200 containers of imported tur dal seized by APMC squad
The seizure was made on the night of May 29, following a special drive, where the vigilance team was keeping watch at JNPA, Turbhe, Nerul, the Thane-Belapur Road and Navi Mumbai area for vehicles illegally transporting agricultural produce.
While checking a container trailer at Vahal junction in Uran, the team found it was transporting tur dal. Documents recovered from the driver revealed the container was part of a 200-container consignment of tur dal exported by Agglo Commodities FZE, Jebel Ali, Free Zone, Dubai. They had been imported by Namha Imports, Mumbai.
The squad also found no record of the consignment at the APMC. In other words, the importer did not have permission to import the produce in the APMC's jurisdiction, nor did it have an import licence from the APMC. No cess, supervision charges of 1%, or market fee for the consignment had been paid.
After the initial container, the team seized all 200 containers from the godown where the consignment had been stored. The squad seized 5,010 tonnes of the pulse worth ₹34.6 crore. The vehicle used to transport the containers was also seized for non-payment of charges and conducting business illegally.
It is mandatory to get APMC permission to engage in the agricultural produce business in the Mumbai region. Under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963, a penalty can be levied that is three times the fees and charges for perishable agricultural produce seized for violating the rules. Apart from the fine, market fee, supervision charges and other related fees are also recovered by the APMC.
In the last two months, the APMC has collected ₹30 lakh in fines following its drive against those avoiding the taxes.
APMC secretary PL Khandagale, said, 'The failure of the importer to inform APMC of the import and payment of the dues confirms the intention of evasion of the market fee and supervision charges. We are hence recovering ₹1,11,48,000 in fines and dues from the importer.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
RS passes Bill to boost exploration and supply of critical and deep-seated minerals
Rajya Sabha Tuesday passed The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2025 which seeks to boost the supply of critical and deep-seated minerals, and relax the regime for mineral conservation, zero waste management and extraction of strategic minerals. The Bill was passed through voice vote as almost all Opposition members had walked out early over their demand for a discussion on the revision of electoral rolls in Bihar. No Opposition member participated in the two-hour discussion during which 19 MPs spoke in support of the Bill. Lok Sabha passed the Bill on August 12. One of the key provisions of the Bill amending the original 1957 Act is to enable inclusion of new minerals in a mining lease. Minister of Mines G Kishan Reddy said about the government's work on critical minerals: 'Today in each sector, from automobile to defence, we need critical minerals such as beryllium, cobalt, gallium. We have identified 24 critical minerals and `32,000 crore set aside for the critical mineral mission.' He said critical mineral exploration will happen outside India in Zambia, Australia and Argentina. 'India's public sector company KABIL has begun exploration in five blocks in Argentina and production on lithium will start from next year,' he said. The government launched the National Critical Mineral Mission in January. Critical minerals are used in solar panels, wind turbines, electric vehicles and in energy storage. Earlier, CPI (M) John Brittas raised a point of order under Rule 67 and said that the Bill trampled on the rights of states, usurping powers of state governments. He said that the Bill should be sent to the select committee as it has far-reaching impacts. However, Ghanshyam Tiwari, who was in the chair, did not accept his demand.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Amendments to Uttarakhand anti-conversion law tabled in assembly
Agency: Gairsain, Aug 19 (PTI) The amendments to the anti-conversion law to make it harsher, with stringent provisions like punishment up to life imprisonment and heavy fines, was introduced in the state assembly on Tuesday. The Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion (Amendment) Bill-2025 provides for a maximum punishment of life imprisonment and a heavy fine of up to Rs 10 lakh for forced conversion. At present, there is a provision of maximum 10 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs 50,000. More stringent provisions were being added to the existing law to stop conversion done through fraud, inducement or pressure, according to the government. The definition of inducement has been expanded in the bill to include gifts, cash/goods benefits, employment, free education, promise of marriage, hurting religious faith or glorifying another religion, categorising all of them as crime. It makes punishable the acts like promoting or inciting conversion through social media, messaging app or any online medium. under the bill, there is a provision in the bill for three to 10 years imprisonment for general violation, five to 14 years in cases related to sensitive class and 20 years to life imprisonment in serious cases and heavy fines. This is the second amendment to the anti-conversion law that has been in force since 2018. The first amendment to the Act was made in 2022. PTI DPT SKY SKY (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments First Published: August 20, 2025, 01:00 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Gujarat govt terminates services of APP in POCSO case after victim says he asked her to testify in favour of accused
