logo
DOGE cuts are now a Trump loyalty test

DOGE cuts are now a Trump loyalty test

Yahoo4 days ago
The push to pass DOGE cuts through Congress only became more dramatic this week.
Trump says anyone who doesn't support cuts to NPR and PBS won't have his support in the future.
Meanwhile, lawmakers are warning that the cuts threaten the bipartisan government funding process.
The push to get DOGE cuts passed through Congress is only becoming more dramatic.
Senators still have questions about the $9.4 billion in cuts to foreign aid and public broadcasting funding. Some are warning that passing the cuts, known as a "rescission," could upend bipartisan government funding negotiations.
And now, President Donald Trump is turning the cuts, at least those that would affect PBS and NPR, into a political litmus test.
"It is very important that all Republicans adhere to my Recissions Bill and, in particular, DEFUND THE CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING (PBS and NPR)," Trump wrote on Truth Social on Thursday night. "Any Republican that votes to allow this monstrosity to continue broadcasting will not have my support or Endorsement."
The package, which includes $1.1 billion in cuts for public broadcasting and $8.3 billion in foreign aid cuts, narrowly passed the House in June on a party-line vote.
But multiple GOP senators have expressed concerns about the rescissions, which will impact HIV/AIDS prevention programs and could affect rural public radio stations.
Senators may seek to amend the package when it comes up for a vote next week. A White House official, granted anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, told BI that the administration wants senators to pass the rescission package in its current form.
If the package is amended before passing the Senate, then it would need to pass the House again.
And if no bill is approved by the end of the day on July 18, the administration will be required by law to spend all of that money.
In addition to pressure from Trump, GOP senators will have to weigh an ultimatum from Senate Democrats.
In a letter to colleagues this week, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer argued that making the DOGE cuts on a party-line basis undermines efforts to fund the government for the next fiscal year.
Because of the Senate's filibuster rule, it takes 60 votes to clear most bills through the upper chamber. That means that government funding bills are typically negotiated with significant input from both parties, with the minority often able to secure priorities that the majority party otherwise wouldn't support to ensure passage.
But rescissions only take 51 votes, and the administration has said that this could be the first of several. That raises the possibility that Republicans could move to unilaterally defund Democratic priorities after government funding bills are passed in the future.
"It is absurd for them to expect Democrats to act as business as usual and engage in a bipartisan appropriations process to fund the government, while they concurrently plot to pass a purely partisan rescissions bill to defund those same programs negotiated on a bipartisan basis behind the scenes," Schumer said in the letter.
If lawmakers can't agree on how to fund the government in the coming fiscal year by September 30, a government shutdown would take place.
Some Republican senators have acknowledged the validity of Democratic senators' argument.
"If we get to the point where the Democrats look at this and say, 'We can put it in the bill, but they're not going to fund it, or they're not going to use it,' then there's no reason for them to work with us to get to 60 votes," Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota told BI last month.
However, not every Republican is worried about the integrity of the current appropriations process, particularly those who remain concerned about high government spending.
"The appropriations process should be undermined," Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin told BI, saying the current process is "bankrupting" the country. "That needs to be busted up."
Read the original article on Business Insider
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fed's Williams won't comment on Trump attacks on central bank
Fed's Williams won't comment on Trump attacks on central bank

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Fed's Williams won't comment on Trump attacks on central bank

By Michael S. Derby NEW YORK (Reuters) -Federal Reserve Bank of New York President John Williams declined on Wednesday to comment on President Donald Trump's attacks on the central bank and what it might mean if the president were to somehow remove the Fed's leader from office. 'I can't comment' on what the president has said and how markets reacted, Williams told reporters. He was commenting on reports from earlier in the day that suggested Trump was close to firing Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, even as the president later said that was not something he was planning to do. Williams reiterated that an independent central bank delivers better results and noted that in his experience Fed officials and staff maintain a 'laser like' focus on the central bank's mission. Williams also told reporters that amid a drop in the dollar's value, its status as the preeminent reserve currency remains unchanged. 'There are a lot of fundamental factors that support the role of the dollar … in global trade and in global financial markets, and that I see is unchanged now.' Sign in to access your portfolio

Trump Vows Coca-Cola Will Use Cane Sugar In U.S. Sodas — But Did Anyone Tell Coke?
Trump Vows Coca-Cola Will Use Cane Sugar In U.S. Sodas — But Did Anyone Tell Coke?

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Vows Coca-Cola Will Use Cane Sugar In U.S. Sodas — But Did Anyone Tell Coke?

