Keppel still committed to its sustainability course despite the pullback in some markets
Keppel is developing the Sakra Cogen Plant, Singapore's first hydrogen-compatible cogeneration power plant, which is set to commence operations in 2026. PHOTO: KEPPEL
Keppel still committed to its sustainability course despite the pullback in some markets
SINGAPORE - Keppel cut its Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions by over 80 per cent in 2024 compared with 2020, and remains committed to its green push despite the backsliding in sustainability in some markets, it said.
'We see sustainability, especially environmental sustainability, not just through the lens of compliance or disclosure, but as an integral part of how we create value,' said chief executive Loh Chin Hua in the company's sustainability report released on May 28.
'Despite the backsliding seen in some markets, Keppel remains committed to sustainability,' he added. 'We are committed to running our business responsibly, and investing in and creating solutions that contribute to a sustainable future.'
These solutions include the development of Keppel Sakra Cogen Plant, Singapore's first hydrogen-compatible power plant, which is set to start operations in the first half of 2026, and the greening of data centres.
Earlier in 2025, the US withdrew from the Paris Agreement, after President Donald Trump took office. Major banks and asset managers such as JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have also pulled out of various net-zero initiatives, such as the Net-Zero Banking Alliance.
Keppel aims to achieve net-zero Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2050, and have renewable energy supply all its electricity needs by 2030.
Scope 1 emissions refers to direct emissions incurred by a company, say, from its facilities or transport vehicles, while Scope 2 emissions refers to indirect emissions, such as the electricity or heating it buys from power-generation companies.
However, Keppel's Scope 3 emissions in 2024 amounted to 6.03 million tCO2e – or tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent – slightly higher than the 6.02 million tCO2e in 2023.
Keppel CEO Mr Loh Chin Hua says the company sees sustainability as an integral part of how we create value.
PHOTO: KEPPEL
Scope 3 emissions refers to indirect greenhouse gas emissions incurred by a company as part of its value chain, such as business travel by employees, the use of its sold products, or the emissions from its purchased goods and services.
Keppel's reductions in Scope 1 and 2 emissions have come on the back of its continued transition to an asset-light model, as well as the increased use of renewable energy, Mr Loh said.
Renewable energy accounted for 40.7 per cent of Keppel's electricity use in 2024, up from 23.1 per cent in the previous year. Keppel also aims to grow its renewables portfolio to 7GW by 2030. It was 3.8GW as at the end of 2024.
As reference, Singapore is on track to meeting its target of at least 2 gigawatts-peak (GWp) of solar deployment by 2030, which is equivalent to the annual electricity needs of around 350,000 households, according to the Energy Market Authority.
The report said: 'International efforts to decarbonise and combat climate change (are) driving demand for the sustainability solutions that Keppel provides.'
Keppel provides solutions such as waste and water management services and a model that offers cooling, smart energy management and electric vehicle charging on a cost-effective subscription basis.
It also offers sustainable urban renewal and consultancy services for large-scale developments in Asia, which help buildings to drive energy and water efficiency through technology.
Some of the developments where Keppel provides services include the Suzhou Industrial Park and the Sino-Singapore Cooperation Zone in Shandong province in China.
Keppel is also creating solutions for more sustainable data centre operations through concepts such as floating data centres cooled by seawater.
Its floating data centre project, which is proposed to be in Loyang in north-east Singapore, is currently pending government approvals and is designed to deliver improved power and water usage effectiveness through harnessing seawater cooling technologies, it said.
The report also marks Keppel's first disclosures related to its impact on nature and biodiversity, taking reference from the recommendations of the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures. The task force, a global initiative, provided a framework in 2023 to help companies identify and disclose their nature-related risks and opportunities.
Keppel assessed that most of the 28 assets under its operational control have low or medium biodiversity exposure, based on their locations.
For example, three of its district cooling plants are within 10km of the Central Forest and Kranji-Mandai key biodiversity areas in Singapore. Nonetheless, Keppel has assessed that the operations of these plants do not have adverse impacts on these key biodiversity areas, it said.
The assets deemed to face water risks are mainly located in cities in China and Indonesia, it added.
