Major bank announces Australian first
ANZ has announced plans to launch a passwordless entry into its app, claiming to help protect Aussies from cyber attacks.
In an Australian first, ANZ said passwordless web banking would help prevent customers from malware attacks, including infostealer scams, as well as reduce the risks from data stolen in data breaches or impacted in phishing attacks.
ANZ Group executive Australia retail Maile Carnegie said by launching passwordless banking ANZ would help customers access its services effortlessly while fortifying security, identity and data controls. ANZ is launching an Australian first aimed at slowing down scammers. NewsWire / Luis Enrique Ascui Credit: News Corp Australia
'By introducing this change, we're helping prevent customer log-in details from the risk of data breaches or phishing attacks – providing an extra layer of protection and one less thing for customers to worry about when it comes to banking security,' Ms Carnegie said.
Instead of using a password, customers can log in via passkeys of their fingerprint, face or device pin or through their phone number and approving a log-in request sent to their ANZ Plus app.
The passwordless service will be launched on ANZ Plus only and has not been applied to the ANZ app.
Last month, ANZ unveiled Digital Padlock technology that it will roll out in the ANZ app, ANZ Plus and internet services.
Once activated, it will block debit and credit cards as well as disable digital access and stop unauthorised activity on accounts while still allowing direct debits and loan repayments to go through.
The ANZ move comes after the big four banks were named as part of an infostealer attack.
According to an investigation by cyber intelligence researcher Dvuln, banking details belonging to at least 14,000 CommBank customers, 7000 ANZ customers, 5000 NAB customers and 4000 Westpac customers were being traded on the dark web. The major banks have been caught up in an infostealer attack. iStock Credit: istock
Dvuln co-founder Jamieson O'Reilly told NewsWire there was a thriving underground where criminals were making a good living through infostealer scams.
'Instead of the traditional ransomware attack where they lock your computer and ask for money, criminals have found that it's much more lucrative to not be detected, not make any noise and just leave the malware on your device as long as possible so that every time you change your information, it is sent back to the criminal gangs that control it.
'It means they have this continuous stream of information that they can sell to other cybercriminals.
'So rather than one payment with a ransom, they're getting year-on-year payments in some cases where they've got a device infected for a long time.'
Mr O'Reilly said while the research focused on the banks, there was a much larger problem for Aussie households.
'We chose to highlight the banking risk because that would get the everyday Australian's deserved attention, but there was a lot more information,' he said.
With the launch, ANZ is reminding Aussies to remain vigilant online.
'Don't give personal information or money to anyone if unsure.' ANZ said.
'Never click a link in a message, and only contact businesses or governments using contact information available through their official website or secure apps. If you're unsure, hang up or delete.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Millions of Aussie consumers ditching US-made products over Donald Trump's trade war, comparison site Finder reveals
Aussie shoppers are steering clear of United States brands as the stench of Donald Trump's trade war latches onto American-made products. New research from comparison site Finder, shared exclusively with revealed almost one in four Aussies (23 per cent) are avoiding buying US goods due to President Trump's tariff regime. Another 31 per cent said they plan on avoiding buying American products in the coming months, meaning 11.6 million Aussies are either avoiding or plan to avoid purchasing US-made goods. Finder's head of consumer research Graham Cooke said President Trump's trade war could hurt the US economy as he seeks to boost American manufacturing. 'This shift in shopping habits could deliver a multi-billion dollar blow to American brands fighting for a foothold in Aussie households,' Mr Cooke said. 'As trade tensions escalate, many Australians are voting with their wallets in a move that could redraw the retail map. 'The great Aussie Trump dump signals more than protest – it's a potential pivot in loyalty that local and alternative brands are poised to capitalise on.' Finder's research showed men and women were equally avoiding purchasing American-made products, however, more women were planning to avoid buying US goods. Almost two in five women (38 per cent) said they planned on avoiding US goods while 25 per cent of men said they plan to steer clear of products made in President Trump's America. Meanwhile, baby boomers and gen Z were the most likely to avoid purchasing US goods due to the trade war. Mr Cooke said shoppers could be tactful by supporting local industries while President Trump attempts to force manufacturing to American shores. "Every dollar you spend helps shape the economy. By choosing local alternatives, Aussies can support homegrown businesses,' he said. "This is a wake-up call to rethink our spending habits – ditch the brands that don't align with your values and back businesses that support local jobs and sustainable practices. "Consumers have more power than they realise. Audit your spending, shop smarter and hopefully save some money in the process.' Australian steel and aluminium exports now face 50 per cent tariffs after the Trump Administration doubled the levies earlier this month. Automotive parts face a 25 per cent tariff while the nation remains temporarily exempt from the US President's sweeping 10 per cent 'Liberation Day' tariffs until July 9. The US and China continue to undergo negotiations to avert a massive trade war after the two economic superpowers continually hiked tariffs on each other earlier in the year. China had a 125 per cent tariff on US goods at the peak of the trade war, while the US had a 145 per cent tariff on China before they mutually agreed to drastically lower the levies.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Defence experts warn Australia's armed forces 'languishing', short on firepower due to 'deeply inadequate' military spending
