‘None of us are free until everyone is free': Tens of thousands attend Budapest Pride in defiance of ban
Tens of thousands of protesters marched through
Hungary's
capital on Saturday as a banned
LGBTQ+
rights rally swelled into a mass demonstration against the government.
Crowds filled a square near Budapest's city hall before setting off across the city, some waving rainbow flags, others carrying signs mocking prime minister
Viktor Orban
.
'This is about much more, not just about homosexuality .... This is the last moment to stand up for our rights,' said Eszter Rein Bodi, one of the marchers.
'None of us are free until everyone is free,' one sign read.
READ MORE
Small groups of far-right counter-protesters attempted to disrupt the parade, but police kept them away and diverted the route of the march to avoid any clashes.
Participants march in the Budapest Pride parade on Saturday. Photograph:Mr Orban's nationalist government has gradually curtailed the rights of the LGBTQ+ community in the past decade, and its members of parliament passed a law in March that allows for the ban of Pride marches, citing the need to protect children.
Opponents see the move as part of a wider crackdown on democratic freedoms ahead of a national election next year when Mr Orban will face a strong opposition challenger.
Organisers said participants arrived from 30 different countries, with 70 members of the European Parliament, including from Ireland, joining the parade.
More than 30 embassies have expressed support for the march and
European Commission
president
Ursula von der Leyen
called on Hungarian authorities to let it go ahead.
Seventy Hungarian civil society groups, including the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union, Transparency International Hungary and the Hungarian Helsinki Commission, published an open letter on Friday in support of the march, saying the law that led to the police ban 'serves to intimidate the entire society'.
'The right to assembly is a basic human right, and I don't think it should be banned. Just because someone does not like the reason why you go to the street, or they do not agree with it, you still have the right to do so,' said Krisztina Aranyi, another marcher.
Budapest's municipality organised the Pride march in a move to circumvent a law that allows police to ban LGBTQ+ marches. Photograph: Peter Kohalmi/AFP via Getty Images
Budapest mayor Gergely Karacsony tried to circumvent the law by organising the march as a municipal event, which he said does not need a permit. Police, however, banned the event, arguing that it fell under the scope of the child protection law.
Mr Orban, whose government promotes a Christian-conservative agenda, provided some clues on Friday about what participants can expect when he warned of 'legal consequences' for organising and attending the march.
Earlier this week his justice minister Bence Tuzson warned in a letter sent to some foreign embassies in Budapest that organising a prohibited event is punishable by one year in jail, while attending counts as a misdemeanour.
The law that allows for the ban of Pride lets police impose fines and use facial recognition cameras to identify people who attend.
When asked about the threat of a one-year jail term, Mr Karacsony said at a press briefing on Friday that such a sentence would only boost his popularity.
'But I cannot take it seriously,' he said.
Making the march a key topic of political discourse has allowed the Orban government to take the initiative back from the opposition and mobilise its voter base, said Zoltan Novak, an analyst at the Centre for Fair Political Analysis.
Hungary's prime minister Viktor Orban. Photograph: John Thys/AFP via Getty Images
'In the past 15 years, Fidesz decided what topics dominated the political world,' he said, noting that this has become more difficult as Mr Orban's party has faced an increasing challenge from centre-right opposition leader Peter Magyar's Tisza party, which had a 15-point lead over Fidesz in a recent poll.
Tisza, which has been avoiding taking a strong position on gay rights issues, did not specify in response to questions whether it believed the Pride march was lawful, but said those attending deserved the state's protection.