Besides sustainability, Keppel also adopted a board gender-diversity policy in 2024, aiming to have at least 30 per cent female board representation by 2030. As at Feb 28, two women are on its nine-member board.
In 2024, women occupied about 36 per cent of senior management and managerial positions, Keppel said, adding that remuneration is comparable between men and women.
At the board level, Mr Teo Siong Seng, the first chairman of the board sustainability and safety committee, has stepped down.
Independent director Olivier Blum will take over the chairman position.
Mr Loh said: 'With his wealth of experience in driving sustainability and sustainable solutions at Schneider Electric, I am confident that he will further elevate Keppel's focus on sustainability.'
Sue-Ann Tan is a business correspondent at The Straits Times covering capital markets and sustainable finance.
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
44 minutes ago
- Business Times
South-east Asia's polymer production crisis worsens as US-China trade shift looms
[SINGAPORE] South-east Asia's petrochemical industry is facing a double whammy of weakening export demands and potential import surges, as trade tensions could redirect US polymer to the region's already-saturated market, sustaining pressure on production. Polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP), as crucial downstream segments, are encountering 'considerable challenges' in the region, noted commodity markets intelligence firm Argus. This is amid trade uncertainty exacerbated by a US federal appeals court ruling on Wednesday (Jun 11) that President Donald Trump's tariffs can remain in place while it reviews an earlier court decision to block them. The latest ruling complicates newly drafted US-China plans to ease trade tensions. Argus highlighted that additional US polymer supply is anticipated to enter South-east Asia as part of trade flow redirection, driven by cost-competitiveness and the low likelihood of countries in the region imposing retaliatory tariffs on US cargoes. The London-headquartered research firm found that some US producers and regular exporters had already begun sending their cargoes to Vietnam instead of China. 'However, the situation remains fluid, and any continued shift in trade flows could contribute to additional supply entering the South-east Asian market,' the research firm said. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up During the US-China trade war in Trump's first term in office, US polymer exports were redirected to countries in the Asia-Pacific. Specifically, US PE exports to Singapore and Malaysia rose by 328 per cent and 264 per cent, respectively, Argus noted in another report released on May 30. Plastic goods pressuring demand Meanwhile, trade uncertainty could prompt new trade routes for finished plastic goods, beyond the polymer trade. Chinese plastic products once bound for the US will likely seek alternative markets – including South-east Asia. This threatens to further strain the region's export-dependent finished goods sector, putting indirect downward pressure on polymer demand. In 2024, around 8 per cent of the US' imported finished plastic goods came from South-east Asian countries, which now see the risk of a significant fall in demand, noted Argus. Around 17 per cent of China's PE imports were from the US in 2024. The intelligence firm noted that South-east Asian countries could explore opportunities to increase run rates and export PE to China with low-cost feedstocks amid the trade tensions between the world's two largest economies. 'But this remains a challenge for the region, as it predominantly relies on naphtha as a feedstock, which is less cost-competitive than lighter options,' it added. It also said that limited upstream integration further disadvantages the region, compared with markets in the Middle East and North-east Asia, where more integrated supply chains enhance cost efficiency. China factor Other than trade uncertainty, China's expanding polymer production capacity also threatens to deepen South-east Asia's existing polymer production crisis, where some regional crackers had been in extended shutdowns since late 2024. Fumiko Dobashi, manager of Asia-Pacific chemicals price reporting at S&P Global, highlighted a trade dynamic between the US, China and Asia in a briefing on Jun 3: The US exports raw materials such as ethane, liquefied petroleum gas and polymers, while Asia ships back finished plastic products and rubber products. However, China has been expanding its polymer capacity, transforming itself into a net exporter from a net importer and adding to the polymer flood into nearby regions, said Dobashi. She noted that while the US remains a major polymer exporter, the trend of China becoming a significant player continues, with the country increasing its exports to Asean nations such as Vietnam. Declining operating rates Over the past five years, South-east Asia's PE and PP operating rates have declined by 25 per cent and 20 per cent, respectively, on average as exports fell and imports rose, Argus noted. Meanwhile, the region's PP net trade position has shifted from net exporter to net importer since 2022; as has its PE trade position since 2024, amid China's accelerated progress towards self-sufficiency and increasing exports. Specifically, China's PP exports into the region have trebled to 636,000 tonnes over the past five years, mainly to Vietnam and Indonesia. China's focus on self-sufficiency also significantly reduced South-east Asia's PE and PP exports by 1.8 million tonnes, or 37 per cent, over the same period, according to the research firm. It added that the region's polymer prices will be further depressed by shrinking downstream export demand and more supply entering the market.
