Forest dept cracks down on illegal trade at Ropeway stn
Following a field inspection that revealed multiple violations of environmental and forest laws, the department removed all illegal activities mentioned in the report.
A senior forest official said, "All the activities that were found to be illegal and operational were shut down by the team. A report was prepared and submitted to higher authorities."
A source said, the Chief Minister's Office (CMO) also took cognisance of the issue and directed the forest department to take appropriate action.
The ropeway operator was granted permission to use 0.8735 hectare of forest land under strict conditions laid down by the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change. However, it was found that the operator was using more land than sanctioned, and several activities far beyond the approved scope were underway.
In a detailed report dated July 7, the assistant conservator of forests (ACF) flagged at least fifteen major irregularities, terming them "a serious violation" of multiple laws — including the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; the Rajasthan Forest Act, 1953; the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972; the Environment Protection Act, 1986; and the Rajasthan Ropeway Act, 1996.
The ACF recommended legal action against the company and immediate enforcement of compliance with all applicable regulations to safeguard forest land, wildlife, and the surrounding environment.
The inspection also found that high-risk adventure activities, such as a 360° zipline cycle ride, were being conducted for an additional fee without any legal clearance. Additionally, the use of plastic cups, plates, and packaging within forest premises was noted — a clear violation of environmental norms.
Rajendra Tiwari, who runs an NGO working to protect the Nahargarh Wildlife Sanctuary, said, "As per the rules, the department should impose environmental compensation on private players for any construction carried out on forest land. If they fail to act, we will approach the National Green Tribunal (NGT)."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Protection against misuse: on POCSO Act, adolescent sex
The key objective of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 is the protection of children, but over the past few years, courts around the country and rights activists have called for some exemptions. Noticing a trend that adolescents, above 15 years but under 18, in voluntary relationships and having consensual sex were often being persecuted, the courts sought a review. In that backdrop, senior advocate Indira Jaising's written submission to the Supreme Court that consensual sex between teenagers aged 16-18 years must not be criminalised is a welcome move. She was appointed amicus curiae and her submissions are part of a petition filed by advocate Nipun Saxena. Her brief challenged the designation of 18 years as the age of consent. She said the only solution lies in declaring that sex between consenting adolescents between the age of 16, an almost universal age of sexual maturity, and 18, is not a form of 'abuse'. Ms. Jaising called for this exception to be read into the POCSO Act and Section 63 (sexual offences), of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). 'Such an exception would preserve the protective intent of the statute while preventing its misuse against adolescent relationships that are not exploitative in nature,' she said. In a 2023 report, the Law Commission had said that it was against changing the age of consent. It advised 'guided judicial discretion' instead, while sentencing in cases that involve children between 16 and 18 years in a voluntary, consensual relationship. Under the POCSO Act and under several provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the BNS, whoever commits a penetrative sexual assault on a child — who is anyone below 18 years — can face stringent punishment under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, Section 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, and provisions of the IPC and BNS. A 16-year-old is considered a 'child' under Section 2(d) of the POCSO Act and hence her consent does not matter. But caveats have to be put in place so that the broad intent of the law is adhered to, as the Madras High Court suggested in 2021, in Vijayalakshmi vs State Rep. The High Court said the age difference in consensual relationships should not be more than five years to ensure that a girl of an impressionable age is not taken advantage of by an older person. Educating adolescents about the law on sexual offences and its consequences is a must too. Criminalising normal adolescent behaviour is not the way to protect against non-consensual, exploitative sexual offences.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Masala scam: Udhna cops bust fake factory in Surat, 5 held
Surat: Udhna police on Sunday busted a fake masala manufacturing unit operating out of Chamunda Industrial Estate and arrested five people for producing duplicate Maggi and Everest brand masalas. The police seized counterfeit goods and machinery worth Rs 25 lakh from the spot. Police inspector S N Desai said the raid was carried out following a tip-off. "After verifying the input, we raided the unit and found five persons manufacturing large quantities of fake Maggi masala and Everest Chicken masala. These popular brands were targeted due to their high demand among consumers," he told TOI. The arrested accused have been identified as Vinod Rajendradas, Vinod Punadas, Kailu Murmu, Surendra Kaludas, and Sunil Soni. One key accused, Anil Goyal, is still absconding. During the operation, police recovered fake masalas worth Rs 17.28 lakh, three packing machines worth Rs 3 lakh, a compressor machine valued at Rs 50,000, and 15 bags of loose masala worth Rs 3 lakh. Plastic rolls used for packaging and a large number of cartons were also seized. "The accused had a network in the local market where they supplied the fake masala at prices 10–20% lower than the original brands. The gang has been operating for the last six months and sold products worth several lakhs," Desai said. The Food and Drug Control Administration has been informed, and samples of the seized masala will be tested in laboratories to check for harmful substances. All accused have been booked under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the Copyright Act, and the Trade Marks Act.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Interfaith marriages without religious conversion illegal: Alld HC
Prayagraj: The Allahabad high court ruled that interfaith marriages without religious conversion are illegal and refused to quash criminal proceedings against a man accused of marrying a minor at an Arya Samaj temple, reports Rajesh Kumar Pandey. The Allahabad High Court directed the state home secretary to investigate how Arya Samaj temples are issuing marriage certificates without following rules and submit a compliance report. The court declined to set aside the criminal proceedings against the man who married a minor after allegedly kidnapping her. In his order dated July 24, Justice Prasant Kumar made it clear that the investigation has to be made by an officer not below the rank of deputy commissioner of police. Before passing the above directions, the court found that the applicant and the victim belong to different religions. "There is averment in the application that they have solemnized marriage in Arya Samaj Mandir at Prayagraj. However, the same could not have been done without proper conversion as per the existing law," added the court. With these observations and directives, the court dismissed the petition filed by one Sonu alias Shahnur, who had moved the court to quash summoning order dated September 12, 2024 issued against him as well as the entire proceedings of criminal case going on against him under section 363 (punishment), 366 (kidnapping a woman to compel her to marry) 376 (rape) of IPC and sections 3/4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offence (Pocso) Act at Nichlaul police station of Maharajganj district. During the course of hearing, the counsel for the applicant submitted that Shahnur had solemnized marriage with the victim on February 14, 2020. He further submitted that since the girl was minor, she was sent to Nari Niketan and when she became an adult, she started living with the applicant. On other hand, the government counsel submitted that the girl is minor as per her high school certificate and she could not have solemnized marriage with the applicant. He submitted that the applicant and the victim come from different religions, as such, their marriage cannot be considered valid until and unless proper conversion is carried out in accordance with the provisions of the UP Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021. He further submitted that the marriage certificate has been issued by Arya Samaj Mandir, which seems to be a fabricated document. In support of his arguments, the state counsel quoted an earlier order passed by this court, in which the court pointed out that certain people who claim themselves of Arya Samaj and are getting marriages solemnized illegally with mala fide intentions without even verifying the age of the couple. The court will hear the case next on August 29.
