Is Philippines getting short end of US tariff stick? 19% rate slammed as ‘worst insult'
Ferdinand Marcos Jnr as a 'significant achievement' has been slammed by critics at home as the 'worst insult' after Manila secured only a one percentage point tariff cut from Washington while granting American goods duty-free access.
Marcos, the first Southeast Asian leader to be hosted by President Donald Trump since his return to the White House, visited the US capital from Sunday to Tuesday for a series of talks centred on trade and security.
The trip came as Manila sought to defuse tensions over Trump's sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariff policy, which had initially imposed a 17 per cent duty on Philippine exports in April before increasing it to 20 per cent earlier this month.
The outcome – a 19 per cent tariff rate on Philippine goods alongside zero tariffs for US exports – was unveiled by Trump on his Truth Social account after holding a joint press conference at the White House.
Marcos defended the result, insisting the concession was more significant than it appeared.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
29 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
India risks Trump's tariffs as oil refiners may still buy Russian
India has not given the country's oil refiners instructions to stop buying Russian oil, according to people familiar with the matter, as officials grapple with meeting energy needs and maintaining ties with Moscow without further angering US President Donald Trump. Advertisement No decision has been taken as yet on stopping imports from Russia , the people said, asking not to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter. Both state-run and private refiners are allowed to buy from their preferred sources, and crude purchases remain a commercial decision made by them, several of the people said. Trump blasted India on Wednesday for continuing to purchase most of its military equipment and energy from Russia. The US leader imposed a surprise 25 per cent tariff on India and threatened an additional penalty for its close ties with Moscow. Two days later, Trump told reporters he 'heard' India would no longer be buying oil from Russia, calling it 'a good step.' India has maintained its energy purchases are driven by market forces and price. Last week, refiners were told to come up with plans for buying non-Russian crude, people familiar said to reporters. The government asked state-owned processors to prepare an outline of where alternate barrels can be sourced and at what volume if Russian flows get stopped, they said. One of the people said the instruction amounted to scenario planning in case Russian crude were to become unavailable. An Indian fisherman sails over the Ennore Creek covered with an oil spill after Cyclone Michaung, in Chennai, India, December 11, 2023. Photo: EPA-EFE US media reported on Saturday that India will keep buying Russian crude despite a threat of penalties from Trump, citing two senior Indian officials it did not identify.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong must fix talent scheme as mainland Chinese ‘exam immigrants' draw ire
Last December, Hong Kong's Secretary for Labour and Welfare Chris Sun Yuk-han said there were no loopholes in the city's Top Talent Pass Scheme. We know leaders in Beijing have repeatedly asked this administration to be bold, but Sun's claim of no administrative gaps might have been too bold. Given the complexities, no immigration policy can truly be flawless and airtight. In the government's attempt to make up for the outflow of people, it rolled out the Top Talent Pass Scheme in 2022. Since then, the city's various talent admission schemes have received about 500,000 applications, of which 330,000 have been approved and 220,000 people have arrived. The schemes are not without their flaws and former chief executive Leung Chun-ying has been a harsh critic. Leung, of course, wasn't against the idea or its purpose but he questioned if the government had the manpower to properly review, vet and approve the applications. Vetting is crucial to avoid abuse in any immigration policy. Leung said he had come across successful applicants who check into the city only to check out soon after: their aim is to take advantage of the benefits of their Hong Kong status, which allow for tax concessions and their children to study in Hong Kong or in mainland schools set up for Hong Kong children. Sun said while not every successful candidate would eventually settle here, they did not take up Hong Kong's welfare benefits. Even if they did come to check things out only to leave, we at least had them paying for room and board while here. He also brushed off concerns about successful applicants sending their dependants to school here. But then last week happened. The Education Bureau announced that starting from the 2028-2029 academic year, children of non-local talent must have stayed in Hong Kong for at least two years before they can claim resident student benefits at publicly funded tertiary education institutions. This policy change aims to prevent abuse.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong must fix talent scheme as mainland ‘exam immigrants' draw ire
Last December, Hong Kong's Secretary for Labour and Welfare Chris Sun Yuk-han said there were no loopholes in the city's Top Talent Pass Scheme. We know leaders in Beijing have repeatedly asked this administration to be bold, but Sun's claim of no administrative gaps might have been too bold. Given the complexities, no immigration policy can truly be flawless and airtight. In the government's attempt to make up for the outflow of people, it rolled out the Top Talent Pass Scheme in 2022. Since then, the city's various talent admission schemes have received about 500,000 applications, of which 330,000 have been approved and 220,000 people have arrived. The schemes are not without their flaws and former chief executive Leung Chun-ying has been a harsh critic. Leung, of course, wasn't against the idea or its purpose but he questioned if the government had the manpower to properly review, vet and approve the applications. Vetting is crucial to avoid abuse in any immigration policy. Leung said he had come across successful applicants who check into the city only to check out soon after: their aim is to take advantage of the benefits of their Hong Kong status, which allow for tax concessions and their children to study in Hong Kong or in mainland schools set up for Hong Kong children. Sun said while not every successful candidate would eventually settle here, they did not take up Hong Kong's welfare benefits. Even if they did come to check things out only to leave, we at least had them paying for room and board while here. He also brushed off concerns about successful applicants sending their dependants to school here. But then last week happened. The Education Bureau announced that starting from the 2028-2029 academic year, children of non-local talent must have stayed in Hong Kong for at least two years before they can claim resident student benefits at publicly funded tertiary education institutions. This policy change aims to prevent abuse.
