Trump promised peace in 100 days, but Russia's violence against Ukraine has only escalated
"There is no point in negotiating," Maria Rumiantseva told the Kyiv Independent last week, after a missile strike on Kyiv killed her neighbor and stranded her and her family in a wrecked apartment.
"(Russian President Vladimir Putin) won't leave us alone."
Trump celebrates the 100th day of his second term on April 29. As well as a series of devastating Russian attacks on Ukrainian civilians since he took office, Russia's battlefield assaults also show no signs of slowing.
In March, the second full month of Trump's term, 164 civilians were killed and 910 were injured, according to UN figures — a rise of 50% compared to February, and 70% compared to March of last year.
Nearly all the losses were on land controlled by the Ukrainian government, and the majority were caused by long-range missiles or loitering munitions.
Similar figures are expected for April, which also saw the deadliest single strike for Ukrainian children since the full-scale invasion began in 2022. On April 14, 18 people died after a ballistic missile detonated over a playground. Among them were nine children.
Recent major attacks in Sumy and Kyiv have similarly made international headlines, while smaller attacks attract less attention abroad but continue to rack up.
Last week, the head of the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU), Danielle Bell, called out "a deeply disturbing trend — civilians bearing the brunt of ever more intense and frequent attacks."
"The near daily barrage of long-range drones killed and injured scores of civilians across the country last month, and disrupted life for millions more," Bell said.
On the frontlines, too, signs of peace are absent, said Emil Kastehelmi, a Finnish military analyst from the Black Bird Group open-source intelligence collective.
Rather than pulling back or slowing down, Russian attacks have intensified in recent weeks, though this has yet to translate into territorial breakthroughs.
"I suspect that the war will at least go on all the way to fall," Kastehelmi said.
"Of course, there's a lot of diplomacy happening behind closed doors. But when we look at the developments on the front, there aren't any clear signs which would point to diplomatic breakthroughs in the coming weeks."
Read also: Investigation: The hidden journey of Ukrainian coal stolen by Russia — and who profits from it
Dozens of times on the campaign trail, Trump pledged to end the war in Ukraine on his first day in office, or even sooner.
"Before I even arrive at the Oval Office, shortly after I win the presidency, I will have the horrible war between Russia and Ukraine settled," he said in August, just one of many similar statements.
After his election, however, his team dialed back that promise, announcing a new goal of ending the war within 100 days of his Jan. 20 inauguration.
Those first 100 days have been marked by the Trump administration's demands for a deal, a flurry of diplomatic meetings around the globe, severe and sustained pressure on Ukraine, and a reluctance to force any concessions from Russia.
After the disastrous meeting in the Oval Office between Trump and President Volodymyr Zelensky in February which prompted the U.S. to temporarily paused military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine, Ukraine has made multiple concessions to stay in the White House's good graces.
Ukraine walked back its demands that Russia withdraw its troops from Ukrainian land before negotiations, and has declared its readiness to sign a U.S.-proposed, full, unconditional 30-day cease-fire agreement with Russia. To date Moscow has refused.
Despite Trump's aims, signs of peace are few and far between as Moscow refuses to make concessions to its maximalist demands, as well as violating temporary ceasefires it has proposed.
During a temporary three-day ceasefire declared by Russia over Easter earlier this month, Zelensky accused Moscow of nearly 3,000 violations between April 19 and April 21.
On the eve of Trump's 100th day in power, Russia declared its readiness for another three-day ceasefire in May.
The move came only after Trump's recent outbursts showed he appears to be losing patience with Putin's pace of negotiations, and members of Trump's team threatened to walk away from mediation if progress doesn't happen soon.
"I want (Putin) to stop shooting, sit down and sign a deal," Trump told reporters on April 27, describing Zelensky as "calmer" after the two leaders met in the Vatican on April 26.
Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha reacted to Russia's latest ceasefire offer by calling on Russia to accept the 30-day ceasefire proposal.
Read also: Trump said Ukraine 'will be crushed very shortly' — this is why he's wrong
Yet the prospects of a broader ceasefire appear slim as Russia continues to demand international recognition of five Ukrainian territories as Russian — a condition Ukraine has ruled out as a "red line." Among the lands are major cities which experts say Russia has no chance of capturing by force in the near future, if at all.
Russia illegally declared ownership over Crimea in 2014, and of Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, Donetsk, and Luhansk in 2022 despite not fully controlling the oblasts. Conceding these territories as Russia demands would go far beyond simply freezing battlelines — it would permanently hand over territory home to millions of Ukrainians.
In the absence of a ceasefire, dozens of Ukrainian civilians across the country each week continue to be killed in aerial strikes, while on the front lines, Russia continues to grind forward with its slow war of attrition.
