Record number of Senate Democrats vote to block weapon sales for Israel
While the resolutions ultimately failed, the vote demonstrated how Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has fractured historically bipartisan support in Congress over the humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip in Israel's war against Hamas.
The resolutions, sponsored by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt), failed in the face of all Republicans voting against the measure and 20 Democrats.
Senators voted 27 in favor and 70 to defeat Sanders' resolution (S.J.Res.34), which sought to block more than $675 million in weapons sales to Israel.
A second resolution (S.J.Res. 41) garnered 24 in favor, and 73 against. The resolution sought to prohibit the sale of tens of thousands of fully automatic assault rifles.
'Whatever happens tonight, history will condemn those of us who failed to act in the face of these horrors,' Sanders said ahead of the vote.
It was the third time Sanders put senators on record over their military support for Israel. An April vote garnered 15 Democratic Senators. A vote in November 2024 garnered 18 Democratic senators.
Democrats framed their opposition to military aid to Israel as a protest against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and not as opposition to Israel as a whole.
Voting yes for the first time included Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the vice chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee.
'This legislative tool is not perfect, but frankly, it is time to say enough to the suffering of innocent young children and families,' she said in a statement explaining her vote.
'As a longtime friend and supporter of Israel, I am voting yes to send a message: the Netanyahu government cannot continue with this strategy. Netanyahu has prolonged this war at every turn to stay in power.'
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), the ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, also voted yes. While she voted in favor of Sanders' November resolution, she voted against his April resolution.
'I will continue to stand up for the existence of Israel and the safety of its citizens. I will also continue to support Israel's right to defend itself, but I cannot in good conscience vote in support of weapons until the human anguish in Gaza comes to an end,' she said in a statement.
The criticism against Netanyahu matches recent polling on Americans' attitudes toward the Israeli leader. A Gallup poll taken in early July recorded that a majority of Americans disapprove of Netanyahu, at 52 percent, his highest unfavorable rating since 1997.
The poll diverged along party lines. Two-thirds of Republicans, 67 percent, have a favorable view of Netanyahu, compared to 19 percent of independents and nine percent of Democrats.
Those numbers largely reflected Americans' attitudes towards Israel's military action. Support reached an all-time low, with 32 percent of Americans supportive of the war. Among Democrats, there's only eight percent support for Israel's military action, although a large majority of Republicans support the war at 71 percent.
The Senate vote comes as international outrage is peaking against Israel for the humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip, where food crisis experts warned earlier this week that the 'worst-case scenario' of famine is occurring, and as deaths from starvation begin to tick up.
While Israel has started allowing more food and humanitarian assistance into the strip after a months-long blockade, the country is becoming increasingly isolated over Netanyahu's failure to signal an endpoint for the war and images of emaciated children and the widespread death in the strip.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced Monday that the U.K. would join France in recognizing an independent Palestinian state unless Israel took steps to end the war. French President Emanuel Macron will formalize its recognition at the United Nations General Assembly in September.
And President Trump broke with Netanyahu earlier this week in acknowledging that starvation is stalking Palestinians in the Strip. But he has not signaled that he will leverage U.S. military support to achieve a ceasefire.
The administration has pointed to Hamas as the obstacle to a ceasefire deal. The U.S. is proposing a ceasefire that would require Hamas to release at least 20 living hostages and the bodies of 30 others, and that would allow for a scale-up of humanitarian aid into the strip.
The death toll in Gaza passed a grim milestone this week, with more than 60,000 Palestinians killed since the start of Israel's war against Hamas, launched following Hamas's Oct. 7, 2023, terrorist attack, where the group killed approximately 1,200 people and took 251 hostage.