The Gujarat government has terminated the services of an additional public prosecutor in Navsari for allegedly trying to protect a man booked under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act for the alleged rape of a minor. The State Home Department issued orders on August 14 terminating the services of Additional Public Prosecutor of Navsari Ajay Tailor with immediate effect, who was handling the POCSO case of 2024. The case has since been handed over to another APP of Navsari District Court, Bhavesh Gupta. The termination came after the victim wrote a letter to Minister of State for Home Harsh Sanghavi, the Navsari Superintendent of Police, and Additional District and Sessions Judge D K Dave on August 5 claiming that the APP had tutored her to testify in favour of the accused, who was charged of raping her some two years ago. The case is currently at the stage of recording testimonies of the complainant and witnesses in the Navsari court. The case goes back to May 22, 2023 when a teenage girl and resident of a town in Navsari district, left her house to attend her private classes and failed to return in the evening. Her parents searched for her but could not find her. They suspected the accused, an alleged bootlegger and lodged a missing complaint, naming him. The following day, the missing girl's father received a call from his daughter where she told him that she had 'married' a person (not the alleged bootlegger) That evening, the girl arrived at the local police station with her 'husband' and showed photos and their marriage affidavit to the officers. As per her wishes, the girl returned home with her parents. On June 24, 2023, the victim lodged a rape case and claimed threat to her life and named the accused (the alleged bootlegger) and six others including her 'husband' and an advocate. In her complaint, she said that her marriage was fake. Police booked the accused under IPC Sections 376 (2) (n)(rape committed repeatedly on the same woman), 323 (Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt), 504 (Intentional insult to provoke breach of trust), 506(2) (Punishment for criminal intimidation). In the FIR, the girl had alleged that the accused, a notorious criminal, started sending proposals to her in 2019. She stated, 'After my rejection, he chased me at different locations. Fed up with such harassment, my father got my admissions in a Diploma course in dairy management at a private university in Vadodara in 2021. The accused turned up at the college in August 2021 and threatened me that he would kill me and also die by suicide'. The accused, who is already married, allegedly took her to his friend's flat in Vadodara where he allegedly raped her. The victim learnt that he was already married and broke up with him and told her parents the whole story. On her parents' instructions, the victim quit studies and returned to her home in 2022. According to police, the girl's parents fixed her marriage in February 2023. The accused learnt of it and sent videos of them to the mother of the boy and they decided against going ahead with the marriage plan. The accused then forced her to marry his friend, who, he said, would 'divorce' her to facilitate their marriage. Thus the victim married the friend and appeared before the Navsari police and on her wish she was handed over to her parents after which she filed a complaint against the accused, charging him of rape. In her letter to the MoS (Home) and other officials, as seen by The Indian Express, she has alleged that the APP, Ajay Tailor, spoke to her on a ' WhatsApp call from the accused's mobile phone and instructed me to respond with 'yes' and 'no' during my testimony before the court. 'He (Tailor) also said that all the necessary papers for getting the accused let off from the case are ready. As per his instruction, I testified in favour of the accused before the court (on July 25, 2025). The accused also had threatened me to act on the instructions of Tailor and threatened that if I failed to do so, he) would post viral videos of them on social media and also threatened to kill my parents,' the victim alleged in her letter. She further alleged that the accused had called her and pressured her to meet the APP in his official chambers, before her testimony on July 25, 2025. 'I testified as tutored by the APP before the court, and he also told me about the consequences if I failed to act as per his directions,' she says in the letter. On finding that she was declared 'hostile', the victim filed another application before the Navsari Court a few days ago to allow her to testify again, against the APP. The second application of the victim was heard on Monday in the Court of the Additional District and Session Judge D K Dave. The new APP, Gupta, moved an application in the court and asked for more time as he wanted some days to study the case and get all the case documents. The Judge, D K Dave, had fixed a hearing on September 18. Navsari Superintendent of Police Sushil Agrawal said, 'Based on the application, after primary inquiry, APP Ajay Tailor's services as APP was terminated. The case was in hearing stage and the rape victim testified before the court on July 25, 2025.' Meanwhile, speaking to The Indian Express, Tailor denied the allegations of tutoring the victim. 'I have been practising as APP with Navsari district court since 2020, and till date I have fought and got convictions in 29 criminal cases. My track record shows how honestly I worked, and now my services have been terminated,' Tailor claimed. He added that he would accept the order and will continue practising as a lawyer in the Navsari district court. 'The victim had testified before the court last month and she replied according to the questions posed to her. I have not tutored her, nor have I met the accused before the hearing,' Tailor claimed. In 2024, the accused was booked under GUJCTOC (Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime) Act. The Navsari district police also arrested and booked six of his family members including his father and brothers, in the GUJCTOC case for their alleged involvement in bootlegging and criminal activities. Presently, all the GUJCTOC accused are out on bail, and they are staying in the neighbouring Valsad district, acting on the conditions of the Gujarat High Court's bail order.
