logo
How Much Fuel Does A Boeing 747 Burn Per Hour, And How Much Can It Hold?

How Much Fuel Does A Boeing 747 Burn Per Hour, And How Much Can It Hold?

Yahoo16-07-2025
Boeing's very first jetliner, the 707, began commercial flights in 1958. A scant 10 years later, the demand for air travel was so great that Boeing unveiled its new 747 to the world, which held more than twice the number of passengers as the 707. Originally, the 747 was to be a double-decker configuration, but engineers struggled with freight capacity and the ability to rapidly evacuate passengers in the event of an emergency.
Eventually, a compromise was reached where the double-deck height was still present at the front of the aircraft, creating the 747's unmistakable, signature hump. On cargo-carrying variants of the 747, this clever design facilitated placing the cockpit above and out of the way of the hinged front nose section for loading. The resulting upper-deck area behind the cockpit could be utilized for additional seating or a swinging lounge and bar area. Total passenger capacity depends on how each 747 is configured, but fitting 660 of your fellow humans onboard is possible in a dense layout of exclusively economy seats.
For propulsion, the Boeing 747 relies on a brace of four turbofan engines that burn a whopping 3,500 to 3,800 gallons of fuel per hour at cruising speed. The exact fuel burn rate is dependent on the passenger capacity, as well as the particular make and model engines that are installed. Suffice to say, however, the average 747 burns about one gallon of fuel per second. Obviously, that insatiable thirst for kerosene-based Jet A-1 requires a massive fuel capacity to match.
Read more: How Much Do Car Salespeople Make? The Pay Structure Explained
The Boeing 747 isn't just one of the largest commercial jets, it's also one of the fastest. Its impressive cruising speed of 580 MPH means that one mile is covered every 6.2 seconds. Using the fuel burn rate provided by BBC's Future Planet, that equates to fuel economy of 0.18 miles per gallon. While that figure is certainly shocking, one must also consider that, unlike the latest Toyota Prius, the 747 is carrying hundreds of passengers over which to amortize the expenditure.
In order to facilitate such high fuel consumption on the long-haul international routes that are typical of the Boeing 747, it carries approximately 48,400 gallons of fuel. That's enough to get you from, say, New York to London. However, longer routes like Los Angeles to Sydney require more fuel capacity still. Indeed, some variants like the 747-8i Intercontinental carry 63,034 gallons of fuel. So where does 50,000 to 60,000 gallons of fuel go? Primarily, the fuel tanks are located in the aircraft's wings, although select 747s are configured to store additional fuel in the plane's horizontal stabilizer at the tail.
Over the years, aviation authorities worldwide relaxed rules that prohibited jets with two engines from operating long overwater flights. That ushered in the dominance of modern aircraft like the Airbus A330 and Boeing's own 777 which are more fuel efficient with only two engines. Nowadays, the 747 passenger jet is disappearing, but it's not altogether gone. If you want to experience the Queen of the Skies one final time, check out our list of airlines that still operate them on certain routes.
Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox...
Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones discloses decade-long cancer battle
Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones discloses decade-long cancer battle

UPI

time3 hours ago

  • UPI

Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones discloses decade-long cancer battle

1 of 5 | Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones said he was diagnosed with cancer in 2010. File Photo by Ian Halperin/UPI | License Photo Aug. 13 (UPI) -- Jerry Jones was diagnosed with stage 4 melanoma and underwent four surgeries over more than a decade to beat the cancer, the Dallas Cowboys owner revealed. Jones made the disclosure during an interview published Wednesday in the Dallas Morning News. The 82-year-old billionaire, who said he was diagnosed in 2010, credited an experimental drug with saving his life. He received treatment at MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. "I was saved by a fabulous treatment and great doctors and a real miracle called PD-1 [therapy]," Jones told the Morning News. "I went into trials for that PD-1 and it has been one of the great medicines. I now have no tumors." Stage 4 melanoma means the cancer has already spread to other areas of the body, including the distant lymph nodes, areas of skin or other organs, according to the American Cancer Society. Alternative treatments are typically tried before chemotherapy. PD-1, or Programmed Cell Death Protein 1, therapy helps the immune system fight cancer cells. The five-year survival rate for those with a distant spread of melanoma -- with the cancer in the lungs, liver, skin or lymph nodes -- is 35%, based on data collected by the American Cancer Society for people diagnosed between 2014 and 2020. Jones said he underwent two lung surgeries and two lymph node surgeries. The longtime Cowboys owner bought the franchise for $140 million in 1989. The Cowboys were listed as the most valuable franchise in the NFL on Wednesday, topping Sportico's annual rankings with a value of $12.8 billion. Last year, the Cowboys became the first franchise to pass the $10 billion mark.