Australia's defence force is weaker than it was before East Timor, is under armoured and short of firepower according to stinging analysis by two of the nation's leading defence experts. With the Prime Minister heading to the G7 in Canada, defence analyst Peter Jennings and Retired Chief of Army, Peter Leahy have both given their thoughts on the AFD and how it stacks up. A break down by Sky News of regional power players also lays out Australia's fragile capabilities despite numerous governments talking up potency, reliability and acquisitions. 'We are in a very dangerous strategic situation now,' said Peter Jennings, from Strategic Analysis Australia. It's a sentiment shared by Retired Lieutenant General, Peter Leahy. 'In the case of the Australian Army I was the Chief from 2002 to 2008. If I look at the army now it is smaller than what it was then. It's not as capable. It has less armoured protection and recruiting is really quite difficult,' said the former Chief. A former senior naval officer who wished to remain anonymous affirmed the Royal Australian Navy was down on the missile firepower it had 30 years ago – leaving it short of ships and under-gunned. With Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Europe rearming and the Chinese Communist Party intent on achieving hegemony in the region, armouries are growing, and defence budgets are being stretched. This year the United States intends to spend (in Australian dollars) $1.56 trillion on defence. China stated spend is $375-billion although its estimated to more accurately be around $620 billion. It's acquired three aircraft carriers and the world's second largest air force in a little over decade. It's also expanding its nuclear arsenal and is amassing a bespoke fleet to potentially take the democratically governed islands of Taiwan. Japan continues to ramp up its own defence spending, reportedly up nearly ten per-cent year on year to $105-billion. The sum is equal to one-point-eight percent of its GDP. Australia will spend $59 billion. It's roughly two per-cent of GDP with an intention to reach two-point-four per cent by 2034. 'We are facing some difficult times,' said Peter Jennings. 'Up against that level of risk, our defence spending is deeply inadequate… We are just a tiny shade over two per-cent of GDP and you know, that I think was a peace time level spend.' When it comes to combat airpower – fighters, bombers and long-range armed drones, America's force numbers around 3,276. China's air fleet is estimated to be around 2750. It remains highly secretive around the number of long-range drones capable of inflicting damage. Japan's defence force numbers 258. Indonesia's strike force is 116. Australia's modest but capable strike force numbers 108. The Department of Defence was specifically asked how many long-range armed drones Australia has acquired, but in its answer, didn't identify any. It's concerning considering the state of the Royal Australian Navy, which critics believe lags a decade behind in acquisition. Australia operates on a 'three to one' rotation policy meaning its force needs to be divided by three. Consequently, it aims to have two submarines, one destroyer and two frigates available for deployment. Although Australia's two resupply ships are both currently out of action tethering the navy even closer to shore. When it comes to soldiers and marines, China's fighting force numbers more than a million. Indonesia stands around 300,000. Australia's active duty force has shrunken to 28,500. 'The ADF is a professional organisation, sadly I think it's languishing,' said Peter Leahy. 'There's a really solid debate that says we need to spend more money on defence and I agree entirely. But I agree with the Prime Minister and others that it's not just a sum we need to spend, we need to be careful about what we want. How we acquire and how we introduce it into services. 'Everybody is saying it's the most catastrophic circumstances since before the second world war (and) we need to do something …. Action is required.' The former Army Chief dismissed the notion Australians should be scared. 'I don't think there's any reason to be scared …. (but) the public need to be concerned that people are thinking about this.' Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese has publicly sidestepped – if not rebuffed - America's request for Australia to urgently increase the nation's defence spending to three-point-five per cent of GDP, saying 'I think that Australia should decide what we spend on Australia's defence. As simple as that.' 'It's very clear that the Americans think our defence spend is deeply inadequate,' said Peter Jennings. '(US Defense Secretary) Pete Hegseth in Singapore said we should lift it from two per- cent to three-and-a-half per cent. That's a massive increase … So, I think the signal, not particularly coded from the United States is we need to do a lot better.' Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison recently told this reporter, 'We've got to be looking at three per cent. We should be at two-and-a-half per cent as quickly as possible. You know, I'd be saying three-per cent by 2030 … and it's not like we haven't been there before.' Though, it's always easier to talk about where defence spending should be than decide where taxes should increase or what must be cut. In the Second World War Australia's defence spend climbed towards 35 per cent of GDP. It's nothing if not an indication of the financial cost of conflict when diplomacy fails. When it came to opposition, Peter Jennings rebuffed suggestion the outcry amounted to warmongering. 'With the biggest war in Europe since the Second World War, with the Middle East in flame, with China not hiding the fact that it's becoming increasingly aggressive to all of its neighbours, circumnavigating Australia with some of its best military equipment. How could anyone think we are in a benign period and we don't have to worry about these developments,' he said. 'Il's plain for all to see, it's not like you need to have some special security clearance to understand what's going on. We can't afford to be in denial about it,' he said.
AU Financial Review
an hour ago
- AU Financial Review
ANZ's Nuno Matos smokes on the First Nations pipe
ANZ's new CEO Nuno Matos was part of a smoking ceremony outside the bank's Melbourne office this week marking the release of its 'landmark' First Nations strategy. It came after he received a Powhiri – the traditional Maori welcome – on his visit to Auckland last month. The Portuguese Prince (who's worked in Peru and Mexico) is apparently very attuned to cultural sensitivities around Indigenous peoples. Both events were naturally marked by social media posts, their virtue signalled and enacted (#purpose #firstnations #banking).
