
Inside the race to succeed Sadiq Khan
Photo byfor SXSW London.
Only a year has passed since Sadiq Khan won a record third term as Mayor of London. That victory – which plenty doubted – is one he can still relish ('it's looking good for Susan Hall' has become a familiar election meme). This week has seen Khan confirm plans to pedestrianise Oxford Street after a public consultation found what he called 'North Korean' levels of support. But what of his future?
When I last interviewed the mayor I was struck by his caution on the question of standing for a fourth term. 'Let's wait and see,' he said, abandoning any hint of braggadocio (Khan has often quipped that he intends to serve six terms). This remains City Hall's official line. 'Sadiq hasn't decided yet if he's standing again at the next mayoral election,' a spokesman told me. 'This is the same as the last election cycle when he didn't announce his decision until much later in the mayoral term.'
But friends of Khan tell me that he has privately indicated that he does not expect to stand for a fourth term. Some attribute this to the strain of being the most heavily guarded person in the country after the King and the Prime Minister. 'Hand on heart, had I known when I first began this journey what it involved for my family, I can't unequivocally say I would have done this,' Khan reflected last year.
And while there might not be a vacancy there is always a contest. Dawn Butler, a close friend of Khan's (the pair bonded as new MPs in 2005), has already announced her intention to stand when the mayor steps down. In Labour circles the other candidates typically discussed include Rosena Allin-Khan (who represents Khan's former seat of Tooting), Walthamstow MP Stella Creasy and Vauxhall and Camberwell MP Florence Eshalomi.
For the first time, this unspoken contest has now been polled. A survey by Survation for LabourList gave Allin-Khan a net favourability rating of +18 among London party members, with Cabinet Office minister Georgia Gould in second on +14 and Eshalomi in third on +13.
The poll, a former City Hall strategist suggests, proves that 'there's no appetite in London for some kind of celebrity candidacy' and that 'attempts to try to make that happen will fail'. James Corden, who has expressed interest in the mayoralty, languishes on -62 (Idris Elba, who joined Keir Starmer at a knife crime summit last year, is on a more credible +6).
Perhaps the clearest trend is a preference for relative newcomers. Creasy, who entered parliament in 2010 and stood for the deputy leadership in 2015, is on -7 and Butler is on -3.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
Allin-Khan's status reflects an enduring base in the party (she finished second to Angela Rayner in the last deputy leadership contest). Though not from Labour's left, as some have suggested, she has nurtured a reputation for independent-mindedness – typically a premium in London contests.
'Having a candidate that can credibly distance themselves from the government when necessary is absolutely critical,' a former Khan aide told me. 'That's how Boris [Johnson] survived in 2012 and Ken [Livingstone] won in 2004.' After a sometimes fraught relationship with Starmer's office, Allin-Khan resigned as shadow mental health minister in 2023, stating that the leader did 'not see a space for a mental health portfolio in a Labour cabinet'.
'Rosena is focused on delivering for the residents of Tooting as well as continuing to work shifts as an A&E doctor,' a spokesperson told me when I asked about Allin-Khan's intentions. 'We have a fantastic Labour Mayor of London in Sadiq who is delivering for London. Rosena is 100 per cent behind Sadiq in his role and the work he's doing including tackling violent crime, building affordable homes and free school meals.' (A loyal response that rules nothing out.)
A potential candidate who many in Labour believe would be more amenable to No 10 is Eshalomi. The former London Assembly member was previously a councillor in Lambeth, crossing over with Morgan McSweeney who served as chief of staff to borough leader Steve Reed (now Environment Secretary), and endorsed Liz Kendall in the 2015 Labour leadership election. As chair of the Housing, Communities and Local Government committee, Eshalomi is free to speak out on a defining London brief.
Gould, the MP for Queen's Park and Maida Vale, has similarly deep roots in the capital: she served as leader of Camden council from 2017-24, where she pioneered 'mission-led government', and chaired the London Councils association. That both her and Eshalomi enjoy organic support – neither has publicly expressed interest in the mayoralty – shows their potential.
