logo
Stephen Flynn clashes with Labour MP over PIP cuts on Politics Live

Stephen Flynn clashes with Labour MP over PIP cuts on Politics Live

The National18-06-2025
On Wednesday's BBC Politics Live, Labour MP Helena Dollimore attempted to defend her party's plans to change the eligibility criteria for Personal Independence Payments (PIP), which the UK Government's own analysis has said will push 250,000 people into poverty, including 50,000 children.
SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn made sure these statistics were laid out as as Dollimore tried to argue Labour were helping to pull people out of poverty.
Dollimore started by saying: "The clue is in the name. We are the Labour Party, we are the party of work, we believe in the benefits of people going to work when they can, but protecting those who can't work…"
READ MORE: Scotland can 'go beyond mitigating Westminster' with minimum income guarantee
Referencing his own experience in claiming disability benefits, Flynn then intercepted to say: "This isn't about people who can't work this is about disabled people, some of whom are already in work.
"I claimed disability benefits, I was disabled for 18 years until I got a hip replacement a couple of years ago. I know the benefit of having access to disability living allowance as it was then, or personal independence payment. It can facilitate their ability to get to and from work, or to do the basic things, in some cases like being able to wash themselves.
"You are going to put 250,000 people into poverty including 50,000 children. If you want to talk about the name of the Labour party, that is not it."
(Image: BBC) The exchange then started to get more heated as the pair began speaking over each other.
Dollimore went on: "This is about targeting the support of the welfare state at those who need it the most, those who can never work and giving support to those who want to work."
But Flynn interjected to say: "Do you accept that 50,000 children are going to go into poverty as a result of your decision?"
Dollimore tried to highlight some issues with the analysis, saying it didn't look at "positive measures we are taking to lift children and people out of poverty".
READ MORE: Watch as journalist Peter Oborne calls out BBC double standards over Gaza
But Flynn then pointed out how Labour had kept the two-child benefit cap in place, which several charities have said is the biggest driver of child poverty.
He said: "Like lifting the two-child benefit cap? By matching the Scottish child payment? Do you believe in the two-child benefit cap? Of course you do.
"If you want to talk about the policies and values of the Labour party, you've lost yourselves."
Dollimore then exclaimed "don't talk over me, let me speak" to Flynn as the pair continued to argue.
"In the budget we gave three million of the lowest paid workers a raise in the national minimum wage, that's worth £1400 a year, that helps lift people out of poverty, it makes work pay better, and that analysis you've talked about doesn't include any of that," she said.
Laughing, Flynn replied: "It's your own analysis!"
The UK Government's reforms to the welfare system are expected to have their first outing in Parliament on Wednesday.
The Welfare Reform Bill will be introduced in the House of Commons, and its text will be published so MPs can begin scrutiny of the proposals.
Alongside changing PIP criteria, ministers also want to cut the sickness related element of universal credit (UC), and delay access to it, so only those aged 22 and over can claim it.
Ministers are likely to face a Commons stand-off with backbench Labour MPs over their plans, with dozens of them last month saying the proposals were 'impossible to support'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Badenoch urges Tory councils to challenge asylum hotels in court
Badenoch urges Tory councils to challenge asylum hotels in court

