DNA Casts Doubt Over Theory on What Killed Napoleon's Forces
While withdrawing from Russia, at least half of the 600,000-strong force were ravaged by the extremes of winter, starvation, and disease. A new study that has yet to be peer reviewed has now identified which pathogens helped decimate the weakened forces.
Physicians at the time documented typhus, with symptoms that include fevers, headaches, and rashes. But Paris Cité University microbiologist Rémi Barbieri and colleagues found no traces of the bacterium Rickettsia prowazekii, which would have been responsible for the disease.
Related:
After extracting and analyzing ancient DNA from the teeth of 13 soldiers they instead found evidence the men suffered from a combination of paratyphoid caused by a strain of Salmonella enterica, and a relapsing fever caused by a bacterium called Borrelia recurrentis, which is transmitted by body lice .
"While not necessarily fatal, the louse-borne relapsing fever could significantly weaken an already exhausted individual," the researchers explain in their paper.
Barbieri and team caution that just because their analysis did not detect typhus doesn't mean it didn't contribute to the infamous loss of soldiers, as they only took samples from 13 individuals. Over 3,000 bodies lie in the mass graves found in Vilnius, Lithuania, in 2001.
Other researchers have pointed out several diseases match the historical accounting of symptoms, including typhus.
Many of the men were buried in their uniforms and with horses, too. The lack of weapons suggests these people did not die in battle, Barbieri and his team explain.
"The analysis of a larger number of samples will be necessary to fully understand the spectrum of epidemic diseases that impacted the Napoleonic army during the Russian retreat," they write.
"In light of our results, a reasonable scenario for the deaths of these soldiers would be a combination of fatigue, cold, and several diseases, including paratyphoid fever and louse-borne relapsing fever."
This paper has been uploaded to bioRxiv.
Related News
Study Reveals How Many IVF Babies Have Been Born Worldwide
Image on The Shroud of Turin May Not Belong to a Real Human
Venting Doesn't Reduce Anger, But Something Else Does, Says Study
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 days ago
- Newsweek
Satellite Image Shows Tsunami Triggered by Massive Russian Earthquake
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The 8.8 Kamchatka earthquake in Russia has prompted a collaborative scientific effort to improve tsunami warning systems. The massive earthquake off the coast of Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula on July 30 triggered a tsunami that was successfully measured by a joint U.S.–French satellite, a technological first that is already being used to improve early warning systems The event, which occurred amidst a series of powerful aftershocks, is helping scientists at the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to validate and enhance their tsunami forecast models. The Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite, a collaborative effort between NASA and the French space agency CNES, captured the leading edge of the tsunami approximately 70 minutes after the initial 8.8 magnitude earthquake struck. According to NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the satellite recorded a wave height exceeding 1.5 feet in the open Pacific Ocean, east of Japan. While a wave of that size might seem small, oceanographer Ben Hamlington of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory emphasized the potential danger: "What might only be a foot or two in the open ocean can become a 30-foot wave in shallower water at the coast." Satellite map of the tsunami's leading edge (red), with the epicenter depicted by a red star. Satellite map of the tsunami's leading edge (red), with the epicenter depicted by a red star. NASA/JPL-Caltech NASA's visualization showed the wave's height, shape and direction of travel—offering a multidimensional look at the tsunami. The data captured by the satellite is a crucial breakthrough for disaster prediction. "The power of SWOT's broad, paintbrush-like strokes over the ocean is in providing crucial real-world validation, unlocking new physics and marking a leap towards more accurate early warnings and safer futures," said Nadya Vinogradova Shiffer, NASA Earth lead and SWOT program scientist. Aftershocks in the Region The 8.8 magnitude quake, which struck at a depth of about 12 miles, has been followed by a series of powerful aftershocks. As Newsweek previously reported, dozens of aftershocks were recorded in the days following the initial event. