Columbia suspends, expels 80 students for participating in Gaza protests, university says ‘such violations will…'
According to the student group Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD), around 80 students have now been punished. Some were expelled, and others were suspended for as long as three years. CUAD has been calling on Columbia to cut all financial ties with Israel, according to Al Jazeera report.
Also Read: Israeli forces open fire on hundreds of starving Palestinians waiting for aid in Gaza, hospitals say; 25 dead
Punished for protests at Butler Library
In a statement on Tuesday, Columbia said the latest punishments are related to protests at Butler Library in May 2025 and an encampment during Alumni Weekend in spring 2024.
The university said, 'Disruptions to academic activities are in violation of University policies and rules, and such violations will necessarily generate consequences.'
CUAD said Columbia's actions go far beyond what's been done in past campus protests.
The group said, 'We will not be deterred. We are committed to the struggle for Palestinian liberation.'
Student encampments at Columbia in 2024 drew national and global attention. The protests were eventually shut down after the university let hundreds of NYPD officers onto campus, leading to many arrests.
Despite that, student protesters took over Butler Library again during final exams in May. They called for the university to stop investing in companies tied to the Israeli military and showed support for Palestinians in Gaza. Columbia's Judicial Board said expulsions, suspensions, and revoked degrees were handed out for disrupting the campus during that time. The university didn't say how many were expelled but said this was 'the final set of findings from that period.'
Columbia is also trying to get back $400 million in federal funding. The Trump administration cut the funds, saying the university didn't do enough to protect Jewish students from harassment.
Claire Shipman, Columbia's acting president and a former trustee, was booed by students during the May graduation ceremony because of her role in punishing the pro-Palestinian protests.
Also Read: History sheeter charged with arson for setting NYC police vehicles on fire at Pro-Palestinian protests
Harvard University also faced threats of funding cuts
Meanwhile, Harvard University, which also faced threats of funding cuts, has taken the Trump administration to court over it.
The disciplinary actions at Columbia came the same day reports from Gaza said at least 15 people, including a six-week-old baby, died from hunger and malnutrition in a single day, according to local health officials.
Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia protest leader who was detained by immigration officials, met with lawmakers in Washington, DC, on Tuesday. He had recently been released from a Louisiana detention center. The Trump administration has said it plans to deport pro-Palestinian activists.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Textile industry seeks short term cash flow support to ease US tariff pain
The labour intensive-textile industry has asked the government for immediate cash support and moratorium on repayment of loans to endure the shock of steep 50 per cent US tariffs that could lead to job losses in industry. The industry during a key meeting at the Ministry of Textiles on Tuesday also sought a fast-tracking of free trade agreement (FTA) negotiations with the EU that could act as a cushion for losses in the US market. 'The industry is seeking support from the government to at least absorb 20-25 per cent tariffs hit from the US so that they can retain the market share as US buyers have stopped placing fresh orders and are asking the Indian exporters to absorb the tariffs,' a source told The Indian Express The apparel manufacturers have asked for faster implementation of the UK deal and fast tracking of EU trade deal that could ease the pain of US tariffs in the medium term, the source said. 'The manufacturers have pitched for re-introduction of Interest Equalization scheme and a focused textile market scheme,' the person quoted above said. The meeting, chaired by Union Textiles Minister Giriraj Singh, was called to discuss the challenges being faced by exporters in their order flows, especially amid the widening tariff differentials with other competing Asian countries after the recent imposition of secondary tariffs by the US on India. The Ministry of Textiles said in a statement that it has announced the constitution of four committees, comprising industry representatives, to submit time-bound recommendations on fiscal and ease-of-doing-business measures, structural reforms in the textile value chain, enhancing cost competitiveness and innovation, and achieving a target of $100 billion in exports by 2030. With the US being India's largest export market for the labour-intensive textile and apparel industry, textile exporters are under stress after the hike in import tariff to 25 per cent from August 7 by the Trump administration, which is set to rise further to 50 per cent on August 27. Textile and apparel exporters have been asking for support from the government as their orders have been hit with buyers either asking them to share the tariff hike burden or pausing the orders till further clarity emerges about the trade deal negotiations between India and the US. One of the major concerns raised by textile and apparel exporters in their representations to the government has been about a disruption in their cash flow with a reduction in orders by buyers from the US, officials said. 'Exporters are asking for sops. They are asking for soft loans or interest subvention schemes or focused market schemes. Their concern is that they should get cash in hand,' an official told The Indian Express. Exporters are hoping that the tariff hike is temporary and they are able to retain the orders as buyers are already shifting to other countries with lower tariffs such as Vietnam and Bangladesh, with India's 25 per cent reciprocal tariff exceeding those applicable to other competing Asian countries, except China. If the higher levies continue, there's also a worry in policy circles that the distress in the textiles and apparels sector could result in job losses. The government is engaging continuously with exporters to understand the evolving situation. 'Exporters have been communicating their issues. The government is taking their feedback and will provide the necessary support to them,' another official said. The Ministry of Finance has estimated that more than half of the country's merchandise exports to the US will be subject to the higher reciprocal tariff. The US is a key market for Indian Ready-Made Garments (RMG) exports; its share in India's total garment exports in 2024 stood at 33 per cent, as per the Apparel Export Promotion Council (AEPC). Home textiles and carpets are also significant export-oriented sectors, with exports accounting for 70-75 per cent and 65-70 per cent of total sales, respectively, for these sectors. Of this, the US accounts for 60 per cent of exports for home textiles and 50 per cent of exports for carpets. US President Donald Trump had announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods in a post on social media platform Truth Social on July 30, with an additional but unspecified 'penalty' for importing energy and defence items from Russia. On August 6, the penalty was clarified to be an additional 25 per cent tariff that will be effective from August 27.
