Dame Joanna Lumley: I ‘wouldn't mind' assisted dying
The 79-year-old actress says she supports the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill approved in the House of Commons last month, which would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales with fewer than six months to live to apply for an assisted death.
Asked about the Bill in an interview with Saga magazine, Dame Joanna said: 'People are terribly anxious about it and think one may be coerced (into voluntary euthanasia).
'But I'm saying this now when nobody's coercing me, don't let me turn into somebody who doesn't recognise the people I love most, where I'm having a miserable time.
'When I get to the stage where I can't speak and have to be fed, that won't be me any more and that's when I wouldn't mind saying farewell.'
Under the Terminally Ill Adults Bill, which was backed by 314 votes to 291 in the Commons, those wishing to go through assisted dying would require approval by two doctors and a panel including a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist.
It will next come before the House of Lords for further debate and votes at a date to be confirmed.
Dame Esther Rantzen, who is terminally ill with cancer and has been one of the biggest proponents of the bill, has urged the House of Lords to pass the legislation.
The TV presenter and campaigner, who has stopped responding to her lung cancer treatment, said: 'Their job is to scrutinise, to ask questions, but not to oppose.
'Law is actually created by the elected chamber, which is the House of Commons, who have voted this through.'
Lord Shinkwin, a disabled Conservative peer, has been critical of the bill, having been in intensive care earlier this year.
He said if a doctor had asked him at the time about assisted dying – which they would be able to under the provisions of the bill – he 'would have felt under real pressure to do that'.
The proposal was first put forward by Labour MP Kim Leadbeater in October last year and passed through the House of Commons on June 20.
Sir Keir Starmer, Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, and Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, were among the 224 Labour MPs who voted in favour of the bill, with 160 against.
Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Opposition, was one of the 20 Conservative MPs out of 121 who voted against the bill.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
a minute ago
- Metro
Starmer should give Trump a warm welcome - then a £14m bill
Donald Trump jets into Scotland today on a visit which is 'private', according to White House officials. Yet despite that label, he nonetheless intends to make you – the British taxpayer – foot an expected £14million bill. So here's my suggestion: Starmer should shake the man's hand and then pass on the invoice. It's simple. If the President of the United States wants to make a personal pilgrimage to his luxury golf resorts in Scotland, he's free to do so. But if he wishes to take advantage of our stretched to the limit public services so he can fund his circus during an onslaught of budget cuts, crumbling infrastructure, and exhausted police officers, then he can forget it. The bloke's a billionaire! He can afford it. He should pay his way just like any other showman on a world tour. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. Trump's relationship with Scotland has always been strained, at best. Long before he was President, long before the MAGA hats, indictments, and the endless motorcades, he was already deeply unpopular here. His expansion of Menie Golf Course was met with fervent opposition from residents. Local farmers were threatened with forced purchase orders. And there's that glorious moment comedian Janey Godley welcomed then-candidate Trump to Scotland in 2016 by holding up a banner that read: 'Trump is a c**t'? This time around, we're being told his visit is unofficial, yet our leaders are queuing up to meet him. Starmer is to be flown up to Aberdeen to reportedly 'refine' a recent US-UK trade deal. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video First Minister John Swinney says he is meeting the President to 'protect and promote the interests of Scotland'. I think the interests of Scotland are protected by billing Trump for police overtime, airspace shut downs, motorway closures, and operational disruption the visit will entail. After all, we're continually being reminded there is 'no magic money tree'. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is already warning she will have to make tough decisions (aka tax rises) in the next Budget again. And yet there's nothing tough about the decision of politicians to block their diaries and drain the public purse to accommodate a man who is extravagantly wealthy and extravagantly divisive. Trump does not need to be welcomed with sycophantic deference. Trump needs to be welcomed with boundaries. Because the minute you give him an inch, he'll take the whole fairway. Just ask Cole Palmer, after he intruded on Chelsea's Club World Cup trophy lift by seemingly refusing to move away from the spotlight. This OAP day out is a horrific incentive for a man whose name is much on everybody's lips when it comes to mayhem, corruption, and conspiracy. Epstein anybody? For a man under investigation for mishandling confidential documents and whose election has been based on authoritarian campaign rhetoric. When you think about it, Trump will probably respect being charged. He's in the WWE Hall of Fame for a reason – he loves conflict. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video So what better way to earn his grudging admiration than to stand up for ourselves, rather than grovelling? Our squeamish politicians need to stop bootlicking. Presidential away days never come without that hefty price tag, even when it's not a proper state visit like this one. Trump's last trip to the UK in 2018 cost the taxpayer £14.8 million, which was partly used for his jaunt around Turnberry. His four day visit saw thousands of police deployed, mass protests in Glasgow and Edinburgh, and a security operation of such size as to be comparable with that of a conventional state visit. This time also shall not be any different – perhaps worse, considering he has become even less stable. Scotland Police has already confirmed that this is a 'complex' operation, with extra resources being pulled from across the UK. That, alone, is dozens of precious hours our brilliant officers can't spend solving real crimes. A place where his name is emblazoned in gold letters on our landscape, despite sensational disapproval and ongoing concerns about how much these properties are contributing to the economy. We shouldn't dismiss the views of you and me, too. Everybody gets what he represents: division, authoritarianism, and a transactional politics in which loyalty is bought through economic self harm and truth can be junked. So why are we, as a country, so keen to appease him? We can respect his office, without the costly symbolism. More Trending If the PM wants to demonstrate strength on the world stage, it will not be from photoshoots alongside Trump on an exclusive golf course. It will be from treating him as what he is – an elderly grandpa on a private getaway. We need to be serious about financial prudence, we need to be serious about valuing our public services, and then we start by asking the most glaring question of all: why on earth are we spending millions to go and fetch the world's most powerful tourist? So go ahead and shake the man's hand if you must, Prime Minister. But then, after he hops back onto Air Force One, send over the invoice. Make it clear: the UK won't pick up the bill for foreign billionaires. Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: My lover praised my oral skills – but I wasn't happy MORE: Trump 'called Epstein 'the greatest' in note inside book he gave to him' MORE: Search for 'migrant hotels near me' has rocketed – it's chilling