The largest change in battlelines since Trump's election has been the near collapse of Ukraine's positions within Russia's Kursk Oblast.
Russia has also reportedly intensified its attacks in recent weeks, including in the Sumy region, though it has not made any other breakthroughs.
Apart from Kursk, noted Kastehelmi of Black Bird Group, the broader situation in most directions has not changed significantly since January.
"The spring offensive is ongoing, but it has not yielded very significant gains for the Russians," he said.
"The Russians are capturing a village here and there occasionally, they are slowly finding their way forward. But small tactical victories don't mean there's any kind of larger operational change in the whole situation," he added.
With breakthroughs looking unlikely on the battlefield and in the diplomatic arena, Russia appears to have no plans of changing course.
At the end of March, Putin ordered a spring conscription of 160,000 men, making it the largest call-up of men in 14 years.
Read also: What's next for North Korean troops fighting for Russia? A possible Ukraine deployment, experts, officials say
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas lawmakers approve redistricting map favouring Republicans
Texas legislators have approved new congressional maps designed to give Republicans an edge in next year's elections for the US House of Representatives. After a two-week standoff, where Democrats fled the state to stall the vote and rally supporters against the redistricting plans, Republicans in the Texas House of Representatives passed the new voting lines in an 88-52 vote. The maps will now go to the Texas Senate, where they are expected to be swiftly approved. They create five new Republican-leaning seats that would shore up the party's US House majority in Washington DC. Democratic-led states are pushing to redraw their own maps to offset the Texas ones. President Donald Trump backed redrawing the maps to safeguard a Republican majority in the US House. Republicans hold a slim majority in the upper chamber of Congress, which Democrats aim to win back in the 2026 midterm elections. Wednesday's vote in Texas followed a dramatic showdown as Democrats fled across state lines to deny Republicans the quorum necessary in the state legislative body to take a vote. Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a Republican, ordered their absent Democrats' arrest, and some of them said law enforcement had monitored their homes while they were gone. The lawmakers returned this week, saying they had achieved their objective of drawing national attention to the matter. In an effort to ensure Democrats would not attempt to halt the vote again, Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows ordered the statehouse chamber doors to be locked on Monday. He also said Democrats would be "released into the custody" of a designated police officer to ensure they returned to the statehouse on Wednesday for the redistricting vote. Several Democrats instead ripped up the written agreements that they were required to sign for the police escort. One lawmaker, Nicole Collier, decided to sleep in the chamber rather than be escorted by an officer. In the time since Texas started planning these new voting maps, other states controlled by both political parties - including Florida, New York, Ohio and Missouri - have been weighing similar changes. California lawmakers are currently debating new maps that would give new advantages to Democrats in five districts, which would cancel out changes made in Texas. A key provision in California says the maps would only go into effect if Texas or other states went ahead with changes favouring Republicans. After the vote on Wednesday, California Governor Gavin Newsom wrote on X: "It's on, Texas." The new maps in Texas sparked uproar over gerrymandering - the redrawing of electoral boundaries to favour a political party - which is practised by both main parties and is legal unless ruled to be racially motivated. Like other states, Texas typically redraws congressional districts once a decade when new population data is released by the US Census. Texas Democrats claimed that redrawing the maps before the next population count in 2030 was being done along racial lines - an argument that has been rejected by Republicans. Voting maps that were approved in 2021 after the last population count are still being litigated over claims of racial discrimination. During one of the many heated exchanges during debate in the Texas statehouse, Republican legislator Todd Hunter, who introduced the redistricting bill, was applauded as he scolded Democrats. "Don't come into this body and say we didn't include you," he said. "You left us for 18 days, and that's wrong." Democrats in the chamber questioned the legality of the maps and accused Republicans of trying to "steal" an election. "Let's talk about cowardice and cheats," Democratic legislator Ann Johnson said. "The root of all of this is around racism and power," she added. "A pure power grab." Democrats and civil rights groups have said the new maps will dilute voting power from minorities, which would violate federal law, and have threatened to sue. Texas Democrats return home after redistricting row California governor unveils voting lines plan to counter Texas Republicans Texas redistricting feud escalates as Democrats face bomb and FBI threats
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Protesters heckle Vance, Hegseth at photo op to thank National Guard troops in DC