Should Khan stand down as anticipated, Labour's next candidate will face a new challenge: incumbency. The party's support in London has fallen by 13 points since the last election (to 30 per cent) and Khan, a long-standing Starmer ally, offered unusually blunt criticism of the government after the Spending Review accepted none of his major transport demands (such as Docklands Light Railway and Bakerloo line extensions). 'I think she has made a colossal mistake in pitting London against the rest of the country,' Khan declared of Rachel Reeves.
The mayor has privately warned that Labour could one day lose London just as it lost the 'Red Wall' and Scotland – former fiefdoms where voters came to feel taken for granted. Recalling how the Liberal Democrats made gains against New Labour in urban centres in 2005, some fear the potential of an 'eco-populist' Green Party. Should Khan depart undefeated in 2028, his task in the years ahead will be to provide his successor with a legacy they can champion.
[See also: Labour is heading for war over welfare cuts]
Related

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
Government urged to do more to show it values public services
A senior union leader has urged the Government to do more to show it values public services and the workers who deliver them. Christina McAnea, general secretary of Unison, told her union's annual conference in Liverpool that if the Government could change its mind on so many issues, it could change it on taxation. 'Tax wealth and profits, and raise the money needed to fix our country. That's the message I'll continue to take to Government,' she told delegates. 'I want Labour to do more to show it values our public services, and the people – our members – who deliver them. 'How do I think they should pay for this? 'Not by taking money away from those least able to afford it, but by taking it from those with the deepest pockets.' Ms McAnea said Unison's job was to hold Labour to account, to tell the party to do its job better. She added: 'Just as we did when they attacked benefits – we were one of the first unions to come out against the cut to the winter fuel allowance. 'They've changed their stance, we've not. 'Some commentators say Labour changing their policies is a sign of weakness. 'I disagree – I think it's a sign of maturity, and of growing into the role of Government after 14 years out in the cold – and it's a sign they're listening to us.'


North Wales Live
an hour ago
- North Wales Live
North Wales council praised for 'getting it right' on 20mph limits
North Wales Live readers have been engaging in heated discussions about the contentious reduction of speed limits from 30mph to 20mph on Welsh roads and the impending reversal on some roads. This follows announcements from two Welsh councils that no alterations will be made on their 20mph roads. Councils across Wales are currently assessing which 20mph roads could potentially return to a 30mph limit. In a divisive move back in September 2023, the Welsh Government lowered the default speed limit on restricted roads in Wales from 30mph to 20mph. This decision sparked widespread public outrage, leading to a petition signed by hundreds of thousands of individuals. Despite early indications of a decrease in accidents and fatalities on our roads, there remains a strong demand for changes to be implemented. Councils have always retained the authority to maintain some roads at 30mph - with some, such as Cyngor Gwynedd, fully utilising this prior to the 2023 change. However, under Transport Minister Ken Skates, the Welsh Government revised the guidance last year, anticipating that this would result in more roads reverting to 30mph. This has indeed been the case in certain areas, with Wrexham, Flintshire and Anglesey well into the process of implementing changes. However, just last week, Denbighshire and Ceredigion both announced they have no plans to make any changes after reviewing their 20mph roads. The full list of roads set to revert back to 30mph can be viewed here. One reader, Kthd, comments: "Denbighshire County Council at its finest yet again." Outofhere says: "Absolutely a joke and a con! Conwy CBC as usual done nothing but make statements!" Yes-cymru questions: "Why did Gwynedd need a public consultation? They received 83 responses from population of over 125,000, waste of money." Damojo asks: "Where was the change of speed limit survey response document displayed. I never saw one." Co Dre comments: "Gwynedd working at a speed of 20 miles per year." While Ofcourseitis suggests: "Just get the people from Gwynedd to visit each council area and sort out which roads should revert, and which ones should stay at 20mph, they are the only ones who have shown that they understand what the new law should look like, all others have failed miserably and have probably lost Labour the next Senned election." Tinnybasher says: "Well at least it clears up and makes things consistent throughout Wales, need to copy and print the list for my dashboard." Tjr42 believes: "What a huge mistake it was. Money down the drain. Those who vote Labour next year need to think again. Shambles." Cymrucyw pleads: "C'mon Conwy, hurry up and revert please." Totemlad1 asks: "How come Denbighshire County Council seems to be anti car when some areas have no alternatives, reverse the 20 limit." Butterfly1722 adds: "It was no surprise that Denbighshire was one of the counties that wouldn't change course, even before reading the article. The reason is clear: they simply lack the funds to do so." Tometoyou replies: "Not a single road reversal from Denbighshire County Council. It's unrealistic to expect the removal of 20 mph limits near estates, schools, and hospitals. I won't be voting for my current councillor again." Forestdragon says: "Recall the initial rollout when 20 mph signs had 30 mph stickers that were ripped off overnight on 17th September 2023? Why not reapply 30 mph stickers as a temporary fix until permanent signs are installed? On a separate note, kudos to Gwynedd for getting it right from the start and saving taxpayers' money by correctly interpreting the guidelines." Toxteth O'Grady answers: "The real motive is to continue generating revenue by catching drivers struggling to adhere to the speed limit."

