Martin Boys will put it ‘all on the line' in national competition
Here's how to vote for the Woodstock country duo on Canada's Got Talent airing at 9 p.m. Atlantic on Citytv, Tuesday, May 13.
The Martin Boys plan on giving everything they've got during the finale of Canada's Got Talent (CGT) on Tuesday.
To win the competition, brothers Macauley and Micah from Red Bridge will need to garner the most votes from across the country.
Here's all you need to know about CGT's voting process.
The season five finale of CGT airs Tuesday, May 13, at 9 p.m. Atlantic time on Citytv and Citytv+.
The voting is online only and must be done during the episode's voting window. First, tune in to the program and watch. The audience will be told how to vote during the show.
Voting will be done on their website,
Citytv.com/vote
. That page will be live once voting is open. You first need to create a Citytv account or log in. If you don't have an account, you can set that up beforehand to save yourself time.
Once logged in, you must find the 'Vote Now for CGT' option on the homepage. Then, choose your favourite finalist.
Lastly, you must submit your vote by pressing 'VOTE.' You can vote up to ten times and will receive a notification when you have reached your voting limit.
The winner of the cross-Canada talent contest walks away with $1 million, compliments of Rogers.
There is also a free viewing party at Atlantic Cinemas in Woodstock on Tuesday, May 13. The doors open at 8 p.m., and concessions will be available for purchase. The tickets are first-come, first-served, and no advance ticket purchasing is available.
Wi-Fi will be available for voting.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
8 Celebrities Who Dramatically FLED the Country for Good
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." Many celebrities live in dreamy primary residences and have even built impressive real estate portfolios in and outside of the United States. Over the past two decades, and especially in recent years, some stars have decided to leave behind their stateside homes altogether in favor of living abroad full-time. Several have been vocal about their moves, citing work commitments, a desire to escape the spotlight, and conditions in the United States as driving factors. No matter the reason, they've all expressed how much the decision has bettered their lives. If you're eager to live vicariously through the public figures who have left the country, we're taking stock of the celebs who have become permanent expats. From Pamela Anderson's Canadian homecoming to Lindsay Lohan's relocation to Dubai circa 2014, these celebrities couldn't be happier in their new home countries. The Most Beautiful Celebrity Wedding Venues You Can Rent These 7 Countries Are a Smart Real Estate Investment 8 Countries Where It's Ridiculously Easy for Americans to Buy Real EstateRichard Gere relocated to Spain with his wife Alejandra, who is from the country, and their kids. In early 2025, he spoke about settling into his new life abroad with Elle España. "The truth is, you're seeing us in our moment. We're happier than ever," he said. "She's happy because she's at home, and I'm happy because if she's happy, I'm happy."Pamela Anderson returned to her Canadian roots in early 2020, after a two-year stint in Marseille, France. 'I came to a point where I decided to move home and disappear and get into my garden,' Anderson told Better Homes & Gardens, explaining that she felt lonely and misunderstood at the time. She sold her longtime Malibu property in 2021 and now lives on Vancouver Island, in a former motel she renovated that was once owned by her filming the final season of Suits in 2019, Gabriel Macht left the country to focus on his family and explore the world with them. 'I don't tell anybody where I live because I like to keep that under wraps,' the actor told People in January 2025. Macht and his wife were already thinking about homeschooling their kids right before the pandemic hit and, after being stuck in Manhattan during lockdown, they decided to take the Longoria's main reason for leaving the U.S. was because she was working in Europe, but she also felt like it was time to leave Los Angeles. 'I had my whole adult life here,' Longoria told Marie Claire. 'But even before [the pandemic], it was changing. The vibe was different. And then COVID happened, and it pushed it over the edge. Whether it's the homelessness or the taxes, not that I want to shit on California — it just feels like this chapter in my life is done now.' Her family now splits their time between Mexico and O'Donnell relocated to Ireland with her kid in mid-January 2025. In a TikTok video, she explained she never thought she'd move to another country but felt the decision was best for herself and her 12-year-old. While she loves living in Ireland, there are things she misses. She said: 'I miss my other kids. I miss my friends. I miss many things about life there at home, and I'm trying to find a home here in this beautiful country. And when it is safe for all citizens to have equal rights there in America, that's when we will consider coming back.'While married to Joe Jonas, Sophie Turner lived in Los Angeles and Miami. During that time, she was homesick for her native UK, so after the pair divorced, she returned to London. She also cited the state of America as a driving factor. 'The gun violence, Roe v. Wade being overturned... Everything just kind of piled on,' she told Harper's Bazaar UK in an October 2024 interview. 'After the Uvalde [school] shooting, I knew it was time to get the fuck out of there.' She added, 'It felt as if my life was on pause until I returned to England. I just never really feel like myself when I'm not in London.'Ellen DeGeneres, who has a long history of buying and flipping multimillion-dollar homes, left the U.S. in favor of the U.K. She now lives in the Cotswolds with her wife, Portia de Rossi. The couple reportedly fell in love with a house that they paid around $18 million for, but it hasn't exactly been smooth sailing since they arrived; They've already clashed with neighbors about their renovations, which may have disturbed Roman Lohan left Los Angeles for Dubai back in 2014—and she has no plans to return to the City of Angels full-time. Her reasoning? Life is more peaceful away from the spotlight. "It's hard in L.A. Even taking my son to the park in L.A., I get stressed. I'm like, 'Are there cameras?'" she said in a conversation with Saturday Night Live's Chloe Fineman for Elle in May 2025. You Might Also Like 15 Home Bar Gifts Every Cocktail Enthusiast Will Appreciate 32 Low Light Indoor Plants That Can Survive in the Darkest Corners of Your Home These Are the 50 Best Paint Colors for Your Living Room