As President Donald Trump's deployment of National Guard troops in Washington continued Wednesday, protesters booed Vice President JD Vance during a photo op with the guardsmen stationed in the city. The protesters jeered Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller as they visited Union Station, blocks from the U.S. Capitol, to thank the troops at a Shake Shack where they bought lunch for the guard members. "Well, a lot has changed in the past seven days," Vance told the troops, referring to when the federal surge against D.C. crime began. "You guys are doing a hell of a job. I'm proud of you and we're grateful," he told the troops. "So, we'll say hello for a bit -- just want to shake some hands and say hey to you guys." "Free D.C.," the protesters shouted as the three officials arrived and then later inside the Shake Shack. The chants drowned out much of what Vance, Hegseth and Miller said as they tried to speak to reporters. MORE: 6th Republican-led state sends National Guard troops to DC as Trump continues law enforcement takeover Vance and Miller dismissed the jeers, calling the protesters "crazy" and "communists." "They appear to hate the idea that Americans can enjoy their communities," Vance said. Vance was asked why troops were stationed at Union Station instead of parts of the city with higher crime rates. The vice president said the station was being overrun with homeless people and visitors didn't feel safe. "This should be a monument to American greatness," he said. Vance added that he believed that crime statistics do not report the full scope of crime on the streets of the nation's capital. After being met with boos at Union Station, Vance sat down with Fox News Wednesday evening to recap his visit, and criticized those who called the surprise visit a PR stunt. "You've got a lot of national guardsmen over there, some D.C. cops who have been heckled by some of the protesters. So I thought, what a good show of moral support to have the vice president, some of the senior team at the White House show up." At a back-to-school event Wednesday morning, Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser said the city doesn't need federal agents to ensure safety in D.C. "Crime has gone down in our city and it has gone down precipitously over the last two years because of a lot of hard work, changes to our public safety ecosystem, including changes to the law," Bowser said. "And we know that those facts don't comport to what some people are saying, but those are the facts." Bowser also said she doesn't believe the National Guard should be used for "law enforcement." "They have to be used on mission specific items that benefit the nation," she said of the guardsmen. However, when asked about how her relationship with President Trump has changed since the start of the year, Bowser said her plan is to "represent the district." Flanked by Metropolitan Police Department Chief Pamela Smith, Bowser repeatedly deferred to Smith when asked about the city's crime data. The MPD has been collaborative with the federal agencies and so far has developed a congenial relationship with its federal partners, according to Smith. Smith also acknowledged having federal agents spread throughout the city has been helpful to the city's police force. "Hearing from the officers on the street, some of them have found it to be very helpful, some people in the community have found it to be very helpful," she said. ABC News' Arthur Jones II contributed to this report.


The Hill
4 minutes ago
- The Hill
Work begins in Finland on a new Canadian icebreaker for Arctic defense
HELSINKI, Finland (AP) — Dignitaries at a steel-cutting ceremony Wednesday in Finland marked the start of work on a new Canadian icebreaker to be named the Polar Max and aimed at bolstering Arctic defense. The event marked the concrete beginning of a trilateral partnership of the United States, Canada and Finland announced by the White House in July 2024 to bolster defenses in a region where Russia has been increasingly active. Russia has vastly more icebreaker ships than the U.S. and Canada at a time when climate change has made the remote but strategically important Arctic more accessible. The Icebreaker Collaboration Effort, or ICE Pact, aims to leverage Finland's advanced shipbuilding expertise and technologies to help meet U.S. and Canadian demand for new icebreakers. Canada's minister for defense procurement, Stephen Fuhr, said his country is bringing its coast guard into the military and that investing in the Arctic is important for the future. 'The North is opening up, there are many reasons to be up there,' Fuhr said. 'There's security issues, resource development.' The hull will be built at Helsinki Shipyard before being transported to Canada where it's expected to be completed in Levis, Quebec by 2030. Quebec's Economy Minister Christopher Skeete highlighted the benefits of cooperating on the building of the new icebreaker. 'It's a partnership and we have a shared responsibility for the North, so this is a unique and very opportune partnership that allows us to leverage the strengths of both our countries in terms of maritime Arctic protection,' he said. 'The North is becoming more and more accessible, there are more and more rivalries in the North, and so we have to be prepared to assert our sovereignty out there,' Skeete added. During a NATO summit in June, U.S. President Donald Trump said Finland was the 'king of icebreakers' and suggested the U.S. might be willing to buy as many as 15 of them, including the used icebreaker that Trump said might be immediately available. 'We're trying to make a good deal,' Trump said. According to a U.S. Government Accountability Office report, the U.S. hasn't built a heavy polar icebreaker in almost 50 years. The last remaining one in service is the 399-foot Coast Guard Cutter Polar Star commissioned in 1976. During a talk in February at the RAND research organization, U.S. Coast Guard Vice Admiral Peter Gautier said the agency has determined it needs eight to nine icebreakers — a mix of heavy polar security cutters and medium Arctic security cutters. Building an icebreaker can be challenging because it has to be able to withstand the brutal crashing through ice that can be as thick as 21 feet (6.4 meters) and wildly varying sea and air temperatures, the report said.