Iran Sentences 3 to Death Over Shiraz Shrine Attacks
TEHRAN: Iran has sentenced three people to death and jailed several others convicted over their roles in deadly attacks on a Shiite shrine in the southern city of Shiraz, the judiciary said Sunday.
The verdicts stem from two shootings -- in October 2022 and August 2023 -- that killed 15 people at the Shah Cheragh mausoleum in the capital of Fars province. The attacks were claimed by the Islamic State (IS) group.
'Three of these defendants were sentenced to death for aiding and abetting in 'corruption on earth' following proceedings' at Shiraz Revolutionary Court, Fars chief justice Sadrollah Rajaei-Nasab said, quoted by the judiciary's Mizan Online website.
They were also sentenced to 25 years in prison for 'aiding and abetting in moharebeh', he added, referring to the capital offence of enmity against God.
Two other alleged members of the jihadist IS were sentenced to 15 years and 10 years in prison 'based on their level of cooperation and influence in the Shah Cheragh terrorist events'.
Two women were each sentenced to five years, but 'their sentences will be served under Islamic leniency, monitored by electronic ankle bracelets, and within a one-kilometre radius of their homes'.
Rajaei-Nasab said other parts of the case, including charges related to weapons trafficking, remained under review, and that some verdicts had been appealed to Iran's Supreme Court.
In July 2023, Iran executed two men in public over the first attack on the shrine.
Following the second attack, the judiciary said in August 2023 that security forces had arrested nine people -- all foreigners -- and later sentenced a Tajik IS member to death the following month.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
31 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
I paid for haj trip using my own savings, says Nurul Izzah
KUALA LUMPUR: Nurul Izzah Anwar has clarified that her pilgrimage to Makkah was self-funded. In a Facebook post, the PKR deputy president and former Permatang Pauh member of parliament, who is currently performing the haj, said all travel arrangements, including accommodation and transportation, were organised by licensed travel agency Mimm Travel. She said that she and her husband, Yin Shao Loong, flew on a commercial flight and paid for the trip using their personal savings. "Praise be to Allah, my husband and I were granted the opportunity to perform the haj as guests of Allah SWT through a mujamalah (courtesy) visa. "There was no private jet, as falsely alleged. "Our journey was like that of millions of other pilgrims." Nurul Izzah also expressed concern over the slanderous content. She said if something untrue is spread, it must be corrected. "In our differing views and political struggles, let us not turn acts of worship into material for slander or accusation. "Let us all focus on goodwill and prayers for one another and hope that Muslims will be granted the opportunity to perform the haj with ease and sincerity." Nurul Izzah also shared that while in Madinah, she and her husband attended a religious session with prominent Islamic scholars including Sheikh Dr Omar Suleiman, Dr Tahir Wyatt, and Ustaz Dr Mohd Amirul Hassan Ahmaf Tajuddin – an experience she described as deeply moving.
