BJP slams DMK after Tamil Nadu boy denied entry to school over missing documents
The father said they had been 'running from pillar to post' to secure the Aadhaar card but had failed so far.'We don't have his birth certificate or Aadhaar card. I've been travelling from Poonamallee to Koyambedu and came to the Collector office for help. Me and my wife have Aadhaar, but they are not adding his name to the ration card,' he said. The Thiruvallur Collector was unreachable for comment.Former BJP state president K Annamalai picked up the issue on X, questioning Chief Minister MK Stalin if this was part of the state education policy he unveiled recently in Chennai.
He alleged that the boy belonged to the Narikuravar community, which Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government had included in the Scheduled Tribe list, but was now facing 'rustication' from a government school under the DMK regime.'His parents have knocked on the doors of every government office, only to be met with apathy. Under the DMK government, 'Social Justice' exists only in speeches, not in action,' Annamalai said.- EndsMust Watch
IN THIS STORY#Tamil Nadu
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
14 minutes ago
- The Hindu
BJP reaches out to Chirag Paswan, asks him to tone down criticism of Nitish government
In an effort to prevent history from repeating itself, the senior leadership of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has been at pains to ensure that Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas) leader and Union Minister Chirag Paswan refrains from making critical remarks against the Nitish Kumar-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government in Bihar. However, it has so far seen mixed results. According to a senior national office-bearer of the BJP, Mr. Paswan has been asked to tone down his criticism of the State government, particularly following his recent remarks on a series of murders in Bihar. 'I feel sad to support a government under which crime is out of control,' Mr. Paswan had said. The remarks did not go down well with Mr. Kumar's party, the Janata Dal(U), which fears that Mr. Paswan might end up splitting NDA votes, as in the 2020 Assembly election. According to one estimate by the JD(U), the party lost at least 12 seats in that election because Mr. Paswan, after breaking away from the NDA, fielded candidates against the JD(U) who made inroads into the NDA votes. 'We have conveyed to Chirag Paswan that he is on a good wicket, he has age, and a significant support base on his side, he should pull together with NDA, there is no need to be isolated within the alliance,' said a BJP leader. Mr. Paswan, who often refers to himself as Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Hanuman, or disciple, even when he was not a part of the NDA, has never hidden either his antipathy towards Mr. Kumar and the JD(U) or even his own ambitions. His party's MP Arun Bharti (also Mr. Paswan's brother-in-law) had, in an interview to The Hindu, said that Mr. Paswan was a 'Bahujan leader and LJP(RV) is a Bahujan party', signalling Mr. Paswan's intentions of casting his net wider in terms of communities other than his own Dalit constituency. Recently, Mr. Paswan's absence from a meeting presided over by Union Home Minister Amit Shah in Sitamarhi raised eyebrows, but he later said that this was not deliberate but due to a scheduling conflict. 'We will be reaching out to him again,' said a senior BJP leader. The BJP assesses that the upcoming Bihar Assembly election has a couple of unpredictable factors — Mr. Kumar's health and the impact of Prashant Kishor and his Jan Suraaj Party. In the highly caste sensitive political landscape of Bihar, the Opposition party workers often refer to Mr. Kishor as 'Prashant Kishor Pandey', underlining his Brahmin lineage. Much will depend on the candidates selected by Mr. Kishor, and if he puts strong candidates, especially in the seats held by the JD(U), the upper caste voters may choose to go with him. In such a scenario, Mr. Paswan's remarks and the perception that the NDA may not be the united house it should be in the run-up to the polls is something that the BJP wants to squash as early as possible.
