Air India 171 crash report: Fuel switch-off blamed in probe as pilots heard saying 'I didn't do it' moments before June 12 disaster
Black boxes recovered and decoded in India
Two enhanced airborne flight recorders (EAFRs), commonly known as black boxes, were recovered from the crash site. One was found on June 13 with significant heat and impact damage; the second was retrieved three days later. Both were sent to AAIB's Delhi lab on June 24. Using a 'Golden Chassis' and cables sourced from the US National Transportation Safety Board, investigators successfully extracted 49 hours of flight data and two hours of cockpit audio.
The data helped reconstruct the final six flights of the Boeing 787, including the one that crashed. This marks the first time the entire black box decoding process was completed within India.
Cockpit audio reveals critical moment
According to the AAIB's report, the aircraft reached a speed of 180 knots before both fuel cutoff switches transitioned from 'RUN' to 'CUTOFF' within one second of each other. This led to an immediate drop in both engines' power levels.
The cockpit voice recorder captured one pilot asking the other why the fuel had been cut. The response was, "I didn't do it." This moment is being closely examined to understand whether the switches were toggled accidentally or due to a technical fault. The agency has not yet made any conclusive statements, and Civil Aviation Minister Naidu stressed that it is too early to determine the exact cause.
Official response and safety checks underway
Naidu praised the AAIB for handling what he described as a "challenging task" and maintaining transparency. He confirmed that the black boxes were not sent abroad for analysis, as initially speculated. Minister of State for Civil Aviation Murlidhar Mohol had earlier stated that the entire investigation would be conducted domestically.
The AAIB also reported that fuel samples taken from the refueling infrastructure were tested and found to be satisfactory. This rules out poor fuel quality as a contributing factor.
🚨🇮🇳#BREAKING | NEWS ⚠️ apparently the fuel cut off switches were flipped 'from run to cutoff 'just after takeoff starving the engines of fuel causing the Air India plane to crash 1 pilot can be heard asking the other' why he shut off the fuel' WSJ report pic.twitter.com/XZp5DHzRnb
The aircraft, en route from Ahmedabad to London, crashed into the residential quarters of BJ Medical College shortly after takeoff, killing 241 people, including nine students and their family members on the ground. Only one person on board survived.
The final AAIB report is awaited, and authorities stress that no conclusions should be drawn until all technical and procedural assessments are complete.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
7 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Air India crash: DGCA audit flags 51 safety lapses, training, and crew gaps
India's aviation regulator, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), has identified 51 safety-related issues during its July audit of Air India. These include insufficient pilot training, the use of simulators not approved by authorities, and a faulty rostering system, according to an official government report seen by Reuters. Although the audit is unrelated to the recent Boeing 787 crash in Ahmedabad that killed 260 people, it comes at a time of increased scrutiny for the airline. Significant violations, compliance deadlines The 11-page confidential DGCA report flagged seven serious 'Level I' safety breaches that must be addressed by July 30. It also listed 44 other compliance issues that need to be resolved by August 23. The report revealed 'recurrent training gaps' among some Boeing 787 and 777 pilots. These pilots reportedly failed to complete mandatory observation duties—where they monitor cockpit instruments—before their periodic evaluations. Air India operates 34 Boeing 787s and 23 Boeing 777s, as per data from Flightradar24. Training at challenging airports falls short The DGCA criticised Air India's approach to training for Category C airports—airfields that are known to have difficult layouts or surrounding terrain. According to the report, the airline used simulators that did not meet required standards for this training. 'This may account to non-consideration of safety risks during approaches to challenging airports,' the report stated. Air India's response In a statement to Reuters, Air India said it had been 'fully transparent' during the audit and would 'submit our response to the regulator within the stipulated time frame, along with the details of the corrective actions.' A preliminary report into the June crash suggested confusion in the cockpit, with one pilot asking the other why he had turned off the fuel switches. The other pilot reportedly replied that he had not. Fatigue & flight-time limits breached The DGCA audit also highlighted ongoing issues with crew fatigue management. In one instance, a Milan-to-Delhi flight operated by Air India last month exceeded the legal flight-duty time limit