'Peter Magyar has called on the Hungarian authorities and police to protect the Hungarian people this Saturday, and on other days as well, even if it means standing up against the arbitrariness of power,' its press office said. Mr Magyar himself did not attend. - Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
38 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Teacher and SNA resign from Dublin school over alleged ‘harassment' by parents for wearing keffiyeh scarves
Two staff members at a primary school in Dublin resigned after claiming they were 'harassed and bullied' by parents for wearing keffiyeh scarves, T-shirts and a tattoo in support of Palestine . The man and woman, a teacher and a special needs assistant (SNA), expressed disappointment with the school's handling of the issue, claiming a small group of parents were 'allowed to harass and bully with impunity'. The pair said they handed in their resignation this month and are due to cease employment in August. They claimed they were asked to stop wearing keffiyeh scarves at work following complaints from parents who accused them of 'blatant anti-Semitism' and 'psychologically abusive behaviour'. One parent also allegedly complained about a T-shirt worn by the SNA that, the parent said, bore a 'watermelon covering the full state of Israel ' and about a tattoo on the male teacher's arm 'with the pre-1967 borders of my country, which is interpreted by many as a call for the annihilation of my people'. READ MORE In a complaint seen by The Irish Times, the parent claimed the SNA's T-shirt 'promotes the ethnic cleansing of Jews from Israel'. The teacher said he had been wearing a keffiyeh to work since he began teaching at the school in September. Following initial complaints over the scarf, he claimed, he was told to remove it while on school premises in a decision made by the school's board of management. Despite this, he said he continued to wear the keffiyeh and claimed his photo was subsequently taken on multiple occasions by a parent, which he described as 'extremely intimidating'. 'It's been so stressful and so deeply upsetting. We go home every day and we have a live-streamed genocide on our phones along with the fact that we were being harassed and bullied by this small group,' the teacher said. The SNA claimed that on one occasion earlier this month, a parent confronted her over the clothing while another 'shouted' at her in an encounter she described as 'intimidating and distressing'. 'I just couldn't continue to work there,' she said, adding that she raised a grievance with the school, though is 'incredibly disappointed' by the response. While saying staff should not be seen taking sides in times of war and conflict, she claimed, 'this isn't a war or a conflict, it's apartheid, genocide and ethnic cleansing, and if you're not taking a side, you have taken a side'. Both say they exhausted 'every avenue' with the school in an attempt to resolve the issue, including calls for a dress code, which they say is not currently in place. The issue was raised with Tánaiste Simon Harris in the Dáil on Thursday by People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy, who claimed the staff members were 'pressured by school management' not to wear the keffiyeh scarves. 'When Russia invaded Ukraine, schools organised shows of solidarity with Ukraine. But when it comes to Israel's genocidal war on Gaza, some teachers are being silenced, and their clothing choices are being policed,' he claimed. In response, the Tánaiste said: 'There should always be a very high bar before you interfere with anybody's clothing', adding that he would discuss the matter with the Minister for Education. In a statement, the school's board of management said it 'places the welfare and education of the children at the centre of all decisions'. 'As a diverse and equality-based school community, including children, families and staff from over 40 nationalities, the board is committed to ensuring that all actions taken are respectful, inclusive and welcoming to every child and family. 'The board will not be commenting on any individual staff matter, in line with its responsibilities as an employer,' it said.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Israeli military operations in Gaza ‘well over the top', ex CIA chief tells Dublin event
Israeli military operations in Gaza have been 'well over the top', a former director of the US Central Intelligence Agency has said. John Brennan said he 'very much' admires the Irish Government's position on Gaza but is 'disappointed' by the positions taken by the Trump administration and the Biden administration before it. As the US 'provides most of the military capabilities to Israel', he believed it was obliged and 'should have done everything possible to prevent Israel carrying out what I think were too aggressive military operations', he told The Irish Times in Dublin on Friday. In his view, Israeli military operations in Gaza 'have been well over the top' and the number of women, children and non-combatants killed was 'unnecessary'. Asked would he describe it as a genocide, he said that was 'for lawyers to decide'. READ MORE 'The deaths of 70,000 Palestinians, a lot of those deaths obviously were intentionally done by the Israelis. They are not targeting civilians but I think they have allowed disproportionate civilian casualties when they have gone after Hamas operatives.' In the context of continuing debate about Ireland's military neutrality, Mr Brennan said Ireland's neutrality 'is much respected and needed' but it does not mean Ireland 'is not impenetrable by foreign adversaries, particularly given the digital realm and how much we are interconnected as a global community'. It 'makes sense' for Ireland to evaluate its security, defence and intelligence needs, he said. Ireland has taken 'some very principled stands', including on Gaza, he said. If Ireland opted to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (Nato), there is a question whether or not that would limit Ireland's ability to continue to pursue independent policies and positions, he said. Joining Nato is, and should be, a matter for the Irish people to decide, he said. 