Govt's Gurjar quota panel meets without stakeholders
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The three-member panel, headed by parliamentary affairs minister Jogaram Patel, convened to discuss the possibility of including the 5% Most Backward Classes (MBC) quota for Gurjars in the Constitution's Ninth Schedule. The committee includes social justice minister Avinash Gehlot and minister of state for home Jawahar Singh Bedam.
Speaking to TOI, Patel said, "Samiti members were invited yesterday (Monday) to attend the meeting but somehow nobody turned up today.
I'm sure they will join the next meeting, which will be scheduled soon."
The samiti members' absence raised concerns about the consultation process. A samiti representative, speaking on condition of anonymity, cited last minute notice as the reason for their non-attendance.
"Most of our members are spread across the state. Such short notice made it logistically impossible to attend the meeting," the samiti member said.
"With the Aug 8 deadline approaching, we expect better coordination," the representative said, warning of "indefinite protests" if the deadline is missed.
The deadline stems from a June 8 Gurjar Mahapanchayat, where the state govt promised to address the community's demands within two months. Patel, however, downplayed timeline concerns, stating, "What matters is that the process has been initiated."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
21 minutes ago
- Hans India
‘Performance very low, failing in duties': BJP on Rahul Gandhi's one-year tenure as LoP
New Delhi: As Congress leader Rahul Gandhi completed one year as Leader of the Opposition (LoP) in the Lok Sabha, the BJP on Wednesday sharply criticised his performance, calling it 'very low' and accusing him of failing to fulfil his constitutional responsibilities. BJP leaders alleged that LoP Rahul Gandhi was frequently absent from the House for extended periods and spent too much time abroad, undermining his ability to represent the Opposition effectively. 'In the last year, the country's politics has changed a lot. Today, during the meetings of the INDI Bloc in the Lok Sabha, they tried to create an impression that the BJP has been defeated and that the NDA has fallen behind. But the election results over the past year have shown the people of this country the reality. There is a clear difference in the politics and ideology of both sides,' BJP leader Rohan Gupta told IANS. He added that this journey, which started from Haryana, shows a clear mandate from the people, from Haryana to Delhi, demonstrating that there will be no compromise on national issues. 'The message for the Opposition is equally clear: the politics of appeasement has taken centre stage. Their alliance partners are relying on appeasement to save their sinking boat,' he said. He further pointed out that the upcoming Bihar elections will show this even more clearly, with their leaders doubling down on appeasement, adding that they talk about the Constitution, but somewhere they also support Sharia. 'The people of this country know the whole truth. That is why the Congress party, which once led the INDI Bloc, is now reduced to a junior partner. This decline is due to the Congress party's ideology, policies, and its relentless pursuit of appeasement politics,' he said. Another BJP leader, Jagannath Sarkar, also criticised LoP Rahul Gandhi's commitment to his role, saying that Rahul Gandhi has not performed his duties as LoP in the Lok Sabha. 'He has been absent from Parliament for long hours. As LoP, he must be present in the House and listen to debates,' he said. BJP leader Sudhanshu Trivedi claimed that Congress is a party whose leader, Rahul Gandhi, frequently travels abroad, often immediately after each Parliament session. 'Even senior leaders of his party cannot distinguish between national responsibilities and foreign trips,' he alleged. BJP leader Nisith Pramanik said that Rahul Gandhi has completed one year as LoP in the Lok Sabha. 'But I feel that by the time he even begins to understand how Parliament functions, the five-year term will be over,' he said. He further alleged that LoP Rahul Gandhi's performance is 'very poor' even by the standards of a normal parliamentarian. Despite the BJP's criticism, Rahul Gandhi's appointment as LoP marked a significant moment in parliamentary history. After the Congress secured 99 seats in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, the position - vacant for a decade because no Opposition party met the minimum requirement of 10 per cent of seats - was finally filled. As LoP, Rahul Gandhi holds the critical responsibility of holding the government accountable and providing constructive criticism of its policies, a role that remains essential in any parliamentary democracy.