by 2 hours and 18 minutes, which was classified as a 'Level I' violation. The audit team, which included 10 inspectors and four additional auditors, criticised the airline's rostering software for not issuing strong alerts when crew numbers fell short of required minimums. The report cited at least four international flights that departed with too few cabin crew on board. Operational oversight, passenger complaints Since Tata Group acquired Air India in 2022, the airline has expanded its global reach but continues to face complaints about service quality, including broken armrests, dirty cabins, and malfunctioning entertainment systems. Reuters recently reported that senior Air India officials, including the directors of flight operations and training, were issued notices on July 23 pointing to 29 'systemic' lapses and ignoring 'repeated' warnings. Air India has said it plans to respond. Gaps in supervision & documentation The DGCA report further noted discrepancies in 'door checks and equipment checks' and pointed out missing or incomplete training records. It also highlighted that no chief pilots had been appointed for the Airbus A320 and A350 fleets. 'This results in a lack of accountability, and effective monitoring of flight operations for these aircraft types,' the report said. Last year, aviation authorities penalised airlines 23 times for safety breaches -- 11 of which involved the Air India Group. The most severe penalty was a $127,000 fine for not maintaining adequate oxygen supply on certain international flights.
Hindustan Times
10 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Action taken as AI emergency slide inspection overdue: MoS
The country's civil aviation regulator, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), initiated disciplinary action against Air India after it was found that the airline's aircraft emergency slide inspections were overdue, minister of state for civil aviation Murlidhar Mohol informed Parliament in a written reply on Monday. Action taken as AI emergency slide inspection overdue: MoS Mohol said the issue came to light in an audit conducted by DGCA. Replying to DMK MP Tiruchi Siva on a question if the government was aware of the airline's aircraft being allowed to fly with overdue emergency slide inspections, weeks before the Air India 171 crash, Mohol stated, 'During the audit of M/s Air India, Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has found that inspection of emergency slide was overdue. DGCA immediately grounded the aircraft till the required rectification was carried out. DGCA has initiated enforcement action against Air India and the responsible personnel as per Enforcement Policy and Procedure Manual of DGCA.' He, however, did not give details of the audit. The AI 171 flight that was to operate from Ahmedabad to Gatwick, London crashed moments after take-off on June 12, after which the aviation regulator asked the airline to conduct a series of checks not only on the B787s, the make of the aircraft involved in the crash, but also on its other widebody aircraft. Mohol said DGCA ensures compliance by airlines with all safety and maintenance standards through the mechanism of conducting spot checks and night surveillance of airlines and their personnel. 'In case of a violation, DGCA takes enforcement action in accordance with procedures prescribed in Enforcement Policy and Procedure Manual. The enforcement action consists of warning, suspension, cancellation, including imposition of financial penalty to the airlines/ personnel. DGCA officials are well trained to perform the oversight and enforcement function,' his reply read.
The Hindu
17 hours ago
- The Hindu
31 operational aircraft inspected after Air India crash: Minister of State for Civil Aviation
Following the crash of Air India flight AI-171 at Ahmedabad, 31 operational aircraft of the airline were inspected and there were minor findings observed in eight aircraft, Minister of State for Civil Aviation Murlidhar Mohol said. 'Out of total 33 aircraft, 31 operational aircraft have been inspected wherein minor findings were observed in 8 aircraft. These aircraft have been released for operation post rectification. The remaining 2 aircraft are under scheduled maintenance,' he said. Responding to a question raised by DMK MP Kanimozhi NVN Somu in the Rajya Sabha, Mr Mohol said, the eight aircraft were pressed into operations after rectification. Mr Mohol said, Director General, Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) ordered an investigation after the air crash. Also, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) ordered Air India to do additional checks on all 33 Boeing 787-8/9, he added. He noted that DGCA has a systematic safety oversight mechanism to check the compliance of Rules and Civil Aviation Requirements for all the aircraft and the airport operators. 'The safety oversight process includes regular and periodic audits, spot checks, night surveillance and ramp inspections across all operators, including continuous oversight of maintenance practices,' he said.