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Global streamers fight CRTC's rule requiring them to fund Canadian content
OTTAWA — Some of the world's biggest streaming companies will argue in court on Monday that they shouldn't have to make CRTC-ordered financial contributions to Canadian content and news. The companies are fighting an order from the federal broadcast regulator that says they must pay five per cent of their annual Canadian revenues to funds devoted to producing Canadian content, including local TV news. The case, which consolidates several appeals by streamers, will be heard by the Federal Court of Appeal in Toronto. Apple, Amazon and Spotify are fighting the CRTC's 2024 order. Motion Picture Association-Canada, which represents such companies as Netflix and Paramount, is challenging a section of the CRTC's order requiring them to contribute to local news. In December, the court put a pause on the payments — estimated to be at least $1.25 million annually per company. Amazon, Apple and Spotify had argued that if they made the payments and then won the appeal and overturned the CRTC order, they wouldn't be able to recover the money. In court documents, the streamers put forward a long list of arguments on why they shouldn't have to pay, including technical points regarding the CRTC's powers under the Broadcasting Act. Spotify argued that the contribution requirement amounts to a tax, which the CRTC doesn't have the authority to impose. The music streamer also took issue with the CRTC requiring the payments without first deciding how it will define Canadian content. Amazon argued the federal cabinet specified the CRTC's requirements have to be "equitable." It said the contribution requirement is "inequitable because it applies only to foreign online undertakings and only to such undertakings with more than $25 million in annual Canadian broadcasting revenues." Apple also said the regulator "acted prematurely" and argued the CRTC didn't consider whether the order was "equitable." It pointed out Apple is required to contribute five per cent, while radio stations must only pay 0.5 per cent — and streamers don't have the same access to the funds into which they pay. The CRTC imposes different rules on Canadian content contributions from traditional media players. It requires large English-language broadcasters to contribute 30 per cent of revenues to Canadian programming. Motion Picture Association—Canada is only challenging one aspect of the CRTC's order — the part requiring companies to contribute 1.5 per cent of revenues to a fund for local news on independent TV stations. It said in court documents that none of the streamers "has any connection to news production" and argued the CRTC doesn't have the authority to require them to fund news. "What the CRTC did, erroneously, is purport to justify the … contribution simply on the basis that local news is important and local news operations provided by independent television stations are short of money," it said. "That is a reason why news should be funded by someone, but is devoid of any analysis, legal or factual, as to why it is equitable for foreign online undertakings to fund Canadian news production." In its response, the Canadian Association of Broadcasters said the CRTC has wide authority under the Broadcasting Act. It argued streamers have contributed to the funding crisis facing local news. "While the industry was once dominated by traditional television and radio services, those services are now in decline, as Canadians increasingly turn to online streaming services," the broadcasters said. "For decades, traditional broadcasting undertakings have supported the production of Canadian content through a complex array of CRTC-directed measures … By contrast, online undertakings have not been required to provide any financial support to the Canadian broadcasting system, despite operating here for well over a decade." A submission from the federal government in defence of the CRTC argued the regulator was within its rights to order the payments. "The orders challenged in these proceedings … are a valid exercise of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission's regulatory powers. These orders seek to remedy the inequity that has resulted from the ascendance of online streaming giants like the Appellants," the office of the attorney general said. "Online undertakings have greatly profited from their access to Canadian audiences, without any corresponding obligation to make meaningful contributions supporting Canadian programming and creators — an obligation that has long been imposed on traditional domestic broadcasters." The government said that if the streamers get their way, that would preserve "an inequitable circumstance in which domestic broadcasters — operating in an industry under economic strain — shoulder a disproportionate regulatory burden." "This result would be plainly out of step with the policy aims of Parliament" and cabinet, it added. The court hearing