
How Recent Grads Can Get a Job in a Challenging Labor Market
Companies are already using AI to decrease the number of entry-level roles they plan to hire. And with federal government layoffs and general uncertainty in the economy, graduating college students are facing an uphill climb as they enter the job market.
We teach at Harvard and Northwestern and we have found that even the brightest of graduates are struggling to find jobs. Although the current economic landscape is unique, it is not entirely different from difficult labor markets in the past. We remember ourselves what it was like to be newly-minted college graduates during the Black Monday stock market crash in 1987 and on the heels of the dot-com bubble crash in 2002.
Based on the research and coaching we've done with over 1,000 individuals looking for jobs, we have found that there are approaches job seekers can use to find work—even in a challenging labor market.
When you're in college, what people actually do in different jobs and careers is often opaque. That was true for us. Formal job titles and the names of whole industries overwhelmed us before we had even explored what the day-to-day work was actually like.
But here's something we've learned since: Companies aren't just hiring people. When someone decides to work somewhere, they are also hiring their employer in return. As a result, workers are also the customers of prospective jobs. That means college graduates should learn how to shop for employment.
When shopping for a new product, it's not enough to just look at the names and prices. Instead, we think about what it would be like to actually use the product—and whether it would help us make progress. Individuals might explore Reddit boards, scour reviews, and talk to friends who have dealt with similar challenges.
Job seekers should do the same. Don't focus on the features of a job—the title, the pay, and so forth. Instead, focus on what you'll do. What is the actual work and tasks? What pathways do different roles lead to? Where are the dead ends?
To learn about the daily work a job entails, we've found it's best to talk to people who have the jobs we're curious about. The key is to ask questions about what people do on a day-to-day and week-to-week basis. Then, decide if what they do lines up with the things that energize and drain you. That will help you learn and refine your search.
It will also help you meet people, which is crucial. Most individuals don't land jobs by applying blindly to things online. They get them through their network—according to estimates, at least 50% and as high as 85% of roles are filled this way.
That is another thing we wish we had known when we were recent graduates: jobs don't materialize because of how many applications you send out, or purely because of your resume. Most people find jobs by networking with people in the industries that interest them. That's how it played out for both of us.
Finally, graduating students are often impatient—for success, money, titles, work-life balance, and more. But what recent graduates, of all generations, struggle with is how to make tradeoffs so that they can get a job. The hard truth is that a job is better than no job.
Yes, there are risks associated with accepting your first job offer. Research by Burning Glass Institute shows that roughly half of students are underemployed in their first job—meaning they take a role that doesn't require their college degree.
The risk of doing so is that five years later, nearly 90% of those who undermatch are still underemployed. But at the same time, we can tell you from experience that there is no perfect job. Everyone—even the most successful CEO—has to make tradeoffs in their role.
Those who are successful in the job market learn how to embrace tradeoffs to make wise choices. In other words, they don't settle. They are intentional about choosing what specifically is going to suck about their job so that they can get the things that matter most to them. To do that, individuals need to have a clear understanding of their priorities.
In the early stages of one's career, job seekers should be willing to trade off things like prestigious titles for the chance to have a true mentor and get real hands-on experience where they can make an impact. Doing so can build confidence and a network. And employers value when applicants have demonstrated in work settings that they can get the job done well.
