Columbia grads shred diplomas over Mahmoud Khalil arrest: 'We are enraged'
Columbia University students and graduates gathered over the weekend to protest the school's recent acquiescence to the Trump administration's demands to combat antisemitism at the school, and the arrest of Mahmoud Khalil, a pro-Palestinian ringleader on campus.
During the protests, several graduate students from the School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA) shredded their own diplomas.
"SIPA and Columbia are working against the incredible efforts their students are making to envision a world where Palestinians can enjoy their full human, civil and national rights," one of the protesters said before tearing her diploma in half. "SIPA is not proud, we are enraged. We will continue to rage at this institution until Mahmoud Khalil is free."
Ice Agents Arrest Anti-israel Activist Who Led Protests On Columbia University For Months
Another protester announced that she was "renouncing" her degree, before destroying her diploma.
Several other protesters spoke briefly before following suit.
Read On The Fox News App
"Free, free Palestine," chants echoed during the protest.
The rally took place during Columbia's Alumni Day celebration on Saturday.
Khalil was picked up by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in early March as part of a new effort by the Trump administration to revoke the green cards of Hamas sympathizers.
The Department of Homeland Security said that Khalil "led activities aligned to Hamas, a designated terrorist organization."
According to his LinkedIn, Khalil studied at Lebanese American University in Beirut before starting his master's degree at Columbia in public administration in January 2023.
The Trump administration recently pulled $400 million in funding, citing the school's failure to control pro-Palestinian violence on campus. The school also agreed to a Trump administration demand that student protesters be barred from disguising their faces with masks and other coverings.
Columbia University Yields To Trump Admin Demands Over Revoked $400M In Federal Funding
Katrina Armstrong, Columbia's interim president, abandoned her post Friday amid the unrest.
WATCH: Interim Columbia president resigns amid White House funding fight
"Dr. Armstrong accepted the role of interim president at a time of great uncertainty for the University and worked tirelessly to promote the interests of our community," David J. Greenwald, chair of the board of trustees, said in a news release late Friday. "Katrina has always given her heart and soul to Columbia. We appreciate her service and look forward to her continued contributions to the University."
Khalil is now fighting deportation in court.
Fox News' Diana Stancy, Jasmine Baehr and Alexis McAdams contributed to this report.Original article source: Columbia grads shred diplomas over Mahmoud Khalil arrest: 'We are enraged'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
JFK Files: From Ticks To Tricks, How The U.S. Planned To Sabotage Cuba
Join experts Dennis McCuistion and Dory Wiley for an explosive panel discussion at The Dallas Express' 'Who Killed JFK?' event on June 9, 2025. , , or today! A newly declassified document shows U.S. officials contemplated disguising biological warfare against Cuba as a natural disaster in 1962. The file, titled MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE SPECIAL GROUP ON MONGOOSE 6 SEP 62, suggests top U.S. intelligence and defense officials, including the CIA, Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the State Department, discussed the possibility of using covert biological agents to induce crop failure in Cuba during the Cold War. In a section of the document, General Marshall Carter of the Army discussed the 'extreme sensitivity' of such operations but proposed methods to make crop failures 'appear (to be) of natural origin.' McGeorge Bundy, then President John F Kennedy's National Security Advisor, reportedly said such sabotage would be acceptable if it could be plausibly denied and blamed on local disaffection or natural causes—urging caution against 'external activities such as release of chemicals… unless they could be completely covered up.' The document is heavily redacted and appears incomplete, cutting off mid-sentence. Two overlapping versions of the minutes appear in the file, one containing handwritten notes and markings and another including stamps indicating that the CIA objected to its release as recently as 2016. Despite no objection from the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the CIA marked the document 'Top Secret,' not releasing it until this year. Also included in the file is a note that 'the Attorney General and Mr. Bundy said that no reprisals against exiles who undertake active operations on their own are contemplated.' The Attorney General at the time was Robert F. Kennedy, President Kennedy's brother, indicating he was directly involved in deliberations over sabotage operations against Cuba, although his views were not recorded on the biological warfare element. Though the list of 'contemplated actions' referenced in the meeting is not included in this batch of released materials, the document indicates that the group spent significant time considering biological sabotage. Throughout the conversation, the assumption is that the United States not only had the capability to develop such agents but also the logistical means to deploy them covertly in a hostile nation. These revelations deepen the historical record of Operation Mongoose, a