Attempting to dismiss the Jeffrey Epstein scandal as a 'hoax' wasn't the only thing President Donald Trump did on Wednesday: He also made a bold claim that Coca-Cola was making a big change to its flagship product. The president took to his Truth Social platform to declare that the soft drink manufacturer had agreed to replace the corn syrup used to sweeten Cokes in the U.S. with cane sugar: I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so. I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better! There's just one teeny tiny issue with the president's statement: So far, Coca-Cola hasn't confirmed that company officials have agreed to go along with the plan. The closest anyone can find is a link on the Coca-Cola website that has this very broad, open-to-interpretation statement — and not anything close to a confirmation: We appreciate President Trump's enthusiasm for our iconic Coca‑Cola brand. More details on new innovative offerings within our Coca‑Cola product range will be shared soon. Considering that Trump announced the news at a time when his followers aren't happy about his recent handling of the Epstein scandal, it's no wonder that the Coke announcement ― which, again, was made without the company's official confirmation ― was thoroughly mocked. Many people assumed the president was trying to create a distraction to draw attention away from other aspects of his presidency. Oh thank god! I've totally forgotten about the Epstein files now! — Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) July 16, 2025 Cool, now release the Epstein files. We're not changing the subject. — Warren (@swd2) July 16, 2025 What Trump did today:- Forgot he appointed Fed Chair Powell during his first term- Yelled at a reporter to be quiet- Said he can't appoint special counsel to investigate Epstein because he has "nothing to do with that"- Prioritized changing the type of sugar in Coca Cola — FactPost (@factpostnews) July 16, 2025 President Trump is the best spokesman for Coca-Cola since Dr. Cosby! — Gary Peterson 🇺🇸 (@GaryPetersonUSA) July 16, 2025 Literally two days ago, Trump announced they were blocking a bunch of sugar imports. Today, Trump says he's gonna make Coca-Cola use like he's actively trying to design the least sensible trade policy possible — Joey Politano 🏳️🌈 (@JosephPolitano) July 16, 2025 Fact check: The whole reason that Coca-Cola uses High Fructose Corn syrup in their sodas here in America of longstanding tariffs on sugar (as @professor_TopK always talks about) — BonkDaCarnivore (@BonkDaCarnivore) July 16, 2025 You can put the cane sugar back in Coke, but you can't take Trump out of the Epstein files — Jamie Bonkiewicz (@JamieBonkiewicz) July 16, 2025 Decades of protectionist trade polices are the reason that Coca-Cola does not use real sugar in its US product. Sugar costs twice as much in the USA as in free-trade countries. — David Frum (@davidfrum) July 16, 2025 Trump needs to bring back cocaine in Coca Cola — e-beth (@ebeth360) July 16, 2025 Trump is working on getting everyone the special Jew Coke. (Coca Cola uses cane sugar in its limited Kosher for Passover line, which is why some non-Jewish enthusiasts buy it up every year, and also why some antisemites are obsessed with "Jew Coke.") — Yair Rosenberg (@Yair_Rosenberg) July 16, 2025 Related... Coca-Cola's Trump Honor Leaves Critics Bubbling With Outrage Gen. Mike Flynn Has A Teeny Tiny Request For Donald Trump Republican Sen. Calls Out Trump For Trying To Move On From Epstein Trump Melts Down Over 'Jeffrey Epstein Hoax' — And The Internet Explodes

House breaks record for longest-ever vote — again
House breaks record for longest-ever vote — again

Axios

time7 minutes ago

  • Axios

House breaks record for longest-ever vote — again

House Republicans broke the record Wednesday for the lower chamber's longest vote in history — for the second time in as many weeks. Why it matters: It's the latest example of Johnson's strategy for dealing with his razor-thin majority — holding votes open for hours as he tries to sway opponents in his own party. Wednesday's record-setting vote was on a resolution setting the terms of debate on several measures, including the GENIUS Act, which would establishing a regulatory framework for stablecoin issuers. That broke the previous record, set two weeks ago to the day amid grueling negotiations over President Trump's " big, beautiful bill." The big picture; Before two weeks ago, the previous record was set in 2021, when the House took seven hours and six minutes on a procedural vote related to then-President Biden's Build Back Better legislation. This was Speaker Mike Johnson's (R-La) second attempt after the House floor ground to a halt Tuesday when the chamber rejected the procedural vote on the first try. Johnson is facing demands from hardliners to combine the GENIUS Act with two other crypto bills the chamber is considering this week. That would force the Senate to reconsider the legislation, likely leading to significant delays. Between the lines: Wednesday's revote follows a meeting Trump said he held late Tuesday in the Oval Office with opponents — after which he declared victory, apparently prematurely.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store