Machine Bias: How AI Misidentifies and Grounds Travellers

Time Business News

2 days ago

Amicus International Consulting Warns That Algorithmic Errors in Border Security Systems Are Costing Innocent Travellers Their Freedom
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
VANCOUVER, Canada – Artificial Intelligence is rapidly transforming the way borders are managed. Facial recognition cameras, predictive surveillance, and AI-driven immigration databases now control who boards a plane, who is flagged for inspection, and who is denied entry.
But in 2025, these automated systems are not infallible, and their mistakes are grounding innocent travellers.
Amicus International Consulting, a global authority on legal identity change, biometric resistance, and international relocation, has published an urgent report examining how machine bias is leading to travel bans, wrongful detentions, and permanent digital mislabeling of law-abiding individuals.
'We've seen a staggering rise in AI-driven misidentifications,' said a spokesperson for Amicus. 'Clients have been barred from flights, detained at borders, or added to watchlists simply because an algorithm made an assumption—and no human bothered to double-check.'
The Rise of Border AI: Fast, Scalable—and Flawed
Artificial intelligence (AI) is now a central component of border security across most developed nations. The shift toward automated clearance has been touted as a triumph of speed and safety.
At major airports, passengers walk through biometric corridors where cameras match faces against centralized identity databases. Algorithms assess risk, detect discrepancies, and generate alerts.
Examples of AI in Border Control: CBP's Biometric Entry/Exit system scans the faces of travellers entering and leaving the United States.
scans the faces of travellers entering and leaving the United States. The EU's ETIAS and EES systems use predictive algorithms to assess threat levels before issuing electronic travel authorizations.
use predictive algorithms to assess threat levels before issuing electronic travel authorizations. Singapore's Changi Airport uses facial recognition at every stage of the passenger journey.
uses facial recognition at every stage of the passenger journey. China's Skynet surveillance grid integrates facial, gait, and behavioural recognition with state security databases.
However, this level of automation comes with a critical flaw: machine bias.
What Is Machine Bias?
Machine bias refers to systematic errors in decision-making made by artificial intelligence systems due to flawed training data, design assumptions, or operational contexts. These biases disproportionately affect: People of colour
Women
Transgender and non-binary individuals
Children and elderly travellers
Individuals with medical conditions or facial disfigurements
Unlike human errors, machine bias can replicate itself across systems at scale, affecting thousands—or millions—before anyone notices.
Case Study: Wrongfully Flagged at Heathrow
In 2024, a U.K. citizen of Middle Eastern descent was detained at Heathrow Airport after facial recognition systems identified him as a suspected terrorist.
In reality, the man shared facial features with another individual whom Interpol had flagged, but the software failed to distinguish between them.
Amicus was contacted after the man missed his international connection, was interrogated for 11 hours, and faced travel bans from five partner countries—all based on an AI-generated false positive. It took months to clear his name.
How AI Gets It Wrong: The Technical Reality
1. Poor Training Data
Facial recognition algorithms are often trained on limited datasets. When these datasets underrepresent certain ethnicities or genders, the system becomes less accurate for those groups. A 2023 MIT study found that facial recognition software misidentified Black women at rates up to 35% higher than white men.
2. Static Rules in a Dynamic World
AI lacks context. It cannot account for recent legal name changes, updated citizenship, or medical changes in appearance, especially after gender reassignment surgery or reconstructive procedures.
3. Dependency on Legacy Systems
Border AIs are often linked to outdated or incorrect watchlists, including expired INTERPOL notices, unverifiable alerts, or flawed database merges.
4. Feedback Loop Contamination
When an individual is misidentified, the system often treats that error as confirmed data, reinforcing the false flag and pushing it across multiple countries' databases.
The Real-World Consequences of AI Error Missed Flights and Detainment
Innocent travellers are frequently stopped, interrogated, and denied boarding because their biometric scans generate false alerts.
Innocent travellers are frequently stopped, interrogated, and denied boarding because their biometric scans generate false alerts. Visa Rejections and Travel Bans
Once flagged by an AI system, individuals often face rejection on visa applications, even after the mistake is corrected.
Once flagged by an AI system, individuals often face rejection on visa applications, even after the mistake is corrected. Social and Financial Fallout
Some clients have lost job opportunities, had business contracts cancelled, or faced reputational harm due to travel disruption.
Some clients have lost job opportunities, had business contracts cancelled, or faced reputational harm due to travel disruption. Permanent Surveillance Labels