The Independent
a minute ago
- The Independent
Trump's visit to Scotland is in ‘public interest', says Chancellor
The visit of US President Donald Trump to Scotland is in the 'public interest', Chancellor Rachel Reeves has said. Mr Trump is due to touch down in Scotland on Friday evening ahead of a four-day visit, during which he will meet Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and First Minister John Swinney. His meeting with Sir Keir is seen as a chance to refine the UK-US trade deal which came into force last month. Speaking to journalists during a visit to the Rolls-Royce factory near Glasgow Airport on Friday morning, the Chancellor talked up the importance of the visit. 'It's in Britain's national interest to have strong relations with the US administration and as a result of both that long-term special relationship, but actually more importantly, the work that our Prime Minister Keir Starmer has done in building that relationship with President Trump has meant that we were the first country in the world to secure a trade deal,' she said. 'That has a tangible benefit for people here in Scotland, whether it is people working in the Scotch whisky industry or people working in the defence sector like here at Rolls-Royce, that trade deal means lower tariffs than any country in the world on things that we send to the US.' Ms Reeves dodged a question relating to senior ministers – including Health Secretary Wes Streeting, Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Scottish Secretary Ian Murray – supporting a motion when in opposition in 2019 calling for the president's first state visit to be cancelled and accusing him of 'misogyny, racism and xenophobia'. Mr Trump is expected to visit both of his golf clubs in Scotland – in South Ayrshire and Aberdeenshire – during the visit, which has been described as 'private' by the White House, before leaving on Tuesday. His presence is likely to spark protests across the country, with Police Scotland being forced to request aid from other forces to help increase manpower for the trip. In a carefully worded statement ahead of the visit, Mr Swinney said the focus it will bring to Scotland will allow people to have their voice heard on issues including 'war and peace, justice and democracy'. Speaking to the PA news agency on Friday, the First Minister said his meeting with Mr Trump would present an opportunity to 'essentially speak out for Scotland' on issues like trade and the increase of business from the United States in Scotland. 'But there are clearly also significant international issues upon which the people of Scotland have a view and want to have that view expressed by their First Minister,' he said. 'That relates to the awfulness of the situation in Gaza and the unbearable human suffering that is going on in Gaza. 'I want to make sure that those concerns and those views are expressed to the President of the United States. 'We have that opportunity, and I intend to take that opportunity to make sure that Scotland's voice is heard.' Mr Swinney also urged all of those set to protest against the President's visit to do so 'peacefully and to do so within the law'.
The Guardian
2 minutes ago
- The Guardian
UK ban on Palestine Action at odds with international law, says UN rights chief
The UK government's ban on Palestine Action limits the rights and freedoms of people in the UK and is at odds with international law, the UN human rights chief has said. Volker Türk, the UN human rights commissioner, said ministers' decision to designate the group a terrorist organisation was 'disproportionate and unnecessary' and called on them to rescind it. In a statement on Friday, he said the move amounted to an 'impermissible restriction' of people's rights to freedom of expression and assembly that was 'at odds with the UK's obligations under international human rights law'. He added that the decision restricted the rights of people involved with Palestine Action 'who have not themselves engaged in any underlying criminal activity but rather exercised their rights to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association'. Türk said that it could 'lead to further chilling effect on the lawful exercise of these rights by many people' and that the UK government should halt any police and legal proceedings against protesters who have been arrested on the basis of the proscription. The Guardian has contacted the Home Office for comment. Dozens of people have been arrested for holding placards in support of Palestine Action since the group was proscribed on 5 July. In a case reported by the Guardian on Thursday, a 80-year-old woman from Somerset was arrested for holding a placard at a pro-Palestine rally and was held by police for almost 27 hours, with officers forcing their way into her house and searching it. Marianne Sorrell said she felt 'very traumatised' after officers removed 19 items from her house, including iPads, a Palestine flag, books on Palestine, material related to Extinction Rebellion and the climate crisis, as well as drumsticks for – and a belt that holds – her samba drum. In another case, armed police threatened to arrest a 42-year-old women in Kent, Laura Murton, for supporting a proscribed organisation because she was holding a Palestinian flag and had signs saying 'Free Gaza' and 'Israel is committing genocide'. Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion Several UN experts, civil liberties groups, cultural figures and hundreds of lawyers have condemned the ban as draconian and said it sets a dangerous precedent by conflating protest with terrorism. Concern has also been expressed by some Home Office staff. Ministers proscribed the group under the Terrorism Act 2000 after some of its members broke into a military airfield in June and spray-painted two RAF aircraft. The ban means that being a member of Palestine Action or inviting support for it carries a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. Palestine Action is the first direct action protest group to be banned under the Terrorism Act, placing it in the same category as Islamic State, al-Qaida and the far-right group National Action.