Glasgow Times

time26 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

Badenoch urges Tory councils to challenge asylum hotels in court

In a letter to Tory councils, Mrs Badenoch said she was 'encouraging' them to 'take the same steps' as Epping Council 'if your legal advice supports it'. Labour dismissed her letter as 'desperate and hypocritical nonsense', but several of its own local authorities have already suggested they too could mount legal action against asylum hotels in their areas. Epping secured a temporary injunction from the High Court on Tuesday, blocking the use of the Essex town's Bell Hotel as accommodation for asylum seekers on planning grounds. The decision has prompted councils controlled by Labour, the Conservatives and Reform UK to investigate whether they could pursue a similar course of action. Kemi Badenoch said she would back Tory councils that wanted to pursue similar action to Epping (Lucy North/PA) These include Labour-run Tamworth and Wirral councils, Tory-run Broxbourne and East Lindsey councils and Reform's Staffordshire and West Northamptonshire councils. But Labour's Newcastle City Council and Brighton and Hove City Council have both ruled out legal action. Tuesday's High Court decision has also caused a potential headache for the Home Office, which has a legal duty to house destitute asylum seekers while their claims are being dealt with. If planning laws prevent the Government from using hotels, ministers will face a scramble to find alternative accommodation, potentially in the private rented sector. In her letter, Mrs Badenoch praised Epping Council's legal challenge and told Tory councils she would 'back you to take similar action to protect your community'. But she added that the situation would 'depend on individual circumstances of the case' and suggested Tory councils could pursue 'other planning enforcement options'. She also accused Labour of 'trying to ram through such asylum hotels without consultation and without proper process', saying the Government had reopened the Bell Hotel as asylum accommodation after the Conservatives had closed it. The hotel had previously been used as asylum accommodation briefly in 2020 and then between 2022 and 2024 under the previous Conservative government. A Labour spokesperson said Mrs Badenoch's letter was a 'pathetic stunt' and 'desperate and hypocritical nonsense from the architects of the broken asylum system', saying there were now '20,000 fewer asylum seekers in hotels than at their peak under the Tories'. The letter comes ahead of the publication on Thursday of figures showing how many asylum seekers were being temporarily housed in hotels at the end of June this year. Home Office figures from the previous quarter show there were 32,345 asylum seekers being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March. This was down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Figures on those staying in hotels date back to December 2022 and showed numbers hit a peak at the end of September 2023, when there were 56,042 asylum seekers in hotels. Data is not released on the number of hotels in use, but it is thought there were more than 400 asylum hotels open in summer 2023. Labour has said this has since been reduced to fewer than 210.

Badenoch urges Tory councils to challenge asylum hotels in court
Badenoch urges Tory councils to challenge asylum hotels in court

Western Telegraph

time28 minutes ago

  • Western Telegraph

Badenoch urges Tory councils to challenge asylum hotels in court

In a letter to Tory councils, Mrs Badenoch said she was 'encouraging' them to 'take the same steps' as Epping Council 'if your legal advice supports it'. Labour dismissed her letter as 'desperate and hypocritical nonsense', but several of its own local authorities have already suggested they too could mount legal action against asylum hotels in their areas. Epping secured a temporary injunction from the High Court on Tuesday, blocking the use of the Essex town's Bell Hotel as accommodation for asylum seekers on planning grounds. The decision has prompted councils controlled by Labour, the Conservatives and Reform UK to investigate whether they could pursue a similar course of action. Kemi Badenoch said she would back Tory councils that wanted to pursue similar action to Epping (Lucy North/PA) These include Labour-run Tamworth and Wirral councils, Tory-run Broxbourne and East Lindsey councils and Reform's Staffordshire and West Northamptonshire councils. But Labour's Newcastle City Council and Brighton and Hove City Council have both ruled out legal action. Tuesday's High Court decision has also caused a potential headache for the Home Office, which has a legal duty to house destitute asylum seekers while their claims are being dealt with. If planning laws prevent the Government from using hotels, ministers will face a scramble to find alternative accommodation, potentially in the private rented sector. In her letter, Mrs Badenoch praised Epping Council's legal challenge and told Tory councils she would 'back you to take similar action to protect your community'. But she added that the situation would 'depend on individual circumstances of the case' and suggested Tory councils could pursue 'other planning enforcement options'. She also accused Labour of 'trying to ram through such asylum hotels without consultation and without proper process', saying the Government had reopened the Bell Hotel as asylum accommodation after the Conservatives had closed it. The hotel had previously been used as asylum accommodation briefly in 2020 and then between 2022 and 2024 under the previous Conservative government. 32,345 Asylum seekers living in hotels at the end of March 2025 A Labour spokesperson said Mrs Badenoch's letter was a 'pathetic stunt' and 'desperate and hypocritical nonsense from the architects of the broken asylum system', saying there were now '20,000 fewer asylum seekers in hotels than at their peak under the Tories'. The letter comes ahead of the publication on Thursday of figures showing how many asylum seekers were being temporarily housed in hotels at the end of June this year. Home Office figures from the previous quarter show there were 32,345 asylum seekers being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March. This was down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Figures on those staying in hotels date back to December 2022 and showed numbers hit a peak at the end of September 2023, when there were 56,042 asylum seekers in hotels. Data is not released on the number of hotels in use, but it is thought there were more than 400 asylum hotels open in summer 2023. Labour has said this has since been reduced to fewer than 210.