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) warned that the likelihood of additional magnitude seven or larger earthquakes remains high. A magnitude seven earthquake on Sunday near the peninsula triggered short-lived tsunami warnings for three Russian coastal areas. Newsweek's report on Wednesday noted that a recent 5.8 magnitude tremor had also struck the region. A visualization of the tsunami's leading edge. A visualization of the tsunami's leading edge. NASA/JPL-Caltech Improving Tsunami Forecasts The primary purpose of the SWOT data is to help improve the accuracy of forecast models, a long-sought-after ambition. The NOAA Center for Tsunami Research, which sends out alerts to coastal communities, tested its model with SWOT's tsunami data. The results were exciting, according to Vasily Titov, the center's chief scientist. He said that the results suggest that "SWOT data could significantly enhance operational tsunami forecasts—a capability sought since the 2004 Sumatra event." The devastating 2004 Sumatra quake killed thousands, highlighting the critical need for more advanced and accurate early warning systems. The ability of the SWOT satellite to capture and measure resulting tsunamis is a leap forward in protecting coastal communities around the world from future seismic events. Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about tsunamis? Let us know via science@
Buzz Feed
2 days ago
- Buzz Feed
Common Historical Facts That Are Myths Debunked
You've probably heard that Victorians invented the vibrator to treat women for "hysteria," right? Yeah… that's not really true. Vibrators were a hand-cranked massage device that doctors used to treat a number of issues, including hysteria, but they were likely only used on the back and neck, and they were used on both men and women. Also, despite what we often assume, Victorians weren't totally clueless about female sexuality, so they weren't secretly handing out orgasms under the guise of medicine. This is mostly a modern myth, as the whole vibrator story really took off thanks to a 1999 book and later a movie that ran with the idea! Similarly, the idea that all Victorians were buttoned-up prudes isn't true. Sure, they had strict social rules and didn't exactly lead with their feelings, but behind closed doors, they were just as curious and passionate as people are today. There was actually a ton of interest in sex, desire, and the human body, and you could buy things like sex toys and erotic books. Michelangelo's David has always been a work of art; however, it wasn't always housed in a museum. From 1504 (the year it was completed) to 1873, the statue was outdoors, in front of the Palazzo Vecchio in Florence, Italy. It was moved indoors to the Galleria dell'Accademia to help protect it from deteriorating. A copy of David was placed in its original outdoor location in 1910 and is still there today. It turns out rats might not be the real villains behind the bubonic plague (the one that wiped out somewhere between 25 and 50 million people in Europe during the 14th century). It was believed that the disease was transmitted by fleas that lived on rats, which then spread the plague to humans. But newer research suggests the story is a bit different. Studies now point to human fleas and lice (the kind living in people's hair and clothing) as the more likely culprits. In other words, it wasn't just rats skittering through the streets spreading the disease; it was people unknowingly passing it to each other through their own bodies and belongings. The study also points out this makes more sense, too: the way the plague spread so quickly from person to person doesn't quite match how a rat-based outbreak would behave. Paul Revere never said, "The British are coming!" to warn the American colonists. First off, he didn't ride alone. Revere was part of a network of riders that included William Dawes and Samuel Prescott, who also helped spread the warning. Secondly, yelling, "The British are coming!" wouldn't have made much sense, since most colonists at the time still considered themselves British. He likely said something more specific, like, "The regulars are out" or "The troops are marching." Napoleon and his troops did not shoot off the Sphinx's nose with cannonballs. In fact, sketches of the Sphinx without a nose existed long before Napoleon ever set foot in Egypt. Most historians believe the nose was deliberately chiseled off sometime in the 14th century by a Sufi Muslim, who saw the Sphinx as a symbol of idolatry and wanted to destroy it. You may have heard the story that when people saw the 1896 short film L'Arrivée d'un train en gare de La Ciotat, or Arrival of a Train at La Ciotat — which shows a train pulling into a station — they panicked and ran out of the theater, thinking the train was coming straight at them. Well, it's more than likely not true. Most film historians think the tale is exaggerated or completely made up, possibly added later to hype up how "new and shocking" cinema was at the time. Additionally, given that it was in black and white