Trump's Trifecta: Leveraging tariffs and energy dominance for industrial renewal
Trump's Trifecta: Leveraging tariffs and energy dominance for industrial renewal

The Hill

time4 hours ago

  • The Hill

Trump's Trifecta: Leveraging tariffs and energy dominance for industrial renewal

President Trump's trade and energy policies are recalibrating the global economic order — and not by accident. Under his leadership, trade is no longer simply about moving goods. It is a tool of strategic policy — one that drives industrial revival, and shapes strategic, economic and national outcomes. Trump's approach is disruptive but methodical. Tariffs create negotiating power, leading to trade agreements that reduce deficits and rewire supply chains. When combined with U.S. energy exports and capital markets, this strategy doesn't just rebalance trade — it reinvigorates American industry. As a senior negotiator on the U.S.-China Phase I Trade Agreement in Treasury during Trump's first term, I saw firsthand that what critics dismissed as 'erratic', 'chaotic' and 'unpredictable' was, in fact, deeply strategic. President Trump's instincts, honed by decades of high-stakes dealmaking, informed a broader strategy. He approached policy like a grandmaster playing three-dimensional chess: every tariff, handshake and message was a calculated move to reassert American economic leadership. Just as in Trump's first term, this administration began by confronting structural imbalances. The 2024 U.S. goods trade deficit hit $1.2 trillion — its highest in history. In response, Trump used executive authority to impose reciprocal tariffs — not as an end in themselves, but as tools to bring others to the table. Starting in early 2025, Trump's targeted tariffs compelled negotiations to rebalance trade relationships and repatriate supply chains. Japan agreed to reduce average industrial tariffs from 25 percent to 15 percent and pledged $550 billion in U.S.-bound investment. The European Union followed suit, agreeing to a framework that includes a baseline 15 percent tariff on industrial goods, expanded market access for U.S. energy, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals, and a commitment to $420 billion in foreign direct investment into the U.S. And, most recently, the United States also reached a trade agreement with South Korea: Seoul will face a 15 percent duty, reduced from a threatened 25 percent, in exchange for a pledge to invest $350 billion in U.S.-owned projects and purchase $100 billion in American liquefied natural gas and energy products. Indonesia and the Philippines opened markets for U.S. agriculture and energy, while committing to major purchases, including 50 Boeing aircraft. Vietnam accepted 20 percent tariffs and tighter controls on transshipped Chinese goods. Negotiations continue with India, Taiwan and others. Together, these countries now account for $809 billion — or 67 percent — of the 2024 U.S. trade deficit. Once deals with India and Taiwan are finalized, that coverage will exceed three-quarters. A mere 5 percent improvement across these relationships could slash the annual deficit by up to $95 billion. Beyond deficit reduction, these agreements reset incentives. They punish transshipment, enhance transparency and support rules-of-origin provisions that favor North American manufacturing. The result? Companies are investing in new U.S. production — auto components, semiconductors, specialty steel and energy systems. And job creation follows capital. Analysts estimate that up to 1.5 million advanced manufacturing jobs could be brought back to American soil over five years — a far cry from Barack Obama's declaration that some U.S. manufacturing jobs were gone forever. Trade reform paves the way for yet another explosion in growth: deploying U.S. energy and capital into newly aligned partner markets. Programs like America Crece and Asia EDGE, flagship infrastructure growth initiatives during Trump's first term, demonstrated the power of this model. This programming identified and unlocked growth opportunities in our partner countries using American energy exports and American equipment, employing American workers, and financing through American capital markets. In Latin America alone, we identified over $300 billion in infrastructure projects with U.S. private capital in the lead. In Vietnam, we identified $8 billion in near-term energy exports and $50 billion in longer-horizon infrastructure investments. Before the Biden administration ended this programming, we executed on $2.5 billion in transactions in Panama, backed a $3.5 billion facility in Ecuador and laid the groundwork for more than $4 billion in liquefied natural gas-based investment flows into Vietnam. Japan and Taiwan are now adopting this U.S. liquefied natural gas-driven model. Their national priorities — liquefied natural gas security and grid modernization — create natural demand for U.S. energy exports and financing partnerships. Trade deals open the market; energy and infrastructure partnerships deliver the substance. Our capital markets are unmatched in size, efficiency and depth. Trump's tariff leverage opens doors. Energy exports and U.S. financing flow through them — fueling global infrastructure while anchoring demand for American industry. This energy multiplier also advances a core tenet of Trump's economic agenda: U.S. energy dominance. American liquefied natural gas, coal and refined products are now strategic assets — tools of both commercial strength and geopolitical influence. Trump's approach fuses trade, energy and finance into a cohesive doctrine. It turns deficits into investment. It transforms market access into industrial revival. And it leverages the full might of U.S. capital to strengthen allies abroad and jobs at home. If the goal is to bring back U.S. manufacturing, secure energy markets and make capital markets work for working Americans — this is the model. The chessboard is set. And America, once again, is playing to win. Mitchell A. Silk served as assistant secretary for International Markets at the U.S. Treasury during Trump's first term. He was the senior Treasury official on U.S.-China trade negotiations and helped design America Crece and Asia EDGE. He is the author of ' A Seat at the Table: An Inside Account of Trump's Global Economic Revolution,' to be published in September 2025.

