak publicly about them. Advertisement Associated Press writer Nadia Lathan in Austin contributed to this report.