comes as trade tensions between the U.S. and Canada have cast a shadow over the CRTC's attempts to regulate online streamers. The regulator launched a suite of proceedings and hearings as part of its implementation of the Online Streaming Act, legislation that in 2023 updated the Broadcasting Act to set up the CRTC to regulate streaming companies. In January, as U.S. President Donald Trump was inaugurated for his second term, groups representing U.S. businesses and big tech companies warned the CRTC that its efforts to modernize Canadian content rules could worsen trade relations and lead to retaliation. Then, as the CRTC launched its hearing on modernizing the definition of Canadian content in May, Netflix, Paramount and Apple cancelled their individual appearances. While the companies didn't provide a reason, the move came shortly after Trump threatened to impose a tariff of up to 100 per cent on movies made outside the United States. Foreign streamers have long pointed to their existing spending in Canada in response to calls to bring them into the regulated system. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 8, 2025. Anja Karadeglija, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Sullivan's Crossing' Season 3: Chad Michael Murray, Morgan Kohan tackle relationship tension
In Sullivan's Crossing Season 3, Episode 6, things get heated between Cal (Chad Michael Murray) and Maggie (Morgan Kohan). After she told Cal that she didn't want to move in with him, the question is whether their relationship will last. Additionally, it's an uphill battle for Rob (Reid Price), who has to fix up the lodge in just two weeks when the health and safety officer returns. But additional snags make Rob's dream diner look almost impossible to achieve. Starting with the lodge, Jacob (Joel Oulette) is able to identify that there's "wet rot," a fungus that gets into wood when it's damp. Rob has to replace the infected parts and treat the rest to make sure it doesn't spread. But things get worse when they find a giant water stain on the floor, meaning all the plumbing has to be replaced. Luckily, Cooper (Steve Lund) agrees to have the guys from the fire station help at the lodge, so Rob can, hopefully, make the two-week deadline. But when one of the firefighters gets stomach pain, can't breathe and eventually develops a rash, the question is whether there's possibly something at the lodge that caused the reaction. Sully (Scott Patterson) is feeling guilty about not checking the condition of the lodge before promising the space to Rob. But when Helen (Kate Vernon) comes over to comfort him, she convinces Sully to take a yoga class to ease his mind, as much as possible. On the way back from the class, Helen probes about something Sully's wanted to do that can push him out of his comfort zone. Sully reveals that he's always wanted to try ballroom dancing, and she recommends they look into taking classes together. Meanwhile, Edna (Andrea Menard) is facing her own medical issues. After experiencing possible menopause symptoms, she finally goes to see a doctor about hot flashes, feeling anxious and getting headaches. But when she gets there, the doctor is quite dismissive, saying that she didn't book a physical and she should make an appointment with an OBGYN. Frank (Tom Jackson) is furious about how she was treated, but following that appointment, Edna tells him she's thinking about retiring. Now on to the tense relationship between Cal and Maggie. While Maggie wants to have a conversation with Cal about where they stand, he's more interested in channelling the awkwardness into fixing the lodge. Eventually talking, Maggie says she feels Cal has "some things to work out" before they move in together, but Cal questions whether it's really him that's the problem. At the hospital, following the incident with the firefighter who was working on the lodge, Cal says he thought that they were going to move their relationship forward. And says Maggie isn't being honest to herself about why she doesn't want to move in with him. "I think there's something you're holding back, Maggie," Cal says. "And until you figure that out, I just don't think there's anything left to talk about." Maggie tries to talks to Sully about it, but they're interrupted when Helen, who's coming out of the shower at Sully's place, comes downstairs. Then, while Maggie thought her mom was calling, it was Walter (Peter Outerbridge) on the line. Maggie calls him out for telling her that her father didn't want to have anything to do with her. "I was just trying to protect you, Maggie," he says in response, adding that he thinks she should be moving back to Boston to continue to pursue her career as a surgeon. Maggie stresses that she didn't leave Boston because of Walter, the Crossing is her home. But that conversation was enough to go back to Cal, running to his house in the rain. Maggie tells Cal he was right, she hasn't been honest with herself. "I'm scared of making a mistake," Maggie says. "I'm scared of losing myself." "I spent my entire life trying to be perfect, trying to prove that I was someone worth loving, and I am scared that if we do this that you're going to wake up one day and realize that I'm not what you want." "I know how hard it is for you to let yourself trust someone, " Cal says in response. "I need you to give me a chance. Give us a chance. I love you, Maggie. I just want to make you happy. If you'll let me." And some passionate making out, and a little more, implies that things end up OK between the show's star couple. Speaking of romance, Jacob and Lola (Amalia Williamson) spend more time together, as she helps him with his research on lichens. That's when they share their first kiss. But the shut down mine they were waiting out the storm in seems to collapse to end the episode. Hopefully they're OK when we see the new couple next week.