and had no sound, people knew what they were looking at. Albert Einstein never flunked math as a kid. In reality, Einstein was actually very good at math from a young age. By the time he was 12, he was teaching himself algebra and geometry, and he was working through college-level material by his early teens. There is a misconception that medieval food was bland and boring. On the contrary, people in the Middle Ages actually used a ton of spices in their cooking. Spices like cinnamon, cloves, nutmeg, pepper, saffron, and ginger were incredibly popular, especially among the wealthy. In fact, spices were so prized that they were often more expensive than meat, and some were even used like currency. And for those who couldn't afford spices, they would flavor their meals with herbs and local seasonings when they could. Spartans didn't fight in bare-chested or nude (that would literally put them at risk of dying easily). In reality, Spartan warriors wore armor, including bronze helmets, breastplates, and greaves. The whole "ripped guys charging into battle wearing nothing but capes and sandals" thing comes from art created over the centuries and movies, like 300, that were more focused on showing off idealized human bodies than sticking to what ancient soldiers actually wore. White Star Line, the company that owned the Titanic, never said the ship was "unsinkable." In reality, some promotional materials described it as "practically unsinkable," which is a big (and important) difference. That phrasing reflected confidence in the ship's design, not a guarantee. But after the disaster, the story shifted, and people believed that it had been marketed as "unsinkable." The whole idea that the Ancient Romans had vomitoriums, special rooms to go vomit during lavish feasts so that they could keep eating, is a huge myth. As this article points out, it was likely a single linguistic error, as it sounds like our modern word for vomit. It actually referred to the passageways in amphitheaters, theaters, and stadiums that allowed crowds to "spew out" quickly after a show or event. The word comes from the Latin vomere, meaning "to discharge" or "to gush forth," but it had nothing to do with food or purging. George Washington didn't have wooden teeth. He did have dentures, but they were made from a mix of materials like ivory, human teeth, and gold, but not wood. Also, wood wouldn't have been used to make dentures at the time. The wooden teeth rumor likely started because the ivory in his dentures stained over time, which would have given them a wooden appearance. Marilyn Monroe's iconic, breathy performance of "Happy Birthday, Mr. President" at JFK's 45th birthday might seem like a spontaneous, flirtatious stunt. However, it was far from a last-minute PR gimmick. In reality, Marilyn had been asked to perform at the star-studded event months in advance (as it was put together by her friend, and the president's brother-in-law, actor Peter Lawford). Marilyn took it seriously and spent hours rehearsing in the days leading up to the event. The term "UFO" didn't come from the 1947 Kenneth Arnold Mount Rainier sighting or the Roswell incident (the first two big UFO stories in the US); in fact, they used the terms flying disks or saucers. It was actually coined by the US Air Force in 1952, as a more technical and neutral way to describe any unknown object, covering everything from balloons and aircraft to, yes, possibly alien crafts. The idea was to keep things neutral and grounded in observation, not speculation. Most 19th-century cowboys didn't wear those oversized, "10-gallon" cowboy hats you see in Westerns. In fact, our association with cowboys wearing 10-gallon cowboy hats comes from Western movies from the 1920s. Early cowboys were more likely to wear bowler hats, sombreros, or whatever sturdy headgear they could get their hands on. The bowler was especially popular as it stayed on during windy rides and didn't get in the way. The wide-brimmed Stetson, which we now think of as the cowboy hat, didn't become common until the late 1800s, when it started catching on for its practicality and sun protection out on the range. And lastly, Walt Disney was not cryogenically frozen. In reality, Walt was cremated two days after his death in 1966. His ashes were placed in an urn and interred at the family mausoleum in Forest Lawn Memorial Park in Glendale, California (photo of the mausoleum below). According to Snopes, rumors of his body being frozen started almost immediately after his death, because it coincided with the rise of cryonics as a concept, and it was further spread by two discredited biographies that were published in the '80s and '90s. In 1972, Walt's daughter Diane did set the record straight, and wrote, "There is absolutely no truth that my father, Walt Disney, wished to be frozen. I doubt that my father had ever heard of cryonics."