MSPs call for oath to King to be scrapped
MSPs call for oath to King to be scrapped

Times

time35 minutes ago

  • Times

MSPs call for oath to King to be scrapped

Holyrood should follow the lead of Grenada by scrapping a requirement for politicians to swear allegiance to the King, more than a dozen MSPs have claimed. A motion put forward by Kevin Stewart, a former SNP minister, heaped praise on the Commonwealth island nation for this month officially abandoning the need for officials to pledge loyalty to the monarch, and instead promise to serve the 'people of Grenada'. The Aberdeen Central MSP said that the Scottish parliament should also have the power to 'have its members pledge allegiance to the people of Scotland and not an unelected monarch'. His call has so far been backed by 14 of his colleagues, with mainly nationalists from the SNP and Greens putting their names to his motion, as well as Mercedes Villalba, the left-wing Labour MSP. On entering parliament, MSPs are required by law to swear to be 'faithful and bear true allegiance' to the British head of state, despite a sizeable number of republicans sitting in Holyrood. Murdo Fraser, the Tory MSP, accused Stewart of launching a 'shameless bid to try and pander to republican voters both inside and outside his party'. While official SNP policy remains to retain the British monarch as head of state should Scotland become independent, the position is widely seen as being designed not to alienate royalist voters. In her memoir, Nicola Sturgeon admitted she was a republican 'at heart and by instinct', a position shared by her successor Humza Yousaf. John Swinney has reiterated that it is the SNP's position that an independent Scotland would keep the King as head of state, but he has not made his personal views on the issue known. 'The reality is that the King and the monarchy remain one of the most loved and respected institutions across Scotland,' Fraser said. 'Most people will wonder why nationalist MSPs are focusing on this constitutional navel-gazing at a time when they should be tackling the real priorities of Scots. 'They want this SNP government to be focused on reducing NHS waiting times, growing the economy and restoring standards in our schools, rather than engaging in the worst sort of petty student politics.' Under the Scotland Act, which created the devolved parliament, MSPs must take the 'oath of allegiance' and are not allowed to take part in proceedings until they have done so. Those who do not do so within two months of being elected cease to be MSPs. Holyrood does not have the power to change the requirement, meaning the law would have to be altered at Westminster for the rule to be abolished or changed. Republican MSPs who feel strongly opposed to swearing allegiance to the monarch have typically undertaken acts of protest before doing so, for example by stating that their real allegiance is to the Scottish people. Dickon Mitchell, Grenada's prime minister, wants the nation to become a republic and remove Britain's monarch as its head of state. The legal changes to oath requirements on the island took effect earlier this month as Caribbean nations marked Emancipation Day, the anniversary of slavery being abolished in the British Empire in 1834. The law states that the word 'Grenada' should replace 'His Majesty King Charles the Third, his heirs and successors' in its oath. It adds that in any law requiring an oath the words 'our sovereign lord the King' must be deleted and replaced with 'the people of Grenada'. Asked whether the Scottish government supported Stewart's call for Holyrood to gain the powers to make similar changes, a spokesman declined to comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store