The Hindu
14 minutes ago
- The Hindu
‘124-year-old' Minta Devi wants poll body to rectify age goof-up
Siwan's Minta Devi, who became the face of the Opposition's protest against the Election Commission on Tuesday (August 12, 2025), said she was not aware that her age in the electoral roll was recorded as 124 years. She urged the poll panel to correct it. Several Congress MPs, including Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, wore a T-shirt with Ms. Devi's face printed on it while protesting outside the Parliament against the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter rolls in Bihar. The Opposition leaders alleged voter fraud in various constituencies and cited Ms. Devi's case to highlight 'irregularities'. 'I do not know what is going on in the Parliament, but my date of birth mentioned in the Aadhaar card is July 15, 1990. I had given my Aadhaar to my brother-in-law who had applied online for the voter I-card two months ago,' she said. The application was made in Siwan. 'However, when I received my voter card, I did not check it. It was only when the media met me that I saw my date of birth was printed as July 15, 1900. It is the mistake of the person who has issued the voter card,' Ms. Devi said, adding that she has never voted before. She said no Booth Level Officer contacted her during the SIR. 'Those who are responsible for this blunder should rectify it and issue me a fresh voter I-card. I have not made any mistakes,' Ms. Devi said. Ms. Devi is a resident of Arjaanipur village and a voter registered in the Daraunda Assembly constituency of Siwan district. Her husband, Dhananjay Kumar Singh, is an e-rickshaw driver. The Siwan District Magistrate's office issued a press statement saying that the age shown in Ms. Devi's voter card was due to a 'human error' and it was made by her husband while filing the online form. The process of correction has already started, the statement said. 'Deputy Election Officer, Siwan, Sohail Ahmed has received the information that in polling station number 94, Siwan block under 109 Darauda Legislative Assembly constituency, Minta Devi, husband-Dhananjay Kumar Singh had filled the online application form for adding the name through Form-06,' the statement said. Ms. Devi's father-in-law Tej Bahadur Singh alleged that the BLOs were not going door-to-door for verification. 'The BLOs filled most of the enumeration form on their own. If they would have visited our house, we could have told them about the number of family members and their age,' he said.
The Hindu
14 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Aadhaar, voter ID not proof of citizenship, says Bombay High Court rejecting bail plea of alleged Bangladeshi man
The Bombay High Court on Tuesday (August 12, 2025) rejected the bail plea of Babu Abdul Ruf Sardar, accused of illegally entering India from Bangladesh and obtaining forged Indian identity documents, citing national security concerns, ongoing investigation, and the risk of absconding. Passing the order, Justice Amit Borkar observed, 'In my opinion, the Citizenship Act, 1955 is the main and controlling law for deciding questions about nationality in India today. Merely having documents such as an Aadhaar card, PAN card, or Voter ID does not by itself make someone a citizen of India. These documents are meant for identification or availing services, but they do not override the basic legal requirements of citizenship as prescribed in the Act.' Mr. Sardar is facing charges punishable under Sections 335 (causing grievous hurt), 336(3) (endangering life or personal safety of others, aggravated form), and 340 (wrongful confinement) read with Section 3(5) (aggravated offence relating to the above) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, along with offences under Sections 3(a) (prohibition on entry without valid passport) and 6(a) (penalty for entry without passport) of the Passport (Entry into India) Act, 1950, and Sections 3(1) (restriction on entry of foreigners), 3(2) (conditions for lawful stay), and 14 (penalty for contravention) of the Foreigners Order, 1948. Appearing for the applicant, advocate Jyotiram S. Yadav argued that Mr. Sardar is 'a bona fide citizen of India' and that the recovered birth certificates are 'unverified and do not even mention the applicant's name.' He added that these were received via WhatsApp from an unidentified sender and that the applicant holds multiple valid Indian documents linked to tax records, bank accounts, and utility services. 'Nothing remains to be recovered from him, and continued custody serves no useful purpose,' Mr. Yadav said. Digital evidence Opposing the plea, Additional Public Prosecutor Megha S. Bajoria contended that the accused 'entered the country without valid permission and is residing illegally by using forged identity documents.' She pointed to the digital evidence suggesting Bangladeshi origin and argued that Mr. Sardar's release could allow him to abscond, obtain another false identity, or destroy evidence. Ms. Bajoria further warned of possible links to 'a larger organised network involving illegal immigration and identity fraud.' Justice Borkar, after reviewing the evidence, observed that citizenship claims must be tested strictly under the Citizenship Act and that the burden of proof lies with the accused when credible evidence raises doubts about nationality. 'The allegations in this case are not small. It is not just about staying in India without permission or overstaying a visa. It is about making and using fake and forged identity documents like Aadhaar card, PAN card, and Voter ID, with the aim of pretending to be an Indian citizen.' Highlighting that verification of Mr. Sardar's Aadhaar card and other documents is still pending with the UIDAI and other authorities, the court concluded that releasing him at this stage would be 'neither proper nor prudent.' The judge also noted, 'The danger of the applicant running away from the law or interfering with the investigation is real.' The bail application was dismissed, but the court allowed Mr. Sardar to renew his request for bail if the trial is not completed within one year.