While the death toll in Gaza does not distinguish between militants and civilians, Israel claims it has killed about 20,000 fighters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
Virginia GOP candidate, CNN host tangle on air over Trump questions
Virginia gubernatorial nominee and Lieutenant Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears (R) clashed with CNN reporter Manu Raju over her past criticisms of President Trump on Friday. Raju pressed Earle-Sears over the Trump administration's cuts to the federal workforce this year, which have had a significant impact on Virginia given its large population of federal workers. 'Do you support the president's purge of the federal workforce, yes or no?' Raju asked the lieutenant governor. 'Oh, okay. If this is the way you want to go, then go ahead. I'm just not going to participate because I want to talk about real issues,' Earle Sears responded, adding that Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) and his administration have tried to bring more jobs to Virginia. Earle-Sears accused Democrats of blocking the jobs. 'If they want to work together with me, we can get it done,' she said. Raju also pressed Earle-Sears about her previous criticism of Trump, specifically pointing to a 2022 interview with Fox Business, in which she referred to Trump as 'a liability.' 'Do you stand by those comments?' Raju asked. 'I voted for the president the first time around. I voted for him the second time around and I voted for him the third time around,' Earle-Sears responded. 'I am going to vote for somebody who understands how everything works.' 'I'm talking about who has brought us economic prosperity in the past,' she continued. 'I'm talking about somebody who understands how business works, who understands that the rogue nations of the world have to be told that we're not going to let them fool around with America, that we will protect America, and that's what President Trump has done.' The GOP hopeful added, 'Now because of your politics I suppose, you wanted to keep talking about the past when I've already told you the president and I have been in the Oval Office, we have had discussion, and I'm going to talk about things that should be held private.' Trump has yet to formally endorse the lieutenant governor to succeed Youngkin, who is term limited. Virginia Republicans have raised red flags about their chances in the state's gubernatorial race, pointing to Earle-Sears significantly trailing her Democratic opponent Abigail Spanberger in fundraising and polls.
The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
Colleges must speak up for their Chinese students
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said all the right things last week after Hong Kong issued arrest warrants for 19 pro-democracy activists in other countries, including in the U.S. 'The extraterritorial targeting of Hong Kongers who are exercising their fundamental freedoms is a form of transnational oppression,' Rubio declared in a statement. 'We will not tolerate the Hong Kong government's attempts to apply its national security laws to silence or intimidate Americans or anyone on U.S. soil.' But we already tolerate the transnational oppression of one large group on our soil: Chinese students. And for the most part, our universities have kept silent about that. That's because of the billions of dollars that Chinese students bring to American colleges, of course. We're already facing an expected decline in Chinese enrollment because of the Trump administration's threats against international students, which higher-education leaders have rightly condemned. But if we really cared about those students — and not just their tuition fees — we would also speak out against the Chinese government's extraterritorial targeting of their fundamental freedoms. Anything less makes us look petty, scared and small. In a report issued last year — titled 'On my campus, I am afraid' — Amnesty International showed how Chinese and Hong Kong students in the U.S. and Europe faced surveillance and intimidation from Chinese authorities. Students reported being photographed and followed at protests, and that their families back home had been harassed. At Georgetown, for example, a Chinese law student who handed out pamphlets denouncing China's 'zero-COVID' policies was videotaped by members of the Chinese Students and Scholars Association, an organization sponsored by the Chinese government. They told him that the pictures would be sent to security officials in China. And soon after that, his family was interrogated and warned that they could face penalties if he continued to speak out. None of this is news, unfortunately. In 2021, ProPublica reported that Chinese intelligence agents were using local informants to threaten and harass students in America. Some Chinese students said they avoided taking courses with other students from their country, because they did not know who was working for the government — and who might report on them. And in 2020, when COVID forced universities to move online, the Wall Street Journal revealed that some professors had told Chinese students that they wouldn't be evaluated on class participation. The faculty didn't want their students to feel the need to speak up and risk getting on the wrong side of Chinese security officials, who were likely monitoring them on Zoom. 'There is no way I can say to my students, 'You can say whatever you want on the phone call and you are totally free and safe,'' one Harvard professor admitted. But most of our university leaders are keeping quiet about the matter. They don't want to take any risks, either, with so much money at stake. A welcome exception is Purdue University, which denounced Chinese spying after ProPublica revealed that one of its students was harassed by security agents for posting a letter about the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. That's a taboo topic in China, which has prohibited public discussion and commemoration of the event. 'Any student found to have reported another student to any foreign entity for exercising their freedom of speech or belief will be subject to significant sanction,' declared Mitch Daniels, Purdue's president at the time. 'We regret that we were unaware at the time of these events and had to learn of them from national sources,' Daniels added, referring to the 2021 ProPublica report. The rest of us have no excuse, especially now. Everything we have learned over the last four years confirms the same fact: China is intimidating students at our institutions. And so is the Trump administration, of course. It has arrested and deported international students who made pro-Palestinian comments. And it has been screening the social media accounts of student visa applicants to find 'any indications of hostility toward the citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles of the United States.' Nobody knows what that means, so applicants have been scrubbing their accounts of material about Barack Obama, Kamala Harris and anything else that might put them in the administration's crosshairs. To me, that sounds more like China than America. Our most important founding principle is freedom of expression. And we are flouting it by harassing our international students, even as we accuse them of being hostile to it. But we can't make a persuasive case against Trump's assault on freedom if we ignore the Chinese attacks on it. Anticipating that many international students won't be allowed to come here, some universities — including my own — are creating online courses and programs to serve them. That's a great gesture, but it also leaves the students even more vulnerable to harassment by internet snoops back home. And that's why we have to speak up for the students and make it clear that we won't tolerate intimidation of them, just as Rubio said. Thomas Jefferson — who knew something about America's founding principles — swore 'eternal hostility against every form of tyranny.' He didn't care where it came from. Neither should we.
