Stop conflating being transgender with being sick
This week a tragic death was reported. Media handling of the story has only increased the harm.
News broke on Thursday that V, a transgender (trans) teenager, had died alone in emergency accommodation in 2023, in the late stages of an eating disorder. It is always a tragedy when a young person dies. The grief felt by V's parents and others who loved him must be immense. For those of us who know and love trans young people, this tragedy has an extra sting in its tail. We know trans young people face higher risks of harm than other young people, due to the impacts of stigma, discrimination and violence on their lives. As trans communities and allies work to reduce the structural barriers that put pressure on trans young people's health and wellbeing, it is a slap in the face when media coverage actively reinforces those barriers.
The RNZ article reporting on the events surrounding V's death reproduces several harmful messages about trans young people. As researchers working on school and family support for trans young people, we know what damage this messaging causes. Below we offer perspectives that affirm the rights of trans young people to be recognised and supported for who they are.
It is normal to be trans
Being trans is part of the diversity of being human. Trans people have always existed, all around the world. The RNZ article is peppered with subtle and overt suggestions that being trans is a problem, reflecting an outdated treatment of trans people within Western medical science. In Aotearoa we uphold people's rights to be trans. We now have laws to protect trans people from 'conversion practices' because we know how harmful it is to suggest that being trans is an illness and a problem. Telling someone there is something wrong with them because they are trans, when their experience of gender is perfectly normal, will not support their mental health.
Other people do not cause someone to be trans
Each person's sense of gender is highly personal and unique to them. The article says that V 'became' non-binary after 'being introduced to the concept of gender diversity' at high school, implying that this education made V non-binary. It also notes that 'immediately after a messy break-up with [a] boyfriend', V 'started identifying as a boy'. This framing suggests that V's school and breakup were reasons why he 'became' trans. Being trans is not something you can catch like a virus from your school, or because you can't manage a breakup. But supportive schools are more likely to create the conditions where young trans people can feel confident to share and celebrate their identity with others, enabling them to learn and thrive.
Autistic people know who they are
Many trans people are neurodivergent – for example, they may be autistic or have ADHD. In the most recent Counting Ourselves survey of trans and non-binary people in Aotearoa, over two thirds identified as neurodivergent. There is no basis for claiming that neurodivergent people do not know their own gender, but this is a common narrative used to restrict autistic young people's access to gender-affirming care. Trans people exist. Neurodivergent people exist. People who are both trans and neurodivergent exist. None of these things are a problem.
Young people's gender can shift and that's OK
Trans young people can move through a range of different gender identities as they figure out who they are. The article implies doubt that V was trans because his gender identity apparently shifted over time. By highlighting these shifts, the article reflects ideas that being trans is never really real, but rather some departure from a normal state. Drawing attention to shifts in gender identity also reinforces the message that something made him trans and he could be 'fixed' or 'return' to being cisgender (not trans). Framing V's gender in this way implies his transness was a central part of his mental health issues, rather than a fundamental part of his identity that needed to be recognised and affirmed by those involved in providing him care.
Treatments for disordered eating must take gender into account
Disordered eating is common among trans young people, with 39% of trans youth participants meeting the threshold for the likely presence of an eating disorder in the most recent Counting Ourselves survey. V clearly did not receive appropriate treatment for the eating disorder that took his life. Oddly, a psychiatrist is said to have recommended that the parents not affirm V's gender as this might interfere with his recovery from disordered eating, but effective treatment of disordered eating among trans young people must take their gender into account.
Gender-affirming language is important
Using a trans young person's chosen name and pronouns shows you believe and support them in their gender. In the article, the parents use the name and pronouns they gave their child at birth, despite V having chosen a new name and going by he/him pronouns. RNZ's Rainbow Communities Reporting and Content Guidelines state that articles should use the name and pronouns a person tells them to use, but the author chose to use a range of pronouns and names for the young person, based on the dubious rationale that the young person is not alive to state their wishes. Due to the poor timing of publication, before the release of the formal coronial report, no other professionals involved were able to gender V correctly. This is an attack on the mana of this young person.
Family support saves lives
Research shows that family support helps trans young people stay safe and well. A key finding of the 2022 US Trans Survey, published this week, was that family support is not just important for health – it is lifesaving. Respondents with supportive families reported substantially better health and fewer thoughts of suicide than those with unsupportive families. The only heartening aspect of this tragic story is the glimpses of support that V may have received before he died. One of these was the manager at the emergency accommodation where he lived for the last three months of his life. The manager said of V: 'My main concerns were 'Can I help this person become more resilient? Can I help them find happiness? Can I help them get hold of life somehow and enjoy it?'' We can all show support for the trans young people we have in our lives.