covert anti-Castro campaign launched in 1961 following the failed Bay of Pigs invasion. As noted by the State Department's Office of the Historian, Operation Mongoose was designed 'to remove the Communist Castro regime from power in Cuba.' Directed by Air Force General Edward Lansdale, the program involved coordinated psychological, political, military, and intelligence efforts, including propaganda dissemination, sabotage missions, and assassination attempts. The State Department Historian notes that Lansdale's plan laid out a six-phase strategy presented to Robert Kennedy in February 1962 and to President Kennedy in March. Monthly initiatives were set in motion to destabilize the Cuban government, culminating in preparations for a potential military intervention in October 1962. Though many of these operations were deployed, the military intervention never occurred. The newly revealed document echoes earlier reporting from The Dallas Express, which uncovered evidence of biological tactics being used to manipulate international opinion. That report, titled JFK Files: From Hoof to Hoax, Revealing the Army's Epidemic PR Stunt, cited an Army intelligence memorandum describing how U.S. operatives influenced Mexican media to report outbreaks of hoof-and-mouth and smallpox in Cuba. The effort apparently discouraged Mexican professionals from attending an architecture conference in Havana under the guise of a public health scare. It remains unclear whether the reported epidemic ever existed—or whether it was planted as part of a psychological operation. These disclosures align with firsthand accounts like that of Kris Newby, author and science journalist, who told Corporate Crime Reporter in 2024 about a conversation with a former CIA operative who claimed he had 'dropped infected ticks on Cuban sugar cane workers in 1962.' Newby, who has extensively researched the origins of Lyme disease, said the man admitted the goal was to cripple Cuba's economy by targeting its most lucrative crop—sugar. Newby said she later verified aspects of the man's story, tracing it back to Operation Mongoose. The tactic, she explained, aimed to weaken the Cuban labor force and induce economic collapse, consistent with broader U.S. objectives in the region. Newby wrote the 2020 non-fiction Bitten: The Secret History of Lyme Disease and Biological Weapons. These new documents and testimonies suggest that U.S. intelligence agencies had the means to execute a biological attack, as well as to control the media coverage around it. As DX reported, the Army previously used fabricated or exaggerated outbreaks to shape international perception and discourage engagement with Cuba. The covert planting of diseases—or even rumors of diseases—was part of a larger strategy of media manipulation and subversion. Such operations were conducted in a geopolitical context marked by Cold War paranoia, heightened by the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962. Fidel Castro's growing ties with the Soviet Union led U.S. intelligence officials to view Cuba not just as a local threat but as a potential launching point for communist influence throughout Latin America, DX reported. A 2017 CBS report on a prior batch of JFK files revealed that the CIA had even considered staging bombings in Miami to justify retaliation against Cuba. The declassified materials documented deliberations over creating a wave of staged terrorist attacks to justify military action. In the years since these operations were conceived, U.S. policy ostensibly moved away from biological weapons. On November 25, 1969, President Richard Nixon formally renounced the use of biological warfare, ordering the end of all offensive biological research. Fort Detrick, once an apparent nerve center of such experimentation, allegedly shifted to focus solely on defensive research and diagnostics. The Mongoose meeting minutes were obtained by The Dallas Express in the outlet's ongoing processing of the approximately 80,000 files related to the assassination of President John F Kennedy that were declassified by the Trump administration earlier this spring.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Turmoil, worry swirl over cuts to key federal agencies as hurricane season begins
WASHINGTON (AP) — With predictions for a busy hurricane season beginning Sunday, experts in storms and disasters are worried about something potentially as chaotic as the swirling winds: Massive cuts to the federal system that forecasts, tracks and responds to hurricanes. Experts are alarmed over the large-scale staff reductions, travel and training restrictions and grant cut-offs since President Donald Trump took office at both the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which prepares for and responds to hurricanes, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which tracks and forecasts them. 'My nightmare is a major catastrophic storm hitting an area that is reeling from the impact of all of this nonsense from the Trump administration and people will die. And that could happen in Florida, that could happen in Texas, that could happen in South Carolina,' said Susan Cutter, the director of the Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute at the University of South Carolina. Representatives of both NOAA and FEMA say the agencies are prepared. Experts: DOGE cuts diminish FEMA About 2,000 full-time staff have left FEMA since Trump took office in January, a loss of roughly one-third of the agency's full-time workforce, amid Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) mandated cuts. Scholars who study emergency management are concerned by both the reduction in capacity and the 'brain drain' of experienced staff. 