The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
GOP congressman suggests he'd ‘lose money and go broke' if advisers stop stock trades
Rep. Rob Bresnahan (R-Pa.) dismissed the idea of directing his financial advisers to halt any stock trades amid his difficulties in establishing a blind trust that meets his standards, suggesting he would 'lose money and go broke.' Bresnahan, who has come under heat for continuing stock trades carried out by his advisers despite writing in support of banning congressional stock trades while campaigning for his seat, made the comment in an interview with local public news organization WVIA that was published Thursday. While Bresnahan said he has not been involved with the stock trades directed by his financial advisers, the outlet noted that he could order his advisers to stop trading stocks. 'And then do what with it?' Bresnahan told WVIA. 'Just leave it all in the accounts and just leave it there and lose money and go broke?' Bresnahan, a businessman whose net worth is estimated to be in the multi-millions, has said he would like to form a blind trust that would block him from having any control or knowledge of trades made on his behalf. But Bresnahan said he wants to use his existing financial advisers and wants to instruct the trustee to avoid investments that benefit foreign adversaries and avoid shorting American companies — running into problems with the House Ethics Committee. 'So, you would have to then find someone else that would even consider taking you to manage through a trustee account,' Bresnahan told WVIA. 'So, it became a disaster.' Last week, Bresnahan's lawyer sent a letter to the House Ethics committee saying that the Pennsylvania congressman prohibited his advisers from those types of investments or trades, the Washington Examiner reported. The letter also said Bresnahan is not consulted about any trade and is informed of trades only after they are complete. Bresnahan has also introduced a bill to ban stock trading for members of Congress and their spouses, and is open to working with other members on the issue. Still, Bresnahan has caught heat for being an active trader in Congress. The New York Times in April brought attention to Bresnahan continuing to trade despite writing a letter to the editor in The Citizens' Voice local newspaper in 2024 calling to ban congressional stock trading. The contrast between Bresnahan's statement during the campaign and his continued stock trades has made the freshman swing-district congressman a top target of Democrats hoping to win back the seat in 2026. 'Multi-millionaire Rob Bresnahan is full of shit,' Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Spokesperson Eli Cousin said in a statement in response to the WVIA interview. 'He campaigned on a promise to ban congressional stock trading, but is now saying that he must continue his prolific trading in order to prevent himself from going broke. He doesn't care about his constituents – he only cares about his bottom line.' Bresnahan's spokesperson Hannah Pope fired back by pointing to trades reported in former Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-Calif.) financial disclosures. 'Rep. Bresnahan was a small business owner before becoming a Member of Congress, and unlike the DCCC's long-time benefactor, prolific stock trader Nancy Pelosi, he does not plan on being a Member of Congress for the rest of his career. He does not trade his own stocks and is unaware of what is traded or when,' Pope said in a statement. The trades reported by Pelosi that have garnered scrutiny were made by her husband Paul Pelosi, according to the disclosures, and Pelosi has thrown her support behind an effort to ban stock trading by members of Congress. Bresnahan's spokesperson continued: 'He believes Members of Congress should not be allowed to profit off the information they are entrusted with, which is why he introduced legislation to ban Congressional stock trading, restoring the integrity Americans expect and deserve from their government. As a Member of Congress, his number one focus will always be the people of Pennsylvania's Eighth Congressional District.' Bresnahan's comments come as legislative action on stock trading bans heat up. A Senate committee this week advanced a bill to ban congressional stock trading, and Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) has pledged to file a discharge petition to try to force a vote on a bill to ban stock trading in the House.