Trans young people can thrive
The article paints a very upsetting picture for trans young people and their whānau. However, many trans young people in Aotearoa do have supportive whānau and those who do not are often adept at finding support in other places when support is lacking at home. Young people get support from family (biological or chosen), school, medical and social services, and organisations that support rainbow youth. Organisations supporting rainbow youth are struggling in the current political and economic climate, and deserve all our support.
Th RNZ article has greatly distressed many trans people, parents, community organisations, counsellors, teachers and health professionals. This is not only because of the pain we feel at the loss of another young trans person who did not get the care he needed, but because of the way his story was framed. Messaging that pathologises trans youth causes a great deal of harm. It is time to stop conflating being trans with being sick and look at where the real sickness lies – the lack of care we provide as a society to our precious trans young people, who deserve so much better.
Julia de Bres is Associate Professor at Massey University, where she researches family support of transgender young people in Aotearoa. John Fenaughty is Associate Professor at the University of Auckland, where he specialises in the wellbeing of rainbow young people in schools. He led the Identify Survey of takatāpui and rainbow young people in New Zealand.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Spinoff
3 hours ago
- The Spinoff
The Weekend: Dignity in death shouldn't be so hard
Madeleine Chapman reflects on the week that was. I was going to write a short, silly thing about how everyone should get back into wearing singlets as undergarments in the winter. But then I read an article published by our national broadcaster that made me feel like I'd travelled back in time to a colder, darker society. ' Teenager starves to death alone in emergency accommodation ' is the headline. On the surface, a sad headline that you'd expect to accompany a short report on the tragic death of a young New Zealander. Instead, what follows is a 4,000 word feature article told largely through the testimony of V's parents who still seem to be struggling to accept his gender identity, even after his death. Ever since I read it I have wondered: what responsibility do we as journalists have to respect the wishes of the dead? In reading the full article, it can be ascertained that V was a young trans man who also happened to be autistic and suffered from disordered eating. They went by he/they pronouns and had adopted the gender neutral name 'V' at 15. V's parents 'did not accept the teen was transgender' and were kept 'at a distance' up until V's death in emergency accommodation in 2023. The article is harrowing reading simply for the myriad struggles V faced in their short life. The topline suggestion that 'multiple agencies failed' in their care may well prove true in the coroner's report. But woven throughout the article is a recurring theme, posited by V's parents: that V's gender identity being acknowledged and supported by care providers was a direct factor in their death as it distracted from their eating disorder. That mindset, and some of the framing in the article, have been responded to here. I suspect there is a lot more to come on this story. There are questions around how our health agencies care for young people in acute mental distress. There's a conversation to be had around disordered eating and its treatment in New Zealand. And there's plenty to be interrogated into how our gender diverse population is at such a higher risk of harm and what contributes to this risk. But in this short reflection I can only think about the disservice done to V in having their life and death be reduced to an argument about gender identity. RNZ placed its 'Rainbow Communities Reporting and Content Guidelines' at the bottom of the article which state that 'we use the name and pronouns that people tell us they use'. In the article, those who interacted with V regularly (the Family Works team leader who saw them a week before their death, the motel manager where they were staying), referred to them as 'V' and used either he or they pronouns. Even the police attending to the scene, who had presumably never met V as a living person, 'insisted on using a male name and pronouns'. Clearly this was the name they wished to be known by and the pronouns they used. This was their identity. And yet the article includes their birth name throughout 'at the parents' request' and uses she/her pronouns. Why? 'As this story deals with a deceased person, they are not able to communicate their wishes.' V spent their short life communicating their wishes around their identity to their closest relatives, to no avail. Allowing them to have it in death is a small dignity that shouldn't be so hard to give. The stories Spinoff readers spent the most time with this week Feedback of the week 'Thank you Liam. Beautifully written. I grew up in a state house next to the Ford Block in Rotorua, later immortalised by Alan Duff in Once Were Warriors. We thought it was the way life was. (And life was certainly a lot better before the Labor Govt corporatised the Forest Service and put 5000 people out of work, with devastating consequences.) I couldn't wait to escape because everything I was reading was about New York and London. Much later, looking back, I realised what rich cultural material it was – how interesting it was. There's no doubt Mangere will be gentrified in time. The great pity is that the people who live here now will be priced out. As you write, it's complicated! My only solution: ensure working people are paid a living wage. And all the best to you and your son.' 'On the Western line this morning I am happy to report that Neil's still got it. Big ups to the one person who clapped after his performance.'