'There's really been a brain drain within FEMA in addition to the loss of overall employees,' said Samantha Montano, who teaches emergency management at the Massachusetts Maritime Academy. She noted that many who left were in critical management positions. The agency is run by an acting chief, David Richardson, a former Marine Corps officer who served overseas and worked as the Department of Homeland Security's assistant secretary for countering weapons of mass destruction. He does not appear to have any experience in managing disasters. Emergency management requires knowing where to get things, who to call, how things work and how to get it done quickly — which comes from experience and establishing relationships with state officials, Montano and Cutter said. What's happening reminds former Federal Emergency Management Agency Director Craig Fugate of 2005, the year Hurricane Katrina devastated Louisiana and exposed inexperienced and poorly prepared governments at all levels, especially the then-FEMA chief who came from a horse-rearing association. Fugate said he's especially worried about top experienced disaster people leaving FEMA. FEMA canceled various emergency management trainings this spring, moved others online and restricted travel to events such as the National Hurricane Conference. Some trainings have resumed. 'Given the reduction in staffing, being unable to do trainings, participate in conferences, there's potential that the federal government's ability is diminished,'' said former Florida Emergency Management chief Bryan Koon, now president of the disaster preparedness firm IEM. FEMA has also cut disaster resilience programs. Making areas more survivable saves up to $13 for every dollar spent, said Lori Peek, director of the Natural Hazards Center at the University of Colorado. The federal government promises to be ready for hurricane season, which runs through November. 'FEMA is shifting from bloated DC-centric dead weight to a lean, deployable disaster force that empowers state actors to provide relief for their citizens,' Associate FEMA Administrator Geoff Harbaugh said in a email. 'FEMA is fully activated in preparation for hurricane season.' FEMA's relationship with states Richardson promised to push more responsibilities to the states. He warned that the agency will only do what the law requires and shift more costs to states. But Koon noted that states haven't budgeted for FEMA's changes, adding: "The biggest issue right now is just the uncertainty.' Some states — which coordinate disaster operations — are experienced in catastrophes, have well trained staff and will do fine, such as Texas and Florida, Fugate said. But it's the poorer states that worry the experts. The feds often pick up the entire bill in big disasters and most of it in smaller ones. In the Trump administration, disaster declarations have been denied or delayed. When disaster declarations were issued for nine states last week, some had been pending for two months and others were only partially approved. 'We've just relied on FEMA for so much for so long and not knowing who's going to fill the gap and how we're going to fill it is really scary," said University at Albany emergency management professor Jeannette Sutton. Hurricane center dodges NOAA cuts NOAA, the parent agency of the National Weather Service, has undergone a series of dramatic job cuts, with some people then reinstated. A sizable chunk of the weather service's 121 local field offices as of late March had vacancy rates of more than 20%, what's seen by outsiders as a critical level of understaffing. Local weather offices are crucial in helping people translate national warnings into what to do locally. 'It should be all hands on deck and we're being hollowed out," former NWS director Louis Uccellini said. But the National Hurricane Center, which tracks and warns of hurricanes in the Atlantic, Pacific and Caribbean, has been spared. Acting NOAA Administrator Laura Grimm, National Weather Service Director Ken Graham and National Hurricane Center Director Michael Brennan said the agency is prepared for the season with the Miami-based storm center fully staffed and so are the planes that fly into storms. For the first time this year, the hurricane center will incorporate artificial intelligence into forecasting because it has shown to improve predictions generally, Brennan said. 'Our services have never been better,' Graham said. 'Our ability to serve this country has never been better. And it will be this year as well.' But beyond the hurricane center, weather balloons launches have been curtailed because of lack of staffing. In some places, balloon launches have dropped from twice a day to once a day. NOAA hopes to get more balloons launched if needed, Brennan said. Data from the balloons is crucial for understanding steering currents and needed for forecasts, Uccellini said. He said when hurricanes threatened during his tenure he would order the launch of several extra balloons in the Great Plains to help figure out if storms would hit the United States. 'Hurricane forecasts, I'm expecting not to be as accurate this year because of that lack of balloon data,″ said former NOAA meteorologist Jeff Masters, now at Yale Climate Connections. ___ Aoun Angueira reported from San Diego. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Saga Of RFK Jr., Dr. Oz, And The Possibly Infectious Canadian Ostrich Wobble
Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has brought us so much, including sext scandals, bulls**t citations (more on that below), and admittedly bad medical advice. Now, the gravelly voiced political scion wants to bless us with flightless birds that are quite possibly infected with a deadly virus. The birds in question are about 400 ostriches that are currently living on a farm in Canada's western British Columbia province. (I was today years old when I learned that a group of ostriches is apparently called a 'wobble.') This particular wobble was hit with a bird flu epidemic last last year that claimed the lives of 69 ostriches. Not very nice. Given concerns that bird flu, or H5N1, has spread to humans and could cause a major outbreak, officials in Canada have ordered the owners to kill the surviving members of the wobble. (I am taking every opportunity I can to use the word 'wobble' here because I find it inherently amusing.) Karen Espersen and Dave Bilinski, who run Universal Ostrich Farms — which is home to the aforementioned wobble — have pushed back and argued that studying the birds could be beneficial. Most veterinarians and experts do not agree with this take, and the Canadian courts have not either. The fact scientists see the wobble as a public health threat has not deterred the Canadian right, which has turned the ostriches into something of a cause célèbre. Over on Facebook (of course), Esperson has styled herself as a 'digital creator' and 'leader in the ostrich industry in Canada.' In between making posts about sleeping among the possibly infected birds, Esperson has tried to amp up her support. 'We need people to come and surround our farm,' Esperson wrote on May 13. The call to action has apparently resulted in flag-waving busloads reminiscent of the anti-COVID-mandate trucker convoy protests that galvanized the Canadian right prior to its losses in this year's elections, which were widely seen as a referendum on President Trump. It also inspired some members of the Trump administration to get involved in yet another example of their efforts to connect with the global right wing. Last week, Kennedy sent a letter to Canadian officials urging them to spare the wobble and study it. Dr. Mehmet Oz, the former reality television star who is Trump's administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, took things a step further and offered to house the animals on his massive Florida ranch. So far, Canada has seemingly remained unmoved by these appeals. For her part, Esperson has tried to co-opt liberal-coded language to bring them on board. Her posts about the standoff included one meme with a bold declaration: 'I IDENTIFY AS OSTRICH' — Hunter Walker A preview of what Republicans are up against as they prepare to wrestle the Big, Beautiful bill through the Senate. A look at the Trump administration's often comically misguided reliance on AI. A suggestion that we take the long view on society's recent lurch toward ultranationalism and isolationism. 'We're all going to die,' Sen. Joni Ernst reminds us. Let's dig in. The Senate is preparing to take up the House-passed reconciliation package starting next week. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) will have to coordinate opposing demands for changes to the bill from the senators in his caucus, just as House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) had to in the House. Some are asking for more spending cuts than what the House bill included in order, they say, to shrink the amount by which the bill would increase the deficit. Others are unhappy with the cuts to Medicaid and the rollback of the Biden-era clean energy tax cuts. Thune can only lose three votes, so he will have to walk a fine line to find a compromise for those in his caucus. But he will also have to avoid making major changes to the package, because those changes would then have to be voted on again by the House. Any change could backfire, breaking the delicate balance on which Johnson spent weeks building the bill. So far, it is unclear if Senate Republicans will hold committee markup hearings or take the package straight to the Senate floor, where senators would still have the opportunity to make changes. Markup hearings would also mean Democrats could force the members on each committee to take uncomfortable votes on amendments they propose to specific provisions, getting Republicans on the record for their stance around the unpopular cuts to the safety net programs. 'Why would we subject ourselves to a whole bunch of amendments from Democrats when the Republican members in various committees certainly have all the opportunity… to have their say without needing to go through the brain damage of an official markup?' Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) said according to Punchbowl. We will know more in the coming days, but considering the pushback House Republicans received from the public during their hearings, Senate Republicans could very well skip that step and avoid the spectacle. — Emine Yücel In mid May, the Trump administration rolled out its 'MAHA report,' a purported effort to get to the bottom of America's poor health outcomes. The report was cast as a collaboration between various Cabinet secretaries and advisors, including, of course, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., the secretary of Health and Human Services. As you likely already know, it now appears that an AI chatbot was among the report's true authors. The DC news outlet NOTUS first determined on Thursday that many of the studies referenced in the report don't exist. The report misstated the findings of others. In some cases, the report cited real researchers, but claimed they had authored papers or come to conclusions they had not. The Washington Post soon sought an answer to the obvious question, and found Chat GPT appears to be at least partially to blame. Some of the URLs cited, the Post found, include 'oaicite,' a marker inserted into citations generated by OpenAI, the company behind Chat GPT. This isn't the first time the administration has turned to AI to help it complete its work on time, a move more expected of high school students than advisors to the president. DOGE reportedly used a Meta AI model to review federal workers' Elon Musk-demanded lists of the five things they had done that week. Trump's mathematically unsound 'liberation day' tariffs were widely speculated to be the work of artificial intelligence, making use of a formula that many AI chatbots recommend. 'A number of X users have realized that if you ask ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, or Grok for an 'easy' way to solve trade deficits and put the US on 'an even playing field,' they'll give you a version of this 'deficit divided by exports' formula with remarkable consistency,' the Verge reported. (Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick tried to laugh off the possibility AI was involved during a Face the Nation interview.) Tech CEOs flood us with increasingly dire warnings of what their products will do to our society: AI could wipe out half of all entry-level white collar jobs in five years, Anthropic's CEO claimed in a round of media appearances this week. But, for now, it appears these products are not quite ready to replace government experts. At least, not with the prompts administration officials have been giving them. — John Light We might have imagined that, with the rise of the internet and the ability to communicate with anyone, anywhere, we'd move toward a more open, dynamic world. Yet, in 2025, the opposite appears to be the case: a cycle of contraction. In the United States, the Trump administration is clamping down on immigration in the name of border security, safety and 'Western values.' Italy's right-wing government recently restricted immigration, paring back its long-standing Jure Sanguinis policy through which someone — me, for example — could claim citizenship by demonstrating an unbroken chain from my great-grandpa, who emigrated to America, to myself. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's Cabinet this week announced its intent to abolish a fast-track-to-citizenship program in an attempt to restrict migration into Germany. Earlier this month, the UK's Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced the desire to end what he called the 'failed experiment in open borders.' Where to begin? Border security is a fraught issue and the concerns are not exclusive to the right, as Starmer illustrates. But, in the end, we all lose. The demonization of immigrants in the name of safety, or the even greater canard of 'protecting culture,' only serves to weaken the human spirit. It becomes more difficult to share wisdom and learn about the rich and glorious constellation of lifeways that exist. We doom people to lives they don't want to live and foreclose opportunities that may exist elsewhere. It's easy to forget that the 'nation state' as we conceive of it didn't exist until the 16th century. The indigenous peoples of America used to range for hundreds of miles, learning from and trading with others. It's not a given that the world will move, linearly, toward greater and greater interconnectedness and integration, as many predicted just a decade ago. As technological innovation expands our abilities to communicate and to travel, this thinking went, the world should get smaller. Cultures should synthesize and understanding of the other should deepen. But that progress — a word some may take issue with — is anything but linear. If you pick a point in time long ago and compare it to today, it may appear that way. But hidden within the millennia and centuries and decades are cycles of greater and lesser freedom of movement and greater and lesser acceptance of other cultures. In many ways, recent years see us trending toward a more static, staid way of life. I tend to believe these things are cyclical, this trend won't last forever. But that doesn't necessarily help in the short run for those of us alive right now. — Joe Ragazzo 'Well, we're all going to die.' That was Sen. Joni Ernst's (R-IA) response this week when she was confronted by constituents shouting at her during a town hall that cuts to Medicaid and SNAP would cause people to die. The Iowans were, of course, referring to the reconciliation package that the House passed last week, adding additional, last-minute Medicaid cuts to appease House Freedom Caucus members who were threatening to sink the bill without steeper cuts to shrink the amount by which the bill would increase the deficit. Ernst's response received raucous pushback from the crowd. 'For heaven's sakes. For heaven's sakes, folks,' Ernst continued. 'What you don't want to do is listen to me when I say that we are going to focus on those that are most vulnerable. Those that meet the eligibility requirements for Medicaid, we will protect. We will protect them.' But, as we've been reporting, the massive cuts in the bill will lead to millions losing their health care coverage. — Emine Yücel