United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
BJP slams Cong for pact with Jamaat-e-Islami in Kerala bypolls, calls it 'double standards'
New Delhi, July 2 (UNI) The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) today launched a scathing attack on the Congress for its alliance during the Nilambur Assembly by-election in Kerala with Jamaat-e-Islami, an organisation that, it alleged, has long opposed democracy, the Indian Constitution, and secular values. Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Kerala State President of the BJP and former Union Minister while addressing the media, traced the controversial history of Jamaat-e-Islami, saying that it has openly advocated for the implementation of Sharia law in India and rejected the core principles of democracy and secularism. In support of his claims, the BJP leader referred to a 2018 statement by Congress's former Kerala Chief Minister, Oommen Chandy, who had referred to Jamaat-e-Islami as 'dangerous and anti-national.' Chandrasekhar accused Congress of double standards, saying, 'On one hand, leaders like Rahul Gandhi often parade the Constitution, symbolising their commitment to secularism, while on the other, they forge alliances with radical and anti-national groups like Jamaat-e-Islami.' He emphasised that the Congress had allied with Jamaat-e-Islami in the recent Nilambur by-election, a seat that falls within the Wayanad parliamentary constituency once represented by Congress MP Rahul Gandhi. Congress won the seat in the bypolls, which marked the first time they officially acknowledged their alliance with Jamaat-e-Islami. 'This is the true face of Congress politics: Constitution in one hand, secularism on the lips, and a dangerous partnership with Jamaat-e-Islami in their pursuit of power,' said Chandrasekhar. The BJP leader accused Congress of indulging in a 'politics of appeasement,' particularly Muslim appeasement, which he argued had been the party's central strategy for decades. He noted that while the Congress had historically relied on Jamaat-e-Islami for support in Kerala, these alliances were previously kept under wraps. 'Now, under pressure from Jamaat-e-Islami, Congress has openly acknowledged the alliance,' he remarked. Mujeeb Rahman, the leader of Jamaat-e-Islami, had recently acknowledged that the BJP was the only party in India that had never sought support from the radical group, while other parties, including Congress, Left, and RJD, had consistently done so, Chandrasekhar added. Shifting the focus to national security, Chandrasekhar recalled instances where, it said, Congress had distorted facts and undermined the nation's security interests. He pointed to the aftermath of the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, accusing Congress of suggesting that the RSS was behind the attacks instead of Pakistani terrorists. He also referenced the Batla House encounter, where Sonia Gandhi had defended the terrorists. Chandrasekhar also condemned Congress MP Rajmohan Unnithan for calling a Hamas leader who attempted to radicalize children in Kerala a 'freedom fighter.' He likened this language to that used by Pakistan to justify terrorism. In his closing remarks, the BJP leader accused Congress of abandoning any meaningful dialogue on development, governance, or economic issues. Instead, he argued, the party has increasingly resorted to religious appeasement in a desperate bid to regain political relevance. He pointed to the party's failures in states like Karnataka, Telangana, and Himachal Pradesh, where it has struggled to address key issues of governance. UNI AJ ARN GNK 1509
News18
an hour ago
- News18
‘Scandalous, Contemptuous': Allahabad HC Dismisses Plea Accusing Trial Judge Of Bribery
Last Updated: The bench of Justice Subhash Vidyarthi said that the allegations were not only false and vague but also appeared to be a calculated attempt to delay judicial proceedings. The Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) recently dismissed a plea by former LACFEDD Managing Director Brahma Prakash Singh seeking transfer of a money laundering trial on allegations that the special judge demanded a Rs 1 crore bribe for his acquittal. The bench of Justice Subhash Vidyarthi said that the allegations were not only false and vague but also appeared to be a calculated attempt to delay judicial proceedings. Singh, who is facing trial under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) based on a 2018 Enforcement Directorate (ED) complaint, had approached the high court under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the sessions court's refusal to transfer the case. Court noted that Singh had been convicted earlier in a corruption case and was currently out on bail during the pendency of his appeal. The bribery allegation against the special judge surfaced for the first time in December 2024—nearly three months after the alleged demand was made in court, and notably after the trial court had passed multiple orders against him. 'Apparently, the transfer application has been devised to avoid facing trial before the court," the high court observed. The sessions judge, who earlier rejected Singh's transfer request, had sought comments from the trial judge. The latter outright denied the bribery allegations, stating that no such interaction could have occurred without the presence of court staff and prosecutors. He also accused Singh and his counsel of trying to mount pressure on the court and disrupt proceedings. Singh's counsel, who admitted to receiving the alleged bribe demand by the special judge, told the high court that he delayed reporting it to avoid conflict with a judicial officer. However, the high court found this explanation implausible and inconsistent with conduct expected from a legal professional. What drew even sharper judicial rebuke were Singh's allegations against a sitting high court judge. The transfer application claimed that Justice Rajesh Singh Chauhan had deliberately refused to pass an interim order in a Section 482 CrPC plea, even though the petition had merit. Justice Vidyarthi termed these claims 'scandalous and contemptuous," reiterating the Supreme Court's precedent that statements recorded in judicial orders cannot be questioned by extraneous evidence. 'I find myself in complete agreement with the view taken by the learned sessions judge," the bench held, adding that Singh's writ petition lacked merit and deserved outright dismissal.