Scoop
11 hours ago
- Scoop
Experts Warn Regulatory Standards Bill Threatens Future Public Health Laws
Article – RNZ One of the experts said it would have a 'chilling effect' on public health measures. , Reporter Public health experts are worried the government's proposed Regulatory Standards Bill will act as a disincentive for future law-makers to limit harmful industries. A group of scholars in health and policy have worked together on a briefing, titled 'Regulatory Standards Bill threatens the public interest, public health and Māori rights'. It's authors are Jonathan Boston, Michael Baker, Andrew Geddis, Carwyn Jones and Geoffrey Palmer. The Regulatory Standards Bill was introduced to Parliament in May, and is now being considered by the finance and expenditure committee. It would set up a Regulatory Standards Board to consider how legislation measures up to the principles. It was part of ACT's coalition agreement, and in putting the bill forward, party leader David Seymour said: 'In a high-cost economy, regulation isn't neutral – it's a tax on growth. This government is committed to clearing the path of needless regulations by improving how laws are made.' The bill wants politicians to show their workings, he said. 'This bill turns the explanation from politicians' 'because we said so' into 'because here is the justification according to a set of principles'.' But Baker said the bill had prompted a large number of concerns, not least from a public health perspective. He said it was problematic that the bill failed to mention public harm in its ethical framework, which was needed to balance out private benefits. Another issue was the 'takings or impairment principle'. The bill in its current form would allow commercial interests, such as the tobacco or alcohol industries, to seek compensation – paid with public money – if any future legislation caused them to lose money. Baker explained this would have a 'chilling effect' on public health measures. He said it would make it less appealing for governments to create any new legislation aimed at protecting public health which could negatively impact harmful industries, which might then seek compensation. This could include the denicotinisation of cigarettes, alcohol restrictions like sponsorship bans, controls on unhealthy food and drink such as limiting marketing to children, and clean air provisions such as mandating emissions reductions by industry. This bill would mean taxpayers paid to compensate these businesses for the money lost because of moves to protect public health. 'And that's going to make it very difficult for any groups – even governments – promoting new public health laws and regulations, that are intended to protect the public interest.' The briefing notes that, rather than this being a by-product of the legislation's overall goal, it 'appears to be the Bill's intention'. Seymour response Seymour accused Baker of 'alarmism'. 'What the bill actually says is that if a politician or government department wants to pass a regulation that infringes on your private property rights, they'll need to justify why. Inconsistency with the principles does not prevent any new legislation from being passed. All it requires is transparency to the taxpayer. That's not radical, it's democratic accountability. If a policy is justified, it will stand up to scrutiny.' 'The Regulatory Standards Bill will help New Zealand get its mojo back. It requires politicians and officials to ask and answer certain questions before they place restrictions on citizens' freedoms. What problem are we trying to solve?' Seymour asked. 'What are the costs and benefits? Who pays the costs and gets the benefits? What restrictions are being placed on the use and exchange of private property?' 'This Bill turns 'because we said so' into 'because here's the evidence'.'