By acting like a customer, building your network, and making wise decisions about tradeoffs, recent graduates can start their careers on the best foot possible—even if the labor market is on shaky ground.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Reddit, Inc. (RDDT) Is A 'Winner,' Says Jim Cramer
Reddit, Inc. (NYSE:RDDT) is one of the . Reddit, Inc. (NYSE:RDDT) is a new-age social media company that has proven to be one of the most important stocks in today's AI era. The firm's platform allows complete anonymity to posters and allows it to gather a diverse set of viewpoints. This enables Reddit, Inc. (NYSE:RDDT) to provide key data for training AI models and it's an aspect that's also caught Cramer's attention. He believes that the firm is a data mine for AI companies. His previous remarks about Reddit, Inc. (NYSE:RDDT) have praised its management and stressed that it is one of the top plays in digital advertising. Here are his latest thoughts: 'But these are two of the companies, along with Reddit. . .they came from a particular era of IPO. Of winners. And these are all ones I'd buy.' For Cramer, Reddit, Inc. (NYSE:RDDT) is a top stock. Here are his recent thoughts: 'Okay, I want you to buy Reddit here. Let me tell you something, this stock has been coming down. It was a short squeeze, went all the way up to 200. That shouldn't have happened. I think Steve Huffman is doing a remarkable job, and you are onto something. Reddit, I think, is probably the best bang, really the best bang for the buck that there is right now in advertising and people don't realize that. I've done so much more work on this. I can't even tell you how much work I've done on this, and I keep coming back and… you know what, Insta is second. Alright, TikTok second, kind of even. First is going to be Reddit, bang for the buck. You are onto something because the verticals are so precise. They're so precise…. I used to say TikTok first. I used to say Insta first. No, their backseat to Reddit. You heard it from me.' While we acknowledge the potential of RDDT as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


TechCrunch
an hour ago
- TechCrunch
Facebook Group admins complain of mass bans; Meta says it's fixing the problem
After a wave of mass bans impacting Instagram and Facebook users alike, Meta users are now complaining that Facebook Groups are also being impacted by mass suspensions. According to individual complaints and organized efforts on sites like Reddit to share information, the bans have impacted thousands of groups both in the U.S. and abroad, and have spanned various categories. Reached for comment, Meta spokesperson Andy Stone confirmed the company was aware of the issue and working to correct it. 'We're aware of a technical error that impacted some Facebook Groups. We're fixing things now,' he told TechCrunch in an emailed statement. The reason for the mass bans is not yet known, though many suspect that faulty AI-based moderation could be to blame. Based on the information shared by impacted users, many of the suspended Facebook groups aren't the type that would regularly face moderation concerns, as they focus on fairly innocuous content — like savings tips or deals, parenting support, groups for dog or cat owners, gaming groups, Pokémon groups, groups for mechanical keyboard enthusiasts, and more. Facebook Group admins report receiving vague violation notices related to things like 'terrorism-related' content or nudity, which they claim their group hasn't posted. While some of the impacted groups are smaller in size, many are large, with tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, or even millions of users. Those who have organized to share tips about the problem are advising others not to appeal their group's ban, but rather wait a few days to see if the suspension is automatically reversed when the bug is fixed. Currently, Reddit's Facebook community (r/facebook) is filled with posts from group admins and users who are angry about the recent purge. Some report that all the groups they run have been removed at once. Some are incredulous about the supposed violations — like a group for bird photos with just under a million users getting flagged for nudity. Others claim that their groups were already well-moderated against spam– like a family-friendly Pokémon group with nearly 200,000 members, which received a violation notice that their title referenced 'dangerous organizations,' or an interior design group that served millions, which received the same violation. At least some Facebook Group admins who pay for Meta's Verified subscription, which includes priority customer support, have been able to get help. Others, however, report that their groups have been suspended or fully deleted. It's unclear if the problem is related to the recent wave of bans impacting Meta users as individuals, but this seems to be a growing problem across social networks. In addition to Facebook and Instagram, social networks like Pinterest and Tumblr have also faced complaints about mass suspensions in recent weeks, leading users to suspect that AI-automated moderation efforts are to blame. Pinterest at least admitted to its mistake, saying the mass bans were due to an internal error, but it denied that AI was the issue. Tumblr said its issues were tied to tests of a new content filtering system, but did not clarify if that system involved AI. When asked about the recent Instagram bans, Meta had declined to comment. Users are now circulating a petition that has topped 12,380 signatures so far, asking Meta to address the problem. Others, including those whose businesses were impacted, are pursuing legal action. Meta has still not shared what's causing the issue with either individual accounts or groups.


Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Brian Brenberg Explains How Trump Spearheaded The Reinvention Of The Global Energy Economy
Host of 'The Big Money Show' on Fox Business Brian Brenberg joins Fox Across America With Jimmy Failla to give his take on the Trump administration's approach to domestic energy production. Brian Brenberg On Trump's Push To Pull Federal Funding From Harvard PLUS, check out the podcast if you missed any of Tuesday's show!