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Japan remains cautious on tariff impact in June econ report
TOKYO :Japan's government reiterated its warning on the risks from U.S. tariffs on economic growth, saying in a monthly report on Wednesday that the potential impact on corporate profits needed attention. The economy faces pressure from U.S. import levies of 24 per cent from July unless officials can negotiate them down. Japan's government is also seeking an exemption for its carmakers from a separate 25 per cent import tariff on vehicles. Japan's gross domestic product shrank an annualised 0.2 per cent in the January-March quarter, even before U.S. President Donald Trump announced his so-called "reciprocal" tariffs on April 2. "The economy is recovering moderately, while uncertainty is arising from U.S. trade policies," the Cabinet Office said in its monthly report for June released on Wednesday, keeping the assessment unchanged for a third month. In addition to tariffs, the report maintained its reference to "the effect of continued price rises on household sentiment and consumption" as another negative risk to the economy. It also noted that corporate profits were recovering, citing first-quarter business statistics, but added a fresh reference to the potential impact of trade disruptions. "With some firms withholding financial forecasts amid uncertainties surrounding U.S. tariffs, their impact on earnings may come to light only in the data for the April-June quarter or beyond," an official at the Cabinet Office told a press briefing. While no significant impact from U.S. tariffs on Japan's export volumes has been seen so far, trade trends from May onwards required attention, the official added. On wages, this spring's pay negotiations probably led to an average raise of more than 5 per cent, exceeding last year's, although smaller firms lagged bigger companies, the official said, based on the national labour group Rengo's data. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said earlier this week that his ruling party would pledge to achieve growth of more than 50 per cent in Japan's average income by 2040 in campaigning for the upper house elections next month.
AsiaOne
2 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, US appeals court rules, World News
A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday (June 10) while it reviews a lower-court decision blocking them on grounds that he had exceeded his authority by imposing them. The decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, DC means Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his "Liberation Day" tariffs on imports from most US trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and Mexico. The appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the duties to remain in place while the appeals play out. The Federal Circuit said the litigation raised issues of "exceptional importance" warranting the court to take the rare step of having the 11-member court hear the appeal, rather than have it go before a three-judge panel first. It scheduled arguments for July 31. The tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with US trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature, have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The ruling has no impact on other tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as duties on steel and aluminium imports. A three-judge panel of the US Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that the US Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies. The Trump administration quickly appealed the ruling, and the Federal Circuit in Washington put the lower court decision on hold the next day while it considered whether to impose a longer-term pause. The May 28 ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Centre on behalf of five small US businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties, and the other by 12 US states led by Oregon. Jeffrey Schwab, an attorney for the small businesses that sued, said Tuesday's federal appeals court decision was disappointing, but it did not mean that the Trump administration would win in the end. "It's important to note that every court to rule on the merits so far has found these tariffs unlawful, and we have faith that this court will likewise see what is plain as day: that IEEPA does not allow the president to impose whatever tax he wants whenever he wants," Schwab said Tuesday. The White House and state of Oregon did not immediately respond to requests for comment after normal business hours on Tuesday. Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The 1977 law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the US or freeze their assets. Trump is the first US president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said that the tariffs imposed in February on Canada, China and Mexico were to fight illegal fentanyl trafficking at US borders, denied by the three countries, and that the across-the-board tariffs on all US trading partners imposed in April were a response to the US trade deficit. The states and small businesses had argued the tariffs were not a legal or appropriate way to address those matters, and the small businesses argued that the decades-long US practice of buying more goods than it exports does not qualify as an emergency that would trigger IEEPA. At least five other court cases have challenged the tariffs justified under the emergency economic powers act, including other small businesses and the state of California. One of those cases, in federal court in Washington, DC, also resulted in an initial ruling against the tariffs, and no court has yet backed the unlimited emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed. [[nid:718640]]