The Spinoff
21 hours ago
- The Spinoff
Stop conflating being transgender with being sick
This week a tragic death was reported. Media handling of the story has only increased the harm. News broke on Thursday that V, a transgender (trans) teenager, had died alone in emergency accommodation in 2023, in the late stages of an eating disorder. It is always a tragedy when a young person dies. The grief felt by V's parents and others who loved him must be immense. For those of us who know and love trans young people, this tragedy has an extra sting in its tail. We know trans young people face higher risks of harm than other young people, due to the impacts of stigma, discrimination and violence on their lives. As trans communities and allies work to reduce the structural barriers that put pressure on trans young people's health and wellbeing, it is a slap in the face when media coverage actively reinforces those barriers. The RNZ article reporting on the events surrounding V's death reproduces several harmful messages about trans young people. As researchers working on school and family support for trans young people, we know what damage this messaging causes. Below we offer perspectives that affirm the rights of trans young people to be recognised and supported for who they are. It is normal to be trans Being trans is part of the diversity of being human. Trans people have always existed, all around the world. The RNZ article is peppered with subtle and overt suggestions that being trans is a problem, reflecting an outdated treatment of trans people within Western medical science. In Aotearoa we uphold people's rights to be trans. We now have laws to protect trans people from 'conversion practices' because we know how harmful it is to suggest that being trans is an illness and a problem. Telling someone there is something wrong with them because they are trans, when their experience of gender is perfectly normal, will not support their mental health. Other people do not cause someone to be trans Each person's sense of gender is highly personal and unique to them. The article says that V 'became' non-binary after 'being introduced to the concept of gender diversity' at high school, implying that this education made V non-binary. It also notes that 'immediately after a messy break-up with [a] boyfriend', V 'started identifying as a boy'. This framing suggests that V's school and breakup were reasons why he 'became' trans. Being trans is not something you can catch like a virus from your school, or because you can't manage a breakup. But supportive schools are more likely to create the conditions where young trans people can feel confident to share and celebrate their identity with others, enabling them to learn and thrive. Autistic people know who they are Many trans people are neurodivergent – for example, they may be autistic or have ADHD. In the most recent Counting Ourselves survey of trans and non-binary people in Aotearoa, over two thirds identified as neurodivergent. There is no basis for claiming that neurodivergent people do not know their own gender, but this is a common narrative used to restrict autistic young people's access to gender-affirming care. Trans people exist. Neurodivergent people exist. People who are both trans and neurodivergent exist. None of these things are a problem. Young people's gender can shift and that's OK Trans young people can move through a range of different gender identities as they figure out who they are. The article implies doubt that V was trans because his gender identity apparently shifted over time. By highlighting these shifts, the article reflects ideas that being trans is never really real, but rather some departure from a normal state. Drawing attention to shifts in gender identity also reinforces the message that something made him trans and he could be 'fixed' or 'return' to being cisgender (not trans). Framing V's gender in this way implies his transness was a central part of his mental health issues, rather than a fundamental part of his identity that needed to be recognised and affirmed by those involved in providing him care. Treatments for disordered eating must take gender into account Disordered eating is common among trans young people, with 39% of trans youth participants meeting the threshold for the likely presence of an eating disorder in the most recent Counting Ourselves survey. V clearly did not receive appropriate treatment for the eating disorder that took his life. Oddly, a psychiatrist is said to have recommended that the parents not affirm V's gender as this might interfere with his recovery from disordered eating, but effective treatment of disordered eating among trans young people must take their gender into account. Gender-affirming language is important Using a trans young person's chosen name and pronouns shows you believe and support them in their gender. In the article, the parents use the name and pronouns they gave their child at birth, despite V having chosen a new name and going by he/him pronouns. RNZ's Rainbow Communities Reporting and Content Guidelines state that articles should use the name and pronouns a person tells them to use, but the author chose to use a range of pronouns and names for the young person, based on the dubious rationale that the young person is not alive to state their wishes. Due to the poor timing of publication, before the release of the formal coronial report, no other professionals involved were able to gender V correctly. This is an attack on the mana of this young person. Family support saves lives Research shows that family support helps trans young people stay safe and well. A key finding of the 2022 US Trans Survey, published this week, was that family support is not just important for health – it is lifesaving. Respondents with supportive families reported substantially better health and fewer thoughts of suicide than those with unsupportive families. The only heartening aspect of this tragic story is the glimpses of support that V may have received before he died. One of these was the manager at the emergency accommodation where he lived for the last three months of his life. The manager said of V: 'My main concerns were 'Can I help this person become more resilient? Can I help them find happiness? Can I help them get hold of life somehow and enjoy it?'' We can all show support for the trans young people we have in our lives. Trans young people can thrive The article paints a very upsetting picture for trans young people and their whānau. However, many trans young people in Aotearoa do have supportive whānau and those who do not are often adept at finding support in other places when support is lacking at home. Young people get support from family (biological or chosen), school, medical and social services, and organisations that support rainbow youth. Organisations supporting rainbow youth are struggling in the current political and economic climate, and deserve all our support. Th RNZ article has greatly distressed many trans people, parents, community organisations, counsellors, teachers and health professionals. This is not only because of the pain we feel at the loss of another young trans person who did not get the care he needed, but because of the way his story was framed. Messaging that pathologises trans youth causes a great deal of harm. It is time to stop conflating being trans with being sick and look at where the real sickness lies – the lack of care we provide as a society to our precious trans young people, who deserve so much better. Julia de Bres is Associate Professor at Massey University, where she researches family support of transgender young people in Aotearoa. John Fenaughty is Associate Professor at the University of Auckland, where he specialises in the wellbeing of rainbow young people in schools. He led the Identify Survey of takatāpui and rainbow young people in New Zealand.