NDTV
26 minutes ago
- NDTV
They Lack 'Expertise' In Handling India: Expert On US' Op Sindoor Response
The way the US treated India at the end of Operation Sindoor shows a lack of expertise on their part in terms of understanding how to act towards India, Max Abrahms, an international security professor and author on terrorist dynamics said. In an interview with ANI, Abrahms said that India does not feel respected by the US in its treatment, "Pakistan became very vocally supportive of the US role and recommended a Nobel Prize for Trump, whereas India really chipped at the level of US involvement and especially Trump claiming so much credit for the course of the short war." He explained how even though India is the largest democracy in the world, with the largest population and will soon be the third largest economy, the Trump administration does not regard India as a "fully independent country on the world stage". He also said that because of how the US is treating India, it seems like it does not fully appreciate its contributions. "I cannot really say with any level of confidence exactly what the Trump administration's role was", Abrahms said regarding Trump's claim of being involved in stopping the conflict between the two South-Asian nations. He stated that India-US relations are dependent on the US-Russia meeting, as Russian oil is the major bone of contention between US and India, adding, "We need to be a little bit patient in terms of the meetings between Trump and Putin". Highlighting how important it is for the US to mend its relations in the Indo-Pacific in order to control China, he said, "But you know the China threat isn't going away and the United States, especially under this administration, sees China as a threat that needs to be contained. And that is going to require the US to mend relations with allies in the Indo-Pacific region", adding that this aspect makes him "optimistic" about moving forward. He pointed out that the US cannot become isolated or have asymmetrical trade relations with other countries as we live in a globalised world. He said, "If something's bad for the Indian economy, it's also not good for the US economy" and noted that it is in the US interest for the Indian economy to grow. Warning about how "dangerous" Trump's 'America First' policy is, he said, "That's a dangerous path to go down. It can have not just a negative effect on the financial system, but also in terms of military ties."
NDTV
26 minutes ago
- NDTV
White House Reviews Smithsonian Museums for 'Divisive Narratives'
The Smithsonian Institution said Wednesday that it was reviewing a White House letter announcing a probe of content at several museums for "divisive or partisan narratives." The review is the latest pressure campaign by President Donald Trump's administration as part of his war on "woke" racial and gender viewpoints, and follows similar moves to assert unprecedented control over American cultural institutions since his second term began in January. An independent organisation which receives public funding, the Smithsonian is one of America's most hallowed institutions, with its vast network of museums boasting tens of millions of artefacts for public display. A letter to the institution's secretary, Lonnie Bunch, published on the White House website on Tuesday, said the administration would carry out a "comprehensive internal review of selected Smithsonian museums and exhibitions." "This initiative aims to ensure alignment with the President's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions," said the letter, signed by three senior White House officials. It will target eight major museums, including the National Museum of American History, the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the National Museum of the American Indian, the letter said. The review follows an executive order from Trump in March on "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History," and aims to assess "tone, historical framing, and alignment with American ideals" across museum content ahead of the 250th anniversary of the nation's founding next year. Last month, the removal by the American History Museum of a sign referring to Trump's two impeachments sparked controversy and worries over White House intervention, before an exhibit update restored mention of the proceedings. The Smithsonian denied any involvement of the Trump administration in the exhibit changes. In its letter, the White House officials thanked Smithsonian chief Bunch for a recent "brief tour" of several museums. The Smithsonian's independent status means the Trump administration does not directly oversee its functions, though the White House could seek to pressure the organisation through threats to its funding. The White House letter "requests" that the museums submit extensive documentation -- including exhibition plans, wall text, educational materials, grant information and internal guidelines -- within 30 days. According to the White House's timeline, within 120 days, the museums "should begin implementing content corrections where necessary, replacing divisive or ideologically driven language with unifying, historically accurate, and constructive descriptions." The Smithsonian said in a statement to AFP on Wednesday that its "work is grounded in a deep commitment to scholarly excellence, rigorous research and the accurate, factual presentation of history." "We are reviewing the letter with this commitment in mind... and will continue to collaborate constructively with the White House, Congress and our governing Board of Regents," it said.