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Crew-10 astronauts to depart ISS: How they set stage for ‘stuck' Starliner crew to leave
In mid-March, four spacefarers arrived at the International Space Station on a mission that at any other time would have been relatively routine and unremarkable. NASA astronauts Nichole Ayers and Anne McClain were joined by Japanese astronaut Takuya Onishi and Russian cosmonaut Kirill Peskov on a mission known as Crew-10 that took on far more significance than most of the regular ventures jointly carried out by SpaceX and NASA. As expected, awaiting the Crew-10 contingent at the orbital outpost were months of scientific experiments tailored to be conducted in microgravity. Crucially, though, the mission also attracted plenty of headlines and fanfare as it cemented its place in spaceflight history for its role in ending the infamous Starliner saga. The Crew-9 team may have arrived in September on a spacecraft with room for the two astronauts who crewed the doomed Boeing Starliner to hitch a ride home, but it was the arrival of the Crew-10 astronauts at the space station that set the stage for Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams to make their long-awaited homecoming. Now that the Crew-10 astronaut are soon due to depart the space station more than four months later, here's everything to know about the mission and why it made headlines. Remembering the Boeing Starliner: Look back at mission's biggest moments What was the Crew-10 mission? Astronauts relieve 'stuck' Starliner crew The March 15 arrival of Crew-10 astronauts at the space station made it possible for astronauts Wilmore and Williams, who arrived in June on the doomed Starliner, to finally depart. The mission got off the ground a day earlier from NASA's Kennedy Space Center. The U.S. space agency had been working toward a February liftoff before announcing in December 2024 that the mission had been pushed to late March to give SpaceX more time to prepare a new Dragon capsule. The launch date was then moved up to mid-March – most likely because of pressure from President Donald Trump and SpaceX founder Elon Musk – when NASA decided to instead use a previously flown Dragon. The Dragon docked at the orbital outpost after a 28-hour journey, allowing the crew to exit the vehicle and enter the space station through its Harmony module. Once aboard, the four Crew-10 spacefarers officially greeted the Expedition 72 crew members, including the astronauts who flew aboard the Starliner. What happened with the Boeing Starliner? Selected for the inaugural crewed flight of the Boeing Starliner, Wilmore and Williams became fixtures of the news cycle when the vehicle they flew to the space station in June 2024 encountered a series of technical failures. NASA and Boeing ultimately decided that the troubled Starliner capsule wasn't safe enough to crew and would instead undock and return to Earth without them. On Sept. 28, 2024, NASA launched the SpaceX Crew-9 mission as planned, but with one crucial change: Just two astronauts – Nick Hague of NASA and Russian cosmonaut Aleksandr Gorbunov – headed to the space station on a Dragon, leaving two empty seats on their vehicle reserved for Wilmore and Williams. NASA opted to keep Williams and Wilmore at the station a few extra months rather than launch an emergency mission to return them to Earth and leave the station understaffed. Williams and Wilmore eventually departed the space station with the Crew-9 team and safely landed March 17 off the Florida coast after the arrival of the Crew-10 mission. When will SpaceX launch Crew-11 astronauts on NASA mission? Now, the astronauts of the Crew-10 mission are set to return to Earth themselves after their own replacements arrive. The Crew-11 mission is scheduled to launch no earlier than 12:09 p.m. ET Thursday, July 31, from near Cape Canaveral, Florida, according to NASA. As the name suggests, Crew-11 is NASA and SpaceX's 11th science expedition to the International Space Station. The missions, most of which last about six months, are contracted under NASA's commercial crew program. The program allows the space agency to pay SpaceX to launch and transport astronauts and cargo to orbit aboard the company's own vehicles, freeing up NASA to focus on its Artemis lunar program and other spaceflight missions, including future crewed voyages to Mars. Selected for the mission are NASA astronauts Zena Cardman and Mike Fincke; Japanese astronaut Kimiya Yui of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA); and Russian Oleg Platonov, a Roscosmos cosmonaut. SpaceX uses its Falcon 9 rocket – one of the most active in the world – to launch the crew missions from Launch Complex 39A at NASA's Kennedy Space Center. The astronauts themselves ride a Dragon crew capsule – the only U.S. spacecraft capable of carrying astronauts to and from the space station – which separates from the rocket in orbit. Ahead of the planned launch, the Dragon has been stacked atop the Falcon 9 rocket, which was rolled out July 27 to the launch pad before being raised to a vertical position, according to NASA. When will the Crew-10 astronauts depart ISS and return to Earth? The arrival of Cardman, Fincke, Yui and Platonov will ultimately pave the way for their predecessors, the Crew-10 contingent, to depart the space station and head back to Earth. But the Crew-10 astronauts won't leave right away. What follows upon the arrival of any astronauts is a brief handover period in which the new crew members are familiarized with the orbital laboratory and station operations. McClain, Ayers, Onishi and Peskov will depart a few days later on the same Dragon capsule that flew them to the space station. Mission teams also will have to review weather conditions off California, where the Dragon will splash down. Who else is at the International Space Station? Another three spacefarers are also living and working about the International Space Station as members of Expedition 73. They are NASA astronaut Jonny Kim and cosmonauts Sergey Ryzhikov and Alexey Zubritsky, who flew to the outpost in April. Eric Lagatta is the Space Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach him at elagatta@ This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: What was the Crew-10 mission? Astronauts played role in Starliner saga Solve the daily Crossword