'Nato has been evolving, its European members recognise they need to do more on their own and cannot continue to rely continually on the US, so I think it's a worthwhile question for the Irish people to ask.' Mr Brennan, whose father Owen Brennan emigrated to the US from Co Roscommon in 1948, was in Dublin to address the inaugural summer school of the Law Society's Centre for Justice and Law Reform, which explored the theme Defending Democracy: Legal Responses to Emerging Threats. Other speakers included EU Justice Commissioner Michael McGrath, Attorney General Rossa Fanning, Online Safety Commissioner Niamh Hodnett and UK commissioner for countering extremism Robin Simcox. Mr Brennan was a CIA officer for 25 years from 1980 before serving under president Barack Obama as his chief counterterrorism adviser. He was director of the CIA from 2013 to early 2017. Asked how Ireland might combat extremism, he said all governments have to set a 'delicate balance' in allowing free speech while not allowing hate speech and incitement to violence. This is something the Irish people need to look at and to 'weigh in on' with their politicians. The Law Society and other objective actors have important roles to help ensure that truthful, factual information is 'pushed out into the communications bloodstream'. During his career, he was mainly focused on countering terrorism by groups such as Islamic State and al-Qaeda but in more recent years, he is concerned about the growth of domestic extremism and violence in the US, epitomised by the assault on the US Capitol on January 6th, 2021, he said. He has been personally targeted by extremists, including with a pipe bomb, Mr Brennan said. He is concerned some domestic extremism was 'fuelled' by commentary from public officials and said government officials have a 'special responsibility' to try to clamp down extremist sentiment and be more uniting, less divisive, of people. Some of president Donald Trump's rhetoric is 'rather combative' and there is 'an increasing coarseness' in the public discourse, especially in the way Mr Trump and others make reference to their opponents, he said. 'I served for six presidents and none of them would publicly refer to their political opponents as scum and Donald Trump does that. I think that's beneath the dignity of the office of the presidency.' Even if public officials do not intend matters to then 'take it to the next level', it has that effect, he said. This sometimes happens on both sides and it is important to bring down that level of tension, animosity, anger and hatred and to try and find 'more civil ways of discourse'. He is concerned about the US administration's commitment to the rule of law, including efforts to use the US Department of Justice 'to go after political opponents', and to try and 'get around' some judicial rulings. Democracy and the rule of law cannot be taken for granted and a lot of people see the US as 'sliding towards authoritarianism', he said. In the CIA, he saw some countries use the democratic process to put authoritarian leaders in place. 'The playbook is very similar, you crack down on opponents, use your instruments of government, whether they be the intelligence and security services, the courts, you crack down on the media.' Asked about Mr Trump's recent authorisation of a US military attack on Iran's nuclear sites, Mr Brennan said he shares the concerns about Iran's nuclear programme but believed the US attack was 'unnecessary' and had not addressed the problem. It seemed, from press reports, there did not appear to be a change in the intelligence community's assessment that Iran has not restarted its nuclear weapons programme, he said. Now the issues include whether Iran will move, perhaps in a 'more clandestine' fashion, to try and reconstitute its programme and even move towards a nuclear weapon.
The Journal
17 hours ago
- The Journal
EU may end up cutting services and asking Ireland for more cash to settle a €30bn Covid bill
Muiris O'Cearbhaill CUTS TO GRANT schemes and increases in the amount of money given to the EU each year by Ireland may be considered in order to pay back an annual €30bn bill which was racked up following Europe's Covid response plan. €732bn was made available to member states during the Covid-19 pandemic, aimed at protecting the European economy. The annual cost to repay that debt for the EU could reach up to €30bn every year from 2028. The figure is a fifth of the EU's current five-year budgetary plan. A new spending plan is currently being developed and will give politicians a clear picture on how member states can afford to pay the bill back. Fianna Fáil MEP Billy Kelleher, who is a member of the European Parliament's taxation committee, believes services like grant schemes may be cut and contributions from member states may be increased to raise the funds needed to repay Europe's debts. The budget plan – what's called the multiannual financial framework – is due to be announced on 16 July. Currently, the EU spends €160bn every year on schemes such as grant programmes for local authorities and infrastructure investments. The budget could be cut back in order to make more funds available to repay the debts. This could come at the cost of local community groups, who may rely on funding from European programmes to keep service hubs open or pay operating costs for community centres. Another option for the EU is to instead increase the amount that its members pay in each year. In 2023, Ireland paid €3.69bn in EU contribution fees for the annual budget . Ireland currently pays more money into the EU's budget than it receives each year . Kelleher told The Journal : 'We're going to either have to increase the budget through contributions [from member states] or find additional resources.' He added the issue will be a 'key debate' in the coming years. Advertisement It could involve tense discussions if member states, like Ireland, must foot the annual bill in order to keep services for groups that rely on the EU's funding schemes active. Asked how the debate might be settled, the Ireland South MEP said he believes the EU may 'fall a little bit between the two'. He added that there might be 'just a small' increase in contributions from member states, including Ireland. Potential increases come at a time when Ireland is experiencing significant uncertainty around the economy, with the looming threat of tariffs by US President Trump. There is a significant level of unpredictability felt in Brussels over the pending deadline. Taoiseach Micheál Martin has said that potential tariffs by the US on the Irish economy could impact the domestic budget . Analysis from the Central Bank suggests US tariffs could lead to slower economic growth and a fall in the creation of new jobs . Corporation tax receipts – a massive earner for the state - fell in May and companies in Ireland with business in the US, such as Guinness maker Diageo, are projecting the tariffs to cost them millions of euro this year . Kelleher said: 'A lot of member states who are making contributions are, financially, in very stringent times. If you look at France and Germany, for example. I mean, their two economies are really struggling.' Asked if it would be difficult to justify an increase in Irish contributions in the scenario that US tariffs have a major impact on the economy, the MEP told The Journal that the amount of contributions is based on economic growth. Current forecasts suggest, even if US tariffs have an impact on Ireland, the economy will continue to grow. Speaking in Brussels this week, justice commissioner Michael McGrath said there are no forecasts predicting any major impacts to the European economy. RRF repayments will begin in 2028 and continue into the long-term. A minimum of 37% of the funds were allocated to climate-related investments, while 20% were dedicated to the digital transition plan for member states. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