Student Visas to Be Upended Under Trump Admin Proposal
Student Visas to Be Upended Under Trump Admin Proposal

Newsweek

time4 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Student Visas to Be Upended Under Trump Admin Proposal

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Department of Homeland Security rule proposal that would limit how long international students could remain in the United States has cleared a final White House review, a move that could lead to huge changes to the visa applications for international students. The regulation would replace the current practice under which F-1 and J-1 visa holders are authorized to remain for the full length of an academic program with fixed-term limits that could require renewals while students remained enrolled, creating potential procedural disruptions for campuses and visa applicants, according to Bloomberg Law. Newsweek reached out to the Department of Homeland Security for comment. Why it Matters Higher education institutions and advocates have argued that limiting authorized duration would require students to reapply for status mid-program, potentially introducing processing delays, gaps in lawful status, and interruptions to work authorization tied to study. Advocates and university leaders previously told Newsweek that tightened student visa rules and other immigration changes have already prompted some prospective international students to choose institutions outside the United States, a trend that analysts said could reduce enrollment and revenue for U.S. colleges. NAFSA: Association of International Educators projects new international enrollment in the U.S. could fall 30 to 40 percent this fall, a potential $7 billion hit to the economy. With many foreign students paying full tuition, the drop could deal a sharp blow to college finances. Stock image of college students attending their graduation ceremony. Stock image of college students attending their graduation ceremony. Getty Images What To Know F-1 student and J-1 exchange visitor visa holders are allowed under current regulations to stay in the U.S. for the duration of an academic program or internship. If finalized, the new regulation would restrict their legal status to a fixed period of time before they are required to apply for renewal, potentially before the completion of their studies. The Department of Homeland Security submitted the rulemaking package (RIN: 1653-AA95) to the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) on June 27, which completed its review the following week. The proposal would limit how long F-1 and J-1 visa holders could remain authorized without seeking a renewal, replacing the current program length authorization, marking a major departure from decades of practice that allowed enrollment-tied stays. A prior version of the idea under the Trump administration sought two- or four-year limits by field of study and drew sharp criticism from educational groups for creating needless disruption to academic programs. That proposed rule was subsequently withdrawn by the Biden administration. The rule change will now be publicized in the Federal Register following OIRA clearance, which would trigger a public comment period before any final rule could be issued. A separate DHS proposal to change how H-1B visas are allocated also cleared White House review. That rule change would see the current random lottery for H-1B visas replaced with a "weighted selection process" that gives priority to registrants who meet or exceed certain criteria, such as wage or education level. The Trump administration has earlier taken steps that unsettled many international students, including the temporary revocation and later partial restoration of legal status for thousands of students and enhanced scrutiny of visa applicants' social media, moves that courts and advocates challenged. What People Are Saying Mike Henniger, CEO of Illume Student Advisory Services, told the Associated Press about international students bypassing American universities: "The American brand has taken a massive hit, and the U.K. is the one that is benefiting." What Happens Next The proposal will be published in the Federal Register next, which would open a formal public comment period and begin a multi‑step process before any final rule could take effect.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store