The National
an hour ago
- The National
Stephen Flynn clashes with Labour MP over PIP cuts on Politics Live
On Wednesday's BBC Politics Live, Labour MP Helena Dollimore attempted to defend her party's plans to change the eligibility criteria for Personal Independence Payments (PIP), which the UK Government's own analysis has said will push 250,000 people into poverty, including 50,000 children. SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn made sure these statistics were laid out as as Dollimore tried to argue Labour were helping to pull people out of poverty. Dollimore started by saying: "The clue is in the name. We are the Labour Party, we are the party of work, we believe in the benefits of people going to work when they can, but protecting those who can't work…" READ MORE: Scotland can 'go beyond mitigating Westminster' with minimum income guarantee Referencing his own experience in claiming disability benefits, Flynn then intercepted to say: "This isn't about people who can't work this is about disabled people, some of whom are already in work. "I claimed disability benefits, I was disabled for 18 years until I got a hip replacement a couple of years ago. I know the benefit of having access to disability living allowance as it was then, or personal independence payment. It can facilitate their ability to get to and from work, or to do the basic things, in some cases like being able to wash themselves. "You are going to put 250,000 people into poverty including 50,000 children. If you want to talk about the name of the Labour party, that is not it." (Image: BBC) The exchange then started to get more heated as the pair began speaking over each other. Dollimore went on: "This is about targeting the support of the welfare state at those who need it the most, those who can never work and giving support to those who want to work." But Flynn interjected to say: "Do you accept that 50,000 children are going to go into poverty as a result of your decision?" Dollimore tried to highlight some issues with the analysis, saying it didn't look at "positive measures we are taking to lift children and people out of poverty". READ MORE: Watch as journalist Peter Oborne calls out BBC double standards over Gaza But Flynn then pointed out how Labour had kept the two-child benefit cap in place, which several charities have said is the biggest driver of child poverty. He said: "Like lifting the two-child benefit cap? By matching the Scottish child payment? Do you believe in the two-child benefit cap? Of course you do. "If you want to talk about the policies and values of the Labour party, you've lost yourselves." Dollimore then exclaimed "don't talk over me, let me speak" to Flynn as the pair continued to argue. "In the budget we gave three million of the lowest paid workers a raise in the national minimum wage, that's worth £1400 a year, that helps lift people out of poverty, it makes work pay better, and that analysis you've talked about doesn't include any of that," she said. Laughing, Flynn replied: "It's your own analysis!" The UK Government's reforms to the welfare system are expected to have their first outing in Parliament on Wednesday. The Welfare Reform Bill will be introduced in the House of Commons, and its text will be published so MPs can begin scrutiny of the proposals. Alongside changing PIP criteria, ministers also want to cut the sickness related element of universal credit (UC), and delay access to it, so only those aged 22 and over can claim it. Ministers are likely to face a Commons stand-off with backbench Labour MPs over their plans, with dozens of them last month saying the proposals were 'impossible to support'.