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
US travel ban deepens despair for Afghans awaiting visas
MEHRIA had been losing hope of getting a visa to emigrate to the United States but her spirits were crushed when President Donald Trump raised yet another hurdle by banning travel for Afghans. Trump had already disrupted refugee pathways after he returned to power in January but a sweeping new travel ban on 12 countries, including Afghanistan, will go into effect on Monday. The ban changes little for most Afghans who already faced steep barriers to travel abroad, but many who had hung their hopes on a new life in the United States felt it was yet another betrayal. "Trump's recent decisions have trapped not only me but thousands of families in uncertainty, hopelessness and thousands of other disasters," Mehria, a 23-year-old woman who gave only one name, said from Pakistan, where she has been waiting since applying for a US refugee visa in 2022. "We gave up thousands of hopes and our entire lives and came here on a promise from America, but today we are suffering one hell after another," she told AFP. The United States has not had a working embassy in Afghanistan since the Taliban ousted the foreign-backed government in 2021, forcing Afghans to apply for visas in third countries. The Taliban's return followed the drawdown of US and Nato troops who had ousted them two decades earlier in response to the September 11, 2001, attacks. The Taliban government has since imposed a strict view of Islamic law and severe restrictions on women, including bans on some education and work. Hundreds of thousands of Afghans have applied for visas to settle in the United States, either as refugees or under the Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) programme reserved for those who aided the US government during its war against the Taliban. Afghans with SIV visas and asylum cases will not be affected by Trump's new order but family reunification pathways are threatened, the Afghan-American Foundation said in a statement condemning the ban. Some 12,000 people are awaiting reunification with family members already living in the United States, according to Shawn VanDiver, the president of the AfghanEvac non-profit group. "These are not 'border issues'. These are legal, vetted, documented reunifications," he wrote on social media platform X. "Without exemptions, families are stranded." Refugee pathways and relocation processes for resettling Afghans had already been upset by previous Trump orders, suddenly leaving many Afghans primed to travel to the United States in limbo. The Trump administration revoked legal protections temporarily shielding Afghans from deportation in May, citing an improved security situation in Afghanistan. "We feel abandoned by the United States, with whom we once worked and cooperated," said Zainab Haidari, another Afghan woman who has been waiting in Pakistan for a refugee visa. "Despite promises of protection and refuge we are now caught in a hopeless situation, between the risk of death from the Taliban and the pressure and threat of deportation in Pakistan," said Haidari, 27, who worked with the United States in Kabul during the war but applied for a refugee visa. Afghans fled in droves during decades of conflict, but the chaotic withdrawal of US-led troops from Kabul saw a new wave clamouring to escape Taliban government curbs and fears of reprisal for working with Washington. Pakistan and Iran have meanwhile ramped up deportation campaigns to expel Afghans who have crossed their borders. The Taliban authorities have not responded to multiple requests for comment on the new travel ban but have said they are keen to have good relations with every country now that they are in power – including the United States. Visa options for Afghans are already severely limited by carrying the weakest passport globally, according to the Henley Passport Index. However, travel to the United States is far from the minds of many Afghans who struggle to make ends meet in one of the world's poorest countries, where food insecurity is rife. "We don't even have bread, why are you asking me about travelling to America?" said one Afghan man in Kabul. Sahar, a 29-year-old economics graduate who has struggled to find work amid sky-high unemployment, said the new rules will not have any impact on most Afghans. "When there are thousands of serious issues in Afghanistan, this won't change anything," she told AFP. "Those who could afford to travel and apply for the visa will find another way or to go somewhere else instead of the US."
Borneo Post
3 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Call on federal agency to seek guidance first before distributing Aidiladha korban meat
Abdul Karim cuts the 'korban' meats before distributing them to villagers. KUCHING (June 8): A federal agency has been called on to first seek guidance from Islamic authorities in order to properly distribute Aidiladha 'korban' meat, according to Dato Sri Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah. The Minister of Tourism, Creative Industry and Performing Arts said this in response to the federal Sarawak State Development Office (SDO), which held a 'korban' ritual in Kampung Asajaya Laut two days before Hari Raya Aidiladha. 'Animals that are slaughtered during Aidiladha, there are certain 'pahala' (rewards from God) — even the blood that flows from the sacrificed animals. 'However, if the animals are slaughtered two days before Aidiladha, then the meats are not 'korban meats; they are just ordinary meats distributed to the villagers. 'Before holding the 'ibadah korban' (sacrificial rites), the SDO director must first consult those who are knowledgeable in Islam,' he told reporters after distributing 'korban' meat at Masjid Darul Ehsan at Kampung Asajaya Laut in Asajaya today. While he commended such an act by the SDO, Abdul Karim warned organisers against associating such events with the 'korban' ritual. 'They may have good intentions, but if the supposed sacrificial meats were distributed before Aidiladha, then it is just a normal meat. Don't make assumptions — this can create confusion among the people.' Also present at the event was Kota Samarahan MP Datuk Rubiah Wang. abdul karim rahmah hamzah Hari Raya Aidiladha lead State Development Office