In many cases, an error that triggers machine alerting results in long-term inclusion in border 'alert' categories, even after the issue is resolved.
Case Study: Facial Mismatch Denies Family Reunion
A woman travelling from South Africa to Canada to reunite with her children was stopped at Pearson International Airport in 2023. The AI scanner failed to recognize her updated appearance following chemotherapy-related facial changes. Although she had valid documents and matching fingerprints, the system flagged her as a 'mismatch.'
It took 48 hours, legal intervention, and biometric reevaluation to clear her identity, delaying her travel and causing significant emotional distress.
Amicus' Response: Legal Identity and Biometric Strategy
Amicus International Consulting has developed an advanced suite of services designed to protect clients from AI-driven border control failures. These services include: Legal Name and Gender Change Documentation: Court-recognized changes supported by digital identity updates across systems.
Court-recognized changes supported by digital identity updates across systems. Second Citizenship Acquisition: Providing clean legal identities not associated with old errors or politically sensitive data.
Providing clean legal identities not associated with old errors or politically sensitive data. Facial Recognition Defence Using AI Tools: Use of tools like Fawkes and LowKey to subtly distort publicly available facial data and prevent AI learning.
Use of tools like Fawkes and LowKey to subtly distort publicly available facial data and prevent AI learning. Red Notice Review and Removal Support: Challenging and removing invalid Interpol Red Notices that fuel wrongful alerts.
Challenging and removing invalid Interpol Red Notices that fuel wrongful alerts. Human Rights Advisory: For travellers from vulnerable populations, Amicus provides documentation support and risk profiling to mitigate entry disputes.
'We don't just fix identities—we prevent errors before they happen,' said the Amicus spokesperson. 'In an AI-first world, the best protection is proactive legal and biometric management.'
Where AI Border Errors Are Most Common
Based on client case studies and Amicus research, the following regions pose the highest risk of machine bias and AI error at the border: United States: Particularly in major hubs like JFK, LAX, and Atlanta, where facial scanning is mandatory.
Particularly in major hubs like JFK, LAX, and Atlanta, where facial scanning is mandatory. European Union (Schengen Zone): Automated systems under EES frequently flag biometric mismatches.
Automated systems under EES frequently flag biometric mismatches. United Kingdom: Heathrow and Gatwick use controversial facial databases with high false-positive rates.
Heathrow and Gatwick use controversial facial databases with high false-positive rates. Singapore and South Korea: High-tech but inflexible systems unable to accommodate nuanced identity profiles.
High-tech but inflexible systems unable to accommodate nuanced identity profiles. United Arab Emirates: Broad data sharing and surveillance integration with allied states.
Countries with lower technological enforcement or more flexible human review tend to have fewer reported AI errors.
Case Study: Dual Citizen Blocked from Transit
A Canadian-Iranian dual citizen was flagged while transiting through Frankfurt due to name similarity with a blacklisted individual. The AI system failed to detect different birth dates and citizenships. He was removed from his flight, interrogated, and required to return to his point of origin.
Only after Amicus provided documentary proof of his name change, clean record, and legal travel authorization was he cleared to fly again.
AI Is Not the Judge—But It Decides Who Gets Judged
In 2025, border AI is not just an assistant to human officers—it is the first and sometimes only filter determining who gets a second look. Human oversight has been reduced as systems become more 'efficient.'
'If the algorithm flags you, you're already guilty until proven innocent,' said the Amicus spokesperson. 'Even if you prove it, the delay, damage, and data trail remain.'
Amicus' Solutions: Travel Risk Management in the AI Era
For high-risk clients, Amicus provides: Pre-travel biometric risk analysis
AI compatibility tests against known global systems
Biometric minimalism coaching for low-detection appearance and behaviour
for low-detection appearance and behaviour Client flag removal assistance in global watchlists
in global watchlists Emergency relocation strategy in the event of wrongful denial or detainment
Amicus acts as a legal firewall between clients and the machine errors that would otherwise derail their rights.
Conclusion: In the Age of AI, Mistaken Identity Is a Matter of Code
AI-powered borders may promise security, but their errors are increasingly a threat to lawful travellers. The risk is not just technical—it's existential for those seeking freedom from political targeting, surveillance, or violence.
Amicus International Consulting stands at the intersection of privacy, legality, and human dignity, offering those most vulnerable the ability to move safely, legally, and free from algorithmic discrimination.
In a world where machines make the first call, having Amicus on your side may be the difference between being cleared or permanently flagged.
📞 Contact InformationPhone: [phone]Email: [e-mail]
Website: www.amicusint.ca